The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
The Fate of Western Hungary 1918-1921 - Corvinus Library ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
e ceded to Austria. <strong>The</strong> area is to be <strong>of</strong>ficially handed over on August 27 in<br />
accordance with diplomatic protocols. 258<br />
For the negotiations and resolutions regarding the matter, the Hungarian<br />
government appointed Chief Government Commissioner Antal Sigray with the<br />
authority that, during the time <strong>of</strong> the handover and evacuation, he is to be in<br />
charge <strong>of</strong> all the military and civil authorities. Following the Paris<br />
memorandum <strong>of</strong> July 26, an Inter-Allied Military Mission was formed in<br />
Sopron. <strong>The</strong> mission, comprised <strong>of</strong> an Italian, British and French general, was<br />
soon joined by the mentioned 30 Entente <strong>of</strong>ficers to oversee the handover <strong>of</strong> the<br />
annexed area. In their plan, they defined two zones, “A” and “B”, which<br />
essentially corresponded with the new border proposed by the Hungarian<br />
government in July, and the partitioned area. <strong>The</strong> exception was in Moson<br />
County, where it diverged significantly. Zone “A” lay west <strong>of</strong> the North-South<br />
line <strong>of</strong> the historical Austria-<strong>Hungary</strong> border from Köpcsény – Féltorony –<br />
Fertőrákos – Sopron – Léka – Pusztaszentmihály – Németújvár. East <strong>of</strong> this<br />
sector lay zone “B” to the Köpcsény – Pomogy – Nagycenk – Füles – Rohonc –<br />
Pornóapáti sector. Zone “C” ran about 5kms. wide East <strong>of</strong> that. 259<br />
<strong>The</strong> information received by Deputy Foreign Minister Kánya was reliable.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Entente Mission’s Italian, French and British <strong>of</strong>ficers in Sopron had<br />
worked out a nine page handover plan <strong>of</strong> 39 points, covering the three counties<br />
and their settlements (Plan de Transfert à ľAutriche du territoire de la Deutsch-<br />
West-Ungarn). It was published on August 1, <strong>1921</strong>. <strong>The</strong> last page <strong>of</strong> the prime<br />
ministerial copy bears a hand written note (acknowledging Count Sigray and<br />
chevalier Davy as the Hungarian and Austrian delegates) and is signed by the<br />
heads <strong>of</strong> the Sopron Military Mission: British General George Gorton, French<br />
General Camille Hamelin and Italian General Carlo Ferrario. <strong>The</strong> note is dated<br />
August 6. 260 It was an accidental event that a one page Hungarian-language<br />
version <strong>of</strong> the Inter-Allied Military Mission’s (in some sources Inter-Allied<br />
Generals’ Mission) August 1 plan appeared on bulletin boards and wall posters<br />
in the form <strong>of</strong> a notice – titled To the people <strong>of</strong> <strong>Western</strong> <strong>Hungary</strong>! – only after<br />
the national holiday honoring King Saint Stephen (August 20).<br />
In conjunction with the August 1 plan (Plan de Transfert…), the Military<br />
Mission also issued a six-page French-language pamphlet, which separately<br />
258<br />
Ibid, p. 72.<br />
259<br />
Zsiga, 1989. p. 114. Map <strong>of</strong> the three zones defined in the handover <strong>of</strong> <strong>Western</strong><br />
<strong>Hungary</strong>.<br />
260<br />
MOL. K 26. 1388. csomó. 1922–„H”-tétel, pp. 80-85. <strong>The</strong> French member <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Mission, Gen. Hamelin, was deemed by Count Sigray as an unambiguous Austrian<br />
supporter. General Árpád Guilleaume did not consider him as such. Hamelin’s siding<br />
with Austria is refuted by the already cited confidential military report <strong>of</strong> July 1 in<br />
which Hamelin “sees the Entente’s behavior as ultimately in error, which, in all<br />
likelihood, will annex ‘Burgenland’ to Austria at the same time as returning Baranya<br />
County. (…) in its entirety, he deems it a foolish, senseless step to weaken <strong>Hungary</strong> for<br />
the sake <strong>of</strong> the Entente strengthening Germany – through Austria.” Fogarassy, 1981,<br />
op. cit., pp. 48-49.<br />
107