04.04.2013 Views

Know_files/FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.pdf - D Ank Unlimited

Know_files/FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.pdf - D Ank Unlimited

Know_files/FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.pdf - D Ank Unlimited

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Graham Hancock – <strong>FINGERPRINTS</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>GODS</strong><br />

so far encountered (except those at the very base) and estimated to<br />

weigh between 10 and 15 tons apiece. 3 This contradicted engineering<br />

logic and commonsense, both of which called for a progressive decrease<br />

in the size and weight of the blocks that had to be transported to the<br />

summit as the pyramid rose ever higher. Courses 1-18, which diminished<br />

from a height of about 55.5 inches at ground level to just over 23 inches<br />

at course 17, did obey this rule. Then suddenly, at course 19, the block<br />

height rose again to almost 36 inches. At the same time the other<br />

dimensions of the blocks also increased and their weight grew from the<br />

relatively manoeuvrable range of 2-6 tons that was common in the first<br />

18 courses to the more ponderous and cumbersome range of 10-15<br />

tons. 4 These, therefore, were really big monoliths that had been carved<br />

out of solid limestone and raised more than 100 feet into the air before<br />

being placed faultlessly in position.<br />

To have worked effectively the pyramid builders must have had nerves<br />

of steel, the agility of mountain goats, the strength of lions and the<br />

confidence of trained steeplejacks. With the cold morning wind whipping<br />

around my ears and threatening to launch me into flight, I tried to<br />

imagine what it must have been like for them, poised dangerously at this<br />

(and much higher) altitudes, lifting, manoeuvring and positioning exactly<br />

an endless production line of chunky limestone monoliths—the smallest<br />

of which weighed as much as two modern family cars.<br />

How long had the pyramid taken to complete? How many men had<br />

worked on it? The consensus among Egyptologists was two decades and<br />

100,000 men. 5 It was also generally agreed that the construction project<br />

had not been a year-round affair but had been confined (through labour<br />

force availability) to the annual three-month agricultural lay-off season<br />

imposed by the flooding of the Nile. 6<br />

As I continued to climb, I reminded myself of the implications of all<br />

this. It wasn’t just the tens of thousands of blocks weighing 15 tons or<br />

more that the builders would have had to worry about. Year in, year out,<br />

the real crises would have been caused by the millions of ‘average-sized’<br />

blocks, weighing say 2.5 tons, that also had to be brought to the working<br />

plane. The Pyramid has been reliably estimated to consist of a total of 2.3<br />

million blocks. 7 Assuming that the masons worked ten hours a day, 365<br />

days a year, the mathematics indicate that they would have needed to<br />

place 31 blocks in position every hour (about one block every two<br />

minutes) to complete the Pyramid in twenty years. Assuming that<br />

construction work had been confined to the annual three-month lay-off,<br />

3<br />

Dr. Joseph Davidovits and Margie Morris, The Pyramids: An Enigma Solved, Dorset<br />

Press, New York, 1988, pp. 39-40.<br />

4<br />

Ibid., p. 37.<br />

5<br />

John Baines and Jaromir Malek, Atlas of Ancient Egypt, Time-Life Books, Virginia, 1990,<br />

p. 160; The Pyramids of Egypt, pp. 229-30.<br />

6<br />

The Pyramids of Egypt, p. 229.<br />

7 Ibid., p. 85.<br />

275

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!