04.04.2013 Views

Know_files/FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.pdf - D Ank Unlimited

Know_files/FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.pdf - D Ank Unlimited

Know_files/FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.pdf - D Ank Unlimited

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Graham Hancock – <strong>FINGERPRINTS</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>GODS</strong><br />

it takes roughly 72 years (an entire human lifetime) for the equinoctial<br />

sun to migrate just one degree along the ecliptic. It is because of the<br />

observational difficulties entailed in detecting this snails’ pace rate of<br />

change that the value worked out by Hipparchus in the second century BC<br />

is hailed in the Britannica as a ‘notable discovery’.<br />

Would this discovery seem so notable if it turned out to be a<br />

rediscovery? Would the mathematical and astronomical achievements of<br />

the Greeks shine so brightly if we could prove that the difficult challenge<br />

of measuring precession had been taken up thousands of years before<br />

Hipparchus? What if this heavenly cycle, almost 26,000 years long, had<br />

been made the object of precise scientific investigations long epochs<br />

before the supposed dawn of scientific thought?<br />

In seeking answers to such questions there is much that may be<br />

relevant which would never be accepted by any court of law as concrete<br />

proof. Let us not accept it either. We have seen that Hipparchus proposed<br />

a value of 45 or 46 seconds of arc for one year of precessional motion.<br />

Let us therefore not attempt to dislodge the Greek astronomer from his<br />

pedestal as the discoverer of precession unless we can find a significantly<br />

more accurate value recorded in a significantly more ancient source.<br />

Of course, there are many potential sources. At this point, however, in<br />

the interests of succinctness, we shall limit our inquiry to universal<br />

myths. We have already examined one group of myths in detail (the<br />

traditions of flood and cataclysm set out in Part IV) and we have seen that<br />

they possess a range of intriguing characteristics:<br />

1 There is no doubt that they are immensely old. Take the<br />

Mesopotamian flood story, versions of which have been found<br />

inscribed on tablets from the earliest strata of Sumerian history,<br />

around 3000 BC. These tablets, handed down from the dawn of the<br />

recorded past, leave no room for doubt that the tradition of a worlddestroying<br />

flood was ancient even then, and therefore originated long<br />

before the dawn. We cannot say how long. The fact remains that no<br />

scholar has ever been able to establish a date for the creation of any<br />

myth, let alone for these venerable and widespread traditions. In a<br />

very real sense they seem always to have been around—part of the<br />

permanent baggage of human culture.<br />

2 The possibility cannot be ruled out that this aura of vast antiquity is<br />

not an illusion. On the contrary, we have seen that many of the great<br />

myths of cataclysm seem to contain accurate eye-witness accounts of<br />

real conditions experienced by humanity during the last Ice Age. In<br />

theory, therefore, these stories could have been constructed at almost<br />

the same time as the emergence of our subspecies Homo sapiens<br />

sapiens, perhaps as long as 50,000 years ago. The geological<br />

evidence, however, suggests a more recent provenance, and we have<br />

identified the epoch 15,000-8000 BC as the most likely. Only then, in<br />

the whole of human experience, were there rapid climatic changes on<br />

236

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!