The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter 3: <strong>The</strong> occupation <strong>of</strong> the Vend (Slovenian) region<br />
<strong>of</strong> Vas County by Serbs – the Mura Republic<br />
December <strong>1918</strong> – August 1919<br />
We have already noted that the Serb army has completely occupied all the<br />
villages up to the line <strong>of</strong> demarcation, from the Trans-Danubian sector along<br />
the Barcs and Maros Rivers to Arad by November 21, <strong>1918</strong>. Now, it was just a<br />
matter <strong>of</strong> time when the occupation <strong>of</strong> the southern end <strong>of</strong> Zala and Vas<br />
Counties would begin by the crossing <strong>of</strong> the Drava River. <strong>The</strong> district center <strong>of</strong><br />
Muraköz, bounded by the Drava and Mura Rivers, Csáktornya, 140 was taken on<br />
December 24, <strong>1918</strong> by a Croatian unit <strong>of</strong> only 200, bolstered by some Serb<br />
elements. With this action, the Serb government and military command<br />
aggressively broke the terms <strong>of</strong> the November 13 Belgrade Convention when<br />
its forces crossed the demarcation line, the Drava River, and illegally pushed<br />
into the Muraköz. Here “they took over public administration, all the posts and<br />
<strong>of</strong>fices, courts and schools were taken over with all their equipment. Civil<br />
servants, judges, teachers were let go and expelled [from the region], their<br />
places filled by their own men. (…) …people complaining about the arbitrary<br />
actions (i.e., individuals—J.B.) were jailed, beaten. <strong>The</strong> people <strong>of</strong> Muraköz also<br />
raised objections against this aggression because the Serbs and Croats had no<br />
right to do it.” 141<br />
<strong>The</strong> occupying Serb and Croat soldiers closed not only the railways leading<br />
into <strong>Hungary</strong> (the Alsólendva–Lenti–Zalaegerszeg–Vasvár–Szombathely and<br />
Murakeresztúr–Nagykanizsa lines) but also blockaded the main public roads, as<br />
well. Contact with the Hungarian side was completely cut <strong>of</strong>f. Thus, the<br />
Muraköz region was lost to the country. <strong>The</strong> region was completely dependent<br />
on <strong>Hungary</strong>: countless farmers had fields, vineyards on the far side <strong>of</strong> the Mura<br />
River and sold their produce there, too.<br />
On hearing the news <strong>of</strong> the hostile occupation <strong>of</strong> Muraköz, the Hungarian<br />
border defense forces that entered the other district seat, Alsólendva, 20 kms.<br />
North <strong>of</strong> Csáktornya, in the middle <strong>of</strong> December, received the inexplicable<br />
order from Nagykanizsa – from the Communist Commissar <strong>of</strong> Somogy County,<br />
Jenő Hamburger (1883-1936) – to immediately withdraw from the village. <strong>The</strong><br />
order was carried out and the village remained without protection. <strong>The</strong> Serb<br />
units immediately exploited this and, on the following day, entered the mainly<br />
Hungarian-populated Alsólendva with a meager force <strong>of</strong> about 20 soldiers on<br />
December 25 (according to some sources December 26). 142<br />
140 According to the 1910 census, the population <strong>of</strong> Csáktornya was 5,213 <strong>of</strong> which<br />
2,433 were Hungarian (46.7%), 2,404 Croatian (45.5%), and 251 Germans. In:<br />
Magyarország Közigazgatási Atlasza 1914, p. 100.<br />
141 A magyar béketárgyalások. Vol. II, <strong>1921</strong>, p. 63.<br />
142 Göncz, László: A muravidéki magyarság <strong>1918</strong>–1941 [<strong>The</strong> Hungarians <strong>of</strong> the Mura<br />
region <strong>1918</strong>-1941]. Lendva, 2001, pp. 36–37.<br />
62