The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
agenda.”<br />
Lansing: “Perhaps it would be best to assign this for a sub-committee to<br />
study, which would later report to the conference if there is a need or not for<br />
any alteration <strong>of</strong> the present border between these two countries? This<br />
committee could evaluate all suggestions that would be put forward by<br />
either Austria or <strong>Hungary</strong>.”<br />
Sonnino: “I see no need to send out a special group, since neither side raised<br />
the problem <strong>of</strong> a new border settlement. If they raise it, we can discuss it.<br />
Italy, for its part, completely agrees with the current border and we have no<br />
reason to alter it.”<br />
Lansing: “I only wish to prepare the problem, in case the border question<br />
should arise and the council should not be unprepared for the problem.”<br />
Sonnino: “I see no reason to forcibly raise the question. <strong>The</strong> Hungarians,<br />
although they were not present at the drawing <strong>of</strong> the Romanian border, still<br />
presented sharp objections. This matter would only create needless chaos. In<br />
any case, the two countries have never disagreed for fifty years over their<br />
mutual border. <strong>The</strong>ir current governments are very uncertain and the time is<br />
not right to give rise to opposition over it between the two countries.”<br />
Lansing: “It is also my opinion that any work be undertaken by a committee<br />
if the matter does not create special problems.”<br />
Sonnino: “If it would be possible to do this, without the affected parties<br />
knowing <strong>of</strong> the preparations in the matter, then I have no opinion against the<br />
special committee.” 182<br />
<strong>The</strong> peace arbitrators – after the French Foreign Minister’s comment –<br />
finally agreed that the question <strong>of</strong> the Hungarian-Austrian question will be<br />
‘objectively’ prepared for the time if this topic should ever arise in the future<br />
between Austria and <strong>Hungary</strong>. <strong>The</strong>y also decided that, with regard to a potential<br />
border adjustment, fact finding was to begin as soon as possible and without<br />
attracting attention. However, until the two countries raised the issue, all future<br />
decisions were to be suspended. In spite <strong>of</strong> the decision <strong>of</strong> the committee, at<br />
one <strong>of</strong> the next meetings <strong>of</strong> the Supreme Council, Woodrow Wilson again<br />
brought up the question <strong>of</strong> altering the border between Austria and <strong>Hungary</strong>. It<br />
can be justifiably supposed that the Austrians and the Czechs (especially Beneš<br />
and Masaryk, related to the US president by marriage, through his wife) pushed<br />
to realize their dream <strong>of</strong> the Slav corridor. Having won the confidence and<br />
support <strong>of</strong> Balfour and Lansing, they must also have reached Wilson, too – and<br />
with momentous result. Miller recorded the following about the unexpected<br />
comment <strong>of</strong> the American president, which caught the Italian Sonnino<br />
completely by surprise:<br />
Wilson: “I have received some information that the ‘Austrian side’ raised the<br />
problem <strong>of</strong> border adjustment between Austria and <strong>Hungary</strong> and so a<br />
decision should be made in this question.”<br />
Sonnino: “I cannot understand why it would not be sufficient if <strong>Hungary</strong><br />
182 Czakó, 1933, op. cit., pp. 32–34.<br />
79