04.04.2013 Views

Know_files/FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.pdf - D Ank Unlimited

Know_files/FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.pdf - D Ank Unlimited

Know_files/FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.pdf - D Ank Unlimited

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Graham Hancock – <strong>FINGERPRINTS</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>GODS</strong><br />

other facts, particularly where the Great Pyramid was concerned, seemed<br />

to speak persuasively against any robbery having occurred. It was not just<br />

a matter of the narrowness and unsuitability of the well-shaft as an<br />

escape route for bulky treasures. The other remarkable feature of Khufu’s<br />

Pyramid was the absence of inscriptions or decorations anywhere within<br />

its immense network of galleries, corridors, passageways and chambers,<br />

and the same was true of Khafre’s and Menkaure’s Pyramids. In none of<br />

these amazing monuments had a single word been written in praise of<br />

the pharaohs whose bodies they were supposed to house.<br />

This was exceptional. No other proven burial place of any Egyptian<br />

monarch had ever been found undecorated. The fashion throughout<br />

Egyptian history had been for the tombs of the pharaohs to be extensively<br />

decorated, beautifully painted from top to bottom (as in the Valley of the<br />

Kings at Luxor, for example) and densely inscribed with the ritual spells<br />

and invocations required to assist the deceased on his journey towards<br />

eternal life (as in the Fifth Dynasty pyramids at Saqqara, just twenty miles<br />

to the south of Giza.) 19<br />

Why had Khufu, Khafre and Menkaure done things so differently? Had<br />

they not built their monuments to serve as tombs at all, but for another<br />

and more subtle purpose? Or was it possible, as certain Arab and esoteric<br />

traditions maintained, that the Giza pyramids had been erected long<br />

before the Fourth Dynasty by the architects of some earlier and more<br />

advanced civilization?<br />

Neither hypothesis was popular with Egyptologists for reasons that<br />

were easy to understand. Moreover, while conceding that the Second and<br />

Third Pyramids were completely devoid of internal inscriptions, lacking<br />

even the names of Khafre and Menkaure, the scholars were able to cite<br />

certain hieroglyphic ‘quarry marks’ (graffiti daubed on stone blocks<br />

before they left the quarry) found inside the Great Pyramid, which did<br />

seem to bear the name of Khufu.<br />

A certain smell ...<br />

The discoverer of the quarry marks was Colonel Howard Vyse, during the<br />

destructive excavations he undertook at Giza in 1837. Extending an<br />

existing crawlway, he cut a tunnel into the series of narrow cavities,<br />

called ‘relieving chambers’, which lay directly above the King’s Chamber.<br />

The quarry marks were found on the walls and ceilings of the top four of<br />

these cavities and said things like this:<br />

<strong>THE</strong> CRAFTSMEN-GANG,<br />

HOW POWERFUL IS <strong>THE</strong> WHITE CROWN <strong>OF</strong> KHNUM—<br />

19<br />

See Valley of the Kings; for Saqqara (Fifth and Sixth Dynasties) see Traveller’s Key to<br />

Ancient Egypt, pp. 163-7.<br />

292

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!