The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
191,000 (13.5%) Slavs would have become the ruling nationality. It would have<br />
meant that the other 85%, 917,000 Hungarians (64.9%) and 305,000 Germans<br />
(21.6%), would have come under Czechoslovak and South-Slav occupation and<br />
into minority status.<br />
<strong>The</strong> need bring to life the plan was vociferously repeated by Beneš and the<br />
Czech-Slovak representatives at the Paris Peace Conference in January-<br />
February <strong>of</strong> 1919. On February 5, the Czechoslovak delegates were invited to<br />
state their claims before the Supreme Council. Beneš mentioned the Slav<br />
corridor, among other territorial claims, but by this time he had somewhat<br />
modified the memorandum with regard to the corridor. He claimed that,<br />
according to his calculations, there were now 200,000 Slavs living in Moson,<br />
Sopron, Vas and Zala counties, giving him a basis for claiming the northern<br />
part <strong>of</strong> the corridor, Moson and Sopron counties, while the South-Slav kingdom<br />
should have Vas and Zala counties.<br />
Following the example <strong>of</strong> Beneš, Belgrade also put together a plan which<br />
was even more grasping, not being satisfied with the previously detailed<br />
territory but laying claim to a huge swath <strong>of</strong> southern Trans-Danubia for the<br />
South Slav state. 99 This southern Hungarian territory area, a zone 5-20 km.<br />
North <strong>of</strong> the demarcation line along the railway line from Barcs–Szigetvár–<br />
Pécs–Bátaszék–Baja–Bácsalmás–Szeged, then from the Maros River to Arad,<br />
Serbia intended to seize permanently. This vast swath was thoughtlessly and<br />
myopically signed away by the Károlyi government as part <strong>of</strong> the Belgrade<br />
Military Convention (truce treaty), with disastrous consequences. Between<br />
November 7 and 19, the Serb army was able to secure it by simply marching<br />
in. 100 According to the new Serb plan, areas to the West and South <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Barcs–Nagykanizsa–Szentgotthárd line was to come under the control <strong>of</strong> the<br />
South Slav country. North <strong>of</strong> it, anything West <strong>of</strong> the straight line linking<br />
Nagykanizsa and Győr, was to go to Czechoslovakia.<br />
As a matter <strong>of</strong> interest, the claimed corridor’s central and eastern thirds were<br />
inhabited by a substantial majority <strong>of</strong> Hungarians. Croatians lived in dispersed<br />
settlement in Moson, Sopron and Vas counties, but in the majority in Muraköz<br />
(Međimurje), in southwest Zala County. <strong>The</strong> Vends/Slovenes lived in the<br />
southeast corner <strong>of</strong> Vas County and in neighboring Zala County along the Mura<br />
River. In the four counties intended for expropriation for the corridor, the only<br />
sizeable cities were Sopron, Szombathely and Nagykanizsa (with populations<br />
from 34,000 down to 27,000). Only in Sopron did the Germans-speakers have a<br />
minimal 51% majority, while the other two had Hungarian majorities <strong>of</strong> 94%<br />
and 95%. 101<br />
99 Ormos, Mária: Civitas fidelissima. Népszavazás Sopronban <strong>1921</strong> [Most loyal city.<br />
Plebiscite in Sopron <strong>1921</strong>]. Győr, 1990, pp. 22–27; Romsics, Ignác: A trianoni<br />
békeszerződés [<strong>The</strong> peace treaty <strong>of</strong> Trianon]. Budapest, 2001, pp. 45, 124.<br />
100 Botlik, József – Csorba, Béla – Dudás, Károly: Eltévedt mezsgyekövek. Adalékok a<br />
délvidéki magyarság történetéhez <strong>1918</strong>–1993 [Lost boundary markers. Addenda to the<br />
history <strong>of</strong> the Hungarians <strong>of</strong> the souther territory <strong>1918</strong>-1993]. Budapest, 1994, p. 39.<br />
101 Magyarország Közigazgatási Atlasza 1914 [Hungarian public administration atlas<br />
43