04.04.2013 Views

Know_files/FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.pdf - D Ank Unlimited

Know_files/FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.pdf - D Ank Unlimited

Know_files/FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.pdf - D Ank Unlimited

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Graham Hancock – <strong>FINGERPRINTS</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>GODS</strong><br />

only been a cumulative total of just over 1000 years in which its body has<br />

been susceptible to wind-erosion; all the rest of the time it’s been<br />

protected from the desert winds by an enormous blanket of sand. The<br />

point is that if the Sphinx was really built by Khafre in the Old Kingdom,<br />

and if wind erosion was capable of inflicting such damage on it in so<br />

short a time-span, then other Old Kingdom structures in the area, built<br />

out of the same limestone, ought to show similar weathering. But none<br />

do—you know, absolutely unmistakable Old Kingdom tombs, full of<br />

hieroglyphs and inscriptions—none of them show the same type of<br />

weathering as the Sphinx.’<br />

Indeed, none did. Professor Robert Schoch, a Boston University<br />

geologist and specialist in rock erosion who had played a key role in<br />

validating West’s evidence, was satisfied as to the reason for this. The<br />

weathering of the Sphinx—and of the walls of its surrounding rock-hewn<br />

enclosure—had not been caused by wind-scouring at all but by thousands<br />

of years of heavy rainfall long ages before the Old Kingdom came into<br />

being.<br />

Having won over his professional peers at the 1992 Convention of the<br />

Geological Society of America, 4 Schoch went on to explain his findings to<br />

a much wider and more eclectic audience (including Egyptologists) at the<br />

1992 Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement<br />

of Science (AAAS). He began by pointing out to delegates that ‘the body<br />

of the Sphinx and the walls of the Sphinx ditch are deeply weathered and<br />

eroded ... This erosion is a couple of metres thick in places, at least on<br />

the walls. It’s very deep, it’s very old in my opinion, and it gives a rolling<br />

and undulating profile ...’ 5<br />

Such undulations are easily recognizable to stratigraphers and<br />

palaeontologists as having been caused by ‘precipitation-induced<br />

weathering’. As Santha Faiia’s photographs of the Sphinx and the Sphinx<br />

enclosure indicate, this weathering takes the distinctive form of a<br />

combination of deep vertical fissures and undulating, horizontal coves—<br />

‘a classic textbook example,’ in Schoch’s words, ‘of what happens to a<br />

limestone structure when you have rain beating down on it for thousands<br />

of years ... It’s clearly rain precipitation that produced these erosional<br />

Chephren-present day, c. 4700 years 3300 years<br />

4 ‘An abstract of our team’s work was submitted to the Geological Society of America,<br />

and we were invited to present our findings at a poster session of at the GSA convention<br />

in San Diego—the geological Superbowl. Geologists from all over the world thronged to<br />

our booth, much intrigued. Dozens of experts in fields relevant to our research offered<br />

help and advice. Shown the evidence, some geologists just laughed, astounded [as<br />

Schoch had been initially] that in two centuries of research, no one, geologist or<br />

Egyptologist, had noticed that the Sphinx had been weathered by water.’ Serpent in the<br />

Sky, p. 229; Mystery of the Sphinx. NBC-TV, 1993. 275 geologists endorsed Schoch’s<br />

findings.<br />

5 AAAS, Annual Meeting 1992, Debate: How Old is the Sphinx?<br />

405

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!