Marcus Aurelius Antoninus to Himself - College of Stoic Philosophers
Marcus Aurelius Antoninus to Himself - College of Stoic Philosophers Marcus Aurelius Antoninus to Himself - College of Stoic Philosophers
xvi INTRODUCTION SECT. the various deposits of Greek thought which find a place in his philosophy, of dexterous and surprising intricacy. and which form a combination Early in the sixth century B.C., when Greek thought thrilled into sudden interest in the causes and origin of things, the first question to rouse and baffle intellectual curiosity was, naturally enough, the make and nature of the external world. What was it made of? How did it come into being ? and continue to exist ? What was its ' nature ' ? These were the questions which first troubled the waters of Western thought, and aroused the speculative curiosity and imagination of the Ionian philosophers. Behind the countless variety of things lay an irresistible suggestion of order and of unity, which, amid the infinite diversity of phenomena, seemed to connect the phases of matter, and to shape the round of being, in alternations of succession and recurrence, within the limits of some fixed mould, or subject to the opera- tions of some unifying power such as inhabits and directs the individual organism. What was the fixed something that underlay the phases of transformation ? The earliest guess attributed the unity to oneness of material, and looked for some elemental stuff that might be regarded as the common cause and basis of existent things. The study of phenomena showed everywhere the passage from form to form, the processes of birth, change, decay, and reconstruction, nothing anywhere coming out of nothing, or passing from being back into nothingness. What was the fixed One among the moving Many? The great visible unities, earth, sea, and sky the solid, the fluid, and the gaseous were
i ORIGINS OF STOICISM xvii tried in turn by the Ionian physicists. Thales selected Water, the most versatile of substances, and the most variable in form, as the prime unit of * nature,' that is of material being. Anaximenes gave the preference to Air, which thought and language had so long associated with the spirit and breath of life, and which alone met the demand for quantitative infinity. Others turned to Fire, and contemplating its generative heat, its ductile energies, its incomparable mobility, found in it the truest source and representative of nature's one inherent life. Theory directed and quickened observation, and foundations of science were laid in the observation of the celestial bodies, and in the study of rarefaction, condensation, liquefaction, congelation, and other natural processes; but for the understanding of Stoicism the main outcome is the fixed determination to derive the world of matter, in spite of superficial appearances, from a single source of being. And the Stoics, in their more mature en- deavour to explain the Universe on a monistic basis, pay tribute to these early cosmologists in freely em- ploying such terms as Air, Breath, Fire, to denote that elemental substance or spirit which pervades and under- lies all things that are. Nature defied these efforts to reduce its contents to a single physical term, and the death-blow to such endeavours was given by the genius of Heraclitus. He propounded a more intelligible reconciliation between the Many of sense and the One of thought. To him the shifting panorama did not suggest kaleidoscopic states of rest, succeeding one another as a series of abrupt and stationary rearrangements. Being seemed rather
- Page 9 and 10: TA EIC EAYTON MARCUS AURELIUS ANTON
- Page 11 and 12: MARCUS AURELIUS ANTONINUS TO HIMSEL
- Page 13 and 14: PREFACE ENGLISH translations of Mar
- Page 15 and 16: PREFACE v may be, the manner, tone,
- Page 17 and 18: may gain PREFACE vii as much or mor
- Page 19: PREFACE ix In choice of readings I
- Page 23 and 24: INTRODUCTORY ESSAY ON STOICISM AND
- Page 25: i ORIGINS OF STOICISM xv have been
- Page 29 and 30: i ORIGINS OF STOICISM xix ' 1 air f
- Page 31 and 32: i ORIGINS OF STOICISM xxi moralised
- Page 33 and 34: i ORIGINS OF STOICISM xxiii phenome
- Page 35 and 36: i ORIGINS OF STOICISM xxv are resol
- Page 37 and 38: i ORIGINS OF STOICISM xxvii confusi
- Page 39 and 40: i ORIGINS OF STOICISM xxix universe
- Page 41 and 42: SECT, ii i BIRTH OF STOICISM xxxi k
- Page 43 and 44: ii i BIRTH OF STOICISM xxxiii order
- Page 45 and 46: ii i BIRTH OF STOICISM xxxv theory
- Page 47 and 48: ii i BIRTH OF STOICISM xxxvii well
- Page 49 and 50: ii 2 BIRTH OF STOICISM xxxix the co
- Page 51 and 52: ii 2 BIRTH OF STOICISM xli and proc
- Page 53 and 54: ii 2 BIRTH OF STOICISM xliii of the
- Page 55 and 56: n 2 BIRTH OF STOICISM xlv raitted t
- Page 57 and 58: ii 2 BIRTH OF STOICISM xlvii change
- Page 59 and 60: ii 2 BIRTH OF STOICISM xlix of man
- Page 61 and 62: SECT, in i STOIC DOGMA li thought o
- Page 63 and 64: in i STOIC DOGMA liii Epicurean in
- Page 65 and 66: in i STOIC DOGMA Iv it * sparked,'
- Page 67 and 68: in i STOIC DOGMA Ivii gives that ba
- Page 69 and 70: in 2 STOIC DOGMA lix 2. Cosmic Pant
- Page 71 and 72: in 2 STOIC DOGMA Ixi deniable purpo
- Page 73 and 74: in 2 STOIC DOGMA Ixiii entering on
- Page 75 and 76: in 2 STOIC DOGMA Ixv and beneficent
i ORIGINS OF STOICISM xvii<br />
tried in turn by the Ionian physicists. Thales selected<br />
Water, the most versatile <strong>of</strong> substances, and the most<br />
variable in form, as the prime unit <strong>of</strong> *<br />
nature,' that is <strong>of</strong><br />
material being. Anaximenes gave the preference <strong>to</strong> Air,<br />
which thought and language had so long associated with<br />
the spirit and breath <strong>of</strong> life, and which alone met the<br />
demand for quantitative infinity. Others turned <strong>to</strong> Fire,<br />
and contemplating its generative heat, its ductile energies,<br />
its incomparable mobility, found in it the truest source<br />
and representative <strong>of</strong> nature's one inherent life. Theory<br />
directed and quickened observation, and foundations <strong>of</strong><br />
science were laid in the observation <strong>of</strong> the celestial<br />
bodies, and in the study <strong>of</strong> rarefaction, condensation,<br />
liquefaction, congelation, and other natural processes;<br />
but for the understanding <strong>of</strong> S<strong>to</strong>icism the main outcome<br />
is the fixed determination <strong>to</strong> derive the world <strong>of</strong> matter,<br />
in spite <strong>of</strong> superficial appearances, from a single source<br />
<strong>of</strong> being. And the S<strong>to</strong>ics, in their more mature en-<br />
deavour <strong>to</strong> explain the Universe on a monistic basis,<br />
pay tribute <strong>to</strong> these early cosmologists in freely em-<br />
ploying such terms as Air, Breath, Fire, <strong>to</strong> denote that<br />
elemental substance or spirit which pervades and under-<br />
lies all things that are.<br />
Nature defied these efforts <strong>to</strong> reduce its contents <strong>to</strong><br />
a single physical term, and the death-blow <strong>to</strong> such<br />
endeavours was given by the genius <strong>of</strong> Heraclitus. He<br />
propounded a more intelligible reconciliation between<br />
the Many <strong>of</strong> sense and the One <strong>of</strong> thought. To him the<br />
shifting panorama did not suggest kaleidoscopic states<br />
<strong>of</strong> rest, succeeding one another as a series <strong>of</strong> abrupt<br />
and stationary rearrangements. Being seemed rather