The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
to a rejection <strong>of</strong> the Anschluss (union) option. Days before this announcement,<br />
the staff <strong>of</strong>ficers <strong>of</strong> the Austrian Military Office (Staatsamt für Heerwesen)<br />
worked out the plan for the military occupation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Western</strong> <strong>Hungary</strong>. <strong>The</strong> secret<br />
plan consisted <strong>of</strong> seven irregular columns advancing into <strong>Western</strong> <strong>Hungary</strong><br />
under the guise <strong>of</strong> providing assistance to a population revolting against<br />
Hungarian authorities. <strong>The</strong> headquarters staff was instructed to forbid accepting<br />
Communists, monarchists, Jews and Crown Council members as volunteers<br />
into the seven bands. 106<br />
Chancellor Karl Renner and Foreign Minister Otto Bauer notified Colonel<br />
Thomas Cunningham, the head <strong>of</strong> the Entente mission in Vienna, on May 11 <strong>of</strong><br />
the plan. <strong>The</strong> colonel had previously linked the territorial gain in <strong>Western</strong><br />
<strong>Hungary</strong> with the repudiation <strong>of</strong> the Anschluss plan and specifically urged the<br />
Austrian government to state its territorial claims. This the highest level <strong>of</strong> the<br />
government <strong>of</strong>ficially registered on the same date. Colonel Cunningham urged<br />
the Austrian government on May 16 to militarily occupy the Westungarn<br />
territory, stressing that “the Entente will not object.” At the same time, he<br />
repeatedly urged that German-Austria join in the war against the Hungarian<br />
Soviet Republic on the side <strong>of</strong> the Czechoslovak, Romanian and South Slav<br />
armies. 107 It was not, then, by chance that the other leading politicians <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Entente Powers drew the attention <strong>of</strong> the Austrian government, confidentially<br />
but not <strong>of</strong>ficially, that: because they cannot gain border adjustments for Austria<br />
in the Italian and South Slav areas, it should lay a claim in western <strong>Hungary</strong> as<br />
compensation. It thus became clear to Chancellor Renner, in Paris at the time,<br />
that the right decision was made with regard to Austria’s standpoint: to seek<br />
compensation in western <strong>Hungary</strong> in lieu <strong>of</strong> South Tyrol, given to Italy. For<br />
Vienna, the Hungarian Proletarian Dictatorship came as an opportune event.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Austrian delegates to the Peace Conference wasted no opportunity to raise<br />
alarm over the dangers <strong>of</strong> Bolshevism – presenting the annexation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Western</strong><br />
<strong>Hungary</strong> as a defensive move. On top <strong>of</strong> it all, they did it with great skill,<br />
raising the specter before the Entente decision makers, in turn, the dual<br />
possibilities <strong>of</strong> Anschluss and Hungarian Bolshevism. Of the latter, they were<br />
fully aware <strong>of</strong> its usefulness as an argument only as long as the Hungarian<br />
Commune was in existence.<br />
<strong>The</strong> fate <strong>of</strong> Westungarn, or <strong>Western</strong> <strong>Hungary</strong>, was decided at the Peace<br />
Conference between May 27 and 31, 1919, although few notes remain in the<br />
minutes <strong>of</strong> the discussions. We can only deduce from various sources the<br />
loathsome and distasteful negotiations. <strong>The</strong> Hungarian Soviet Republic began<br />
its northern campaign at this particular time (May 30-June 24) to recapture the<br />
Hungarian populated areas <strong>of</strong> Northern <strong>Hungary</strong> and Sub-Carpathia, which<br />
again favored Austria’s stand. <strong>The</strong> essence was that the annexation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Western</strong><br />
<strong>Hungary</strong> was ultimately linked with the South Slav country’s failure to make<br />
gains <strong>of</strong> Austrian territory (Klagenfurt and area) and Belgrade was instead<br />
106 Fogarassy, 1971, op.cit., p. 293.<br />
107 Ibid, pp. 293–294; Ormos, 1983, op.cit., pp. 194, 275.<br />
47