Marcus Aurelius Antoninus to Himself - College of Stoic Philosophers
Marcus Aurelius Antoninus to Himself - College of Stoic Philosophers Marcus Aurelius Antoninus to Himself - College of Stoic Philosophers
x'v INTRODUCTION SECT. marked; in psychology a new, or at least modified, physiological basis was furnished by the medico-phy- sical speculations of the Pneumatists ; in epistemology, Epictetus becomes of no less importance than Cleanthes. Thus the treatment of Stoicism will be selective, intended to supply so much of history and exposition as a careful reader may desire for comprehension of his author. The treatment of the subject is neither strictly chrono- logical, nor strictly systematic. As each topic comes under consideration, I have felt free to follow it to its particular destination in the pages of Marcus, or merely to allot its place in the general corpus of doctrine, which he received as Stoic dogma. I. ORIGINS OF STOICISM Of all ancient philosophies Stoicism is the most his- torical. The person of the founder is but a term in a continuous series of thought. The system of Plato or of Aristotle bears the sharp impress of a single mind, appre- hending and affirming a new synthesis of truth ; the office of disciples was to preserve and transmit thoughts, which in their fulness they grasped imperfectly. Emphatically, the disciple was less than the master. But Stoicism was the product of many minds, not one : the function of Zeno was to combine far more than to originate ; his individual contribution to philosophic thought was small, and to some extent tentative. The unification of the system and its logical completion was largely the work of successors, Cleanthes and Chrysippus, so that the proverb ' said truly, Had there been no Chrysippus, there would
i ORIGINS OF STOICISM xv have been no Porch.' And this power of development and adaptation was inherent in the system. Founded in the fourth century B.C., it was a quick and growing creed in the second century A.D. ; living, it survived transplanta- tion from the Greek world to the Roman, from the school and the cloister to the Senate and the throne ; dying, it bequeathed no small part of its disciplines, its dogmas, and its phraseology to the Christianity by which it was ingathered. 1 In these respects its history resembles that of a religion rather than a speculative system ; while its range, from Socrates to M. Antoninus, covers almost all that was permanent in the ancient culture, and even survived the wreck of European Paganism. From the first its hold upon the past was deep and conscious : its evolution is a striking instance how human thought, convinced by slow experience, secures gradual advance, by combining seeming opposites into a solid platform for new effort. Supervening at the moment when the original forces of Greek thought fell back exhausted, Stoicism constructed an impressive and, to some extent, a permanent unity out of factors derived from opposite types and schools of thought, and so evolved moral and social conceptions that have become an heirloom of Western civilisation, and are embedded in the inmost structure of the Christian state. In this sense it is the most * historical ' of ancient philo- sophies in cast and in expression ; and M. Aurelius is only partially intelligible without some knowledge of 1 ' The basis of Christian society is not Christian, but Roman and Stoical ' ' Hibbert Lectures on The Influence of Greek (Hatch, Ideas and Usages upon the Christian Church,' p. 170).
- Page 9 and 10: TA EIC EAYTON MARCUS AURELIUS ANTON
- Page 11 and 12: MARCUS AURELIUS ANTONINUS TO HIMSEL
- Page 13 and 14: PREFACE ENGLISH translations of Mar
- Page 15 and 16: PREFACE v may be, the manner, tone,
- Page 17 and 18: may gain PREFACE vii as much or mor
- Page 19: PREFACE ix In choice of readings I
- Page 23: INTRODUCTORY ESSAY ON STOICISM AND
- Page 27 and 28: i ORIGINS OF STOICISM xvii tried in
- Page 29 and 30: i ORIGINS OF STOICISM xix ' 1 air f
- Page 31 and 32: i ORIGINS OF STOICISM xxi moralised
- Page 33 and 34: i ORIGINS OF STOICISM xxiii phenome
- Page 35 and 36: i ORIGINS OF STOICISM xxv are resol
- Page 37 and 38: i ORIGINS OF STOICISM xxvii confusi
- Page 39 and 40: i ORIGINS OF STOICISM xxix universe
- Page 41 and 42: SECT, ii i BIRTH OF STOICISM xxxi k
- Page 43 and 44: ii i BIRTH OF STOICISM xxxiii order
- Page 45 and 46: ii i BIRTH OF STOICISM xxxv theory
- Page 47 and 48: ii i BIRTH OF STOICISM xxxvii well
- Page 49 and 50: ii 2 BIRTH OF STOICISM xxxix the co
- Page 51 and 52: ii 2 BIRTH OF STOICISM xli and proc
- Page 53 and 54: ii 2 BIRTH OF STOICISM xliii of the
- Page 55 and 56: n 2 BIRTH OF STOICISM xlv raitted t
- Page 57 and 58: ii 2 BIRTH OF STOICISM xlvii change
- Page 59 and 60: ii 2 BIRTH OF STOICISM xlix of man
- Page 61 and 62: SECT, in i STOIC DOGMA li thought o
- Page 63 and 64: in i STOIC DOGMA liii Epicurean in
- Page 65 and 66: in i STOIC DOGMA Iv it * sparked,'
- Page 67 and 68: in i STOIC DOGMA Ivii gives that ba
- Page 69 and 70: in 2 STOIC DOGMA lix 2. Cosmic Pant
- Page 71 and 72: in 2 STOIC DOGMA Ixi deniable purpo
- Page 73 and 74: in 2 STOIC DOGMA Ixiii entering on
i ORIGINS OF STOICISM xv<br />
have been no Porch.' And this power <strong>of</strong> development<br />
and adaptation was inherent in the system. Founded<br />
in the fourth century B.C., it was a quick and growing creed<br />
in the second century A.D. ; living, it survived transplanta-<br />
tion from the Greek world <strong>to</strong> the Roman, from the school<br />
and the cloister <strong>to</strong> the Senate and the throne ; dying, it<br />
bequeathed no small part <strong>of</strong> its disciplines, its dogmas,<br />
and its phraseology <strong>to</strong> the Christianity by which it was<br />
ingathered. 1 In these respects its his<strong>to</strong>ry resembles<br />
that <strong>of</strong> a religion rather than a speculative system ;<br />
while<br />
its range, from Socrates <strong>to</strong> M. <strong>An<strong>to</strong>ninus</strong>, covers almost<br />
all that was permanent in the ancient culture, and even<br />
survived the wreck <strong>of</strong> European Paganism.<br />
From the first its hold upon the past was deep<br />
and conscious : its evolution is a striking instance how<br />
human thought, convinced by slow experience, secures<br />
gradual advance, by combining seeming opposites in<strong>to</strong><br />
a solid platform for new effort. Supervening at the<br />
moment when the original forces <strong>of</strong> Greek thought fell<br />
back exhausted, S<strong>to</strong>icism constructed an impressive<br />
and, <strong>to</strong> some extent, a permanent unity out <strong>of</strong> fac<strong>to</strong>rs<br />
derived from opposite types and schools <strong>of</strong> thought,<br />
and so evolved moral and social conceptions that have<br />
become an heirloom <strong>of</strong> Western civilisation, and are<br />
embedded in the inmost structure <strong>of</strong> the Christian state.<br />
In this sense it is the most *<br />
his<strong>to</strong>rical '<br />
<strong>of</strong> ancient philo-<br />
sophies in cast and in expression ; and M. <strong>Aurelius</strong> is<br />
only partially intelligible without some knowledge <strong>of</strong><br />
1 ' The basis <strong>of</strong> Christian society is not Christian, but Roman<br />
and S<strong>to</strong>ical '<br />
'<br />
Hibbert Lectures on The Influence <strong>of</strong> Greek<br />
(Hatch,<br />
Ideas and Usages upon the Christian Church,' p. 170).