04.04.2013 Views

Know_files/FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.pdf - D Ank Unlimited

Know_files/FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.pdf - D Ank Unlimited

Know_files/FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.pdf - D Ank Unlimited

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Graham Hancock – <strong>FINGERPRINTS</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>GODS</strong><br />

highlights the period from about 32,000 to about 18,000 years ago as<br />

being one during which particularly warm conditions prevailed. 17<br />

• As we saw in Part IV, huge numbers of warm-blooded, temperate<br />

adapted mammal species were instantly frozen, and their bodies<br />

preserved in the permafrost, all across a vast zone of death stretching<br />

from the Yukon, through Alaska and deep into northern Siberia. The<br />

bulk of this destruction appears to have taken place during the<br />

eleventh millennium BC, although there was an earlier episode of largescale<br />

extinctions around 13,500 BC. 18<br />

• We also saw (Chapter Twenty-seven) that the last Ice Age came to an<br />

end between 15,000 and 8000 BC, but principally between 14500 and<br />

12,500 BC, with a further outburst of extraordinarily intense activity in<br />

the eleventh millennium BC. During this geologically brief period of<br />

time, glaciation up to two miles deep covering millions of square miles<br />

which had taken more than 40,000 years to build-up suddenly and<br />

inexplicably melted: ‘It must be obvious that this could not have been<br />

the result of the gradually acting climatic factors usually called upon to<br />

explain ice ages ... The rapidity of the deglaciation suggests that some<br />

extraordinary factor was affecting climate ...’ 19<br />

The icy executioner<br />

Some extraordinary factor was affecting climate ...<br />

Was it a 30° one-piece shift of the lithosphere that abruptly terminated<br />

the Ice Age in the northern hemisphere (by pushing the most heavily<br />

glaciated areas southwards from the northern pole of the spin axis)? If so,<br />

why shouldn’t the same 30° one-piece shift of the lithosphere have<br />

swivelled a largely deglaciated six-million-square-mile southern<br />

hemisphere continent from temperate latitudes to a position directly over<br />

the southern pole of the spin axis?<br />

On the issue of the movability of Antarctica, we now know that it is<br />

movable and, more to the point, that it has moved, because trees have<br />

grown there and trees simply cannot grow at latitudes which suffer six<br />

months of continual darkness.<br />

What we do not know (and may never know for certain) is whether this<br />

movement was a consequence of earth-crust displacement, or of<br />

continental drift, or of some other unguessed-at factor.<br />

Let us consider Antarctica for a moment.<br />

We have already seen that it is big. It has a land area of 5.5 million<br />

17 Ibid., p. 99.<br />

18 See Part IV.<br />

19 Ibid.<br />

458

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!