Marcus Aurelius Antoninus to Himself - College of Stoic Philosophers

Marcus Aurelius Antoninus to Himself - College of Stoic Philosophers Marcus Aurelius Antoninus to Himself - College of Stoic Philosophers

stoicscollege.com
from stoicscollege.com More from this publisher
05.04.2013 Views

INTRODUCTORY ESSAY ON STOICISM AND THE LAST OF THE STOICS THE aim of this Introduction is not to give a complete or balanced exposition of Stoicism as a whole, but to consider so much of it as remains implicit or explicit in the words of Marcus Antoninus, so that the reader of the Thoughts, in approaching the ' dogmas ' and the formulas which they contain, may have in mind their origin, their meaning, their development, and their eventual content for Marcus and his contemporaries. For this end portions of Stoic doctrine may be ignored, or touched but lightly : Stoic developments of logic and of grammar may pass unheeded ; physics and physiology will concern us only in their ethical con- nexions j and some sides of epistemology may be dis- regarded. Upon the other hand special factors, which asserted or reasserted themselves in the Roman phase of Stoicism, will receive consideration in excess of their real importance to philosophy at large, or even to Stoicism as a system. In physics the revival of Hera- clitean formulas, in ethics of Socratic aphorisms is b

INTRODUCTORY ESSAY<br />

ON<br />

STOICISM AND THE LAST OF THE STOICS<br />

THE aim <strong>of</strong> this Introduction is not <strong>to</strong> give a complete<br />

or balanced exposition <strong>of</strong> S<strong>to</strong>icism as a whole, but <strong>to</strong><br />

consider so much <strong>of</strong> it as remains implicit or explicit in<br />

the words <strong>of</strong> <strong>Marcus</strong> <strong>An<strong>to</strong>ninus</strong>, so that the reader <strong>of</strong><br />

the Thoughts, in approaching the '<br />

dogmas '<br />

and the<br />

formulas which they contain, may have in mind their<br />

origin, their meaning, their development, and their<br />

eventual content for <strong>Marcus</strong> and his contemporaries.<br />

For this end portions <strong>of</strong> S<strong>to</strong>ic doctrine may be ignored,<br />

or <strong>to</strong>uched but lightly : S<strong>to</strong>ic developments <strong>of</strong> logic<br />

and <strong>of</strong> grammar may pass unheeded ; physics and<br />

physiology will concern us only<br />

in their ethical con-<br />

nexions j and some sides <strong>of</strong> epistemology may be dis-<br />

regarded. Upon the other hand special fac<strong>to</strong>rs, which<br />

asserted or reasserted themselves in the Roman phase<br />

<strong>of</strong> S<strong>to</strong>icism, will receive consideration in excess <strong>of</strong> their<br />

real importance <strong>to</strong> philosophy at large, or even <strong>to</strong><br />

S<strong>to</strong>icism as a system. In physics the revival <strong>of</strong> Hera-<br />

clitean formulas, in ethics <strong>of</strong> Socratic aphorisms is<br />

b

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!