04.04.2013 Views

Know_files/FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.pdf - D Ank Unlimited

Know_files/FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.pdf - D Ank Unlimited

Know_files/FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.pdf - D Ank Unlimited

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Graham Hancock – <strong>FINGERPRINTS</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>GODS</strong><br />

outstanding achievement of Mayan society was its observational<br />

astronomy, upon which, through the medium of advanced mathematical<br />

calculations, was based a clever, complex, sophisticated and very<br />

accurate calendar?<br />

<strong>Know</strong>ledge out of place<br />

In 1954 J. Eric Thompson, a leading authority on the archaeology of<br />

Central America, confessed to a deep sense of puzzlement at a number<br />

of glaring disparities he had identified between the generally<br />

unremarkable achievements of the Mayas, as a whole and the advanced<br />

state of their astro-calendrical knowledge, ‘What mental quirks,’ he<br />

asked, ‘led the Maya intelligentsia to chart the heavens, yet fail to grasp<br />

the principle of the wheel; to visualize eternity, as no other semi-civilized<br />

people has ever done, yet ignore the short step from corbelled to true<br />

arch; to count in millions, yet never to learn to weigh a sack of corn?’ 9<br />

Perhaps the answer to these questions is much simpler than Thompson<br />

realized. Perhaps the astronomy, the deep understanding of time, and the<br />

long-term mathematical calculations, were not ‘quirks’ at all. Perhaps<br />

they were the constituent parts of a coherent but very specific body of<br />

knowledge that the Maya had inherited, more or less intact, from an older<br />

and wiser civilization. Such an inheritance would explain the<br />

contradictions observed by Thompson, and there is no need for any<br />

dispute on the point. We already know that the Maya received their<br />

calendar as a legacy from the Olmecs (a thousand years earlier, the<br />

Olmecs were using exactly the same system). The real question, should<br />

be, where did the Olmecs get it? What kind of level of technological and<br />

scientific development was required for a civilization to devise a calendar<br />

as good as this?<br />

Take the case of the solar year. In modern Western society we still make<br />

use of a solar calendar which was introduced in Europe in 1582 and is<br />

based on the best scientific knowledge then available: the famous<br />

Gregorian calendar. The Julian calendar, which it replaced, computed the<br />

period of the earth’s orbit around the sun at 365.25 days. Pope Gregory<br />

XIII’s reform substituted a finer and more accurate calculation: 365.2425<br />

days. Thanks to scientific advances since 1582 we now know that the<br />

exact length of the solar year is 365.2422 days. The Gregorian calendar<br />

therefore incorporates a very small plus error, just 0.0003 of a day—<br />

pretty impressive accuracy for the sixteenth century.<br />

Strangely enough, though its origins are wrapped in the mists of<br />

antiquity far deeper than the sixteenth century, the Mayan calendar<br />

achieved even greater accuracy. It calculated the solar year at 365.2420<br />

9 J. Eric Thompson, The Rise and Fall of Maya Civilization, Pimlico, London, 1993, p. 13.<br />

160

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!