The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...

The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ... The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...

hungarianhistory.com
from hungarianhistory.com More from this publisher
04.04.2013 Views

the United States, gave numerous signs of their devotion to Hungary in 1919, and even afterwards. They held meetings and sent telegrams to the Supreme Council in Paris and the American government demanding that the Lendva region (by now called the Mura Region) be reunited to Hungary. Alas, their actions remained fruitless. To these, we must add that they happened more than a year after the signing of the Trianon Peace Decree! This also proves our contention that, in the Fall of 1918, Hungary had vastly greater opportunities for armed resistance if then- Prime Minister Mihály Károlyi, Béla Linder and their associates, believing in the false Entente promises of a just peace, had not disarmed the 1.5 million Hungarian army soldiers returning from the fronts (including 816,000 Hungarians and 46,000 Ruthenians/Rusyns). As it happened, in the middle of November of 1918, the Károlyi government would have been able to field 200,000 – 300,000 Hungarian and Rusyn soldiers against an approximate force of 4,000 Czechs, 4,000 – 5,000 Romanians and 20,000 South Slavs (mainly Serbs). As they neglected to do so, Mihály Károlyi and his group committed a treasonable act. It is an undeniable fact, too, that well after the September 10, 1919 Treaty of Saint-Germain and the June 4, 1920 Trianon Peace Decree, the armed insurrection in Western Hungary of Pál Prónay and Iván Héjjas (August 28 to November 4, 1921) and the proclamation of the independent state of Lajta- Banate forced the holding of a plebiscite in Sopron and eight surrounding settlements (December 14 – 16, 1921) that had a favorable outcome for Hungary, allowing it to retain a territory of 256.82 km 2 intended for annexation to Austria. On the day of the ceremonial return of Sopron and the eight villages, January 1, 1922, Austria’s ninth province, Burgenland, also came into official existence. This, in spite of the fact that the final border adjustment between Austria and Hungary was not finalized until December 22, 1922. The second anti-Austrian Western Hungary uprising attempt in July had an important impact on the adjustment process as the renewed struggle exercised a great impact on the Paris decisionmakers. 516 With the revised border redrawing in 1922-1923, Hungary was able to reclaim 113.7 km 2 and 5,383 people from what was annexed away by the Trianon Decree – over and above the revision of Sopron plebiscite. (There was a minor adjustment in favor of Austria of approx. 1,800 acres and 471 people. 517 ) The following villages were able to return to Hungary: Ólmod, Kisnarda, Nagynarda, Felsőcsatár, Alsócsatár, Magyarkeresztes, Németkeresztes, Horvátlövő, Pornóapáti and Szentpéterfa. 518 The end result was that, through tough negotiating, Hungary was able to retain 8.1% of the 516 Botlik, József: Az őrvidéki magyarság sorsa 1922–1945 [The fate of the Magyars of the Borderland]. Magyar Nyugat Könyvkiadó ,Vasszilvágy, 2011, pp. 119–147. 517 Villani, 1923, op. cit., p. 87. 518 Ibid, pp. 63, 69–71; Schlag, 2001, op. cit., pp. 496–498. 202

territory and 16.1% of the population awarded to Austria by the Saint-Germain and Trianon treaties. 519 Adding the numbers reclaimed by the successful Sopron plebiscite, Hungary realized a gain of 370.5 km 2 and 55,403 Hungarians from its former ally and rapacious territorial claimant, Austria. This was, we must note, the first victory over the onerous terms dictated in Trianon. Today, it is virtually unknown that, after the end of WWII, Austria again came forward with a claim for Austrian-Hungarian border adjustment, mainly for Sopron and vicinity. The new claim was championed by the Socialist Party of Austria in early October of 1945. The new, and former, Socialist chancellor was Karl Renner. 520 The other proponent of the annexation of Sopron and its vicinity to Austria was Ludwig Leser, governor of Burgenland from 1945 to 1950. 521 He was hopeful that Austria would be able to bring up the issue at the Paris Peace Conference. The question of the border revision with Hungary was brought up openly by the paper of the Austrian Socialist Party, the Viennese Arbeiter Zeitung, in an article titled ‘Das Burgenland wieder selbständig’ (Burgenland independent again) 522 which was reported to the Hungarian Foreign Ministry by the Vienna embassy’s Miklós Tóth. The article dealt with the fact that Burgenland became free on October 1945, after having lost its independent status as part of the Third Reich’s Anschluss of 1938, and was once more a full fledged province of the Austrian federated state, the Bundesstaat. The author of the piece goes into great detail of one of the fundamental questions of the irredentist movement, Western Hungary. The writer goes on to state: “The Sopron plebiscite (…) took place under the terror of the reactionary Hungarian civil servants, by then allied to the Italians. The people of Sopron wanted to be a part of Austria – and want it today, too.” The embassy’s Deputy Secretary, Tóth, had a meeting with ambassadorial counsel Seemann, head of the political department of the Austrian Foreign Ministry, also the official in charge of Hungarian issues. Seemann replied that, since the freedom of the press regulations came into effect on October 1, 1945, the government is not empowered to influence the editorial direction of certain newspapers. He assured Tóth that the Austrian government “disapproved to the greatest extent the position of the Arbeiter Zeitung.” The Deputy Secretary finally remarked in his report: “The circumstance should be noted that the article in question happened to appear in the paper of the socialist party, the party whose leading personage is Chancellor Renner, and so it is hardly 519 Villani, 1923, op. cit., p. 87. 520 The Austrian People’s Party won the 1945 November elections. Karl Renner was elected at President of the Austrian Republic, a post he held until his death in 1950. 521 Környei, 1981, op. cit., p. 222. Even in 1924, Leser voiced that the natural center for Burgenland was Sopron. On the 10 th anniversary of the province, he wrote in one of his articles: “Out with everything that is still Hungarian.” 522 Arbeiter Zeitung, 1945, October 2, p. 2. The author of the article – O.H. – was possibly Oskar Helmer, later Minister of the Interior and a leading figure in the Austrian Socialist Party. 203

territory and 16.1% <strong>of</strong> the population awarded to Austria by the Saint-Germain<br />

and Trianon treaties. 519 Adding the numbers reclaimed by the successful Sopron<br />

plebiscite, <strong>Hungary</strong> realized a gain <strong>of</strong> 370.5 km 2 and 55,403 Hungarians from<br />

its former ally and rapacious territorial claimant, Austria. This was, we must<br />

note, the first victory over the onerous terms dictated in Trianon.<br />

Today, it is virtually unknown that, after the end <strong>of</strong> WWII, Austria again<br />

came forward with a claim for Austrian-Hungarian border adjustment, mainly<br />

for Sopron and vicinity. <strong>The</strong> new claim was championed by the Socialist Party<br />

<strong>of</strong> Austria in early October <strong>of</strong> 1945. <strong>The</strong> new, and former, Socialist chancellor<br />

was Karl Renner. 520 <strong>The</strong> other proponent <strong>of</strong> the annexation <strong>of</strong> Sopron and its<br />

vicinity to Austria was Ludwig Leser, governor <strong>of</strong> Burgenland from 1945 to<br />

1950. 521 He was hopeful that Austria would be able to bring up the issue at the<br />

Paris Peace Conference.<br />

<strong>The</strong> question <strong>of</strong> the border revision with <strong>Hungary</strong> was brought up openly by<br />

the paper <strong>of</strong> the Austrian Socialist Party, the Viennese Arbeiter Zeitung, in an<br />

article titled ‘Das Burgenland wieder selbständig’ (Burgenland independent<br />

again) 522 which was reported to the Hungarian Foreign Ministry by the Vienna<br />

embassy’s Miklós Tóth. <strong>The</strong> article dealt with the fact that Burgenland became<br />

free on October 1945, after having lost its independent status as part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Third Reich’s Anschluss <strong>of</strong> 1938, and was once more a full fledged province <strong>of</strong><br />

the Austrian federated state, the Bundesstaat. <strong>The</strong> author <strong>of</strong> the piece goes into<br />

great detail <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the fundamental questions <strong>of</strong> the irredentist movement,<br />

<strong>Western</strong> <strong>Hungary</strong>. <strong>The</strong> writer goes on to state: “<strong>The</strong> Sopron plebiscite (…) took<br />

place under the terror <strong>of</strong> the reactionary Hungarian civil servants, by then allied<br />

to the Italians. <strong>The</strong> people <strong>of</strong> Sopron wanted to be a part <strong>of</strong> Austria – and want<br />

it today, too.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> embassy’s Deputy Secretary, Tóth, had a meeting with ambassadorial<br />

counsel Seemann, head <strong>of</strong> the political department <strong>of</strong> the Austrian Foreign<br />

Ministry, also the <strong>of</strong>ficial in charge <strong>of</strong> Hungarian issues. Seemann replied that,<br />

since the freedom <strong>of</strong> the press regulations came into effect on October 1, 1945,<br />

the government is not empowered to influence the editorial direction <strong>of</strong> certain<br />

newspapers. He assured Tóth that the Austrian government “disapproved to the<br />

greatest extent the position <strong>of</strong> the Arbeiter Zeitung.” <strong>The</strong> Deputy Secretary<br />

finally remarked in his report: “<strong>The</strong> circumstance should be noted that the<br />

article in question happened to appear in the paper <strong>of</strong> the socialist party, the<br />

party whose leading personage is Chancellor Renner, and so it is hardly<br />

519 Villani, 1923, op. cit., p. 87.<br />

520 <strong>The</strong> Austrian People’s Party won the 1945 November elections. Karl Renner was<br />

elected at President <strong>of</strong> the Austrian Republic, a post he held until his death in 1950.<br />

521 Környei, 1981, op. cit., p. 222. Even in 1924, Leser voiced that the natural center for<br />

Burgenland was Sopron. On the 10 th anniversary <strong>of</strong> the province, he wrote in one <strong>of</strong> his<br />

articles: “Out with everything that is still Hungarian.”<br />

522 Arbeiter Zeitung, 1945, October 2, p. 2. <strong>The</strong> author <strong>of</strong> the article – O.H. – was<br />

possibly Oskar Helmer, later Minister <strong>of</strong> the Interior and a leading figure in the<br />

Austrian Socialist Party.<br />

203

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!