04.04.2013 Views

Know_files/FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.pdf - D Ank Unlimited

Know_files/FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.pdf - D Ank Unlimited

Know_files/FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.pdf - D Ank Unlimited

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Graham Hancock – <strong>FINGERPRINTS</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>GODS</strong><br />

seconds per annum). The true figure, as calculated by twentieth century<br />

science, is 71.6 years. 9 If Sellers’s theory is correct, therefore, the ‘Osiris<br />

numbers’, which give a value of 72 years, are significantly more accurate<br />

than those of Hipparchus. Indeed, within the obvious confines imposed<br />

by narrative structure, it is difficult to see how the number 72 could have<br />

been improved upon, even if the more precise figure had been known to<br />

the ancient myth-makers. One can hardly insert 71.6 conspirators into a<br />

story, but 72 will fit comfortably.<br />

Working from this rounded-up figure, the Osiris myth is capable of<br />

yielding a value of 2160 years for a precessional shift through one<br />

complete house of the zodiac. The correct figure, according to today’s<br />

calculations, is 2148 years. 10 The Hipparchus figures are 2400 years and<br />

2347.8 years respectively. Finally, Osiris enables us to calculate 25,920<br />

as the number of years required for the fulfillment of a complete<br />

precessional cycle through 12 houses of the zodiac. Hipparchus gives us<br />

either 28,800 or 28,173.6 years. The correct figure, by today’s estimates,<br />

is 25,776 years. 11 The Hipparchus calculations for the Great Return are<br />

therefore around 3000 years out of kilter. The Osiris calculations miss<br />

the true figure by only 144 years, and may well do so because the<br />

narrative context forced a rounding-up of the base number from the<br />

correct value of 71.6 to a more workable figure of 72.<br />

All this, however, assumes that Sellers is right to suppose that the<br />

numbers 360, 72, 30 and 12 did not find their way into the Osiris myth<br />

by chance but were placed there deliberately by people who understood—<br />

and had accurately measured—precession.<br />

Is Sellers right?<br />

Times of decay<br />

The Osiris myth is not the only one to incorporate the calculus for<br />

precession. The relevant numbers keep surfacing in various forms,<br />

multiples and combinations, all over the ancient world.<br />

An example was given in Chapter Thirty-three—the Norse myth of the<br />

432,000 fighters who sallied forth from Valhalla to do battle with ‘the<br />

Wolf’. A glance back at that myth shows that it contains several<br />

permutations of ‘precessional numbers’.<br />

Likewise, as we saw in Chapter Twenty-four, ancient Chinese traditions<br />

referring to a universal cataclysm were said to have been written down in<br />

a great text consisting of precisely 4320 volumes.<br />

Thousands of miles away, is it a coincidence that the Babylonian<br />

historian Berossus (third century BC) ascribed a total reign of 432,000<br />

9 Death of Gods in Ancient Egypt, p. 205.<br />

10 Ibid.<br />

11 Ibid.<br />

253

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!