04.04.2013 Views

The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...

The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...

The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 5: Austrian efforts and the failure <strong>of</strong> territorial transfer<br />

June 1920 – August <strong>1921</strong><br />

<strong>The</strong> obligatory signing <strong>of</strong> the Trianon peace decree – as already noted – took<br />

place on June 4, 1920 in Paris. <strong>The</strong> decision – in harmony with the Austrian<br />

treaty <strong>of</strong> Saint-Germain signed on September 10, 1919 – cut <strong>of</strong>f 4,364 km 2 <strong>of</strong><br />

western Hungarian territory. <strong>The</strong> last census, in 1910, enumerated a population<br />

<strong>of</strong> 345,082, <strong>of</strong> which 245,714 were <strong>of</strong> German mother-tongue, 49,374 <strong>of</strong><br />

Croatian and 44,191 <strong>of</strong> Hungarian. Of the total population, including the ethnic<br />

Hungarians, 80,632 (23.4%) spoke Hungarian. 213 It is important to point out<br />

once again that, the majority <strong>of</strong> the population given to Austria were <strong>of</strong> German<br />

extraction and mother-tongue and not <strong>of</strong> Austrian extraction and mothertongue,<br />

as the latter did not yet exist! [In fact, the majority <strong>of</strong> the German<br />

speaking population traced their ancestry not to what was to become Austria<br />

but to other German provinces or states-ed.]<br />

Hungarian public opinion could not come to grips with and accept the<br />

obviously unjust and cynical decision that gave Austria, an equally defeated<br />

country in the war, territory from its also defeated ally, <strong>Hungary</strong>. “It is doubly<br />

painful – wrote Foreign Minister Miklós Bánffy (1873–1950) in his memoirs –<br />

that we had to hand over Sopron and its surrounding area not to one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

victorious countries but to Austria. <strong>The</strong>re was something terribly humiliating in<br />

it, and hellishly ironic. Hungarians fought for centuries to protect their country<br />

against Austria. And now that the Entente breaks up the Austrian empire, they<br />

wish us to hand over lands, to what remains <strong>of</strong> Austria, that have always been<br />

ours; wishes it at a time when Austria is as much a defeated country as we are.<br />

What is more, our affiliation with Austria is what drew us into the war, into a<br />

war that nobody in <strong>Hungary</strong> wanted. A war started over the assassination <strong>of</strong> an<br />

Austrian archduke.” 214<br />

Due to the ongoing humbling <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hungary</strong>, some nationalist radical circles<br />

began to organize. It is a unspoken fact that, beginning in early 1920, large<br />

amounts <strong>of</strong> arms and ammunition were shipped from Austria to <strong>Hungary</strong> for the<br />

Hungarian National Army. It was partly <strong>of</strong>ficial, partly as smuggled supplies<br />

but <strong>of</strong> which the Viennese Ministry <strong>of</strong> War was aware, as were some <strong>of</strong>ficials<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Austrian disarmament committee. <strong>The</strong> country had a burning need for<br />

this materiel since it was totally vulnerable and unprotected at this time.<br />

Romanian forces had only withdrawn from Trans-Danubia between October 4<br />

and November 15, 1919, from Budapest on the latter date, from the areas<br />

between the Danube and Tisza Rivers on November 23, retreating to the left<br />

bank <strong>of</strong> the Tisza River by November 23, which they vacated only on March<br />

213 Lőkkös, 143, op. cit., pp. 288–289, 292.<br />

214 Major, Zoltán: Bánffy Miklós: Huszonöt év (1945) [Miklós Bánffy: Twenty-five<br />

years (1945)]. Budapest, 1993, pp. 65-66. Bánffy was Foreign Minister during this most<br />

active period (April 14, <strong>1921</strong> – December 29, 1922). <strong>The</strong> pinnacle <strong>of</strong> his ministerial<br />

career was as a participant at the Venice talks (October 11-13, <strong>1921</strong>).<br />

90

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!