The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ecompensed by Hungarian territory (Baranya County and the Vend region/<br />
Medžimurje). This was confirmed when the Supreme Council <strong>of</strong> the Peace<br />
Conference decided to consider Austria as a new country on May 28-29, whose<br />
current <strong>of</strong>ficial name <strong>of</strong> German-Austria (Deutschösterreich) was changed to<br />
the Republic <strong>of</strong> Austria. <strong>The</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial documents <strong>of</strong> the Supreme Council refer to<br />
it in French and English as République d’Autriche or Republic <strong>of</strong> Austria. <strong>The</strong><br />
heads <strong>of</strong> the Peace Conference also decided henceforth to treat Austria<br />
differently from Germany. <strong>The</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> the peace treaty were handed to the<br />
Austrian delegation on June 2, 1919, which was sharply protested by the<br />
Austrian National Assembly at its extraordinary meeting <strong>of</strong> June 7. 108 Next,<br />
numerous notes, submissions and memoranda were written by Austria<br />
regarding the matter <strong>of</strong> Westungarn – not yet called by its new name,<br />
Burgenland. Most pointed out the dangers threatening the Austrian capital,<br />
Vienna, from “Bolshevik <strong>Hungary</strong>.” Austria’s position was further improved by<br />
the resignation <strong>of</strong> the most Anschluss-leaning Austrian politician, Foreign<br />
Minister Otto Bauer. <strong>The</strong> Chancellor, Renner, then announced a new, Entente<br />
friendly, foreign policy. Austria’s image was further enhanced when a large<br />
demonstration was put down in Vienna on June 15, preventing an attempted<br />
revolt by the Communists. 109<br />
By the date <strong>of</strong> the Peace Conference, the demands <strong>of</strong> the representatives <strong>of</strong><br />
the transitional Austrian National Assembly who sided with the Greater<br />
Germany concepts have substantially modified their territorial demands first<br />
introduced in October <strong>of</strong> <strong>1918</strong>, i.e.- all <strong>of</strong> Pozsony, Sopron, Moson and Vas<br />
counties and a western strip <strong>of</strong> Zala County. By the Spring <strong>of</strong> 1919, the <strong>of</strong>ficial<br />
land claim shrank to 5,055 km 2 with a population <strong>of</strong> 392,000. This claim was,<br />
by now, only one-third <strong>of</strong> the un<strong>of</strong>ficially claimed 16,000 km 2 with 1,300<br />
settlements and a population <strong>of</strong> 1.2 million. <strong>The</strong> Austrian government<br />
demanded to have, first <strong>of</strong> all, Sopron, as well as the district around<br />
Hegyeshalom–Moson–Magyaróvár, and Kőszeg and Szentgotthárd awarded to<br />
it, on top <strong>of</strong> the actual award that later became Burgenland. <strong>The</strong> one-time ally<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>Hungary</strong>, co-founder <strong>of</strong> the Dual Monarchy and equal loser <strong>of</strong> the war,<br />
turned out not to be any less predatory than the Czechs, Romanians or Serbs. 110<br />
Some Austrian sources mentioned a slightly larger claim <strong>of</strong> 5,379 km 2 . 111 Due<br />
to changes in the foreign policy environment, Austria later gave up any claim to<br />
108 Pozsonyi, Márta: A saint-germaini osztrák békedelegáció és a területi kérdés [<strong>The</strong><br />
Austrian peace delegation at Saint-Germain and the territorial question]. In: Történelem<br />
és nemzet. Tanulmánykötet Galántai József pr<strong>of</strong>esszor tiszteletére. Szerk/ed.: Kiss,<br />
Károly – Lovas, Krisztina. Budapest, 1996, pp. 295–332; Romhányi, Zsófia: A saintgermaini<br />
békekötés és az osztrák sajtó [<strong>The</strong> peace treaty <strong>of</strong> Saint-Germain and the<br />
Austrian press]. Ibid, pp. 277–293.<br />
109 Ormos, 1983, op. cit., pp. 286–287.<br />
110 Lőkkös, op. cit., pp. 123, 124. (map)<br />
111 Zsiga, Tibor: Communitas Fidelissima Szentpéterfa. A magyar–osztrák<br />
határmegállapítás 1922–23 [Most loyal town, Szentpéterfa. <strong>The</strong> Hungarian-Austrian<br />
border settlement 1922-1923]. Szombathely, 1993, p. 10.<br />
48