The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
September 2 commenting on the final Austrian peace terms, wrote: the borders<br />
drawn for Austria we cannot change; in any case, the line follows very closely<br />
the ethnic boundaries. That is why they did not consider a plebiscite necessary.<br />
After an insignificant debate in the Austrian National Assembly, Chancellor<br />
Karl Renner signed the peace treaty for Austria on September 10, 1919 in the<br />
Paris suburb <strong>of</strong> Saint-Germain-en-Laye. It was ratified by the Austrian<br />
parliament on October 17. <strong>The</strong> peace – which prohibited Anschluss – trimmed<br />
Austria back to the core provinces. It lost the South Tyrol, Trieste, Istria,<br />
Dalmatia, Krajina, and a part <strong>of</strong> Carinthia. It did, however, manage to gain a<br />
strip <strong>of</strong> <strong>Western</strong> <strong>Hungary</strong> that was part <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hungary</strong> for a thousand years, which<br />
later, from January 1, 1922, was called Burgenland.<br />
With the result <strong>of</strong> the subsequent plebiscite in Sopron, and later minor<br />
border adjustments, the peace treaty <strong>of</strong> Saint-Germain ordered 4,364 km 2 <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Western</strong> <strong>Hungary</strong>, with 345 settlements, to be transferred to Austria. Among<br />
them, three cities (Sopron, Kismarton and Ruszt) were carved from the country.<br />
According to the data <strong>of</strong> the 1910 census, it represented 345,082 people, <strong>of</strong><br />
whom 44,191 (12.5%) were <strong>of</strong> Hungarian mother tongue, 245,714 (77.2%)<br />
German and 49,374 (14.3%) Croatian. [Nota bene: German mother-tongue is<br />
not the same as Austrian ethnicity-ed.] Of the total population, almost twice as<br />
many as those recorded as having Hungarian as the mother tongue – another<br />
80,632 (23.4%) – spoke Hungarian. 138<br />
<strong>The</strong> Austrian government did not want to accept some <strong>of</strong> the terms <strong>of</strong> the<br />
treaty it felt were unjust, either. Shortly, at the end <strong>of</strong> 1919, it requested<br />
plebiscites in all the German speaking areas along the Austrian border, to have<br />
the population decide to which country they want to belong. <strong>The</strong> Peace<br />
Conference only ordered one referendum – in Carinthia. In the meantime,<br />
Austria continued to push for plebiscites in western <strong>Hungary</strong>. In fact, it<br />
suggested that it be expanded to the eastern portion <strong>of</strong> Moson County, as well<br />
as in Kőszeg and Szentgotthárd. As a result <strong>of</strong> the January 1920 Austria-<br />
Czechoslovakia friendship agreement, Austria dropped the idea <strong>of</strong> plebiscites in<br />
<strong>Western</strong> <strong>Hungary</strong>. 139 (<strong>The</strong> referendum in Carinthia was held on October 10,<br />
1920, as a result <strong>of</strong> which Austria was able to keep Klagenfurt and its<br />
surrounding area.)<br />
138 Lőkkös, op. cit., pp. 143, 288–289, 292. Regarding the size and population <strong>of</strong> the<br />
annexed territory, numerous imprecise numbers appear in historical literature. <strong>The</strong><br />
reason is that Hungarian authorities ordered a census on December 30, 1920 on the<br />
<strong>Western</strong> <strong>Hungary</strong> region ceded to Austria. As a result, the data from the 1910 and 1920<br />
census appear intermingled or erroneously attributed.<br />
139 Fogarassy, László: Nyugat-Magyarországi bandaharcok. (<strong>1921</strong>. augusztus–<br />
november 4.) [<strong>Western</strong> <strong>Hungary</strong> gang wars (August – November 4, <strong>1921</strong>)] In: Soproni<br />
Szemle, 1961, vol. I, p. 40. Fogarassy’s treatise appeared on the 40 th anniversary <strong>of</strong> the<br />
creation <strong>of</strong> Burgenland. <strong>The</strong> sole Hungarian language treatment <strong>of</strong> its time. According<br />
to the expectations <strong>of</strong> the era, the title ‘gang wars’ gives away its orientation. It reflects<br />
a servile acceptance <strong>of</strong> the period’s Austrian media’s and technical literature’s<br />
direction, which brands the <strong>Western</strong> Hungarian revolutionaries, to this day, as ‘bandits.’<br />
60