The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>The</strong> second battle <strong>of</strong> Ágfalva – as noted, the first battle <strong>of</strong> August 28 was the<br />
beginning <strong>of</strong> the insurrection – brought a significant change in the direction <strong>of</strong><br />
the <strong>Western</strong> <strong>Hungary</strong> question. Its outcome was that the Entente generals in<br />
Sopron did not accede to Chancellor Schober’s request, namely, either the<br />
dispatch <strong>of</strong> Entente forces or permission for the Austrian army to enter <strong>Western</strong><br />
<strong>Hungary</strong>. <strong>The</strong> Inter-Allied Military Mission saw that permission for the entry <strong>of</strong><br />
Austrian troops could have unforeseen consequences, such as the possibility <strong>of</strong><br />
an Austrian-Hungarian war, leading to a foreign political crisis. Subsequently,<br />
the Chancellor informed the Hungarian ambassador, Szilárd Masirevich, that<br />
Austria had no intention <strong>of</strong> getting into an armed conflict with <strong>Hungary</strong> but<br />
would rather have a peaceful resolution. In these circumstances, Schober<br />
instructed Robert Davy not to expose the Austrian units to any danger and have<br />
them withdrawn. <strong>The</strong> provincial government should set up in Nagymarton,<br />
where control over the mail and telegram services should be secured. 370 <strong>The</strong><br />
gendarmerie continued their total withdrawal, started the day before on the 8 th ,<br />
to the line <strong>of</strong> the millennial Hungarian-Austrian border. By the evening hours,<br />
several strategic settlements <strong>of</strong> western Sopron County were evacuated,<br />
including the villages <strong>of</strong> Kabold, Lakompak, Zárány, Zemenye and Cinfalva,<br />
along with the district center <strong>of</strong> Nagymarton 371 and border services were<br />
resumed in the traditional border zone.<br />
Confirmation <strong>of</strong> the completion <strong>of</strong> the withdrawal came from a wiretapped<br />
telephone conversation on September 10 at 13:20 between the Austrian<br />
delegate to the Sopron Entente Mission, Hueber, and the gendarmerie Chief<br />
Inspector in Wiener Neustadt, Siskovics.<br />
Hueber: What are you doing, then?<br />
Siskovics: Guarding the old border.<br />
Hueber: How did you get there?<br />
Siskovics: We pulled back.<br />
Hueber: According to orders?<br />
Siskovics: Yes.<br />
At 21:50, the head <strong>of</strong> the local Italian mission reported from the Nezsider<br />
district seat to Col. Ivaldi in Sopron: “<strong>The</strong> Austrian gendarmes have left<br />
Kismarton and its entire surroundings.” Ivaldi: “Maintain public safety as well<br />
as you can. It is the same all over the area because the Austrians have left their<br />
positions everywhere.” <strong>The</strong> following day, the 11 th , the [Hungarian] gendarme<br />
headquarters reported: “Workers coming across the border post are saying that<br />
in Vienna and Wr. Neustadt the wall posters released by the Austrian<br />
government made public <strong>Western</strong> <strong>Hungary</strong>’s remaining with <strong>Hungary</strong> and the<br />
withdrawal <strong>of</strong> the Austrian gendarmes yesterday.” 372 This meant that, on the<br />
370 Soós, 1971, op. cit., p. 148.<br />
371 MOL. K 26. 1388. csomó. 1922–„H” tétel, p. 427.<br />
372 Ibid, pp. 269–270, 272.<br />
141