04.04.2013 Views

The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...

The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...

The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Borderland, although not openly welcoming towards the Austrian soldiers, did<br />

not <strong>of</strong>fer them any resistance, either.<br />

It was at this time that the Austrian Postal Service’s directive 127, dated<br />

August 27, <strong>1921</strong> took effect. According to it, Hungarian postage stamps were to<br />

stay in circulation in the annexed <strong>Western</strong> <strong>Hungary</strong> territory for 14 days after<br />

the originally planned occupation date <strong>of</strong> August 28-29, until September 4.<br />

After the outbreak <strong>of</strong> the insurrection – since Austrian forces were forced to<br />

withdraw – the Austrian directive was not in effect. Later, after the actual<br />

handover in November and the second Austrian occupation, the terms <strong>of</strong> the<br />

directive permitted the usage <strong>of</strong> Hungarian stamps until December 11. Those,<br />

however, were not the stamps <strong>of</strong> the Royal Hungarian Mail but the overprinted<br />

stamps issued by an independent Lajta-Banate. <strong>The</strong> reason was that part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

inventory <strong>of</strong> Hungarian stamps was withdrawn from the area at the end <strong>of</strong><br />

August and most <strong>of</strong> what remained was overprinted by the rebels. After the end<br />

<strong>of</strong> Lajta-Banate, the rebel forces sold the remaining inventory (78,000 Korona)<br />

to a Viennese firm. <strong>The</strong>y authorized a person from Budapest, Lipót Schwartz,<br />

to ship it to Austria. Schwartz, however, was detained by the authorities in<br />

Sopron and, lacking an export permit, confiscated the stamps. In the name <strong>of</strong><br />

the former Governing Council <strong>of</strong> Lajta-Banate, György Hir petitioned the<br />

Finance Minister for their return because, at the time, they paid cash for the<br />

inventory before being overprinted. 487 (Further outcome <strong>of</strong> the case is not<br />

recorded.)<br />

On November 22, Foreign Minister Bánffy and the Austrian ambassador in<br />

Budapest signed the document worked out, by the Entente generals in Sopron,<br />

after a great deal <strong>of</strong> dispute, covering the details <strong>of</strong> the plebiscite. In the end,<br />

the recording <strong>of</strong> the referendum was not based on this document but on the<br />

decision <strong>of</strong> the Council <strong>of</strong> Ambassadors, which was brought to Sopron from<br />

Paris by French Gen. Hamelin and contained the final conditions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

plebiscite. (1) Persons eligible for the referendum in the plebiscite territory<br />

must have been born in the territory or over 20 years <strong>of</strong> age who have been<br />

permanently domiciled in the territory after January 1, 1919 and January 1,<br />

<strong>1921</strong>. <strong>The</strong> roll <strong>of</strong> voters is based on the National Assembly election rolls <strong>of</strong><br />

1920, which must be used as the basis for necessary adjustments. (2) Voting is<br />

to take place in separate booths, where the ballot must be torn in half <strong>of</strong> the<br />

choice the voter does not wish to support, but both ballots must be replaced in<br />

the envelope, etc. 488 Events speeded up after that. <strong>The</strong> Austrian parliament<br />

debated, then accepted, the Venice Protocol. During the session, Chancellor<br />

[Report on the Sopron plebiscite and the Hungarian-Austrian border determination].<br />

Szerk/ed.: Baron Frigyes Villani. Sopron, 1923, pp. 19–20. <strong>The</strong> ‘Confidential’, in fact<br />

‘Secret’, report was only printed in 20 (perhaps 30) copies for internal use only. Also<br />

see, Missuray-Krúg, 1935, op. cit., p. 132.<br />

487 Király, 1982, op. cit., pp. 149–150. <strong>The</strong> plates used for the overprinting were<br />

destroyed by the Austrian authorities.<br />

488 Villani, 1923, op. cit., pp. 16–18.<br />

189

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!