The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Council <strong>of</strong> Foreign Ministers, and the Supreme Council <strong>of</strong> Four, usually<br />
accepted, without alteration, the suggestions <strong>of</strong> the committees for border<br />
determination, which operated very superficially and without regard for facts,<br />
or actual ethnic realities – except when those decisions would have been<br />
favorable to <strong>Hungary</strong>. Decisions to carve up a 1000 year-old country were<br />
made in such crude fashion.<br />
As we noted earlier, the idea <strong>of</strong> annexing <strong>Western</strong> <strong>Hungary</strong> to Austria had<br />
not even surfaced in February-March <strong>of</strong> 1919, although claims to it were raised<br />
in October <strong>of</strong> <strong>1918</strong> by the representatives to the interim Austrian National<br />
Council who championed the idea <strong>of</strong> a Greater Germany and Anschluss. <strong>The</strong><br />
terms <strong>of</strong> the Austrian treaty were handed to the Austrian representatives on<br />
June 2, 1919, in which the Austria-<strong>Hungary</strong> border remained as that<br />
determined in the year <strong>of</strong> the Dualism, 1867 (the traditional, millennial border).<br />
This was not accidental because the Entente Powers were clearly aware that<br />
pre-1867, Austria did not exist as an independent country. Even afterward, it<br />
was only as the other founding country <strong>of</strong> the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy –<br />
with <strong>Hungary</strong>.<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the most astonishing chapters <strong>of</strong> David Miller’s stenographic notes<br />
deals with the question <strong>of</strong> the Austria-<strong>Hungary</strong> border. <strong>The</strong> revealing series <strong>of</strong><br />
facts shocks even those with only a rudimentary knowledge <strong>of</strong> the proceedings<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Trianon peace treaty. It is unique in the history <strong>of</strong> the world that, at an<br />
international peace conference, a boundary dispute is settled without any<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficial consultation <strong>of</strong> the affected parties. According to Miller’s notes, the<br />
chief delegates were the most surprised when the topic was tabled. Miller<br />
recorded this interesting committee debate thusly:<br />
Sonnino (Baron Sidney, Italian Foreign Minister): “I do not see the need to<br />
discuss this border question without preliminaries.”<br />
Pichon (Stephen Jean Marie, French Foreign Minister): “ I think I am clear<br />
that we appointed no sub-committee to deal with this border question.”<br />
Lansing (Robert, American Secretary <strong>of</strong> State): “If that is the case, for<br />
myself, I fully agree with Mr. Sonnino’s opinion and see no need to make<br />
any amendments to the present border.”<br />
Balfour (Arthur James, British Foreign Minister): “I consider a border<br />
amendment possible because, allegedly, a large number <strong>of</strong> Germans live in<br />
this territory and they allegedly wish to join Austria. If this is a fact, then it<br />
would be desirable to make preparations to discuss this matter.”<br />
Sonnino: “To the best <strong>of</strong> my knowledge, a request in this direction has not<br />
surfaced either from Austria or <strong>Hungary</strong>.”<br />
Balfour: “In my view, the Great Powers are not very interested in this<br />
question. But, in light <strong>of</strong> the ongoing difficulties between Austria and<br />
<strong>Hungary</strong>, it would be good to dispose <strong>of</strong> this question because it can still<br />
create great difficulty if left disorganized.<br />
Sonnino: “I do not understand and can give no reason for why difficulties<br />
would arise in the relations between these two countries.”<br />
Pichon: “In my opinion, it is unnecessary to put this question on the<br />
78