The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ... The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
In total, 402,683 c.a., or 2,317.3 km 2 , containing one town and 184 villages, with a population of 168,554. Each borough (or district) had a chief district magistrate. The free royal town of Ruszt (3,477 c.a., 1,402 pop.) close to Lake Fertő and the Kismarton borough were not mentioned in the administrative division. Probably because they were, at the time, under the authority of the Friedrich rebels and Prónay’s authority did not yet extend over the area. According to the public administrative directive, villages reassigned from Hungarian boroughs to Lajta-Banate are to be supervised by the nearest borough. 425 This latter instruction was aimed partly at the boroughs contiguous with the Hungarian-Austrian border, and ordered to be ceded to a lesser or greater degree, of the western areas of Sopron (44,708 c.a., 21 vill., 24,580 pop.), Kőszeg (53,432 c.a., 36 vill., 18,692 pop.), Szentgotthárd (43,550 c.a., 32 vill., 24,645 pop.) and Rajka (39,203 c.a., 7 vill., 11,325 pop.). Partly also at the parts of the boroughs of Magyaróvár (14,708 c.a., 2 vill., 3,974 pop.), Szombathely (13,036 c.a., 11 vill., 4,608 pop.) and Körmend (6,469 c.a., 5 vill., 2,290 pop.) also destined for annexation from Hungary. The totals of these last were 215,106 c.a., or 1,237.8 km 2 , containing 114 villages, with a population of 90,114. The area of Lajta-Banate grew in the second half of October 1921 because the district of Kismarton (75,641 c.a., or 435.3 km 2 , 26 vill., 34,779 pop.), where the Friedrich units were active (they had their headquarters in Kismarton), joined the Prónay-led Lajta-Banate. (The Ostenburg rebels of Nagymarton district, headquartered in Nagymarton, came under the command of Prónay in September. As noted in the previous chapter, they formed the 5 th Rebel Army.) After driving out the invading Austrian forces, since September 10 the rebels controlled the parts of zones ‘A’ and ‘B’ from Királyhida in the north to Gyanafalva in the south to the new border specified in the Trianon Treaty. This was the territory over which they proclaimed the new country of Lajta-Banate on October 4. According to the available data, its area in October of 1921was 3,990 km 2 , consisting of the town of Kismarton (excepting the town of Ruszt, which, while not mentioned in the public administrative division, logically belonged there), 298 villages and a population of 258,668. 426 With the addition of the town of Ruszt (20 km 2 , 1,402 pop.), Lajta-Banate comes to 4,010 km 2 and a population of 260,070. Remember that the Saint- Germain Treaty signed on September 10, 1919 awarded 4,364 km 2 of Western Hungary, with 345 settlements, to Austria, along with three towns (Sopron, 425 Lajtabánság, 1921, November 3, issue 1, p. 4. 426 Az 1920. évi népszámlálás. Első rész. A népesség főbb demográfiai adatai községek és népesebb puszták, telepek szerint [The 1920 census. Part I. Major demographic data according to villages, settlements and farms.]. In: Magyar Statisztikai Közlemények. Új sor. Vol. 69. Budapest, 1923, pp. 286–303. Also: A népmozgalom főbb adatai községenként – Die Grundlegenden Angaben der Bevölkerungsbewegung nach Gemeinden 1828-1920. Burgenland. Magyar Központi Statisztikai Hivatal / Ungarisches Statistisches Zentralamt. Budapest, 1981, p. 254. Area conversion calculation: 1 km 2 (100 hectares) = 173.7726 cadastral acres = 247.1 acres. 166
Kismarton and Ruszt). According to the 1910 census and settlement boundaries, the to-be-annexed territory had a population of 345,082. The patriotic resistance of the rebels reclaimed the majority (92%) of this area by a feat of arms more than a year after the June 4, 1920 Treaty of Trianon. It was no fault of theirs that the Borderland (Burgenland), or a large part of it, that Austria wished to amalgamate could not remain a part of Hungary. The political and literary periodical magazine of the free forces, Lajtabánság, published numerous new measures regarding the organization of the new country. The Economy column made known to the public the territorial divisions of Lajta-Banate, as written previously. It also disclosed that regulations governing public administration and the administration of justice were under way. Provisionally, Hungarian laws would remain in force. Everyone would be able to use their mother tongue, in official business and private life; laws and measures are to be published in Hungarian, German and Croatian. Police matters will be handled by the gendarmerie of Lajta-Banate and local home guards; inside Lajta-Banate, the population has the right of free travel, travel documents to be issued by the appropriate authorities, countersigned by the local gendarmerie. People working in Austrian or Hungarian factories will have permanent documents provided; people of Lajta- Banate are permitted to ship animals for sale to Hungarian markets, as well as make purchases there. The column also covered the new customs regulations. The bottom line was that imports were duty free, while exports to Hungary were at preferential rates. The Public Food Supply column criticized the Venice Protocol and promised that the public would be looked after. The columns containing News reported (as already covered previously) the minutes of the Constitutional Assembly meeting, the makeup of the provisional governing council, the description of the boundaries of Lajta-Banate, the draft constitution, as well as interim notices and decrees. It further reported that the command center of the armed forces, along with the central offices, have moved from Felsőőr to Nagyszentmihály, where buildings could house them more comfortably. The most interesting column of the ‘rebel newspaper, Review of the Media, refuted in three articles the charges of the Viennese Neues Wiener Tagblatt (New Vienna Newspaper) and the falsehoods of one of its articles (The Rule of the Bands), according to which a Lt. Bocskay has ordered illegal conscription in Köpcsény. We are clear on the relation of the Austrian press to the Western Hungary insurrection: in their usage, the Hungarian rebels are always referred to as ‘bandits.’ However, it is worth noting that the review extended critical words elsewhere, too. The ‘rebel paper’ pointed the finger at Hungarian media, which, for unknown reasons of higher instructions, began a smear campaign against Lajta-Banate, poisoning public opinion and, wherever possible, calling the heroes of the freedom uprising a ‘band of thieves and compromising their integrity.’ “We can expect the press that, if they do not publish our communiqués due to censorship, at least they not compromise their ideals of integrity by publishing falsehoods. The Governing Council of Lajta-Banate has 167
- Page 115 and 116: ackground of this institution becau
- Page 117 and 118: Chapter 6: The Western Hungary insu
- Page 119 and 120: destination of Felsőőr, the distr
- Page 121 and 122: the first clash of Ágfalva. This w
- Page 123 and 124: they expressed their thanks for our
- Page 125 and 126: of Borostyánkő or the vicinity of
- Page 127 and 128: and not to start to travel towards
- Page 129 and 130: doctors, and, based on purely their
- Page 131 and 132: in the skirmish and the gendarmes t
- Page 133 and 134: evening. 348 Still back on the 4 th
- Page 135 and 136: international news media and focuse
- Page 137 and 138: Zárány was taken into custody by
- Page 139 and 140: enemy incursion into Hungarian terr
- Page 141 and 142: The second battle of Ágfalva - as
- Page 143 and 144: Mayor Mihály Thurner of Sopron and
- Page 145 and 146: On September 12, the prime minister
- Page 147 and 148: insurrection was the already mentio
- Page 149 and 150: the Hungarian government for financ
- Page 151 and 152: police bodyguards, which he might n
- Page 153 and 154: [Entente] generals’ mission deman
- Page 155 and 156: well, they kept the pressure on the
- Page 157 and 158: proclamation of the state of Lajta-
- Page 159 and 160: They also burned the stamp inventor
- Page 161 and 162: our principles from the flood of th
- Page 163 and 164: The post of overall commander of th
- Page 165: peace, attempting to bring down pub
- Page 169 and 170: handling of issues, as decreed by t
- Page 171 and 172: pensions, as well as stipulating a
- Page 173 and 174: Banate was declared to be Hungarian
- Page 175 and 176: expected. Thus, he asked Bethlen to
- Page 177 and 178: Thus, it is clearly evident that th
- Page 179 and 180: face, rather it carried four lines
- Page 181 and 182: newspapers of the ‘20s and ‘30s
- Page 183 and 184: Paris Peace Conference rejected it
- Page 185 and 186: Aladár Boroviczény - Charles Habs
- Page 187 and 188: prerogatives, although they must ha
- Page 189 and 190: Borderland, although not openly wel
- Page 191 and 192: Sopron and János Ambroschitz, colu
- Page 193 and 194: Austria - who were ineligible to vo
- Page 195 and 196: the voting stations, while attempti
- Page 197 and 198: the Hungarians that they must submi
- Page 199 and 200: inventoried the entire house and co
- Page 201 and 202: planted by the bridge over the cree
- Page 203 and 204: territory and 16.1% of the populati
- Page 205 and 206: Bibliography 525 Chapter 1: From al
- Page 207 and 208: Sopronyi-Thurner, Mihály: A magyar
- Page 209 and 210: Romhányi, Zsófia: A saint-germain
- Page 211 and 212: Fogarassy, László: Háború hadü
- Page 213 and 214: Sopron, 1925.) Német nyelven: Trä
- Page 215 and 216: Gévay-Wolff, Lajos: Csoda történ
Kismarton and Ruszt). According to the 1910 census and settlement<br />
boundaries, the to-be-annexed territory had a population <strong>of</strong> 345,082. <strong>The</strong><br />
patriotic resistance <strong>of</strong> the rebels reclaimed the majority (92%) <strong>of</strong> this area by a<br />
feat <strong>of</strong> arms more than a year after the June 4, 1920 Treaty <strong>of</strong> Trianon. It was<br />
no fault <strong>of</strong> theirs that the Borderland (Burgenland), or a large part <strong>of</strong> it, that<br />
Austria wished to amalgamate could not remain a part <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hungary</strong>.<br />
<strong>The</strong> political and literary periodical magazine <strong>of</strong> the free forces,<br />
Lajtabánság, published numerous new measures regarding the organization <strong>of</strong><br />
the new country. <strong>The</strong> Economy column made known to the public the territorial<br />
divisions <strong>of</strong> Lajta-Banate, as written previously. It also disclosed that<br />
regulations governing public administration and the administration <strong>of</strong> justice<br />
were under way. Provisionally, Hungarian laws would remain in force.<br />
Everyone would be able to use their mother tongue, in <strong>of</strong>ficial business and<br />
private life; laws and measures are to be published in Hungarian, German and<br />
Croatian. Police matters will be handled by the gendarmerie <strong>of</strong> Lajta-Banate<br />
and local home guards; inside Lajta-Banate, the population has the right <strong>of</strong> free<br />
travel, travel documents to be issued by the appropriate authorities,<br />
countersigned by the local gendarmerie. People working in Austrian or<br />
Hungarian factories will have permanent documents provided; people <strong>of</strong> Lajta-<br />
Banate are permitted to ship animals for sale to Hungarian markets, as well as<br />
make purchases there. <strong>The</strong> column also covered the new customs regulations.<br />
<strong>The</strong> bottom line was that imports were duty free, while exports to <strong>Hungary</strong><br />
were at preferential rates. <strong>The</strong> Public Food Supply column criticized the Venice<br />
Protocol and promised that the public would be looked after.<br />
<strong>The</strong> columns containing News reported (as already covered previously) the<br />
minutes <strong>of</strong> the Constitutional Assembly meeting, the makeup <strong>of</strong> the provisional<br />
governing council, the description <strong>of</strong> the boundaries <strong>of</strong> Lajta-Banate, the draft<br />
constitution, as well as interim notices and decrees. It further reported that the<br />
command center <strong>of</strong> the armed forces, along with the central <strong>of</strong>fices, have<br />
moved from Felsőőr to Nagyszentmihály, where buildings could house them<br />
more comfortably.<br />
<strong>The</strong> most interesting column <strong>of</strong> the ‘rebel newspaper, Review <strong>of</strong> the Media,<br />
refuted in three articles the charges <strong>of</strong> the Viennese Neues Wiener Tagblatt<br />
(New Vienna Newspaper) and the falsehoods <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> its articles (<strong>The</strong> Rule <strong>of</strong><br />
the Bands), according to which a Lt. Bocskay has ordered illegal conscription<br />
in Köpcsény. We are clear on the relation <strong>of</strong> the Austrian press to the <strong>Western</strong><br />
<strong>Hungary</strong> insurrection: in their usage, the Hungarian rebels are always referred<br />
to as ‘bandits.’ However, it is worth noting that the review extended critical<br />
words elsewhere, too. <strong>The</strong> ‘rebel paper’ pointed the finger at Hungarian media,<br />
which, for unknown reasons <strong>of</strong> higher instructions, began a smear campaign<br />
against Lajta-Banate, poisoning public opinion and, wherever possible, calling<br />
the heroes <strong>of</strong> the freedom uprising a ‘band <strong>of</strong> thieves and compromising their<br />
integrity.’ “We can expect the press that, if they do not publish our<br />
communiqués due to censorship, at least they not compromise their ideals <strong>of</strong><br />
integrity by publishing falsehoods. <strong>The</strong> Governing Council <strong>of</strong> Lajta-Banate has<br />
167