Marcus Aurelius Antoninus to Himself - College of Stoic Philosophers

Marcus Aurelius Antoninus to Himself - College of Stoic Philosophers Marcus Aurelius Antoninus to Himself - College of Stoic Philosophers

stoicscollege.com
from stoicscollege.com More from this publisher
05.04.2013 Views

Ixxxii INTRODUCTION SECT. The difficulties thus raised are fundamental, and on the monistic assumption, certainly as formulated by the Stoics, insuperable. The independence of the will as a true first principle or dp^r) is incompatible with its identification with the world-soul. If, as Stoic masters taught, the highest consciousness of man represents the most complete and perfect embodiment of the world- spirit, the saving thought of self-determination towards some transcendent, and yet unapprehended, harmony is excluded. Not only is man part of the universal pre- destination, but the limits of that predestination are known and absolute. The subjection imposed becomes intolerable. It is impossible to identify the soul of man with the infinite creative spirit of the universe, and at the same time to circumscribe his outlook within the finite limitations of space and time and 'the material shell.' 1 Nature as a whole may be conceived as in some marvellous way at once self-circumscribed and 2 self-sufficing but the individual limited isolated ; part cannot at once inherit and express the spiritual fulness of the whole, and at the same time acquiesce in the transient and incomplete appropriation of limitations that are final. Further, the facts of consciousness remain unsatisfied. The Stoics laboured the classifica- tion and nomenclature of various orders of emotion, but give no account of the inner antagonisms that exist between reason, desire, and impulse. They do not 1 For enforcement of time limitations see ii. 14, 17 J iii. 10, 12; iv. 16, 19, 26, 49; vi. 32; vii. 29, 54; viii. 2, 7, 36, 44; ix. 25, 29; x. II ; xii. I, 3, 26. 2 viii. 50.

in 4 STOIC DOGMA Ixxxiii grapple with the central difficulty, the origin and existence of irregular and irrational impulses in the soul, or show how their presence is compatible with a nature that is altogether good.' 1 All alike are operations of the Pneuma, and the Pneuma is divided against itself. If lusts and affections, good desires and bad, all spring from the same fountain-head, every guarantee for the eventual prevalence of good is withdrawn. The destiny of creation reveals itself in never-ending cycles of unprogressive conflict, and no thought of moral evolution enters in to brace endeavour or justify optimism. As part of this predestination, the basis of individual virtue itself becomes precarious. Such are some of the diffi- culties involved in the Stoic scheme. To this extent then and by this route Greek thought approached the moral problems of 'free-will,' which it bequeathed in intensified form to Christianity. The Stoics did not push the issue to its ultimate contradic- tions ; circumscribing and in effect sacrificing free personality, they were content to leave the conception of Order supreme and paramount ; and their problem was not complicated by the idea of life as probation, by any doctrine of reward or punishment in a life to come, or for the remission of sins. The by any need of provision diseased or rebellious member might suffer loss; it might estrange or excommunicate itself as some mal- 2 content from the social it system ; might entail upon itself forfeitures, pains, disabilities, or death; it might become a kind of tumour 3 or excrescence on the : body 1 Compare p. Ixv. 2 ii. 16 ; viii. 34 ; ix. 23. 3 iv. 29.

in 4 STOIC DOGMA Ixxxiii<br />

grapple with the central difficulty, the origin and existence<br />

<strong>of</strong> irregular and irrational impulses in the soul, or<br />

show how their presence is compatible with a nature that<br />

is al<strong>to</strong>gether good.' 1<br />

All alike are operations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Pneuma, and the Pneuma is divided against itself. If<br />

lusts and affections, good desires and bad, all spring from<br />

the same fountain-head, every guarantee for the eventual<br />

prevalence <strong>of</strong> good is withdrawn. The destiny <strong>of</strong><br />

creation reveals itself in never-ending cycles <strong>of</strong> unprogressive<br />

conflict, and no thought <strong>of</strong> moral evolution<br />

enters in <strong>to</strong> brace endeavour or justify optimism. As<br />

part <strong>of</strong> this predestination, the basis <strong>of</strong> individual virtue<br />

itself becomes precarious. Such are some <strong>of</strong> the diffi-<br />

culties involved in the S<strong>to</strong>ic scheme.<br />

To this extent then and by this route Greek thought<br />

approached the moral problems <strong>of</strong> 'free-will,' which it<br />

bequeathed in intensified form <strong>to</strong> Christianity. The<br />

S<strong>to</strong>ics did not push the issue <strong>to</strong> its ultimate contradic-<br />

tions ; circumscribing and in effect sacrificing free personality,<br />

they were content <strong>to</strong> leave the conception <strong>of</strong><br />

Order supreme and paramount ; and their problem was<br />

not complicated by the idea <strong>of</strong> life as probation, by any<br />

doctrine <strong>of</strong> reward or punishment in a life <strong>to</strong> come, or<br />

for the remission <strong>of</strong> sins. The<br />

by any need <strong>of</strong> provision<br />

diseased or rebellious member might suffer loss; it<br />

might estrange<br />

or excommunicate itself as some mal-<br />

2<br />

content from the social it system ; might entail upon<br />

itself forfeitures, pains, disabilities, or death; it might<br />

become a kind <strong>of</strong> tumour 3<br />

or excrescence on the : body<br />

1<br />

Compare p. Ixv.<br />

2 ii. 16 ; viii. 34 ; ix. 23.<br />

3 iv. 29.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!