Marcus Aurelius Antoninus to Himself - College of Stoic Philosophers

Marcus Aurelius Antoninus to Himself - College of Stoic Philosophers Marcus Aurelius Antoninus to Himself - College of Stoic Philosophers

stoicscollege.com
from stoicscollege.com More from this publisher
05.04.2013 Views

ex INTRODUCTION SECT. and intelligible. The interest lies in another plane, in the ethics of practical experience. Epictetus is the teacher to whom Marcus Aurelius is most allied in age, in doctrine, and in scope of thought. In the emphasis, as well as in the substance, of their teaching there is close resemblance ; their psychology and their epistemology agree ; they insist on the same main ethical dogmas ; they take the same attitude towards abstract dialectic, and to rival schools of philosophy Cynic, Epicurean, or Sceptic. In their concentration upon practical ethics, their recurrence to Socratic formulas, their abandonment of Stoic arrogations of certitude and indefectibility, their extension and enforcement of social obligation, their ethical realisation of the omnipresent immanence of God, they occupy the same position towards Stoicism. But the likeness goes deeper than mere general traits. Among his debts to his chief teacher Rusticus, Marcus recalls with crowning emphasis his gift of the Memoirs of Epictetus.^ With the treatise of Ariston, they may be regarded as the instrument of his 'conversion.' The disciple names Epictetus 2 in the same category with Chrysippus and Socrates, quotes him 3 more often than any philosopher, and borrows from his stores his favourite excerpts, metaphors, and illustrations ; thought and language are saturated with conscious and unconscious reminiscences, too numerous to recapitulate. The most noteworthy differences arise from Marcus' fuller recognition and 1 i. 7. 2 vii. 19. 3 See iv. 41 ; v. 29 ; xi. 33, 34, 35, 36, 37. The citation from Plato in vii. 63 is in the form preserved only by Epictetus.

v MARCUS AURELIUS ANTONINUS cxi application of the idea of the cosmos. This makes itself felt in more than one direction ; in duties to others the cosmic claim tends to absorb and supersede individual virtue and even social fellowship ; in duties to self, the immanence of the indwelling God, while conceived more impersonally, becomes more vivid and imperious in operation ; in physics, especially in the physiology of mind and spirit and in cosmic * sympathy of parts,' surer foundations are provided for pantheistic reverence and belief. The other and more obvious differences that separate them are the result of position and of temperament. As a professed teacher, Epictetus was called upon to examine and weigh grounds of evidence and modes of proof, to accept or reject criteria, to formulate bases of belief, to confront and criticise the tenets of friendly or hostile schools ; he addresses himself to all sorts and conditions of men, the man of the study, the man of the market-place, and the man of the bureau; to philosophers and laymen, to prudes and profligates, misers and spendthrifts, to the privileged and the oppressed, to representatives of every class and age and station in life, from the patrician or proconsul to the freedman and the slave. For the moralist he classifies virtues and vices, tracks their affinities and exposes their disguises ; for the crowd, he deals with the round of daily life, its faults, its foibles and its vicissitudes ; he has shrewd counsels for the quarrelsome, the talkative or the affected ; he holds up the mirror to indolence, hypocrisy, or stubbornness ; he discourses upon manners no less than morals, discussing the ethics of dress, of

ex INTRODUCTION SECT.<br />

and intelligible. The interest lies in another plane, in<br />

the ethics <strong>of</strong> practical experience.<br />

Epictetus is the teacher <strong>to</strong> whom <strong>Marcus</strong> <strong>Aurelius</strong> is<br />

most allied in age, in doctrine, and in scope <strong>of</strong> thought.<br />

In the emphasis, as well as in the substance, <strong>of</strong> their<br />

teaching there is close resemblance ; their psychology<br />

and their epistemology agree ; they insist on the<br />

same main ethical dogmas ; they take the same<br />

attitude <strong>to</strong>wards abstract dialectic, and <strong>to</strong> rival schools<br />

<strong>of</strong> philosophy Cynic, Epicurean, or Sceptic. In their<br />

concentration upon practical ethics, their recurrence <strong>to</strong><br />

Socratic formulas, their abandonment <strong>of</strong> S<strong>to</strong>ic arrogations<br />

<strong>of</strong> certitude and indefectibility, their extension and<br />

enforcement <strong>of</strong> social obligation, their ethical realisation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the omnipresent immanence <strong>of</strong> God, they occupy the<br />

same position <strong>to</strong>wards S<strong>to</strong>icism. But the likeness goes<br />

deeper than mere general traits. Among his debts <strong>to</strong><br />

his chief teacher Rusticus, <strong>Marcus</strong> recalls with crowning<br />

emphasis his gift <strong>of</strong> the Memoirs <strong>of</strong> Epictetus.^ With<br />

the treatise <strong>of</strong> Aris<strong>to</strong>n, they may be regarded as the<br />

instrument <strong>of</strong> his 'conversion.' The disciple names<br />

Epictetus 2 in the same category with Chrysippus and<br />

Socrates, quotes him 3 more <strong>of</strong>ten than any philosopher,<br />

and borrows from his s<strong>to</strong>res his favourite excerpts,<br />

metaphors, and illustrations ; thought and language are<br />

saturated with conscious and unconscious reminiscences,<br />

<strong>to</strong>o numerous <strong>to</strong> recapitulate. The most noteworthy<br />

differences arise from <strong>Marcus</strong>' fuller recognition and<br />

1 i. 7.<br />

2 vii. 19.<br />

3 See iv. 41 ; v. 29 ; xi. 33, 34, 35, 36, 37. The citation<br />

from Pla<strong>to</strong> in vii. 63 is in the form preserved only by Epictetus.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!