The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ... The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
orn Alfred Waldheim, drew attention to the length of the name, thus making it unsuitable for public use. Instead, he suggested Burgenland. This suggestion appealed to the chancellor and he used the name in his reply. 88 According to tradition, or to some, Waldheim gave the area the name Burgenland, which he himself also claimed in later years, saying he named the new Austrian province after the many western Hungarian castles annexed. 89 According to other sources, a person by the name of Gregor Meidlinger used the term ‘Burgenland’ a month before with Chancellor Renner. 90 The statements of the Viennese professor were later refuted by the real creator of the name, Karl Amon, who drew attention that “Burgenland is an artificially created name, which has political significance.” 91 According to some, the name ‘Burgenland’ is an exact translation into German of the Hungarian term ‘royal county,’ which this author holds to be a artificial interpretation, since our administrative unit of county has an equivalent in German of komitat. Incidentally, it was from the Fall of 1919 that the expression took root among the Croats of the region, mirroring the translation of the German concept of ‘Burgenland,’ the name of Gradišće and Gradiščansko among the Slovenes. 92 Following the meeting between Chancellor Renner and a group of western Hungarian Germans living in Vienna, Austrian propaganda and the irredentist movement immediately picked up the newly created Burgenland name and began to clamor for the military occupation of the Western Hungary zone not granted them in the Treaty of Saint-Germain. In the meantime, the Paris Peace Conference was officially begun on January 18, 1919 amid formal ceremonies. Three weeks later, on February 5, 88 Schwartz, Elemér: A Burgenland név [The name: Burgenland]. In: Magyar Nyelv, 1927, Sept.-Oct. issue, p. 486. Alfred Waldheim, fourth Governor of Burgenland between July 14, 1923 and January 4, 1924. About the name Burgenland, also see: Schwartz, Elemér, 1927, op. cit., pp. 484–487; Kubinyi, Elek: A burgenlandi németek [The Burgenland Germans]. In: Magyar Szemle, 1928, vol. III, issue 3, pp. 251–252; Schwartz, Elemér: A Burgenland magyar neve [The Hungarian name of Burgenland]. In: Vasi Szemle, year I, 1934, issue 3, pp. 226–231. 89 Walheim, Alfred: Wie das Burgenland zu seinem Nanem gekommen ist [How Burgenland came by its name]. In: Volkszeitung, Vienna, 1924, January 27. 90 Tóth, Imre: Elméleti és módszertani megjegyzések a regionalitás kérdéseinek kutatásához. Regionális identitások Burgenlandban és Nyugat-Magyarországon [Theoretical and methodological remarks in the research of questions of regionality. Regional identities in Burgenland and Western-Hungary]. In: Arrabona 45/1. Kiad. Győr-Moson-Sopron Megyei Múzeumok Igazgatósága. Győr, 2007, p. 305. 91 Amon, Karl: Wer hat dem Burgenland den Nanem gegeben [How Burgenland got its name]? In: Burgenländische Heimat (Sauerbrunn), 1926, July 11. 92 Schwartz, Elemér: A nyugatmagyarországi német helységnevek [German settlement names in Western-Hungary]. Budapest, 1932; Schwartz, 1934, op. cit., pp. 226–231; Kranzmayer, Eberhard: Die österreichischen Bundesländer und deren Hauptstädte in ihren Namen. Wien, 1956, p. 25; Kiss, Lajos: Földrajzi nevek etimológiai szótára [Etymological dictionary of geograpgical names]. Edition IV, vol. I. Budapest, 1988, p. 266. 38
the representatives of Romania, Czechoslovakia and the Kingdom of Serbia- Croatia-Slovenia, announced on December 1 of the previous year, handed a joint memorandum to the Entente Powers, stating their territorial demands against Hungary. In it, they objected against any possible request(s) for a plebiscite from Hungary. [A plebiscite denied is a plebiscite taken-ed.] It is important to note here that in February-March of 1919, the idea of annexing Western Hungary to Austria had not even surfaced, although the Interim Austrian National Assembly representatives of the Great-Germany direction raised such claims in October of 1918. They were the ones who proposed the Anschluss, or union with Germany and the National Council proclaimed it on November 17. The peace treaty terms with Austria was handed to the Austrian representatives on June 2, 1919 in Paris which defined the Hungarian-Austrian border along the 1867 line, from the time of the Dual Monarchy (the Lajta/Leitha River, peaks of the Rozália mountain range and the Lappincs River, a line that served as a border for the previous millennia). This last was not by accident because the Entente Powers knew very well that pre-1867, Austria did not exist as an independent country and post-1867 only as the other half of the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy with Hungary. In reaching what we today understand as statehood, Austria had taken a unique road. For a millennia, the current country was merely a province – albeit a central one – of the Habsburg Empire. Hence, Austria as a semi-independent country came into being in 1867 with the Austro-Hungarian Compromise (Augsleich). The Hungarian Kingdom, on the other hand, became an independent country with the crowning of King Saint Stephen in 1001, almost 900 years before. The facts of the unique historical ‘statehood’ of present day Austria are as follows: 976-1156 - estates of counts [frontier counts like those of the Welsh Marches-ed.], 1156-1453 - dukedoms, 1490 – archdukedoms, 1521-1522 – perpetual provinces, 1564 – after the Habsburg family division into three parts (Upper and Lower Austria; Tyrol; Styria and Carinthia), 1648 – center of the Habsburg dynasty, 1804 – center of Habsburg empire. From 1867- 1918, a new state form in the Austro-Hungarian Empire, its western provinces organized as an empire, 93 while its eastern allied country, Hungary, is a kingdom. Its joint ruler at the time was Francis Joseph (1830-1916) who was crowned Austrian emperor in 1848 and Hungarian king in 1867. After the military collapse of the Dual Monarchy, the Anschluss movement gained strength in the Fall of 1918, which had made attempts at union with Germany in the 19 th century. The aspiration was supported by most Austrian parties and associations because they had doubts about the viability of an independent Austria shrunk to its oldest provinces. After the proclamation on Nov. 12, 1918 of the German-Austrian Republic (Deutschösterreich) and the announced intent of union with democratic Germany shortly after, Austria was 93 Ausztria. In: Magyar Nagylexikon. Főszerk/ed-in-chief: Élesztős, László. Volume II. Budapest, 1994, pp. 659–665; Zöllner, Erich: Ausztria története [History of Austria]. Budapest, 1998. 39
- Page 1 and 2: The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-19
- Page 3 and 4: CONTENTS Foreword………………
- Page 5 and 6: contemplate - no matter how the cra
- Page 7 and 8: declaration.” 3 The basis for the
- Page 9 and 10: 1918, in its second edition. 8 ) Ge
- Page 11 and 12: of President Woodrow Wilson’s 14
- Page 13 and 14: assessed from this perspective.”
- Page 15 and 16: agreement regarding the delivery of
- Page 17 and 18: goal was to organize, in advance, t
- Page 19 and 20: accompanied by an Austrian military
- Page 21 and 22: The reasons for the minuscule milit
- Page 23 and 24: statements, among other things, is
- Page 25 and 26: counties. The Romanian Army advanci
- Page 27 and 28: were made up of about 20,000 armed
- Page 29 and 30: The tacit support by the Austrian g
- Page 31 and 32: addressed a memorandum 63 to Prime
- Page 33 and 34: county directorates published their
- Page 35 and 36: with its seat in Sopron. It brought
- Page 37: The later name of ‘Burgenland,’
- Page 41 and 42: Romanians, in like manner, wanted t
- Page 43 and 44: 191,000 (13.5%) Slavs would have be
- Page 45 and 46: committee of the Peace Conference u
- Page 47 and 48: to a rejection of the Anschluss (un
- Page 49 and 50: Pozsony County and, in the Paris Pe
- Page 51 and 52: István Széchenyi (1791-1860) and
- Page 53 and 54: and consultation of the affected po
- Page 55 and 56: Also significant was the trade in p
- Page 57 and 58: Austria,” and Zoltán Palotás,
- Page 59 and 60: August 16, stating that every armed
- Page 61 and 62: Finally, and once more, we must fir
- Page 63 and 64: The center of the Vend region, 143
- Page 65 and 66: Szombathely travelled to the Vend r
- Page 67 and 68: his co-nationals in the Vend region
- Page 69 and 70: force - 7 battalions, 8 mounted com
- Page 71 and 72: Incidentally, to bolster their clai
- Page 73 and 74: two Szekler battalions and an artil
- Page 75 and 76: odies and contact with foreign enti
- Page 77 and 78: large volumes of maps and statistic
- Page 79 and 80: agenda.” Lansing: “Perhaps it w
- Page 81 and 82: the subject matter and content of t
- Page 83 and 84: consideration the existing western
- Page 85 and 86: external political education, raisi
- Page 87 and 88: Proclamation: “Our historical iss
the representatives <strong>of</strong> Romania, Czechoslovakia and the Kingdom <strong>of</strong> Serbia-<br />
Croatia-Slovenia, announced on December 1 <strong>of</strong> the previous year, handed a<br />
joint memorandum to the Entente Powers, stating their territorial demands<br />
against <strong>Hungary</strong>. In it, they objected against any possible request(s) for a<br />
plebiscite from <strong>Hungary</strong>. [A plebiscite denied is a plebiscite taken-ed.] It is<br />
important to note here that in February-March <strong>of</strong> 1919, the idea <strong>of</strong> annexing<br />
<strong>Western</strong> <strong>Hungary</strong> to Austria had not even surfaced, although the Interim<br />
Austrian National Assembly representatives <strong>of</strong> the Great-Germany direction<br />
raised such claims in October <strong>of</strong> <strong>1918</strong>. <strong>The</strong>y were the ones who proposed the<br />
Anschluss, or union with Germany and the National Council proclaimed it on<br />
November 17. <strong>The</strong> peace treaty terms with Austria was handed to the Austrian<br />
representatives on June 2, 1919 in Paris which defined the Hungarian-Austrian<br />
border along the 1867 line, from the time <strong>of</strong> the Dual Monarchy (the<br />
Lajta/Leitha River, peaks <strong>of</strong> the Rozália mountain range and the Lappincs<br />
River, a line that served as a border for the previous millennia). This last was<br />
not by accident because the Entente Powers knew very well that pre-1867,<br />
Austria did not exist as an independent country and post-1867 only as the other<br />
half <strong>of</strong> the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy with <strong>Hungary</strong>.<br />
In reaching what we today understand as statehood, Austria had taken a<br />
unique road. For a millennia, the current country was merely a province – albeit<br />
a central one – <strong>of</strong> the Habsburg Empire. Hence, Austria as a semi-independent<br />
country came into being in 1867 with the Austro-Hungarian Compromise<br />
(Augsleich). <strong>The</strong> Hungarian Kingdom, on the other hand, became an<br />
independent country with the crowning <strong>of</strong> King Saint Stephen in 1001, almost<br />
900 years before. <strong>The</strong> facts <strong>of</strong> the unique historical ‘statehood’ <strong>of</strong> present day<br />
Austria are as follows: 976-1156 - estates <strong>of</strong> counts [frontier counts like those<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Welsh Marches-ed.], 1156-1453 - dukedoms, 1490 – archdukedoms,<br />
1521-1522 – perpetual provinces, 1564 – after the Habsburg family division<br />
into three parts (Upper and Lower Austria; Tyrol; Styria and Carinthia), 1648 –<br />
center <strong>of</strong> the Habsburg dynasty, 1804 – center <strong>of</strong> Habsburg empire. From 1867-<br />
<strong>1918</strong>, a new state form in the Austro-Hungarian Empire, its western provinces<br />
organized as an empire, 93 while its eastern allied country, <strong>Hungary</strong>, is a<br />
kingdom. Its joint ruler at the time was Francis Joseph (1830-1916) who was<br />
crowned Austrian emperor in 1848 and Hungarian king in 1867.<br />
After the military collapse <strong>of</strong> the Dual Monarchy, the Anschluss movement<br />
gained strength in the Fall <strong>of</strong> <strong>1918</strong>, which had made attempts at union with<br />
Germany in the 19 th century. <strong>The</strong> aspiration was supported by most Austrian<br />
parties and associations because they had doubts about the viability <strong>of</strong> an<br />
independent Austria shrunk to its oldest provinces. After the proclamation on<br />
Nov. 12, <strong>1918</strong> <strong>of</strong> the German-Austrian Republic (Deutschösterreich) and the<br />
announced intent <strong>of</strong> union with democratic Germany shortly after, Austria was<br />
93 Ausztria. In: Magyar Nagylexikon. Főszerk/ed-in-chief: Élesztős, László. Volume II.<br />
Budapest, 1994, pp. 659–665; Zöllner, Erich: Ausztria története [History <strong>of</strong> Austria].<br />
Budapest, 1998.<br />
39