04.04.2013 Views

Know_files/FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.pdf - D Ank Unlimited

Know_files/FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.pdf - D Ank Unlimited

Know_files/FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.pdf - D Ank Unlimited

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Graham Hancock – <strong>FINGERPRINTS</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>GODS</strong><br />

Antiquités undertook its clearance and restoration once more. 20<br />

Does this not suggest that the climate could have been very different<br />

when the Sphinx enclosure was carved out? What would have been the<br />

sense of creating this immense statue if its destiny were merely to be<br />

engulfed by the shifting sands of the eastern Sahara? However, since the<br />

Sahara is a young desert, and since the Giza area in particular was wet<br />

and relatively fertile 11,000-15,000 years ago, is it not worth considering<br />

another scenario altogether? Is it not possible that the Sphinx enclosure<br />

was carved out during those distant green millennia when topsoil was still<br />

anchored to the surface of the plateau by the roots of grasses and shrubs<br />

and when what is now a desert of wind-blown sand more closely<br />

resembled the rolling savannahs of modern Kenya and Tanzania?<br />

Under such congenial climatic conditions, the creation of a semisubterranean<br />

monument like the Sphinx would not have outraged<br />

common sense. The builders would have had no reason to anticipate the<br />

slow desiccation and desertification of the plateau that would ultimately<br />

follow.<br />

Yet, is it feasible to imagine that the Sphinx could have been built when<br />

Giza was still green—long, long ago?<br />

As we shall see, such ideas are anathema to modern Egyptologists, who<br />

are nevertheless obliged to admit (to quote Dr Mark Lehner, director of<br />

the Giza Mapping Project) that ‘there is no direct way to date the Sphinx<br />

itself, because the Sphinx is carved right out of natural rock.’ 21 In the<br />

absence of more objective tests, Lehner went on to point out,<br />

archaeologists had ‘to date things by context’. And the context of the<br />

Sphinx, that is, the Giza necropolis—a well-known Fourth Dynasty site—<br />

made it obvious that the Sphinx belonged to the Fourth Dynasty as well. 22<br />

Such reasoning was not regarded as axiomatic by Lehner’s<br />

distinguished predecessors in the nineteenth century, who were at one<br />

time convinced that the Sphinx long predated the Fourth Dynasty.<br />

Whose Sphinx is it anyway?<br />

In his Passing of Empires, published in 1900, the distinguished French<br />

Egyptologist Gaston Maspero, who made a special study of the content of<br />

the Sphinx Stela erected by Thutmosis IV, wrote:<br />

The stela of the Sphinx bears, on line 13, the cartouche of Khafre in the middle of<br />

a gap ... There, I believe, is an indication of [a renovation and clearance] of the<br />

Sphinx carried out under this prince, and consequently the more or less certain<br />

proof that the Sphinx was already covered with sand during the time of Khufu and<br />

20 The Pyramids of Egypt, pp. 106-7.<br />

21 Mark Lehner, 1992 AAAS Annual Meeting, Debate: How Old is the Sphinx?<br />

22 Ibid.<br />

335

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!