04.04.2013 Views

Know_files/FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.pdf - D Ank Unlimited

Know_files/FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.pdf - D Ank Unlimited

Know_files/FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.pdf - D Ank Unlimited

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Graham Hancock – <strong>FINGERPRINTS</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>GODS</strong><br />

Other figures and combinations of figures also emerge, for example:<br />

36, the number of years required for the equinoctial sun to complete a<br />

precessional shift of half a degree along the ecliptic;<br />

4320, the number of years required for the equinoctial sun to complete<br />

a precessional shift of 60 degrees (i.e., two zodiacal constellations).<br />

These, Sellers believes, constitute the basic ingredients of a precessional<br />

code which appears again and again, with eerie persistence, in ancient<br />

myths and sacred architecture. In common with much esoteric<br />

numerology, it is a code in which it is permissible to shift decimal points<br />

to left or right at will and to make use of almost any conceivable<br />

combinations, permutations, multiplications, divisions and fractions of<br />

the essential numbers (all of which relate precisely to the rate of<br />

precession of the equinoxes).<br />

The pre-eminent number in the code is 72. To this is frequently added<br />

36, making 108, and it is permissible to multiply 108 by 100 to get<br />

10,800 or to divide it by 2 to get 54, which may then be multiplied by 10<br />

and expressed as 540 (or as 54,000. or as 540,000, or as 5,400,000, and<br />

so on). Also highly significant is 2160 (the number of years required for<br />

the equinoctial point to transit one zodiacal constellation), which is<br />

sometimes multiplied by 10 and by factors often (to give 216,000,<br />

2,160,000, and so on) and sometimes by 2 to give 4320, or 43,200, or<br />

432,000, or 4,320,000, ad infinition.<br />

Better than Hipparchus<br />

If Sellers is correct in her hypothesis that the calculus needed to produce<br />

these numbers was deliberately encoded into the Osiris myth to convey<br />

precessional information to initiates, we are confronted by an intriguing<br />

anomaly. If they are indeed about precession, the numbers are out of<br />

place in time. The science they contain is too advanced for them to have<br />

been calculated by any known civilization of antiquity.<br />

Let us not forget that they occur in a myth which is present at the very<br />

dawn of writing in Egypt (indeed elements of the Osiris story are to be<br />

found in the Pyramid Texts dating back to around 2450 BC, in a context<br />

which suggests that they were exceedingly old even then 8 ). Hipparchus,<br />

the so-called discoverer of precession lived in the second century BC. He<br />

proposed a value of 45 or 46 seconds of arc for one year of precessional<br />

motion. These figures yield a one-degree shift along the ecliptic in 80<br />

years (at 45 arc seconds per annum), and in 78.26 years (at 46 arc<br />

8 Ibid., pp. 125-6ff; see also The Ancient Egyptian Pyramid Texts.<br />

252

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!