Marcus Aurelius Antoninus to Himself - College of Stoic Philosophers

Marcus Aurelius Antoninus to Himself - College of Stoic Philosophers Marcus Aurelius Antoninus to Himself - College of Stoic Philosophers

stoicscollege.com
from stoicscollege.com More from this publisher
05.04.2013 Views

cviii INTRODUCTION SECT. transitory, but in the latter even life as it is loses all moral meaning and motive. 1 But besides the inadmis- sible alternatives there remain hypotheses between which Marcus feels it unimportant to decide. Death may mean final extinction 2 of the Pneuma a conclusion which Cicero imputes to another Roman Stoic, Cornutus, and to which Marcus feels at least no ethical objection. But in assuming the destruction instead of the reabsorp- tion of the life-giving spirit, it does from the physical side sap the Stoic dogma, which regards the sum of Pneuma as constant and eternal; and in all serious discussion 3 of the subject Marcus adheres to the orthodox tenet of reabsorption. At the death of the body the soul undergoes change of place and phase,* and returns to something approaching its pre-incarnate \condition. Some Stoics placed such disembodied souls 'in the upper regions,' or 'in the sub-lunar ' stellar' sphere. And these speculations or 'the are in the ' writer's mind when he speaks of souls passing into the air,' 5 the upper or rarer air that is to say, ' fiery ether ' akin to the of which soul is constituted. There, peradventure by progressive assimilation, analogous to the gradual decomposition of the mortal body, it is eventually reabsorbed or reassumed into the seminal principles of life, 6 out of which it originally sprang, 1 vi. 10. 2

v MARCUS AURELIUS ANTONINUS cix awaiting new activities or the complete reintegration which takes place at the final conflagration of the present order. The denial of the 'hope of immortality' is A settled and complete ; there is no place in the Thoughts \ for the rhetorical ambiguities of Seneca ; and for Marcus as indubitably as for Epictetus 'there is no work nor / device nor wisdom nor knowledge in the grave whither / thou goest.' This digression, if rather minute, will have served to illustrate the right method of studying the Thoughts, if we desire to get at the mind of Marcus and his exact relation to Stoic doctrine. The quality of treat- ment is of a piece with the conditions and character of The ethical value of the work does not workmanship. rest on exactness or originality of speculative thought. Receptiveness, not originality, was the note of his own genius, as well as of the age and society in which he lived. For true self-realisation and that satisfaction of the energies which alone brings happiness, the problems of physics and metaphysics seemed almost as empty and unprofitable as the exercises in rhetoric from which he had turned impatiently when manhood was mature. 1 The life of Reason was more than logic, and not the monopoly of schoolmen. ' Do not,' he writes, ' because dialectic and physics lie beyond your ken, despair on that account of freedom, self-respect, unselfishness, and tractability toward 2 God.' Stoic physics and logic are not to Marcus an arena for argument or speculation, but accepted presuppositions needed to make life coherent 1 i. 7 and close of 17 ; viii. I. 2 vii. 67.

v MARCUS AURELIUS ANTONINUS cix<br />

awaiting new activities or the complete reintegration<br />

which takes place at the final conflagration <strong>of</strong> the present<br />

order. The denial <strong>of</strong> the 'hope <strong>of</strong> immortality' is A<br />

settled and complete ; there is no place in the Thoughts \<br />

for the rhe<strong>to</strong>rical ambiguities <strong>of</strong> Seneca ;<br />

and for <strong>Marcus</strong><br />

as indubitably as for Epictetus 'there is no work nor /<br />

device nor wisdom nor knowledge in the grave whither /<br />

thou goest.'<br />

This digression, if rather minute,<br />

will have served<br />

<strong>to</strong> illustrate the right method <strong>of</strong> studying the Thoughts,<br />

if we desire <strong>to</strong> get at the mind <strong>of</strong> <strong>Marcus</strong> and his<br />

exact relation <strong>to</strong> S<strong>to</strong>ic doctrine. The quality <strong>of</strong> treat-<br />

ment is <strong>of</strong> a piece with the conditions and character <strong>of</strong><br />

The ethical value <strong>of</strong> the work does not<br />

workmanship.<br />

rest on exactness or originality <strong>of</strong> speculative thought.<br />

Receptiveness, not originality, was the note <strong>of</strong> his own<br />

genius, as well as <strong>of</strong> the age and society in which he<br />

lived. For true self-realisation and that satisfaction <strong>of</strong><br />

the energies which alone brings happiness, the problems<br />

<strong>of</strong> physics and metaphysics seemed almost as empty and<br />

unpr<strong>of</strong>itable<br />

as the exercises in rhe<strong>to</strong>ric from which<br />

he had turned impatiently when manhood was mature. 1<br />

The life <strong>of</strong> Reason was more than logic, and not the<br />

monopoly <strong>of</strong> schoolmen.<br />

' Do not,' he writes, '<br />

because<br />

dialectic and physics lie beyond your ken, despair on<br />

that account <strong>of</strong> freedom, self-respect, unselfishness, and<br />

tractability <strong>to</strong>ward 2<br />

God.' S<strong>to</strong>ic physics and logic are<br />

not <strong>to</strong> <strong>Marcus</strong> an arena for argument or speculation, but<br />

accepted presuppositions<br />

needed <strong>to</strong> make life coherent<br />

1 i. 7 and close <strong>of</strong> 17 ; viii. I.<br />

2 vii. 67.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!