04.04.2013 Views

Investigating CSI – Background material Table of Contents I ...

Investigating CSI – Background material Table of Contents I ...

Investigating CSI – Background material Table of Contents I ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DNA & O.J.<br />

by Katherine Ramsland<br />

A barking dog alerted a neighbor to the crime scene. Sukru Boztepe followed the dog<br />

back to the Brentwood condominium, saw the horrendous bloodshed, and urged his wife<br />

to phone 911. That set into motion the initial events in a convoluted series that made up<br />

what many called "the Crime <strong>of</strong> the Century." It also brought DNA testing in criminal<br />

cases to public awareness.<br />

Nicole Brown Simpson, former wife <strong>of</strong> former football celebrity<br />

O. J. Simpson, went outside her home late in the evening <strong>of</strong><br />

June 12, 1994, and was met by an assailant who slashed her to<br />

death. The killer also slaughtered the man who was with her,<br />

Ronald Goldman, age 25. He had brought Nicole the<br />

eyeglasses that her mother had left behind at the restaurant<br />

where he was a waiter. They were both found dead, covered in<br />

blood, just inside the front gate.<br />

O.J. Simpson booking<br />

photo (AP)<br />

62<br />

Ronald Goldman & Nicole Simp<br />

Although Nicole was no longer married to Simpson, the police<br />

contacted him right away. Going to his home, detectives noted a<br />

bloodstain on the door <strong>of</strong> his white Ford Bronco. A trail <strong>of</strong> blood also<br />

led up to the house, but Simpson appeared to be gone. It turned out<br />

that he had just flown to Chicago.<br />

He returned to Los Angeles and agreed to answer questions. Investigators then noticed<br />

a cut on a finger <strong>of</strong> his left hand that would prove to be problematic for him when they<br />

eventually charged him with the crimes. First, he told several conflicting stories about<br />

how he had gotten the cut, and second, the crime scene indicated that the killer had<br />

been cut on his left hand and had trailed blood outside the gates. That hardly seemed<br />

coincidental. Nevertheless, another narrative eventually overshadowed these problems.<br />

Several droplets <strong>of</strong> blood at the scene failed to show a match with either <strong>of</strong> the victim's<br />

blood types. Then Simpson's blood was drawn for testing (after the droplets had already<br />

been collected) and comparison between Simpson's DNA and that <strong>of</strong> the blood at the<br />

scene showed strong similarities. Contrary to what Simpson's defense team was to say<br />

after his arrest, this blood could not have been planted after Simpson's blood was<br />

drawn.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!