Marcus Aurelius Antoninus to Himself - College of Stoic Philosophers

Marcus Aurelius Antoninus to Himself - College of Stoic Philosophers Marcus Aurelius Antoninus to Himself - College of Stoic Philosophers

stoicscollege.com
from stoicscollege.com More from this publisher
05.04.2013 Views

Ixxii- INTRODUCTION SECT. Pneuma within and cognate manifestations of Pneuma without ; the act of consciousness is referred to the interior soul, the sense-organs only providing instruments of communication. The pleasures of sense, just as those of reason in its own department, are due to the smooth or rough flow of the Pneuma-currents l in the channels appropriated to their action, though Reason and Will have power to ignore such excitations at their pleasure. In a lower order still, and served by other organs, comes the generative or reproductive faculty) and (without much clearness or coherence of view) the faculty of speech. 2 Throughout, the materiality of the soul is unflinchingly affirmed, and nowhere more un- reservedly so (in spite of some incidental laxities of expression) than in Marcus, who, following the medical theorisers of his day, describes the soul as an exhalation of the blood. 3 Death similarly is the 'evaporation' 4 of the immanent Pneuma from the physical organism, prior to its extinction or re-immergence in the world-Pneuma. The object of these laboured and somewhat barren speculations is plain, namely, the determination to main- 1 See p. Ivii. 2 This classification seems referred to in xii. 31. 3 avadvfjdaffis d0' cu'yuaros, v. 33 ; vi. 15. The principle of evaporation (dva6v/j.ia(ris) plays a large part in the speculations of the Ionian physicists. To Heraclitus, soul is an exhalation from air, and Cleanthes regards the sun, the Hegemonikon of the World, as recruited by exhalation from the sea. The transition from liquid to gaseous is the normal assumption ; but the explicit pathological association with the blood, as vehicle of vital warmth, was worked out by Diogenes of Apollonia and the medical school. In Marcus it possibly reflects the personal teaching of Galen, vi. 4.

in 3 STOIC DOGMA Ixxiii tain, throughout the spheres of perception, emotion, desire, and reason, the totality of the individual as an organic and inseparable unity. The Stoics did much for the establishment of this conception, and it was unfortunate that they did not grasp it even more com- pletely in assigning to the different faculties their prerogatives and spheres of exercise. A sounder ethic would have resulted from a more complete analysis and under- standing of the nature of will. Here the Stoics like other schools of antiquity came short, and were content to rest in psychological abstractions adopted or devised by their first masters. Instead of investigating the ends of action, and finding in them intrinsic or external criteria to determine the relative value of particular functions and precedence among the faculties, the Stoics selected a single faculty or group of faculties and assigned them exclusive, and more or less arbitrary, dominion over the rest. They were right in declaring the highest and most essential element in man to be the rational, other- wise denominated the social or the universal, 1 as relating man's consciousness to the widest and most comprehensive range of interests. But they erred, partly under the influence of Socratic dicta^ in identifying this rational faculty too exclusively with the intellectual. That virtue is inseparable from knowledge is true ; as virtue passes beyond the instinctive impulses, and widens its range of action and view, the more do perception, insight, and foresight become indispensable. But besides the faculty } The habitual terms in M. A. are Xoyt/o?, rational^ TroXtn/o? and KoivuviKr], social (or unselfish'), and the more unusual KadoXiicri, catholic or universal, e.g. in vi. 14, vii. 64. *

Ixxii- INTRODUCTION SECT.<br />

Pneuma within and cognate manifestations <strong>of</strong> Pneuma<br />

without ; the act <strong>of</strong> consciousness is referred <strong>to</strong> the<br />

interior soul, the sense-organs only providing instruments<br />

<strong>of</strong> communication. The pleasures <strong>of</strong> sense, just as<br />

those <strong>of</strong> reason in its own department, are due <strong>to</strong> the<br />

smooth or rough flow <strong>of</strong> the Pneuma-currents l in the<br />

channels appropriated <strong>to</strong> their action, though Reason<br />

and Will have power <strong>to</strong> ignore such excitations at their<br />

pleasure. In a lower order still, and served by other<br />

organs, comes the generative or reproductive faculty)<br />

and (without much clearness or coherence <strong>of</strong> view) the<br />

faculty <strong>of</strong> speech. 2<br />

Throughout, the materiality <strong>of</strong> the<br />

soul is unflinchingly affirmed, and nowhere more un-<br />

reservedly so (in spite<br />

<strong>of</strong> some incidental laxities <strong>of</strong><br />

expression) than in <strong>Marcus</strong>, who, following the medical<br />

theorisers <strong>of</strong> his day, describes the soul as an exhalation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the blood. 3 Death similarly is the 'evaporation' 4 <strong>of</strong><br />

the immanent Pneuma from the physical organism, prior<br />

<strong>to</strong> its extinction or re-immergence in the world-Pneuma.<br />

The object <strong>of</strong> these laboured and somewhat barren<br />

speculations is plain, namely, the determination <strong>to</strong> main-<br />

1<br />

See p. Ivii.<br />

2 This classification seems referred <strong>to</strong> in xii. 31.<br />

3<br />

avadvfjdaffis d0' cu'yuaros, v. 33 ; vi. 15. The principle <strong>of</strong><br />

evaporation (dva6v/j.ia(ris) plays a large part in the speculations <strong>of</strong><br />

the Ionian physicists. To Heraclitus, soul is an exhalation from<br />

air, and Cleanthes regards the sun, the Hegemonikon <strong>of</strong> the World,<br />

as recruited by exhalation from the sea. The transition from liquid<br />

<strong>to</strong> gaseous is the normal assumption ; but the explicit pathological<br />

association with the blood, as vehicle <strong>of</strong> vital warmth, was worked<br />

out by Diogenes <strong>of</strong> Apollonia and the medical school. In <strong>Marcus</strong><br />

it possibly reflects the personal teaching <strong>of</strong> Galen,<br />

vi. 4.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!