04.04.2013 Views

Know_files/FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.pdf - D Ank Unlimited

Know_files/FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.pdf - D Ank Unlimited

Know_files/FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.pdf - D Ank Unlimited

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Graham Hancock – <strong>FINGERPRINTS</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>GODS</strong><br />

On its north and west sides the Second Pyramid sat on a level platform<br />

cut down out of the surrounding bedrock and was thus enclosed within a<br />

wide trench more than 15 feet deep in places. Walking due south, parallel<br />

to the monument’s scarred western flank, we picked our way along the<br />

edge of this trench towards the much smaller Third Pyramid, which lay<br />

some 400 metres ahead of us in the desert.<br />

Khufu ... Khafre ... Menkaure ... According to all orthodox Egyptologists<br />

the pyramids had been built as tombs—and only as tombs—for these<br />

three pharaohs. Yet there were some obvious difficulties with such<br />

assertions. For example, the spacious burial chamber of the Khafre<br />

Pyramid was empty when it was opened in 1818 by the European explorer<br />

Giovanni Belzoni. Indeed, more than empty, the chamber was starkly,<br />

austerely bare. The polished granite sarcophagus which lay embedded in<br />

its floor had also been found empty, with its lid broken into two pieces<br />

nearby. 2 How was this to be explained?<br />

To Egyptologists the answer seemed obvious. At some early date,<br />

probably not many hundreds of years after Khafre’s death, tomb robbers<br />

must have penetrated the chamber and cleared all its contents including<br />

the mummified body of the pharaoh.<br />

Much the same thing seemed to have happened at the smaller Third<br />

Pyramid, towards which Santha and I were now walking—that attributed<br />

to Menkaure. Here the first European to break in had been a British<br />

colonel, Howard Vyse, who had entered the burial chamber in 1837. He<br />

found an empty basalt sarcophagus, an anthropoid coffin lid made of<br />

wood, and some bones. The natural assumption was that these were the<br />

remains of Menkaure. Modern science had subsequently proved, however,<br />

that the bones and coffin lid dated from the early Christian era, that is,<br />

from 2500 years after the Pyramid Age, and thus represented the<br />

‘intrusive burial’ of a much later individual (quite a common practice<br />

throughout Ancient Egyptian history). As to the basalt sarcophagus—well,<br />

it could have belonged to Menkaure. Unfortunately, however, nobody had<br />

the opportunity to examine it because it had been lost at sea when the<br />

ship on which Vyse sent it to England had sunk off the coast of Spain. 3<br />

Since it was a matter of record that the sarcophagus had been found<br />

empty by Vyse, it was once again assumed that the body of the pharaoh<br />

must have been removed by tomb robbers.<br />

A similar assumption had been made about the body of Khufu, which<br />

was also missing. Here the scholarly consensus, expressed as well as<br />

anyone by George Hart of the British Museum, was that ‘no later than 500<br />

years after Khufu’s funeral’ robbers had forced their way into the Great<br />

Pyramid ‘to steal the burial treasure’. 4 The implication is that this<br />

incursion must have occurred by or before 2000 BC—since Khufu is<br />

2<br />

The Riddle of the Pyramids, p. 54.<br />

3<br />

Ibid., p. 55.<br />

4<br />

George Hart, Pharaohs and Pyramids, Guild Publishing, London, 1991, p. 91.<br />

285

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!