MCO 1650.19J ADMINISTRATIVE AND ISSUE ... - Marine Corps
MCO 1650.19J ADMINISTRATIVE AND ISSUE ... - Marine Corps
MCO 1650.19J ADMINISTRATIVE AND ISSUE ... - Marine Corps
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>MCO</strong> <strong>1650.19J</strong><br />
5 Feb 2001<br />
4. The awards system requires stringent controls and strict application of the<br />
criteria as set forth in SecNavInst 1650.1F. The instructions contained in<br />
this Order seek only to align CMC policies with that criterion.<br />
5. Criteria. Use the following as a guide to assist in applying awards<br />
criteria, established by SecNavInst 1650.1F, to performance of duty:<br />
a. Imaginative improvements in organization or procedures that provide for<br />
more effective <strong>Marine</strong> <strong>Corps</strong> administration.<br />
b. Development of programs, techniques, or equipment that materially<br />
improves the functioning of a command, unit, or headquarters, or improves the<br />
ability of the <strong>Marine</strong> <strong>Corps</strong> to accomplish its mission.<br />
c. Superlative performance of tasks or management of an area of<br />
responsibility that materially improves the administrative procedures of the<br />
<strong>Marine</strong> <strong>Corps</strong>.<br />
d. Superlative performance of a specific act, project, or mission which<br />
was outstanding in character and made a major contribution to the best<br />
interests of the <strong>Marine</strong> <strong>Corps</strong> or Naval service. Superior creative work would<br />
merit a higher recommendation than administrative work.<br />
6. Level of Award. The awards considered appropriate for noncombatant service<br />
by personnel falling under the purview of this Order are set forth in<br />
SecNavInst 1650.1. Quality and extent of meritorious service performed by the<br />
individual and level of responsibility, not the grade of the individual, should<br />
be the primary factors in making a determination as to the level of the award<br />
proposed.<br />
7. Awards Board. Awarding authorities shall establish an awards board to<br />
review and make recommendations on all proposed awards. Structure of the board<br />
shall be as directed by the commander establishing the board.<br />
8. Recommendations. Recommendations must be submitted on the HQMC APS 1650<br />
(EF) (See enclosure (5)), or as provided for in instructions to delegated<br />
authorities. The following guidelines will be used:<br />
ENCLOSURE (2)<br />
2