The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>of</strong> Croatia for a fleetingly short period. <strong>The</strong> Drava River has always been the<br />
natural border between <strong>Hungary</strong> and Slavonia, an associate country under the<br />
Hungarian Crown for 800 years. <strong>The</strong> exception was after the suppression <strong>of</strong> the<br />
1848-49 Hungarian revolution and fight for freedom, when, as punishment, the<br />
Habsburg emperor temporarily separated the Muraköz, and other areas, from<br />
<strong>Hungary</strong> between 1850 and 1861. 160 <strong>The</strong> ancient Croats living here had,<br />
centuries before, a strong local identity and called/call themselves Medjimurec<br />
or Muraközi. On January 17, 1861, Emperor Franz Joseph ordered the reannexation<br />
<strong>of</strong> Muraköz to Zala County, at the urging <strong>of</strong> the Croat and<br />
Hungarian population. It was done on March 11. Hence, the emperor admitted<br />
that the temporary Croat tenure had no legal basis. 161 Thus, from a historicallegal<br />
perspective, the tearing away <strong>of</strong> the Muraköz from Zala County, through<br />
the Croatian unilateral announcement <strong>of</strong> separation on October 29, <strong>1918</strong> (and<br />
its becoming part <strong>of</strong> the South Slav Kingdom through the amalgamation <strong>of</strong><br />
Croatia), is but one <strong>of</strong> the many unjust decisions <strong>of</strong> the Trianon peace decree.<br />
<strong>The</strong> current Muraköz region was formed in 1919 from the Csáktornya (72<br />
villages) and Perlak (33) districts <strong>of</strong> Zala County and a tiny part (6,164 cad.<br />
hectares) <strong>of</strong> the Nagykanizsa district. Thus, the historical size <strong>of</strong> the Muraköz<br />
grew by a tiny amount to 785 km 2 . According to the 1910 census, the 105<br />
villages in the region were populated by 93,283 people, <strong>of</strong> whom the<br />
overwhelming majority were Croats and only 7,706 Hungarians (8.3%). <strong>The</strong><br />
Hungarians lived in more significant numbers in the seven villages <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Csáktornya district, in the county seat <strong>of</strong> Csáktornya (2,433 Hungarians<br />
(46.7%)). <strong>The</strong> size <strong>of</strong> the seven villages varied between 165 and 788 people and<br />
their proportion <strong>of</strong> Hungarians also varied, between 21.1% and 45.4%. Of their<br />
total population <strong>of</strong> 2,564, there were 744 Hungarians (29.1%). Only one village<br />
in the Csáktornya district had a significant Hungarian majority (93.2%), Hétház<br />
with a population <strong>of</strong> 59. From a Hungarian perspective, the second most<br />
Hungarian populated place was the village <strong>of</strong> Légrád, at the confluence <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Mura and Drava Rivers but part <strong>of</strong> the Nagykanizsa district, where a third <strong>of</strong><br />
the 2,896 population were Hungarians (940 persons, 32.5%). 162 With its<br />
inclusion in the territorial transfer, the number <strong>of</strong> Hungarians in the Muraköz<br />
rose to 8,646.<br />
In historical literature, it became a widely accepted view by the 1980s that<br />
the Paris Peace Conference awarded the Muraköz and the Vend region <strong>of</strong> Zala<br />
and Vas counties to the Kingdom <strong>of</strong> Serbs-Croats-Slovenes as compensation<br />
for two cities and their surrounding areas. It is an undeniable fact that the South<br />
Slav country received the Muraköz in compensation for the zealously demanded<br />
Banate city <strong>of</strong> Temesvár (Timişoara), which was, in the end, given to Romania.<br />
160 A magyar béketárgyalások. II. köt. <strong>1921</strong>. 63. old.<br />
161 Botlik – Csorba – Dudás, op. cit., p. 65; Fára, József: Muraköz történetének rövid<br />
foglalata [Short recap <strong>of</strong> the history <strong>of</strong> Muraköz]. In: Vasi Szemle, 1942, issues 3–4, pp.<br />
101–119.<br />
162 Pogány, op. cit., pp. 34–35.<br />
70