Marcus Aurelius Antoninus to Himself - College of Stoic Philosophers
Marcus Aurelius Antoninus to Himself - College of Stoic Philosophers Marcus Aurelius Antoninus to Himself - College of Stoic Philosophers
Ixxxvi INTRODUCTION SECT. common to all the post-Aristotelian, or more truly to all post-Alexandrian, schools are another testimony to the freshness and sincerity of the Greek intelligence. In all alike Stoic, Epicurean, or Cyrenaic the civic basis is abandoned for the individualist and universal. The ethical ideal becomes internal and, as the city widens to the world, transcends limitations of status or franchise ; and belongs to man as man, the common seal of his humanity. As a consequence of this it becomes, or appears to become, for a time, less vital in its effect upon the lives of individuals; it plays less obvious a part in history ; the Athenian or the Spartan ideal, by virtue of its limitations, visibly dominates the lives and words and behaviour of representative Athenians or Spartans ; it is tangible and unmistakable. A universal ideal is less determinate, and in so far frequently less efficacious ; more remote and unattainable in practice, it is prone to compromise with tradition and environ- ment ; the Stoic Wise Man does not appear upon the stage of history, least of all in the days or place which first promulgated the idea. Stoic morality was indeed too novel, too many-sided, and too revolutionary for immediate realisation in the arena of public action. In repudiating the civic tie, it failed at first to supply effective substitutes and incentives to altruistic obligation : politically and socially it was for a time sterile, and indeed rather a naturalised than native product of true Hellenism. Throughout the Hellenic stage, it is im- possible to instance great personalities avowedly con- forming aim and practice to Stoic principles. Though these gradually, no doubt, began to leaven moral
iv STOICISM IN HISTORY Ixxxvii philosophy and to influence standards of action and sentiment, Stoicism proper was an affair of the schools. It was academic before it could become practical ; was necessary for it to submit theory to the checks of experience, before it could command allegiance from the householder, the citizen, and the statesman, as well as the scholar and recluse. But in its Athenian home, engaged in stimulating controversy with rival schools of thought, strengthening defences, abandoning untenable positions, and mellowing the individualist paradoxes of Cynism by maturer conceptions of social aim and obligation, it prepared itself for larger destinies. In the historic embassy, which proceeded from Athens to Rome in 155 B.C., to plead for toleration to philosophers, the Stoic School was represented by Diogenes ; but its first effective apostle was Panaetius of Rhodes, who, a few years later, introduced it at Rome under the most favourable auspices. A man of means and culture, belonging to one of the oldest and most distinguished families of Rhodes, Panaetius devoted himself by deliberate predilection, not by any accident or secondary motive, to the lifelong pursuit of philosophy. At Athens, after hearing the best masters of the day, he attached himself to the Stoic School, of which he was eventually to become the recognised head. Like Polybius, he became a member of that Scipionic circle which first naturalised Hellenic culture at Rome, and by travel as well as domestic intercourse formed ties of special intimacy with the younger Scipio. Rome and Athens were almost equally the centres of his activity, and through him the Stoic philosophy, in a somewhat it
- Page 45 and 46: ii i BIRTH OF STOICISM xxxv theory
- Page 47 and 48: ii i BIRTH OF STOICISM xxxvii well
- Page 49 and 50: ii 2 BIRTH OF STOICISM xxxix the co
- Page 51 and 52: ii 2 BIRTH OF STOICISM xli and proc
- Page 53 and 54: ii 2 BIRTH OF STOICISM xliii of the
- Page 55 and 56: n 2 BIRTH OF STOICISM xlv raitted t
- Page 57 and 58: ii 2 BIRTH OF STOICISM xlvii change
- Page 59 and 60: ii 2 BIRTH OF STOICISM xlix of man
- Page 61 and 62: SECT, in i STOIC DOGMA li thought o
- Page 63 and 64: in i STOIC DOGMA liii Epicurean in
- Page 65 and 66: in i STOIC DOGMA Iv it * sparked,'
- Page 67 and 68: in i STOIC DOGMA Ivii gives that ba
- Page 69 and 70: in 2 STOIC DOGMA lix 2. Cosmic Pant
- Page 71 and 72: in 2 STOIC DOGMA Ixi deniable purpo
- Page 73 and 74: in 2 STOIC DOGMA Ixiii entering on
- Page 75 and 76: in 2 STOIC DOGMA Ixv and beneficent
- Page 77 and 78: in 2 STOIC DOGMA Ixvii Lead me, O Z
- Page 79 and 80: in 3 STOIC DOGMA Ixix his inner con
- Page 81 and 82: in 3 STOIC DOGMA Ixxi with the supe
- Page 83 and 84: in 3 STOIC DOGMA Ixxiii tain, throu
- Page 85 and 86: in 4 STOIC DOGMA Ixxv which marks t
- Page 87 and 88: in 4 STOIC DOGMA Ixxvii of virtues,
- Page 89 and 90: in 4 STOIC DOGMA Ixxix partly on th
- Page 91 and 92: in 4 STOIC DOGMA Ixxxi indefeasible
- Page 93 and 94: in 4 STOIC DOGMA Ixxxiii grapple wi
- Page 95: IV. STOICISM IN HISTORY HISTORICALL
- Page 99 and 100: iv STOICISM IN HISTORY Ixxxix famou
- Page 101 and 102: iv STOICISM IN HISTORY xci Mytholog
- Page 103 and 104: iv STOICISM IN HISTORY xciii though
- Page 105 and 106: iv STOICISM IN HISTORY xcv almost i
- Page 107 and 108: iv STOICISM IN HISTORY xcvii Column
- Page 109 and 110: iv STOICISM IN HISTORY xcix encoura
- Page 111: t T3 bJO c S -S J> 4 | | i * . S I
- Page 114 and 115: civ INTRODUCTION SECT. stand, to di
- Page 116 and 117: cvi INTRODUCTION SECT. that, qualit
- Page 118 and 119: cviii INTRODUCTION SECT. transitory
- Page 120 and 121: ex INTRODUCTION SECT. and intelligi
- Page 122 and 123: cxii INTRODUCTION SECT. theatre-goi
- Page 124 and 125: cxiv INTRODUCTION SECT. philosopher
- Page 126 and 127: cxvi INTRODUCTION SECT. mere record
- Page 128 and 129: cxviii INTRODUCTION SECT. offer of
- Page 130 and 131: cxx INTRODUCTION SECT. this it is w
- Page 132 and 133: cxxii INTRODUCTION SECT. taking cou
- Page 134 and 135: cxxiv INTRODUCTION SECT. among comp
- Page 136 and 137: cxxvi INTRODUCTION SECT. where in t
- Page 138 and 139: cxxviii INTRODUCTION SECT. /^intima
- Page 140 and 141: cxxx INTRODUCTION SECT. in convicti
- Page 142 and 143: \ cxxxii INTRODUCTION SECT. and eve
- Page 144 and 145: cxxxiv INTRODUCTION SECT. The indiv
Ixxxvi INTRODUCTION SECT.<br />
common <strong>to</strong> all the post-Aris<strong>to</strong>telian, or more truly <strong>to</strong> all<br />
post-Alexandrian, schools are another testimony <strong>to</strong> the<br />
freshness and sincerity <strong>of</strong> the Greek intelligence. In<br />
all alike S<strong>to</strong>ic, Epicurean, or Cyrenaic the civic basis<br />
is abandoned for the individualist and universal. The<br />
ethical ideal becomes internal and, as the city widens <strong>to</strong><br />
the world, transcends limitations <strong>of</strong> status or franchise ;<br />
and belongs <strong>to</strong> man as man, the common seal <strong>of</strong> his<br />
humanity. As a consequence <strong>of</strong> this it becomes,<br />
or appears <strong>to</strong> become, for a time, less vital in its effect<br />
upon the lives <strong>of</strong> individuals; it plays less obvious a<br />
part in his<strong>to</strong>ry ; the Athenian or the Spartan ideal, by<br />
virtue <strong>of</strong> its limitations, visibly dominates the lives and<br />
words and behaviour <strong>of</strong> representative Athenians or<br />
Spartans ; it is tangible<br />
and unmistakable. A universal<br />
ideal is less determinate, and in so far frequently less<br />
efficacious ; more remote and unattainable in practice,<br />
it is prone <strong>to</strong> compromise with tradition and environ-<br />
ment ; the S<strong>to</strong>ic Wise Man does not appear upon<br />
the stage <strong>of</strong> his<strong>to</strong>ry, least <strong>of</strong> all in the days or place<br />
which first promulgated the idea. S<strong>to</strong>ic morality was<br />
indeed <strong>to</strong>o novel, <strong>to</strong>o many-sided, and <strong>to</strong>o revolutionary<br />
for immediate realisation in the arena <strong>of</strong> public action.<br />
In repudiating the civic tie, it failed at first <strong>to</strong> supply<br />
effective substitutes and incentives <strong>to</strong> altruistic obligation :<br />
politically and socially it was for a time sterile, and<br />
indeed rather a naturalised than native product <strong>of</strong> true<br />
Hellenism. Throughout the Hellenic stage,<br />
it is im-<br />
possible <strong>to</strong> instance great personalities avowedly con-<br />
forming aim and practice <strong>to</strong> S<strong>to</strong>ic principles. Though<br />
these gradually, no doubt, began <strong>to</strong> leaven moral