04.04.2013 Views

Investigating CSI – Background material Table of Contents I ...

Investigating CSI – Background material Table of Contents I ...

Investigating CSI – Background material Table of Contents I ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A RAPE DEFENDANT WITH NO IDENTITY, BUT A DNA PROFILE<br />

October 7, 1999 <strong>–</strong><br />

New York Times<br />

By BILL DEDMAN<br />

In an unusual legal strategy that stretches the law to match the developing<br />

science <strong>of</strong> DNA, a prosecutor in Wisconsin has filed rape and kidnapping<br />

charges against a defendant who has no name. John Doe is known only by his<br />

DNA code, extracted from semen samples from three rapes and tested after six<br />

years in a police property room.<br />

''We know that one person raped these three women,'' said the prosecutor,<br />

Norman Gahn, assistant district attorney for Milwaukee County. ''We just don't<br />

know who that person is. We will catch him.''<br />

The prosecutor's strategy is an effort to keep the six-year time limit for bringing<br />

charges from running out. A warrant must identify a person to be arrested, and<br />

this one names ''John Doe, unknown male with matching deoxyribonucleic acid<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ile.'' Every month, an F.B.I. computer will compare the description <strong>of</strong> John<br />

Doe's DNA with thousands <strong>of</strong> new genetic samples from around the country.<br />

''John Doe'' is typically used in a warrant when the accused is known by an alias<br />

or by a physical description. The Milwaukee case is unusual in that it describes<br />

the suspect by only DNA information.<br />

The case raises several questions about the gaps between science and law. Can<br />

a person be identified on a warrant by only a DNA code, or is a more traditional<br />

identification required, like a name or a physical description? Is the legal concept<br />

<strong>of</strong> a statute <strong>of</strong> limitations relevant in an age <strong>of</strong> DNA testing? Legal experts said<br />

the case had merit but would be challenged.<br />

The case also reveals the promise and limitations <strong>of</strong> the national DNA databank,<br />

one year old this month, which, much like a national fingerprint databank, was<br />

intended to allow investigators to share in the DNA information collected by state<br />

and municipal law-enforcement agencies.<br />

The Federal Bureau <strong>of</strong> Investigation says the databank had helped solve 583<br />

cases, including one involving a serial rapist in Washington, D.C., who turned out<br />

to also be a serial rapist in Florida. Police routinely collect DNA evidence not only<br />

in rape cases but also from saliva on beer cans left by a burglar, from sweat on a<br />

baseball bat used in a beating and from blood on a bullet that passed through a<br />

suspect.<br />

68

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!