The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
afternoon. 441<br />
With the agreement <strong>of</strong> the Entente generals, the Ostenburg battalion was<br />
withdrawn from the plebiscite-intended area <strong>of</strong> Sopron and its surrounding.<br />
Gyula Ostenburg was arrested a few days earlier, after the unsuccessful clash at<br />
Budaörs, and his unit’s positions were taken over by a battalion <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Nagykanizsa regiment.<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the problems arose from the fact that the rebels thought that the<br />
results <strong>of</strong> the Venice Protocol were not enough. Governor Horthy and the<br />
Hungarian government ordered commander Prónay for consultations to<br />
Budapest on October 31, who arrived with several <strong>of</strong> the leaders <strong>of</strong> the<br />
insurrection (military bishop István Zadravecz, father ‘Archangel’ Bónis,<br />
Bacho Bónis, Károly Pröhle and Aurél Héjjas). Horthy attempted to convince<br />
them that further resistance would cause immense international damage to the<br />
country. PM Bethlen tried to reason that a government based on law has no<br />
need for rebels. 442 Finally, in a private meeting with Horthy, Prónay promised<br />
to disarm his forces by November 6 and leave Lajta-Banate. In the meantime,<br />
Viktor Ranzenberger demanded on November 2, in the name <strong>of</strong> the “rebel<br />
commanders” that: the government notify them in writing to evacuate the area<br />
and assume financial responsibility for it. <strong>The</strong> government gave its assurances<br />
the following day.<br />
On November 4, infantry Gen. Baron Pál Nagy (1864-1927) already<br />
reported to Bethlen that the southern group <strong>of</strong> rebels has finished their<br />
withdrawal. Prónay had already issued his order to disarm and withdraw on the<br />
4 th , two days before the date he promised to Horthy, and left his command<br />
center <strong>of</strong> Nagyszentmihály, departing for Szombathely. “<strong>The</strong> rebels, who<br />
fought valiantly against the Reds and drove them out <strong>of</strong> <strong>Western</strong> <strong>Hungary</strong>, do<br />
not wish to fight against the mother country and, after a short delay, laid down<br />
their arms in the village <strong>of</strong> Torony, west <strong>of</strong> Szombathely, on November 4,<br />
<strong>1921</strong>, exactly a month after the inauguration [<strong>of</strong> Lajta-Banate—J.B.].” 443<br />
In the central and northern zones judged for annexation, the free-troops also<br />
began a planned withdrawal. On the following day, the 5 th , the order was<br />
essentially completed and their disarmament was “in progress,” reported Gen.<br />
Nagy to the prime minister. He also reported that a portion <strong>of</strong> the rebels are <strong>of</strong><br />
foreign nationality [i.e., from areas annexed under the Trianon Decree, having<br />
come from Transylvania, Northern <strong>Hungary</strong> and Vojvodina to fight in <strong>Western</strong><br />
<strong>Hungary</strong>-J.B.] and “being without a livelihood, came to Budapest. (…) <strong>The</strong>ir<br />
discontent is to be prevented.” Gen. Nagy instructed that, within his sphere <strong>of</strong><br />
influence, the 40 rebels – “for most part Serb and Croat army deserters” – be<br />
held in the collection camp for prisoners-<strong>of</strong>-war in the Keleti [Eastern] Train<br />
Station in the Budapest military region “to be fed and housed.” He also<br />
informed that, according to reports, more rebels <strong>of</strong> similar background can be<br />
441 Békés, 2007, op. cit., pp. 101–102.<br />
442 Zadravecz, 1967, op. cit., pp. 173–176; Prónay, 1986, op. cit., pp. 309–312.<br />
443 Ádám T., 1939, op. cit., p. 82.<br />
174