The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...

The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ... The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...

hungarianhistory.com
from hungarianhistory.com More from this publisher
04.04.2013 Views

a very sizable piece of Hungarian territory, even without these few square kilometers.” 504 From the quoted referendum results, it is apparent that a portion of the German-speaking citizens of Sopron voted for Hungary. A reason was that nobody clearly defined in the city: who is Austrian and who is German? The German-speakers held themselves to be Schwabians and were convinced, based on centuries old traditions that their ancestors emigrated from various parts of Germany to Sopron or Western Hungary. [They settled along the western border for the immediate opening their German language gave them in selling their products in Vienna-ed.] A Hungarian citizen, whose ancestors came from a distant German province [or state-ed.], most certainly harbors some fraternal feelings towards Germans but the same cannot necessarily be said towards Austrians. It was also not coincidental that, at the Sopron victory celebrations the following day, Mayor Mihály Thurner said: 70 million Germans can be proud of the Sopron Germans because they are “good Germans and not scoundrels, Germans who did not betray their country.” It must be noted here that, precisely during the Sopron plebiscite, a Czechoslovak-Austria agreement was signed on December 16, 1921 in the castle of Lány near Prague, the residence of Czechoslovak President Tomáš Garrigue Masaryk. The first article of the Treaty of Lány, 505 named for the signing location, stipulated that the signing parties undertake to defend the status quo as defined by the Saint-Germain and Trianon peace treaties. Article two: “The two countries mutually guarantee each other’s territory. (…) in the interest of maintaining peace and the guarantee of the integrity of the noted territories, they further oblige themselves to extend mutual support in the political and diplomatic arenas.” Article three: “Both countries undertake the responsibility that, in the instance that one is attacked, and is forced to defend itself, will declare itself neutral.” The treaty was signed by President Masaryk and Foreign Minister Beneš for Czechoslovakia and President Hainisch and Chancellor Schober for Austria. The latter two signed as if the two month old Venice Treaty did not exist. They, however, had an inkling that, with the plebiscite under way, Sopron was already irretrievably lost for Austria. Thus, as a last attempt to create confusion among the Great Powers, they brought up the Treaty of Lány, after unsuccessfully petitioning the Council of Ambassadors for a delay in the referendum date. The Treaty of Lány was greeted with great delight by Romania and the Kingdom of Serbs-Croats-Slovenes because, with its signing, Beneš was able to encircle and isolate Hungary, i.e., to force his neighbor, who was unwilling to accept the modifications, to its knees. “The ratification of the Trianon peace, the creation of the Little Entente, the unsuccessful attempt of Charles convinced 504 Ormos, 1990, op. cit., pp. 196–198. 505 For the text of the Czechoslovak-Austrian political agreement, see: Halmosy, 1983, op. cit., pp. 186-188. The agreement lapsed on March 15, 1927. It was not renewed. 196

the Hungarians that they must submit to our political direction,” wrote the Czechoslovak Foreign Minister in his notes. 506 Austria, in the meantime, could not come to terms with the referendum results. Between December 19 and 23, it sent a memorandum of objection to the Paris Council of Ambassadors, to the French government and the Entente ambassadors in Vienna, in which it lodged a protest against the referendum and the December 26 scheduled handover of the plebiscite area. As a complaint after the fact, Austria proclaimed loudly that certain abuses were committed when the rolls of the eligible voters was compiled and, thus, demands a repeat of the voting. By this time, the futile charges of the Austrian government greatly annoyed the Entente generals in Sopron. They sent a note to Paris on December 23 to the effect that, if the Council of Ambassadors does not send a note to Hungary by noon the following day, regarding the handover of Sopron and vicinity, then they will do it. The Hungarian government received, in the meanwhile, assurances of support from Italy and Great Britain. In light of the referendum results, the reports of the Entente ambassadors in Budapest and the generals in Sopron, the meeting of the Council of Ambassadors on December 23 – after a long debate – formed the opinion a repeat of the plebiscite would not bring a different outcome and decided to accept the validity of the referendum result. Subsequently, the Council informed the Hungarian government that the handover of Sopron and vicinity was to take place on New Year’s day, 1922, instead of the planned December 26. Finally, on December 28 – after the Council rejected Austria’s newest, and final, objection – President Hainisch signed, thus ratifying, the Venice Agreement. 507 When Hungarian citizens Dénes Kollár and Roland Lex arrived at Németújvár, on the territory annexed to Austria, to visit relatives over the Christmas holidays, Austrian authorities arrested and jailed him for no stated reason. This was clearly in contravention of the Venice Agreement. On their behalf, Albin Lingauer posed a question in the National Assembly, asking what the government intended to do so that “these transgressions will not poison the relations between the two countries and aggravate the mood of the people living along the border?” Foreign Minister Bánffy rose and replied: “When we received the news, we immediately contacted Austria – these sorts of abuses have been perpetrated by the lower echelons of authority – and the Austrian government complied with our wishes. The unjustly arrested pair was immediately released on December 26. According to the Venice Agreement, no one can be persecuted for their political activities. The Austrian government has completely accepted this position, and we have, to date, offered protection to all in every instance where local authorities have acted improperly by abusing their power.” 508 506 Ádám M., 1989, op. cit., p. 152. 507 Ormos, 1990, op. cit., pp. 198–202. 508 Nemzetgyűlési Napló, XVII. kötet. 1922. P. 98. 197

a very sizable piece <strong>of</strong> Hungarian territory, even without these few square<br />

kilometers.” 504<br />

From the quoted referendum results, it is apparent that a portion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

German-speaking citizens <strong>of</strong> Sopron voted for <strong>Hungary</strong>. A reason was that<br />

nobody clearly defined in the city: who is Austrian and who is German? <strong>The</strong><br />

German-speakers held themselves to be Schwabians and were convinced, based<br />

on centuries old traditions that their ancestors emigrated from various parts <strong>of</strong><br />

Germany to Sopron or <strong>Western</strong> <strong>Hungary</strong>. [<strong>The</strong>y settled along the western<br />

border for the immediate opening their German language gave them in selling<br />

their products in Vienna-ed.] A Hungarian citizen, whose ancestors came from<br />

a distant German province [or state-ed.], most certainly harbors some fraternal<br />

feelings towards Germans but the same cannot necessarily be said towards<br />

Austrians. It was also not coincidental that, at the Sopron victory celebrations<br />

the following day, Mayor Mihály Thurner said: 70 million Germans can be<br />

proud <strong>of</strong> the Sopron Germans because they are “good Germans and not<br />

scoundrels, Germans who did not betray their country.”<br />

It must be noted here that, precisely during the Sopron plebiscite, a<br />

Czechoslovak-Austria agreement was signed on December 16, <strong>1921</strong> in the<br />

castle <strong>of</strong> Lány near Prague, the residence <strong>of</strong> Czechoslovak President Tomáš<br />

Garrigue Masaryk. <strong>The</strong> first article <strong>of</strong> the Treaty <strong>of</strong> Lány, 505 named for the<br />

signing location, stipulated that the signing parties undertake to defend the<br />

status quo as defined by the Saint-Germain and Trianon peace treaties. Article<br />

two: “<strong>The</strong> two countries mutually guarantee each other’s territory. (…) in the<br />

interest <strong>of</strong> maintaining peace and the guarantee <strong>of</strong> the integrity <strong>of</strong> the noted<br />

territories, they further oblige themselves to extend mutual support in the<br />

political and diplomatic arenas.” Article three: “Both countries undertake the<br />

responsibility that, in the instance that one is attacked, and is forced to defend<br />

itself, will declare itself neutral.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> treaty was signed by President Masaryk and Foreign Minister Beneš for<br />

Czechoslovakia and President Hainisch and Chancellor Schober for Austria.<br />

<strong>The</strong> latter two signed as if the two month old Venice Treaty did not exist. <strong>The</strong>y,<br />

however, had an inkling that, with the plebiscite under way, Sopron was<br />

already irretrievably lost for Austria. Thus, as a last attempt to create confusion<br />

among the Great Powers, they brought up the Treaty <strong>of</strong> Lány, after<br />

unsuccessfully petitioning the Council <strong>of</strong> Ambassadors for a delay in the<br />

referendum date.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Treaty <strong>of</strong> Lány was greeted with great delight by Romania and the<br />

Kingdom <strong>of</strong> Serbs-Croats-Slovenes because, with its signing, Beneš was able to<br />

encircle and isolate <strong>Hungary</strong>, i.e., to force his neighbor, who was unwilling to<br />

accept the modifications, to its knees. “<strong>The</strong> ratification <strong>of</strong> the Trianon peace,<br />

the creation <strong>of</strong> the Little Entente, the unsuccessful attempt <strong>of</strong> Charles convinced<br />

504 Ormos, 1990, op. cit., pp. 196–198.<br />

505 For the text <strong>of</strong> the Czechoslovak-Austrian political agreement, see: Halmosy, 1983,<br />

op. cit., pp. 186-188. <strong>The</strong> agreement lapsed on March 15, 1927. It was not renewed.<br />

196

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!