04.04.2013 Views

Know_files/FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.pdf - D Ank Unlimited

Know_files/FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.pdf - D Ank Unlimited

Know_files/FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.pdf - D Ank Unlimited

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

his predecessors ... 23<br />

Graham Hancock – <strong>FINGERPRINTS</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>GODS</strong><br />

The equally distinguished Auguste Mariette agreed—naturally enough<br />

since he had been the finder of the Inventory Stela (which, as we have<br />

seen, asserted matter-of-factly that the Sphinx was standing on the Giza<br />

plateau long before the time of Khufu). 24 Also generally concurring were<br />

Brugsch (Egypt under the Pharaohs, London, 1891), Petrie, Sayce and<br />

many other eminent scholars of the period. 25 Travel writers such as John<br />

Ward affirmed that ‘the Great Sphinx must be numberless years older<br />

even than the Pyramids’. And as late as 1904 Wallis Budge, the respected<br />

keeper of Egyptian Antiquities at the British Museum, had no hesitation in<br />

making this unequivocal assertion:<br />

The oldest and finest human-headed lion statue is the famous ‘Sphinx’ at Giza.<br />

This marvellous object was in existence in the days of Khafre, the builder of the<br />

Second Pyramid, and was, most probably, very old even at that early period ... The<br />

Sphinx was thought to be connected in some way with foreigners or with a foreign<br />

religion which dated from predynastic times. 26<br />

Between the beginning and the end of the twentieth century, however,<br />

Egyptologists’ views about the antiquity of the Sphinx changed<br />

dramatically. Today there is not a single orthodox Egyptologist who<br />

would even discuss, let alone consider seriously, the wild and<br />

irresponsible suggestion, once a commonplace, that the Sphinx might<br />

have been built thousands of years before Khafre’s reign.<br />

According to Dr Zahi Hawass, for example, director of Giza and Saqqara<br />

for the Egyptian Antiquities Organization, many such theories have been<br />

put forward but have ‘gone with the wind’ because ‘we Egyptologists<br />

have solid evidence to state that the Sphinx is dated to the time of<br />

Khafre.’ 27<br />

Likewise, Carol Redmont, an archaeologist at the University of<br />

California’s Berkeley campus, was incredulous when it was suggested to<br />

her that the Sphinx might be thousands of years older than Khafre:<br />

‘There’s just no way that could be true. The people of that region would<br />

not have had the technology, the governing institutions or even the will<br />

to build such a structure thousands of years before Khafre’s reign.’ 28<br />

When I first started to research this issue, I had assumed, as Hawass<br />

appeared to claim, that some incontrovertible new evidence must have<br />

been found which had settled the identity of the monument’s builder.<br />

This was not the case. Indeed there are only three ‘contextual’ reasons<br />

why the construction of the anonymous, uninscribed and enigmatic<br />

23<br />

Gaston Maspero, The Passing of Empires, New York, 1900.<br />

24<br />

See Chapter Thirty-five.<br />

25<br />

For a general summary of these views see John Ward, Pyramids and Progress, London,<br />

1900, pp. 38-42.<br />

26<br />

The Gods of the Egyptians, volume I, pp. 471-2 and volume II, p. 361.<br />

27<br />

Interview in Mystery of the Sphinx, NBC-TV, 1993.<br />

28<br />

Cited in Serpent In The Sky, p. 230.<br />

336

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!