,NuJ:1Ul1~~~~~~ - DOH Central Library - Department of Health
,NuJ:1Ul1~~~~~~ - DOH Central Library - Department of Health ,NuJ:1Ul1~~~~~~ - DOH Central Library - Department of Health
- Page 4: 3.5.3 Sampling design.... 28 3.5.4
- Page 7 and 8: . Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 T
- Page 9 and 10: Table 32 Table 33 Table 34 Table 35
- Page 11 and 12: Table 62 Table 63 Table 64 Table 65
- Page 14: . month of pregnancy until birth, a
- Page 18 and 19: The RHM and the BHW must observe cl
- Page 20: TIlE INTER-AGENCY RESEARCH COMMITTE
- Page 24 and 25: San Fernando Rural Health Unit Agri
- Page 26 and 27: Miss Myrna B. Bumatay Miss Isabel B
- Page 28 and 29: The Health Care Delivery System Wit
- Page 30: . measure the effect of food supple
- Page 33 and 34: Table 3. Studies on the Effects of
- Page 36 and 37: unsupervised iron delivery system,
- Page 38 and 39: TYPE & DOSAGE AUTHOR TESTED RESULTS
- Page 40 and 41: served as the PHC coordinator and r
- Page 42: 3. PROJECf DESIGN Conceptual Framew
- Page 45 and 46: Table 5. Three month Nutrina cycle
- Page 48 and 49: Table 6. Treatment Group Assignment
- Page 50 and 51: The barangay health workers were tr
3.5.3 Sampling design.... 28<br />
3.5.4 Mode <strong>of</strong> data analysis 29<br />
3.6 Semi-annual validation <strong>of</strong> level <strong>of</strong> intervention<br />
implementation 36<br />
3.7 Project management and administration 37<br />
3.8 Data processing :........................................................ 39<br />
3.9 Implementation schedule 40<br />
4. THE PROJECTAREA 45<br />
4.1. Socio-economic-demographic pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> La Union 45<br />
4.2. <strong>Health</strong> indices 46<br />
4.3. Rural <strong>Health</strong> Unit (RHU) pr<strong>of</strong>ile 47<br />
4.4 PHC implementation pr<strong>of</strong>ile 48<br />
5. RESULTS OF THE PROJECT OPERATrONS COMPONENT 50<br />
5.1 Training <strong>of</strong> project implementors .. 50<br />
5.2 Delivery & monitoring system implementation 51<br />
5.2.1 Coverage <strong>of</strong> the IFSD project 51<br />
5.2.2 Compliance with protocol....... 52<br />
5.2.2.1 Identification and referral <strong>of</strong><br />
Pregnant Women (PW) 52<br />
5.2.2.2 Delivery <strong>of</strong> interventions 54<br />
5.2.2.3 Monitoring <strong>of</strong> PW supplementation 59<br />
5.2.2.4 Monitoring <strong>of</strong> pregnancy outcome 61<br />
5.3. PHC support system 62<br />
5.3.1 Barangay <strong>Health</strong> Worker (BHW) involvement 62<br />
5.3.2. Primary health care committee involvement 63<br />
5.4. Problems in project implementation 64<br />
5.4.1. Accomplishment <strong>of</strong> project monitoring forms 64<br />
5.4.2. Declining participation <strong>of</strong> BHW and<br />
PHC Committee in the project 64<br />
5.4.3. Leakage <strong>of</strong> project supplement 65<br />
5.4.4. Low compliance with protocol....................... 65<br />
5.4.5. General project with administration 65<br />
5.5. Early response schemes 65<br />
5.5.1. Dialogues and reinforcement training <strong>of</strong><br />
project implementors 65<br />
5.5.2. Revisions on project operations 66<br />
5.5.3. Seminar-Workshop among RHU and<br />
PHC Committee <strong>of</strong>ficers 66<br />
5.5.4. Workshop with provincial and district task forces 66<br />
ii
9.3 Selected variables & nutritional status <strong>of</strong> infants<br />
28 days after birth 106<br />
9.4 Parameters for targetting pregnant women 107<br />
10. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDAnONS .<br />
10.1 Extent <strong>of</strong> anemia problem among PW .<br />
10.2 Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> food, iron and Nutrition Information<br />
and Education (NIE ) interventions ..<br />
10.2.1 Reduction <strong>of</strong> anemia among PW .<br />
10.2.2 Reduction <strong>of</strong> the incidence <strong>of</strong> low birthweight .<br />
10.3 Cost effectiveness analysis .<br />
10.4 Issues and policies on anemia and low birthweight<br />
prevention and control program ..<br />
10.4.1 Need for iron and food supplementation ..<br />
10.4.2 Targetting <strong>of</strong> PW for food supplementation ..<br />
10.4.3 Strengthening <strong>of</strong> the NIE program .<br />
10.4.4 Other components .<br />
10.5 Delivery system within the PHC framework ..<br />
11. REFERENCES .<br />
12. APPENDICES 119<br />
A. Implementor's guide for midwives 119<br />
B. Course design for IFSD training <strong>of</strong> RHM, PHN and Supervisors 144<br />
C. Course design for IFSD training <strong>of</strong> BHWs and<br />
Barangay Primary <strong>Health</strong> Care Committee (BPHCC)<br />
Chairmen............................................................................................... 154<br />
D. List<strong>of</strong> variables :............................................ 157<br />
E. Memo <strong>of</strong>agreement 177<br />
F. Duties and responsibilities <strong>of</strong> project implementors 180<br />
G. IPSD problems, recommendations and<br />
actions taken as <strong>of</strong> May 31, 1985 185<br />
H Findings on IFSD project implementation, Jan-Aug 1985 188<br />
I. Plan <strong>of</strong> action for the integration <strong>of</strong> the IFSD project in PHC 198<br />
J. Summary <strong>of</strong> plan <strong>of</strong> action for integration <strong>of</strong> IFSD in PHC 202<br />
K. Frequency tables on dietary intake 205<br />
iv<br />
108<br />
109<br />
109<br />
109<br />
109<br />
110<br />
110<br />
110<br />
111<br />
111<br />
112<br />
112<br />
115<br />
•
.<br />
Table 1<br />
Table 2<br />
Table 3<br />
Table 4<br />
Table 5<br />
Table 6<br />
Table 7<br />
Table 8<br />
Table 9<br />
Table 10<br />
Table 11<br />
Table 12<br />
Table 13<br />
Table 14<br />
Table 15<br />
Table 16<br />
Table 17<br />
Table 18<br />
LIST OF IFSO TABLES<br />
Page<br />
Prevalence <strong>of</strong> nutritional anemia among pregnant<br />
women in 1976, 1978, 1982, 1987 5<br />
Studies on the effect <strong>of</strong> maternal malnutrition on<br />
the <strong>of</strong>fspring 6<br />
Studies on the effect <strong>of</strong> anemia among pregnant women............. 7<br />
Studies on the effect <strong>of</strong> Iron supplementation 10<br />
Three months nutrina cycle menu 19<br />
Treatment group assignments based on geographic features<br />
and selected health statistics 22<br />
IFSD Monitoring system 27<br />
List <strong>of</strong> varia bles used in multiple regression analysis<br />
on anemia among pregnant women (PW) 30<br />
List <strong>of</strong> variables used in multiple regression analysis<br />
on low birthweight among infants 31<br />
List <strong>of</strong> independent variables used in logistic regression<br />
analysis for the different research objectives 33<br />
IFSD Database 40<br />
IFSD Implementation schedule :......... 42<br />
Provincial averageand range <strong>of</strong> values (per municipality)<br />
<strong>of</strong> selected population and health indices, La Union, 1985<br />
Public <strong>Health</strong> Nurse/Rural <strong>Health</strong> Midwife training<br />
accomplishments..................................................................................... 50<br />
BHW Training accomplishments , 50<br />
Coverage <strong>of</strong> IFSD project December 1984-December 1986 51<br />
Percent distribution <strong>of</strong> pregnant women by place<br />
<strong>of</strong> prenatal check-up first to third validation studies 52<br />
Percent distribution <strong>of</strong> pregnant women by place <strong>of</strong> prenatal<br />
check-up and treatment group 53<br />
v<br />
47
Table 19<br />
Table 20<br />
Table 21<br />
Table 22<br />
Table 23<br />
Table 24<br />
Table 25<br />
Table 26<br />
Table 27<br />
Table 28<br />
Table 29<br />
Table 30<br />
Table 31<br />
Percent distribution <strong>of</strong> pregnant women by<br />
Age <strong>of</strong> Gestation (AOG) in month during enrollment<br />
in IFSD project and treatment group 54<br />
Percent distribution <strong>of</strong> pregnant women by protocol used<br />
in receipt <strong>of</strong> Ferrin and treatment group, first to<br />
third validation studies 55<br />
Percent distribution <strong>of</strong> pregnant women by protocol used<br />
for receipt <strong>of</strong> Nutrina and treatment group, first<br />
to third validation studies 55<br />
Percent distribution <strong>of</strong> pregnant women by AOG<br />
(in months) on first intake <strong>of</strong> Nutrina supplement<br />
and treatment group, post sur:vey 56<br />
Percent distribution <strong>of</strong> pregnant women by AOG<br />
(in months) on first intake <strong>of</strong> Ferrin supplements<br />
by treatment group, post survey 56<br />
Percent distribution <strong>of</strong> pregnant women by number<br />
<strong>of</strong> Nutrina packs received per month and treatment group,<br />
first to third validation studies 57<br />
Percent distribution <strong>of</strong> pregnant women by frequency<br />
<strong>of</strong> receipt <strong>of</strong> nutrina and treatment group, first to<br />
third validation studies 57<br />
Percent <strong>of</strong> pregnant women who received NIB materials<br />
by type and treatment group, first to third validation studies ...' 58<br />
Percent distribution <strong>of</strong> pregnant women by action/advise<br />
received during receipt <strong>of</strong> NIE materials and treatment group,<br />
first to third validation studies 58<br />
Percent <strong>of</strong> pregnant women visited for monitoring <strong>of</strong><br />
supplement intake by type <strong>of</strong> personnel and treatment<br />
group, first to third validation studies 59<br />
Percent distribution <strong>of</strong> pregnant women by frequency <strong>of</strong> .<br />
visit conducted by staff and treatment group, first to<br />
third validation studies 60<br />
Percent distribution <strong>of</strong> pregnant women by ferrin daily<br />
dosage and treatment group, first to third validation studies ...... 60<br />
Percent <strong>of</strong> pregnant women whose infants were weighed<br />
at birth and 28 days after by treatment group, first to<br />
third validation studies 61<br />
vi
Table 32<br />
Table 33<br />
Table 34<br />
Table 35<br />
Table 36<br />
Table 37<br />
Table 38<br />
Table 39<br />
Table 40<br />
Table 41<br />
Table 42<br />
Table 43<br />
Table 44<br />
Table 45<br />
Table 46<br />
·Percent <strong>of</strong> barangay health workers involved in IFSD<br />
activities by treatment group, first to third validation studies .... 62<br />
Percent <strong>of</strong> RHM who obtained assistance from BPHCC<br />
by type <strong>of</strong> assistance given, first to third validation studies 63<br />
Distribution <strong>of</strong> pregnant women by age <strong>of</strong> gestation and<br />
treatment group, pre.-and post-survey 70<br />
Mean values (x), standard deviations (s.d.) and corresponding<br />
sample sizes (n) for selected socio-demographic variables<br />
by treatment group and for the total sample, pre-survey 71<br />
Distribution <strong>of</strong> pregnant women by educational<br />
attainment and treatment group, pre-survey................................ 72<br />
Distribution <strong>of</strong> pregnant women by past pregnancy<br />
outcome and treatment group, pre-survey.................................... 73<br />
Number and percent <strong>of</strong> pregnant women with clinical<br />
signs and symptoms by type and treatment :group, pre-survey.. 74<br />
Prevalence <strong>of</strong> parasites by type and treatment<br />
group, pre-survey 75<br />
Distribution <strong>of</strong> pregnant women by nutritional status and<br />
treatment group, pre-survey 75<br />
Number and percentage <strong>of</strong> pregnant women with adequate<br />
% RDA for various nutrients by treatment group, pre-survey.. 76<br />
Number and percentage <strong>of</strong> pregnant women who smoke<br />
and drink alcohol by treatment group, pre-survey....................... 77<br />
Percent relative change <strong>of</strong> pregnant women who<br />
obtained correct answer by k-item from pre- to post-survey<br />
by treatment group 78<br />
Percentage <strong>of</strong> pregnant women who had pre-natal check-up<br />
prior to conduct <strong>of</strong> survey by treatment group,<br />
pre-and post-survey 79<br />
Percent distribution <strong>of</strong> pregnant women by start <strong>of</strong> pre-natal<br />
check-up and treatment group, pre-and post-survey.................... 79<br />
Percentage distribution <strong>of</strong> PW by place <strong>of</strong> pre-natal<br />
check-up and treatment group, pre-and post-survey..................... 80<br />
vii
Table 47<br />
Table 48<br />
Table 49<br />
Table 50<br />
Table 51<br />
Table 52<br />
Table 53<br />
Table 54<br />
Table 55<br />
Table 56<br />
Table 57<br />
Table 58<br />
Table 59<br />
Table 60<br />
Table 61<br />
Percent distribution <strong>of</strong> pregnant women by reasons for<br />
no-prenatal check-up and treatment group,<br />
pre-and post-survey 81<br />
Mean intake by type <strong>of</strong> nutrient and treatment group,<br />
pre-and post-survey 82<br />
Statistically significant differences in nutrient intakes from<br />
pre- to post-survey by treatment group 83<br />
Percent <strong>of</strong> PW with adequate fat and carbohydrate intake<br />
by treatment group, pre-and post-survey.......................................... 84<br />
Ranges <strong>of</strong> percentage <strong>of</strong> PW whose intake levels were<br />
less than 50% <strong>of</strong> RDA for selected micronutrients in the<br />
four treatment groups"pre- and post-survey..................................... 85<br />
Prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia before and after supplementation<br />
by treatment group 88<br />
Anemia status by treatment group and age <strong>of</strong> gestation<br />
at the time <strong>of</strong> pricking 89<br />
Prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia at baseline and adjusted<br />
prevalence after intervention by treatment group 90<br />
Incidence <strong>of</strong> low birthweight before and after<br />
supplementation by treatment group 91<br />
Cost <strong>of</strong> BHW involvement in identification and<br />
referral activity by treatment 96<br />
Total cost <strong>of</strong> intervention by expenditures item and<br />
trea tmen t 97<br />
Breakdown <strong>of</strong> total cost by item, capital &<br />
recurrent and source ,........ 98<br />
Cost per capita by expense category and<br />
treatment group 98<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> adjusted relative change in anemia status<br />
and cost per capita <strong>of</strong> 2 interventions 100<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> relative change in low birthweight and<br />
cost per capita <strong>of</strong> 3 interventions 101<br />
viii
Table 62<br />
Table 63<br />
Table 64<br />
Table 65<br />
Table 66<br />
Table 67<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> cost per capita and cost per capita<br />
per unit <strong>of</strong> effectiveness for the different type <strong>of</strong><br />
cost components 103<br />
Results <strong>of</strong> the logistic regression analysis on the<br />
interrelationship between anemia status and<br />
socio-economic, demographic and<br />
intervention variables 104<br />
Results <strong>of</strong> the logistic regression analysis on the<br />
interrelationship between birthweight and<br />
socio-economic, demographic and<br />
intervention variables : 105<br />
Results <strong>of</strong> the multiple regression analysis on the<br />
interrelationship between birthweight and the<br />
socio-conomic, demographic and<br />
intervention variables , , 106<br />
Results <strong>of</strong> the logistic regression analysis on the<br />
interrelationship between nutritional status <strong>of</strong> the child<br />
at 28 days after birth and socio-economic, demographic<br />
and intervention variables 106<br />
Results <strong>of</strong> the logistic regression analysis to identify<br />
predictors <strong>of</strong> low birthweight among pregnant<br />
women without intervention , 107<br />
ix
LIST OF FIGURES<br />
Page<br />
Figure 1 IFSD Conceptual framework in the context <strong>of</strong> primary<br />
health care 17<br />
Figure 2 Treatment allocation, La Union Province 21<br />
Figure 3 IFSD Delivery and monitoring system 25<br />
Figure 4 IFSD Project organizational structure 38<br />
Figure 5 Significant landmarks in the IFSD Study, 1982-1989 , 43<br />
Figure 6 Factors affecting effectiveness <strong>of</strong> Iron Supplementation<br />
Delivery 69<br />
Figure 7 Percentage distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>DOH</strong> contribution to the<br />
project costs according to type <strong>of</strong> personnel paid 99<br />
Figure 8 Percentage distribution <strong>of</strong> capital and recurrent costs according<br />
to source and funds. 99<br />
x<br />
.. '
.<br />
month <strong>of</strong> pregnancy until birth, and (c) Nutrition Information and Education (NIE)<br />
using four brochures on iron supplementation, food supplementation, food<br />
prescription and anemia control and prevention reinforced with face to face<br />
counselling during consultations and pre-natal visits.<br />
The study was conducted in the province <strong>of</strong> La Union in Northern Philippines. All<br />
the 20 rural health units <strong>of</strong> the province were allocated to the four treatment groups<br />
namely: (l) Food Group; .(2) Iron Group; (3) Food and Iron Group and (4) NIE Group<br />
using the following criteria for their assignment: a) expected number <strong>of</strong> 7-9 months<br />
PW at any given time, b) variability in the geographical features, c) homogeneity in<br />
the overall birth rate, death rate, and infant mortality rate across treatment groups.<br />
The delivery <strong>of</strong> interventions for the pregnant women was effected through the<br />
health care delivery system <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Health</strong>, primarily through the<br />
Rural <strong>Health</strong> Midwives (RHMs) supported.by the Barangay <strong>Health</strong> Workers (BHWs)<br />
within the PHC framework. Before the start <strong>of</strong> the delivery, these implementors<br />
were trained together with their supervisors, the Public <strong>Health</strong> Nurses (PHNs), the<br />
Municipal <strong>Health</strong> Officers (MHOs), the Area Nurse Supervisors (ANS) and the<br />
District Nutritionists (DNs) and provincial technical staff.<br />
The project delivery system was integrated into the activities and functions <strong>of</strong> the<br />
RHMs and BHWs at the barangay level within the existing maternal and child health<br />
program. Materials for the interventions were delivered directly to the Rural <strong>Health</strong><br />
Units (RHUs) to minimize delays and thus ensure the availability <strong>of</strong> supply at the<br />
barangay level when needed by the targets.<br />
Extent <strong>of</strong> iron deficiency anemia problem<br />
The study indicates a poor nutritional status among the pregnant women in the<br />
study ·population. The data showed that only 12.4% <strong>of</strong> the population at baseline had<br />
adequate iron intake based on the 24-hour food recall method, and the prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />
nutritional anemia using the WHO cut-<strong>of</strong>f point <strong>of</strong> 11 gil hemoglobin concentration<br />
by the cyanmethemoglobin method ':Vas 40.4%.<br />
Moreover, in the treatment groups where there was no iron supplementation, the<br />
prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia increased. The Food group showed an increase <strong>of</strong> 20.8% and<br />
the NIE group, 12.1%, after the 1 1/2 years implementation <strong>of</strong> the project 0984<br />
1986). A similar nationwide trend was apparent. The FNRI nationwide survey in<br />
1987 showed an 32.9% increase from 1982 in the prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia among PW.<br />
Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> food and iron supplementation on Nutrition Information and<br />
Education (NIE) intervention<br />
Reduction <strong>of</strong> anemia among pregnant women<br />
Iron supplementation using the present health delivery system within the<br />
framework <strong>of</strong> PHC was effective in reducing the prevalence <strong>of</strong> nutritional anemia<br />
among pregnant women in the community. Statistics showed that it was possible to<br />
reduce the prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia in a community b/4.0% after 1 1/2 years <strong>of</strong> iron<br />
xii
On the other hand the cost effectiveness analysis <strong>of</strong> the reduction <strong>of</strong> low birthweight<br />
showed the NIE Group to be the most .cost effective intervention followed by the<br />
Food and Iron Group, the Iron Group and the Food Group in that order.<br />
In an already existing health delivery system however, the Iron Group was more cost<br />
effective than the combined Food and Iron Group in the reduction <strong>of</strong> anemia.<br />
Correspondingly, the Iron Group was more cost effective than the Food and Iron<br />
Group in the reduction <strong>of</strong> low birthweight.<br />
Cost <strong>of</strong> preventing anemia and low birthweight<br />
The cost <strong>of</strong> preventing one case <strong>of</strong> anemia or-low birthweight in the community was<br />
also computed for policy guidance purposes. For an on-going food and/or iron<br />
supplementation program the total cost <strong>of</strong> preventing one case <strong>of</strong> anemia in the<br />
community was I24,438 ($317) for the combined Food and Iron Group and 12521 ($37)<br />
for the Iron Group. The costs <strong>of</strong> preventing one case <strong>of</strong> low birthweight in the<br />
community by treatment group were: NIE Group, 12167 ($12); Food and Iron Group,<br />
PS,547($610); Iron Group 122216 ($158); and Food Group, P12,860 ($919).<br />
Recommendations based on the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> iron and food supplementation<br />
A significant finding <strong>of</strong> the study is that the iron group was shown to be effective in<br />
the reduction <strong>of</strong> both the anemia <strong>of</strong> PW and low birthweight (LBW) <strong>of</strong> the infant.<br />
The NIB intervention was not enough to reduce the prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia among<br />
PW as shown in the increased prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia among PW in the treatment<br />
groups without iron intervention. The iron treatment is considered to be cost<br />
effective in the reduction <strong>of</strong> both anemia and LBW. With these findings it is thus<br />
recommended that iron supplementation be implemented nationwide to improve<br />
the nutritional status <strong>of</strong> pregnant women and their <strong>of</strong>fspring.<br />
The combined food and iron intervention was also shown to more than treble the<br />
reduction in the prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia compared with iron intervention alone while<br />
the reduction in the incidence <strong>of</strong> low birthweight, was doubled food alone. The<br />
same treatment group was found to be cost effective more than iron alone or food<br />
alone. It is thus highly recommended that food supplements be given to pregnant<br />
women starting on the 7th month <strong>of</strong> gestation to birth. However it appears that<br />
food intervention is costly (P333.91 for a zero based program or P205.76 involving<br />
supplies and training cost only) per pregnant woman. Multiply these figures by the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> pregnant women in a community, and the sum becomes enormous.<br />
One alternative for the government is to adjust the existing food supplementation<br />
program to include the pregnant women. If the supply <strong>of</strong> food commodities would<br />
still be insufficient, the high risk mothers could then be given priority.<br />
The NIB Group performance in the study shows the possibilities <strong>of</strong> a strengthened<br />
NIE program capable <strong>of</strong> increasing the dietary knowledge and practices among<br />
pregnant women. This package can be promoted to cover all pregnant women. The<br />
pregnant women should be trained to determine the amount <strong>of</strong> food they require,<br />
particularly how to increase their calorie intake through additional servings <strong>of</strong> rice,<br />
addition <strong>of</strong> oil and high calorie foods (like bucayo or boiled root crops) for snacks, and<br />
xiv
The RHM and the BHW must observe closely the problems <strong>of</strong> the PW<br />
during supplementation so as to give proper advice especially in<br />
dissociating the real side effects <strong>of</strong> iron from other symptoms and educating<br />
the PW on the need and benefits <strong>of</strong> iron supplementation.<br />
b) BHWs should undergo rigid recruitment procedures and" be given<br />
adequate training on the significance, benefits and operating procedures <strong>of</strong><br />
anemia control and prevention. Supervision/motivation <strong>of</strong> BHWs must<br />
also be improved. Furthermore, a study should be conducted to determine<br />
the specific achievable roles that should be given to the BHWs given their<br />
educational and economic background. There is also a need to involve<br />
other volunteer groups in the community in social marketing especially on<br />
the importance <strong>of</strong> iron and pre-natal care. The teachers can also participate<br />
in relaying these messages to the parents through their pupils. Alternative<br />
delivery systems may be set-up like the use <strong>of</strong> supply/points service stations<br />
where the PW can get their supplements in case <strong>of</strong> failure <strong>of</strong> deliveries.<br />
c) A study should. be made to determine the validity <strong>of</strong> midwives' claims <strong>of</strong><br />
overload and their needs for motivation and training to improve their<br />
altitude, efficiency and effectiveness.<br />
d) Primary <strong>Health</strong> Care should be strengthened by the government<br />
considering its high potential for developing community participation in<br />
the delivery <strong>of</strong> health services to achieve the goal <strong>of</strong> health for all by the<br />
year 2000. There should be a re-evaluation <strong>of</strong> the PHC strategies and its reidentification<br />
in the health delivery system. Thus, BPHCC should be<br />
reactivated, this time more vigorously to instill in the members a deeper<br />
knowledge and appreciation <strong>of</strong> its concepts, strategies and goal-to improve<br />
the quality <strong>of</strong> life <strong>of</strong> Filipinos.<br />
xvi
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS<br />
We gratefully acknowledge the support given by the following to the project: (a) the UNITED<br />
STATES AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
TIlE INTER-AGENCY RESEARCH COMMITTE AND STAFF FOR TIlE IFSD PROJECT<br />
(1982-August 1989)<br />
Name<br />
Dr. Florentino S. Solon<br />
Mrs. Mercedes A. Solon<br />
Dr. Rodolfo F. Florentino<br />
Dr. Antonio Acosta<br />
Dr. Carrnencita Reodica<br />
Dr. Aurora S. Villarosa<br />
Dr. Virginia Basaca-Sevilla<br />
Dr. James Schiesselman<br />
Dr. Ophelia O. Mendoza<br />
Dr. Rudy Tan<br />
Dr. Stella V. Gonzales<br />
Mrs. Adelisa Ramos<br />
Dr. Fernando Sison<br />
Dr. Manuela Unite<br />
Dr. Conrado Galsim<br />
Dr. Juvencio Ordoiia<br />
Dr. Ceferino Gonzales<br />
Mrs. Romualda M. Guirriec<br />
Mr. Miguel D. Lopez<br />
Positionls Held<br />
Project Director and Steering<br />
Committee Member, Executive Director,<br />
1983-1990(NCP)<br />
Project Co-Director and Management<br />
Committee Member, 1983-1990(NCP)<br />
Project Co-Director - Proposal<br />
Development, 1983-1990 (NCP)<br />
Steering Committee Member, 1983-1986 (OOH)<br />
Steering Committee Member, 1983-1986 (OOH)<br />
Steering Committee Member, 1983-1986 (OOH)<br />
Steering Committee Member, 1983-1986 (OOH)<br />
Project Consultant, 1984-1988 (USAID-Washington)<br />
Project Consultant, 1983-1990 (UP-CPH)<br />
Project Consultant- Proposal<br />
Development, 1983 (UP Stat. Center)<br />
Project Consultant- Research,<br />
National Task Force Member, 1983-1990 (OOH)<br />
Project Consultant - Delivery and<br />
Monitoring Component, National<br />
Task Force Member, 1984-1990(<strong>DOH</strong>)<br />
Project Consultant, 1989-1990 (UP-CPH)<br />
Management Committee Member<br />
Phase I, II, 1983-1986(RHO-<strong>DOH</strong>)<br />
Management Committee Member, 1986-1989<br />
Phase II (RHO - <strong>DOH</strong>)<br />
Provincial Project Leader, 1986-1989<br />
(IPHO-<strong>DOH</strong>)<br />
Provincial Project Leader, Documentation<br />
(IPHO-<strong>DOH</strong>)<br />
Project Leader - Phase I, 1982 - 1983 (NCP)<br />
Project Leader - Phase II, 1983-1986 (NCP)<br />
xviii
Amelia Picardal<br />
Marcelina Tadina<br />
Elaine Zarate<br />
Prisca G. Juloya<br />
Aida Estigoy<br />
Shirley Gapuz<br />
Nancy Coloma<br />
Edna Bilagot<br />
Corazon Valdez<br />
DISTRICT NUTRITIONISTS<br />
Caba<br />
San Fernando<br />
Rosario<br />
Aringay<br />
Bauang<br />
Bauang<br />
Balaoan<br />
Santol<br />
Sudipen<br />
Rosalina P. Estillore - Noguilian District<br />
Manchu R. Pascual - Agoo District<br />
Marlene Micua - Balaoan District<br />
AREA NURSE SUPERVISOR<br />
Agripina Blanco<br />
Sonia F. Sarmiento<br />
Lucia Estocapio<br />
Perla Viduya<br />
Ester V. Asprer<br />
RURAL HEALTH MIDWIVES<br />
San luan Rural <strong>Health</strong> Unit<br />
Imelda Galvez<br />
Leonila Palaroan<br />
Estrelita Quejado<br />
Tubao Rural <strong>Health</strong> Unit<br />
Yolanda Milanes<br />
Myrna Balderas<br />
Julita de Vera<br />
San Gabriel Rural <strong>Health</strong> Unit<br />
Erlinda Rosqueta<br />
Amelita Ariado<br />
MarjorieBuquing<br />
rugo Rural <strong>Health</strong> Unit<br />
[ulita Domede<br />
Beatriz Ortaleza<br />
Bacnotan Rural <strong>Health</strong> Unit<br />
Anita Abril<br />
Fe Fernandez<br />
- Balaoan District<br />
- Bacnotan District<br />
- Naguilian District<br />
- Rosario District<br />
- DGMH District<br />
Susan Amita<br />
Teresita Lictaoa<br />
Norma Viola<br />
Gloria Nelly Laroya<br />
Tita Halog<br />
Clairta Clarita<br />
',r<br />
Clarita Abad<br />
Lourdes Magpayo<br />
Nancy Camilo<br />
Marissa Pinon<br />
Florida de Guzman<br />
[osefina Oreiro<br />
Felipa Ricanor<br />
xx<br />
Merle Peralta<br />
Nora Guerrero<br />
Maxima Lopez<br />
Perla Viduya<br />
Remy Collado<br />
Evangeline D. Llavore <br />
Ofelia Laconsay<br />
Evangeline Cabanban-<br />
Marciana Bugasan<br />
Angelita Quejado<br />
Elvira Agtarap<br />
Grace Mabalot<br />
Susana Estoque<br />
Elda Daoara<br />
Jovita Castro<br />
Jovita Baniqued<br />
Norma Carta<br />
Corazon Cardinez<br />
Adoracion Padilla<br />
Sto, Tomas<br />
San Gabriel<br />
Bacnotan<br />
Puga<br />
Bacnotan<br />
Tubao<br />
Sanjuan<br />
Sanjuan
San Fernando Rural <strong>Health</strong> Unit<br />
Agripina Tilan Nelia Ord<strong>of</strong>ia Agnes Luz Florendo<br />
josephine Rivero Lolita Molanida Gloria Gurtiza<br />
Pacita Naro Purita Flores Swarnaba Marilyn Gaona<br />
Rosa Baleita Limayo Corazon Cacayan Erlinda Ramos<br />
Milagros Flores Ducusin Consuelo Ballesteros Rosa Quilates Balcita<br />
Trinidad Lubrica Emelita Corpuz Emily Bautista<br />
Caba Rural <strong>Health</strong> Unit<br />
Santinela Fermin Marilyn Camacho Herminia de Vera<br />
Francisca Valdez Lydia Dicolon Letecia Maglaya<br />
Bangar Rural <strong>Health</strong> Unit<br />
Luciana Maracha Natividad Balanon Consolacion Maracha<br />
Aurelia Ramos Delfina Monis Constancia Cariano<br />
Felicita Millares Nilda Ramos Linda Lacuadra<br />
Teresa Bermudez<br />
Luna Rural <strong>Health</strong> Unit<br />
Aurea Otero Consuelo Bautista Purificacion Flores<br />
Cleta Navarete Florita Corpus Ester Sibayan<br />
julita Ciron Ester Castro Marieta Bautista<br />
Anabelle Sibayan<br />
Rosario Rural <strong>Health</strong> Unit<br />
Lolita Apilado Luzviminda Zarate Sanchez Elizabeth Labonete<br />
Gloria Boadilla Erlinda Posadas Elena Perez<br />
Eloisa Guieb Elizabeth Ramos<br />
Elaine Diaz Zarate Aurelia Albina Cariaso Blicilda Halog<br />
Lourdes Passcua Marilyn Celis<br />
Aringay Rural <strong>Health</strong> Unit<br />
Marciana Dulay jemina Pascua Remedios Rullan<br />
Serafina Barba Remedios Yaranon Teodora Arizala<br />
jennifer Balangue Lilia Padilla josephine Maranes<br />
Bauang Rural <strong>Health</strong> Unit<br />
Norma Quedit Myrna Sabado Emma Cacdac<br />
julita Subido Lydia dela Cruz Violeta Noriega<br />
Corazon Argonza Zozima Gutierrez Elimeli Tingcay<br />
Leonora Manantan CorazonDumaguing Aurea Hidalgo<br />
Teresita Subido Manzano<br />
xxii
IFSD Project Staff - Nutrition Center <strong>of</strong> the Philippines (NCP)<br />
Mrs. Paulita Latoja-Duazo<br />
Miss Rosemarie Gerolaga<br />
Miss Carolina Pascual<br />
Miss Rosario Ocampo<br />
Miss Myrtle Corpus<br />
Miss Myrthle Famorca<br />
Miss Marichu Rosal<br />
Dr. Jane Teliaken-Dominguez<br />
Dr. Michael Fabay<br />
Dr. Lester Lora<br />
Dr. Rizalina Umel<br />
Mr. Wilson Estillore<br />
Mrs. Merlyn Lorenzo<br />
Mr. Edmundo Savella<br />
Miss Marcita Uy<br />
Miss Imelda Borja<br />
Miss Zenaida Casasola<br />
Miss Jessica Delim<br />
Mrs. Liliosa Delena<br />
Miss Prodema Quezada<br />
Mrs. Lourdes A1barillo<br />
Miss Maritess Lagarto<br />
Mrs. Diana Decena<br />
Mrs. Cecilia Delgado<br />
Statistician, 1988-1989<br />
Statistician, 1987<br />
Writer, 1984<br />
Writer, 1984<br />
Nutritionist Supervisor, 1987-1989 Field<br />
Operations Officer, 1985-1986<br />
Nutritionist Supervisor, 1987-1989<br />
Data Processing Supervisor, 1984-1986<br />
Nutritionist, Field Operations Officer, 1984-1985<br />
Project Physician - Pre-Survey,<br />
Project Physician - Post-Survey<br />
Project Physician - Pre-Survey<br />
Project Physician - Post-Survey<br />
Medical Technologist - Pre-Survey<br />
Medical Technologist - Pre-& Post<br />
Survey<br />
Medical Technologist - Post-Survey<br />
Medical Technologist - Pre-Survey<br />
Nutritionist-Interviewer - Post-Survey<br />
Nutritionist-Interviewer - Post-Survey<br />
Nutritionist-Interviewer - Post-Survey<br />
Nutritionist-Interviewer - Post-Survey<br />
Nutritionist-Interviewer - Pre-Survey<br />
Sociologist - Proposal Development, 1983<br />
Researcher-Nutritionist - Proposal<br />
Development, 1983<br />
Member, National Task Force, 1983-1984<br />
Member, National Task Force, 1983-1984<br />
xxiii
Miss Myrna B. Bumatay<br />
Miss Isabel B. Burnatay<br />
Mr. Eddie Molina<br />
Mrs. Arlene Abueg<br />
Mr. Ferdinand Bernardo<br />
Mr. Hector Gutierrez<br />
Mr. Anthony Rconisto<br />
Mrs. Milagros Almeda<br />
Mr. Frank Montevirgen<br />
Miss lsabelita M. de Leon<br />
Mrs. Lorna Rabulan<br />
Miss Agnes Alma Alejo<br />
Miss Ana Caranay<br />
Mr. Peter Mendoza<br />
Mrs. Kezia Paras<br />
Mr. Amado Rosalinas<br />
Mr. Rolando Capinpin<br />
Mr. Rodolfo Somera<br />
Mr. Dionisio Tuvera<br />
Mr. Raymundo Halvin<br />
Mr. Benjamin Hernandez<br />
Mr. Joaquin Almeda<br />
•<br />
Interviewer, Junior Researcher, 1986<br />
Interviewer, Coder, 1986<br />
Coder, Encoder, 1986-1989<br />
Senior Programmer, 1985-1986<br />
Programmer, 1985-1987<br />
Programmer, 1987-1990<br />
Programmer, 1986<br />
Finance Officer, 1982-1989<br />
Editor, 1988-1990<br />
Secretary-Typist, 1982-1989<br />
Secretary-Typist, 1987-1990<br />
Secretary-Typist, 1990<br />
Typist, 1984<br />
Artist, 1984<br />
Accountant, 1982-1990<br />
Driver, 1984-1986<br />
Driver, 1984-1986<br />
Driver, 1984-1986<br />
Driver, 1984-1986<br />
Delivery Aide, 1884-1986<br />
Administrative Officer, 1982-1990<br />
Property Officer, 1982-1989<br />
xxiv
1. INTRODUCTION<br />
Background and Rationale<br />
In the Philippines, nutritional anemia affects approximately 34% <strong>of</strong> pregnant women<br />
and is more prevalent in rural (34.8%) than in urban (32.5%) areas (1). This problem<br />
among pregnant women is <strong>of</strong> high importance because <strong>of</strong> its effects on the <strong>of</strong>fspring.<br />
Previous studies show that pre-natal and neo-natal physical growth retardation is<br />
associated with high risk <strong>of</strong> infant malnutrition, morbidity and mortality (3-10,12-22).<br />
Nutritional improvement <strong>of</strong> the mother therefore through available health care<br />
services will reduce the risks and complications associated with pregnancy and<br />
childbirth, and thus improve pregnancy outcome, survival. and physical and mental<br />
development <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fspring. It will maintain her capacity to perform other kinds<br />
<strong>of</strong> work and thus contribute to the economic survival <strong>of</strong> the family. Consequently,<br />
any investment made to decrease the incidence <strong>of</strong> maternal malnutrition will<br />
benefit not only mothers and their <strong>of</strong>fspring but also the community as a whole.<br />
In seeking to reduce the problem <strong>of</strong> ma ternal malnutrition and its effects, the<br />
Nutrition Center <strong>of</strong> the Philippines (NCP) and the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Health</strong> (<strong>DOH</strong>) thru<br />
its Nutrition Service have embarked on the project, IRON AND FOOD<br />
SUPPLEMENTATION FOR PREGNANT WOMEN WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK<br />
OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE (PHC). The project is an innovative scheme to<br />
implement iron and food supplementation for pregnant women using
The <strong>Health</strong> Care Delivery System Within The Framework <strong>of</strong> Primary <strong>Health</strong> Care<br />
Through the years, the Philippine government has taken measures to meet the<br />
growing demand for health services made difficult by factors such as scarce resources,<br />
a rapidly growing population and spiralling inflation. It has expanded and<br />
constructed its health care delivery system to serve a bigger percentage <strong>of</strong> the<br />
population. In 1954, in order to meet the increasing medical and health needs <strong>of</strong> the<br />
people, the Rural <strong>Health</strong> Law was passed creating a rural health unit in every town<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Philippines, with a health manpower compliment <strong>of</strong> a doctor, a nurse, a<br />
midwife and a rural sanitary inspector.. An amendment <strong>of</strong> the Law in 1957 provided<br />
for more additional personnel depending on population sizes. In 1974, the Ministry<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>Health</strong> strengthened the rural health unit services by restructuring the health care<br />
delivery system in its attempt to expand health and medical services particularly to<br />
the rural areas. Midwives were recruited, trained and deployed to serve a population<br />
<strong>of</strong> more or less 5,000 people (23).<br />
In 1978, during the Alma Ata Conference in the USSR, the Philippines adopted the<br />
Primary <strong>Health</strong> Care approach as a means <strong>of</strong> making its health care strategy more<br />
effective in meeting the health needs <strong>of</strong> the Filipinos. Formally launched in October<br />
1979 through Letter <strong>of</strong> Instruction 949, the PHC approach aims to provide essential<br />
health services that are community-based, accessible, acceptable and sustainable at a<br />
cost which the community and government can afford. In the context <strong>of</strong> PHC, the<br />
community recognizes and accepts the responsibilities for its own health care and is<br />
prepared to take concerted action and use its own resources for the purpose. The<br />
government health system in turn, renders the basic health services and provides<br />
guidance and even leadership when indicated on areas concerned with the<br />
community's health (24).<br />
In 1980, PHC was piloted in 12 provinces, one in each region (25). It included the<br />
following four fundamental elements: 1) active community participation and<br />
involvement; 2) inter-sectoral cooperation; 3) development and use <strong>of</strong> appropriate<br />
technology to meet local health needs and 4) development <strong>of</strong> support mechanisms to<br />
sustain PHC implementation. Under the PHC Organization and Management, the<br />
<strong>DOH</strong> is the lead agency for implementation with other ministries as cooperating<br />
agencies. PHC committees were set up at the regional, provincial, municipal and<br />
barangay levels. Composed <strong>of</strong> the health <strong>of</strong>ficer, who served as the PHC coordinator<br />
and representatives from cooperating government and private agencies, each<br />
committee was responsible for coordinating, monitoring and reviewing project<br />
activities. The focal point <strong>of</strong> PHC was the barangay where PHC activities were<br />
actually implemented.<br />
As <strong>of</strong> May 31, 1984, 38,100 out <strong>of</strong> the total <strong>of</strong> 38,369 or 99% <strong>of</strong> all barangays in the<br />
country had been initiated to PHC and had PHC committees in varying degrees <strong>of</strong><br />
implementation. A total <strong>of</strong> 214,696 Barangay <strong>Health</strong> Workers (BHWs) or 1 per 31<br />
population have been selected and trained to help mobilize the community to<br />
support PHC and to assist in the delivery <strong>of</strong> health services to the people. Ultimately<br />
these workers are envisioned to effect the transfer <strong>of</strong> skills on health-related matters<br />
to the members <strong>of</strong> the community (25).<br />
2
Within this framework <strong>of</strong> Primary <strong>Health</strong> Care, the health delivery system has now<br />
become a 4-tier system. The staffing complement in the RHU servicing each<br />
municipality in the country (which consists <strong>of</strong> one Municipal <strong>Health</strong> Officer (MHO),<br />
one Public <strong>Health</strong> Nurse (PHN), one Sanitary Inspector (Sl), and resident midwives<br />
equivalent in number to one per 5,000 population) has now been reinforced with a<br />
barangay health worker (BHW). The BHWs make the first point <strong>of</strong> contact handling<br />
arrangements for referrals, and rendering essential health care to the local<br />
community. The resident midwife at the Barangay <strong>Health</strong> Stations who provides<br />
the second level service is responsible for the supervision and training <strong>of</strong> the BHWs<br />
in her area. Her supervision includes regular meetings at the BHS. At the next<br />
level, the PHN visits the BHS and the barangays in her jurisdiction. These<br />
supervisory visits cover the management aspects <strong>of</strong> the station, general nursing<br />
matters including elements <strong>of</strong> medical care, medical referrals and the organization<br />
and management <strong>of</strong> health education approaches to individual groups and to the<br />
local population. The MHO, the fourth level, exercises general supervision over the<br />
RHU staff. This is done through individual conferences and staff meetings.<br />
Objectives and Significance <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
This project addresses the general issue <strong>of</strong> finding ways to meet the problem <strong>of</strong><br />
maternal malnutrition at the community level, specifically within the context <strong>of</strong> the<br />
existing rural health care delivery system. While the literature abounds with studies<br />
establishing the effects <strong>of</strong> iron and food supplementation in increasing the<br />
hemoglobin levels <strong>of</strong> pregnant women and the birthweights <strong>of</strong> their infants<br />
respectively, there is a dearth <strong>of</strong> studies dealing with the delivery system for such<br />
intervention schemes. For public health workers in particular, the main question <strong>of</strong><br />
interest still lies in developing a system within the existing structure for health<br />
service delivery which will ensure the proper identification and adequate coverage <strong>of</strong><br />
target groups, the efficient delivery <strong>of</strong> the intervention and the periodic monitoring<br />
<strong>of</strong> clients to check on compliance and related problems. Unless these different<br />
components <strong>of</strong> service delivery will be sufficiently covered, the optimum effects <strong>of</strong><br />
different forms <strong>of</strong> community intervention will not be attained.'<br />
The current thrust on Primary <strong>Health</strong>Sare makes projects <strong>of</strong> this nature timely and<br />
relevant. Since the structure for PHC-has properly been established in most<br />
Philippine communities, the next step is to study the mechanics <strong>of</strong> the system. indepth,<br />
as it applies to a particular health service, and in the process, identify its<br />
strengths and weaknesses in order to make improvements. This project aims to<br />
contribute to this end by making use <strong>of</strong> the existing health care delivery system as the'<br />
setting in identifying the best form <strong>of</strong> community intervention to meet the specific<br />
problems <strong>of</strong> anemia among pregnant women and low birthweight <strong>of</strong> their babies.<br />
Specifically, the objectives <strong>of</strong> the project are as follows:<br />
1. Using the present health care delivery system as the channel for delivery <strong>of</strong><br />
intervention:<br />
a. measure the effect <strong>of</strong> iron supplementation on the prevalence <strong>of</strong> nutritional<br />
anemia among pregnant women'<br />
3
. measure the effect <strong>of</strong> food supplementation on the incidence <strong>of</strong> low<br />
birthweight among infants<br />
c. determine the cost-effectiveness <strong>of</strong> iron and food supplementation under the<br />
different schemes to be undertaken in this study.<br />
2. determine the relationship between selected socio-economic, dietary and<br />
anthropometric characteristics <strong>of</strong> pregnant women, the different forms <strong>of</strong><br />
intervention given and anemia and/or low birthweight.<br />
3. determine the effect <strong>of</strong> iron and food supplementation on the nutritional status<br />
<strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fsprings <strong>of</strong> target pregnant women 28 days after birth.<br />
4. determine maternal and/or household parameters for targetting pregnant<br />
women for food supplementation. J<br />
4
Specific studies on the effect <strong>of</strong> anemia in the PW on the other hand. show strong<br />
association between anemia and increased risk <strong>of</strong> premature delivery and maternal<br />
and fetal morbidity and mortality (see Table 3) (4-10). Moreover, scientific literature<br />
has cited decreased work performance among PW even with mild to moderate<br />
anemia (3).<br />
.Table 2. Studies on the Effects <strong>of</strong> Maternal Malnutrition on the Offspring<br />
Sample Test <strong>of</strong> Signi-<br />
Author Size ficance Effects<br />
Federick,1973 16,994 chi-square olow birthweight .<br />
Niswander,1974 11,767 multiple reg- olow birthweigh<br />
ression & prenatal death<br />
analysis<br />
Lechtig,1976 olow birthweight<br />
D'Souza, 1981 452 mothers student's t-test osmallerhead<br />
circumference<br />
& length<br />
Love,1985 68,241 live- total and partial oprematurity<br />
births coefficients <strong>of</strong><br />
correia tion<br />
Husaini,1986 1332 correlations, -Iow birthweight<br />
simple &<br />
multiple<br />
regression<br />
Mitchell,1987 1080 single- path analysis olow birthweight<br />
ton preg- & linear regnancies<br />
ression 'analysis<br />
6
Table 3. Studies on the Effects <strong>of</strong> Anemia Among Pregnant Women<br />
AUTHOR SAMPLE TEST OF SIGNI- EFFECTS<br />
SIZE FICANCE<br />
Lowenstein,1966 305anemic Correlation • megaloblastic bone<br />
.PW narrow changes<br />
Roszkowski,1966 486PW • Low birthweight, short<br />
1966 babies, still births,<br />
neonatal deaths, fetal<br />
heart rate disturbance,<br />
congenital<br />
malformations<br />
Harriwn,1973 185 anemic • fetal growth retardation<br />
mothers • low birthweight<br />
Garn,1981 59,391 • fetal perinatal death,<br />
consecutive gestational prematurity,<br />
pregnancies low birthweight, low<br />
Apgar Score<br />
Johnson,1981 Correlation analysis • high mortality rate<br />
• intrauterine hypoxia<br />
patients<br />
KIein,1982 68,241 Correlation • prematurity<br />
Fleming,1987 • breathlessnes, reduced<br />
capacity for work<br />
In 1984 , the incidence <strong>of</strong> low birthweight in the Philippines was 18% (2) signifying a<br />
high rate. <strong>of</strong> maternal undernutrition. Low birthweight has been shown to affect<br />
physical, mental and psychologic growth (22,27-30).<br />
A project conducted in Albay, Philippines showed that the probability <strong>of</strong> a child with<br />
low birthweight to become malnourished six months later was about 3 times greater<br />
than those born with normal weights (31). Early protein-energy malnutrition is the<br />
most extensive and serious public health problem affecting children in developing<br />
countries. Maternal nutrition as a predisposing factor therefore needs to be assessed<br />
and attended to by health/nutrition programs.<br />
Nutritional improvement <strong>of</strong> pregnant women combined with the use <strong>of</strong> available<br />
health care services, is associated with improved chances <strong>of</strong> survival, physical<br />
growth and mental development <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fspring. In the long run, this is less costly<br />
than providing intensive medical care for the mass <strong>of</strong> underweight and premature<br />
babies born to undernourished pregnant women. It can also be inferred that<br />
7
investments aimed at decreasing the incidence <strong>of</strong> maternal malnutrition will benefit<br />
not only mothers and their <strong>of</strong>fsprings but the country as a whole.<br />
Interventions for Anemia and Low Birth Weight<br />
The high prevalence <strong>of</strong> iron deficiency anemia among PW underlines the need for<br />
iron supplementation during pregancy. The high incidence <strong>of</strong> low birthweight also<br />
indicates the need for intervention to improve the nutritional status <strong>of</strong> the mother.<br />
Three <strong>of</strong> the interventions which have been tested through the years are food<br />
supplementation, iron supplementation, and nutrition information and education.<br />
Food Supplementation<br />
Depletion <strong>of</strong> maternal stores, even if due to famine, during the first two trimesters <strong>of</strong><br />
pregnancy may be compensated by adequate intervention during the third trimester<br />
(32,33).<br />
Several food supplementation programs have. been shown to improve pregnancy<br />
outcomes. The Massachusettes WIC supplementation program has decreased the<br />
low birthweight incidence, neonatal mortality and increased gestational age (34). A<br />
daily 431 Kal supplementation <strong>of</strong> African women resulted in increased birthweight<br />
and head circumference among babies, over a control group (35). However, the effect<br />
on birthweight is affected by season whereby positive effects were shown on wet<br />
season but not on dry season. A food supplementation study on Thai pregnant<br />
women showed similar results on birthweight (36). The study also showed a<br />
significant decrease in the prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia in the supplemented groups and an<br />
increased prevalence in the control group.<br />
In the Philippines, supplementation <strong>of</strong> pregnant women was also a priority <strong>of</strong> the<br />
government but for the at-risk group only. The Implementing Guidelines <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Philippine Food and Nutrition Program (PFNP) in 1981 (37) states that it shall be the<br />
objective <strong>of</strong> the PFNP to reach approximately 25% <strong>of</strong> pregnantmo,thers <strong>of</strong> identified<br />
severely and moderately underweight infants and preschoolers through<br />
interventions which will last for not more than 6 months. This wohld be integrated<br />
in preschool feeding programs with a daily provision <strong>of</strong> supplemental food<br />
equivalent to 200 Kcal and with NIE activities emphasizing proper child care and<br />
feeding practices. The lack however, <strong>of</strong> defi'ned targets covered in 'the<br />
accomplishment reports <strong>of</strong> the PFNP since 1981 to 1984 implies there was no definite<br />
intervention on Food Supplementation for PW (38-41). This may be due to lack <strong>of</strong><br />
government resources to give full implementation to the program.<br />
Itwas in 1986 that a PW food supplementation program was implemented in the<br />
form <strong>of</strong> the <strong>DOH</strong>-CARE Targetted Food and Assistance Program(TFAP) (42). The<br />
objective <strong>of</strong> this collaboration, among others is to rehabilitate malnourished<br />
pregnant mothers to reduce the incidence <strong>of</strong> LBW newborns from 18% in 1986 and<br />
17% in 1987 to 12% in 1992. Targets are mothers who are in their 4th to 9th month <strong>of</strong><br />
pregnancy and anemic mothers (based on clinical signs or a hemoglobin level below<br />
10 gm/100 ml) in areas which have more than 20% <strong>of</strong> the identified severely and<br />
moderately undernourished preschoolers and are not covered by feeding programs<br />
8<br />
J,<br />
1<br />
J<br />
j,<br />
J
unsupervised iron delivery system, the required dosage was 120 mg. elemental iron<br />
per day. Close monitoring and supervision <strong>of</strong> intake by the mother is necessary to<br />
assure compliance. Side effects can also be minimized through constant feedback<br />
between targets and health team.<br />
To understand the etiology and prevention and control <strong>of</strong> nutritional anemias, an<br />
important factor to note is the physiology and chemistry in the absorption <strong>of</strong> iron.<br />
Narasinga Rao presented a summary <strong>of</strong> extensive studies conducted on the subject<br />
(60). The author summarized that the body capacity' to excrete iron was very<br />
limited and hence iron balance was regulated primarily by its absorption from the<br />
gut. Factors that played important roles are the enhancers a) gastric juice, lactic acid,<br />
chelating agent intake, ascorbic acid, sugar, amino acid, dicarboxilic acid, hydroxy<br />
acids. The inhibitors are phosphates, phytates, phosphorous compounds in egg and<br />
milk, and tannin which are predominantly present in vegetable foods. Iron<br />
absorption is strongly influenced by the combination <strong>of</strong> foods eaten in a given meal<br />
(3). The absorption <strong>of</strong> iron from a given meal <strong>of</strong> rice, vegetable and spices may be<br />
doubled with the addition <strong>of</strong> fish, mea t, poultry and other sea foods. Conversely<br />
the drinking <strong>of</strong> tea during or shortly after meal has a marked inhibitory effect on<br />
iron absorption.<br />
Nutrition Information and Education<br />
Nutrition education is a highly cost-effective solution to malnutrition and its<br />
consequences. It expands knowledge, creates awareness, modifies attitudes, changes<br />
behavior and improves the nutritional status <strong>of</strong> the individual.<br />
Table 4. Studies on the Effects <strong>of</strong> Iron Supplementation<br />
AUTHOR TYPE & DOSAGE RESULTS<br />
TESTED<br />
Shalom,1968 100 mgironfromferrous gluco- • Iron supplementation gave rise<br />
nate wi 5 mg folic acid & to Hb concentration<br />
100I!gvit.B12daily<br />
Iyengar, 1970 daily dosage<strong>of</strong> 30mg <strong>of</strong> • daily supplement <strong>of</strong> 30mg given<br />
elemental iron as ferrous iron during the last 100 days <strong>of</strong><br />
fumaratewi or wlo VitB12 pregnancywasadequate to<br />
& folic acid for 100days maintain satisfactory<br />
on the 24th week hematological status during<br />
pregnancy<br />
Basu,1973 75,150 mg elementaliron • womenreceiving ironshow a<br />
ferrous gluconate with or wi0 significant rise in HB.<br />
Vit B12 and folic acid on the • Vit B12 & folic acid did not<br />
26th week <strong>of</strong> gestation for enhance the effect<strong>of</strong> iron<br />
28days supplementation<br />
Sood,1974 Vit B12, folic 30-240 mg • groupswi ironshowincreases in<br />
. elemental iron as ferrous HB<br />
fumerate from 26th to the • highest increasein groups<br />
,<br />
10
TYPE & DOSAGE<br />
AUTHOR 1ESTED RESULTS<br />
36th or 38th week <strong>of</strong> preg- receiving 120& 240 mg <strong>of</strong> iron<br />
nancy together with Vito B12 & folate<br />
• however even in the<br />
supplemental groups, still a<br />
high prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia &<br />
iron deficiency was evident.<br />
• iron alone did not produce as<br />
good results as iron plus Vit B12<br />
& folate.<br />
Aung Than - Batu,197 daily dose <strong>of</strong> 120 & 180 mg • the supplemented groups showed<br />
ferrous sulfate from 22 nd - a 0.4 & 0.7g/de in Hb for iron<br />
25th to 38th -40th week alone and iron plus folic add<br />
respectively<br />
Charoenlarp,1981 daily dose <strong>of</strong> 240 mg • statistically significant<br />
ferrous sulfate w/ or w/ 0 increase in Hb concentration in<br />
all supp. grps.<br />
Thane Toe,1982 daily dose 60, 120, 240 • only significant increases in<br />
mg <strong>of</strong> ferrous sulfate for ferritin levels were seen among<br />
12 weeks under strict PW given 120& 240mh ferrous<br />
personal supervision sulfate with or without folic<br />
acid.<br />
• However, there were no<br />
differences in final Hb levels<br />
among the supplemented groups.<br />
Jackson ,1982 60,180mg elemental iron • Hb rose significantly (p
TYPE & DOSAGE<br />
AUTHOR TESTED RESULTS<br />
Valyasevi,1983 6O,120,240mg ironwi orwlo • the increase in Hb concentration<br />
folic acid with daily was statistically significant<br />
supervisionor motivation where thedose <strong>of</strong>iron was 120 or<br />
from 18-22 weeks to6 wks 240wi or wlo folic add<br />
after delivery • the Hb responsein the .<br />
motivation group was the same<br />
as in thesupervisedgroup<br />
• the subjects with low initial Hb<br />
(8-9.9) showed highly<br />
significant increasing Hb level<br />
after ten weeks suppl.<br />
Solon,1984 60,120 mg fast & slow release • only120 mg elementaliron was<br />
iron preparation, supervised adequate to significantly<br />
& unsupervised adrninistra- improve the anemia status <strong>of</strong> PW<br />
tionfor 100 days in field iron supplementation<br />
Several studies have shown the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> nutrition education. Gomez (61)<br />
documented the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> mothercraft nutrition classes in reducing the<br />
incidence <strong>of</strong> malnutrition. Devadas and Sarojini showed how the school could<br />
improve the knowledge, beliefs and food practices among the primary school<br />
students. Bowering et al, (62) presented the greater effectiveness <strong>of</strong> parapr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
assistance in addition to clinic counselling as compared to counselling alone, in<br />
changing dietary practices. Cerquiera (63) demonstrated the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> mass<br />
media techniques in increasing learning and improving food habits. These effects<br />
would be similar to what could result from the direct method <strong>of</strong> education through<br />
person-to-person contact.<br />
The Primary <strong>Health</strong> Care approach as the delivery channel for<br />
health and nutrition services<br />
The Philippine government health delivery systems have corne a long way. Until<br />
enactment in 1954 <strong>of</strong> the Rural <strong>Health</strong> Act (RA 1080), the local health services were<br />
organized as sanitary divisions, each covering one to four municipalities depending<br />
on the population size (23). With the enactment <strong>of</strong> the Rural <strong>Health</strong> Law, the<br />
sanitary divisions were replaced by Rural <strong>Health</strong> Units which cover one municipality<br />
each with a staffing complement <strong>of</strong> a Municipal <strong>Health</strong> Officer (MHO), a Public<br />
<strong>Health</strong> Nurse (PHN), a Rural <strong>Health</strong> Midwife (RHM) and a Sanitary Inspector (51).<br />
In a subsequent amendment <strong>of</strong> the Law (RA No. 1891) in 1957 additional personnel<br />
from medical <strong>of</strong>ficers to sanitary inspectors were provided in relation to population<br />
sizes.<br />
Then to meet the increasing population demand for health care, the restructured<br />
health care delivery system expanded the RHU set-up in the establishment <strong>of</strong><br />
12
Then to meet the increasing population demand for health. care, the restructured<br />
health care delivery system expanded the RHU set-up in the establishment <strong>of</strong><br />
barangay health stations manned by resident -midwives at a ratio <strong>of</strong> one for every<br />
5000 population,<br />
Although the staffing pattern had been enlarged, it was not sufficient to meet the<br />
demands <strong>of</strong> a rapidly increasing population. There were always limited budgets and<br />
other logistical problems especially on medical supplies. In addition, in the<br />
developing countries, hundreds <strong>of</strong> millions <strong>of</strong> people were suffering and dying from<br />
malnutrition and diseases that could be prevented.<br />
As early as in 1973, the World <strong>Health</strong> Organization (WHO) and United Nations<br />
Children's Fund (UNICEF) observed some <strong>of</strong> the successful or potentially successful<br />
programs in a number <strong>of</strong> countries. The final report <strong>of</strong> this study "Alternative<br />
approaches to meeting basic health services in developing countries" was presented<br />
to the twentieth session <strong>of</strong> the UNICEF/WHO Joint Committee on <strong>Health</strong> Policy in<br />
February 1975. In May 1975, the Twenty-Eight World <strong>Health</strong> Assembly considered<br />
the study to be the basis for a major worldwide program for primary health care. The<br />
first regional working group on Basic <strong>Health</strong> Services met in Manila from 21 to 29<br />
September 1976 to a) exchange views and information on the concepts, trends and<br />
status <strong>of</strong> basic health services in the region with particular reference to primary<br />
health care b) consider theapplication <strong>of</strong> the results <strong>of</strong> operational research studies<br />
on basic health services, c) prepare guidelines for the future development <strong>of</strong> basic<br />
health services with emphasis on PHC and d) consider the role <strong>of</strong> international<br />
agencies in the promotion and development <strong>of</strong> basic health services (64).<br />
Then the Ministers <strong>of</strong> <strong>Health</strong> or their representatives from 134 countries met in<br />
Alma Alta in 1977 under auspices <strong>of</strong> the World <strong>Health</strong> Organization, and discussed<br />
the failure <strong>of</strong> health programs to meet the needs <strong>of</strong> their populations. The meeting<br />
set the goal <strong>of</strong> 'achieving "<strong>Health</strong> for All" through the primary health care approach<br />
by the year 2000(65).<br />
In accordance with the Alma Ata Conference in 1977, the then Ministry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Health</strong> in<br />
the Philippines printed and distributed in 1980 the national strategy and plan <strong>of</strong><br />
action for achieving health for all Filipinos by the year 2000. The strategy calls for an<br />
active and continuing partnership among the communities, private and<br />
government agencies, in health development It is a strategy which focuses<br />
responsibility for health on the individual, his family and the community so that<br />
people cease to be mere recipients <strong>of</strong> services and become partners in health<br />
development (24).<br />
During the same year, PHC was piloted in 12 provinces, one in each region (25). It<br />
included the following four fundamental elements: 1) active community<br />
participation and involvement; 2) inter-sectoral cooperation; 3) development and<br />
use <strong>of</strong> appropriate technology to meet local health needs and 4) development <strong>of</strong><br />
support mechanisms to sustain PHC implementation. Under the PHC Organization<br />
and. Management, the <strong>DOH</strong> is the lead agency for implementation with other<br />
ministries as cooperating agencies. PHC committees were set up at the regional,<br />
provincial, municipal and barangay levels. Composed <strong>of</strong> the health <strong>of</strong>ficer, who<br />
13<br />
. ,
served as the PHC coordinator and representatives from cooperating government<br />
and private agencies, each committee was responsible for coordinating, monitoring<br />
and reviewing project activities. The focal point <strong>of</strong> PHC was the barangay where PHC<br />
activities were actually implemented.<br />
As .<strong>of</strong> May 31, 1984, 38,100 out <strong>of</strong> the total <strong>of</strong> 38,369 or 99% <strong>of</strong> all barangays in the<br />
country had been initiated to PHC and had PHC committees in varying degrees <strong>of</strong><br />
implementation. A total <strong>of</strong> 214,696 Barangay <strong>Health</strong> Workers (BHWs) or 1 per 31<br />
population have been selected and trained to help mobilize the community to<br />
support PHC and to assist in the delivery <strong>of</strong> health services to the people. Ultimately<br />
these workers are envisioned to effect the transfer <strong>of</strong> skills on health related matters<br />
to the members <strong>of</strong> the community(25).<br />
In La Union, as <strong>of</strong> December 31, 1984, all 575 barangays in the province had PHC<br />
Commitees in varying degrees <strong>of</strong> implementation. A total <strong>of</strong> 4,929 BHWs had been<br />
trained. Ninety percent <strong>of</strong> this number were active establishing a ratio <strong>of</strong> one to<br />
every 17 households (66).<br />
Several studies have been conducted on PHC. In the Philippines,as early as in the<br />
1970s, primary health care projects and related activities were already existing. The<br />
World <strong>Health</strong> Organization presented in 1978 the results <strong>of</strong> an observation study<br />
made over a period <strong>of</strong> two months on some 20 primary health care projects in<br />
different areas <strong>of</strong> the country. The report documented among others the need for<br />
a) policy document on PHC, b) program development for PHC to include the<br />
following activities: lEC, organizing for action, provision <strong>of</strong> essential health care<br />
services, integration in community development, and research and development; c)<br />
forum for PHC; d) legislation and regulation and e) international collaboration (23).<br />
Flahault documented also the factors contributing to the success <strong>of</strong> the PHC projects<br />
in some countries including one case study in the Philippines. These include: a)<br />
social preparation <strong>of</strong> the community to generate a collective commitment to be<br />
active participants in the project, b) greater coordination efforts between the<br />
proponents and the community leaders, c) strong commitment <strong>of</strong> health <strong>of</strong>ficers, d)<br />
endorsement and selection <strong>of</strong> the BHWs by the community itself, and e) the<br />
community as not only the recipient but the manager-owner <strong>of</strong> the program. If these<br />
are the strong points <strong>of</strong> the PHC program, their lack can also lead to an ineffective<br />
program. In addition management particularly supervisory skills have to be<br />
developed among PHC leaders (67).<br />
Schrimshaw also summarized problems in several countries: a) lack <strong>of</strong> proper<br />
training and motivation <strong>of</strong> health personnel, b) lack '<strong>of</strong> interest among recipients in<br />
preventive programs and negative attitudes <strong>of</strong> their patients and c) lack <strong>of</strong><br />
understanding <strong>of</strong> the financial and time constraints <strong>of</strong> recipients (68). Shah added a)<br />
negative feelings about the projects among PHC staff, 'i.e., that their services were for<br />
projects/programs under operational research and not true PHC services, b) other<br />
heavy assignments <strong>of</strong> the PHC staff leaving little time for the project programs, c)<br />
high drop out rate <strong>of</strong> volunteer workers, d) inadequate training, and e) difficult and<br />
poor communications (69).<br />
14
These studies were not sufficient however .to design a nationwide detkiled strategy<br />
for an integrated PHC approach in. health projects particularly in the prevention and<br />
control <strong>of</strong> anemia among PW. The present study's objective is to develop and test<br />
strategies to reduce the prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia among PW and low birthweight among<br />
their infants using the PHC approach. Lessons from this study can generate<br />
recommendations for the PHC approach in terms <strong>of</strong> strategy for the health programs.<br />
lS
3. PROJECf DESIGN<br />
Conceptual Framework<br />
The IFSD project aimed to reduce the prevalence <strong>of</strong> nutritional anemia among pregnant women<br />
and incidence <strong>of</strong> low birthweightamong their infants within the framework <strong>of</strong> the Primary <strong>Health</strong><br />
Care Approach. Determination <strong>of</strong> the direct effect <strong>of</strong> the intervention inputs; i.e., iron & food<br />
supplementsand NIE materials, on the nutritional status <strong>of</strong>PWand theirinfants take into account<br />
a number <strong>of</strong> variables.<br />
The conceptual framework <strong>of</strong> this project is shown in Fig. 1. Represented in the Schema are the<br />
key variables in the project design namely the environmental, program and outcome factors. The<br />
specific variables comprising each factor as well as the inter-relationship among them are also<br />
defined.<br />
Environmental Factors<br />
These are divided into factors external or internal to the local community. These include the source<br />
<strong>of</strong> the initiative whether local or external: pr<strong>of</strong>essionals or community laymen, the nature and<br />
degree<strong>of</strong>involvement<strong>of</strong>the sponsoringagency (USAID) in programdevelopment,the requirements<br />
<strong>of</strong> the sources <strong>of</strong> the funding, and the quantity and quality <strong>of</strong> technical assistance received.<br />
The characteristics <strong>of</strong> the community and its relationship to the project include socio-economic<br />
status, demographic factors, medical resources in the area, levels <strong>of</strong> community understanding<br />
and expectations, degree <strong>of</strong> community involvement, etc.<br />
A stock <strong>of</strong> current resources for health care is important in addressing the specific needs <strong>of</strong> the<br />
program. These include facilities, equipment, manpower, pharmaceuticals and other supplies.<br />
The physical requirements <strong>of</strong> the programs can then be established in terms <strong>of</strong> facilities,<br />
equipment, manpower, training requirements, pharmaceuticals, other supplies, schedule <strong>of</strong><br />
programs, and utilities.<br />
Program Factors. These variables are further classified into four groups:<br />
1. Scope <strong>of</strong> services<br />
2. Provider<br />
3. Delivery system<br />
4. Program<br />
refers to the interventions addressed to the target population.<br />
refers to the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>essional implementors and<br />
auxiliary personnel.<br />
refers to the involvement <strong>of</strong> distinct categories <strong>of</strong><br />
personnel!committees.<br />
refers more specifically to development <strong>of</strong> administration,<br />
materials, implementation and training <strong>of</strong> monitoring personnel,<br />
delivery and monitoring <strong>of</strong> supplements, <strong>of</strong> compliance and<br />
impact.<br />
16
Outcome Effects<br />
The outcome effects <strong>of</strong> the project can be regarded as having two components namely impact and<br />
stability.<br />
Impact is measured in terms <strong>of</strong> the KAP score/index on health and nutrition <strong>of</strong> the pregnant<br />
women. It can also be expressed in terms <strong>of</strong> measures <strong>of</strong> health outcome, the % change in<br />
hemoglobin level or anemia status and the % change in low birthweight.<br />
In thecase <strong>of</strong> stability, two aspectsare worthstudying,the ability <strong>of</strong> the programto maintaina full<br />
complement <strong>of</strong> providers over time and the ability <strong>of</strong> the program to generate adequate demand<br />
and to control costs in orderto move toward self-sufficiencyand reduce dependence on subsidies.<br />
In the analysis <strong>of</strong> the outcome effects, the effect <strong>of</strong> intervening variables must be controlled -or<br />
explained. A more detailed discussion <strong>of</strong> this will beshown in the presentation <strong>of</strong> project results<br />
by specific objectives in chapter VII.<br />
To attain its objectives, the project was conducted incorporating both operations and research<br />
components. The operations component ensured the delivery <strong>of</strong> the food and iron supplements<br />
to the pregnant women using the designed delivery systems while the research component<br />
measured the program effect. A detailed discussion <strong>of</strong> these two components is presented in<br />
sections 3.4 and 3.5 <strong>of</strong> this chapter.<br />
Intervention Inputs<br />
The project involves three (3)forms <strong>of</strong> intervention directed at the reduction <strong>of</strong> nutritional anemia<br />
among pregnant women and low birthweight among their infants:<br />
(a) food supplements called "NUTRINA" which come in 18 different varieties <strong>of</strong> sweets,<br />
biscuits, chips, noodles and drinks. One pack <strong>of</strong> Nutrina gives an additional 400calories<br />
per day from the 7th month <strong>of</strong> pregnancy until child delivery.<br />
The criteria used in the selection <strong>of</strong> Nutrina varieties were that the food supplement should<br />
be:<br />
• high in caloric content (not less than 400calories per 100 grams)<br />
• made <strong>of</strong> mdigenous, locally produced or available food material<br />
• highly acceptable among the target group<br />
• having a shelf-life <strong>of</strong> 3 months or more<br />
• in a form that will discourage sharing with other members <strong>of</strong> the<br />
family<br />
• relatively low cost<br />
• easy to distribute<br />
• requiring only simple or available technology for its production<br />
Table 5 is a list <strong>of</strong> the Nutrina varieties used in the IFSD Project. The 18 varieties werean <strong>of</strong>fshoot<br />
<strong>of</strong> an original 5 varieties and were intended for a 3-month Nutrina menu cycle. This was done<br />
to avoid monotony as well as to encourage continuous compliance with supplementation for the<br />
whole supplementation period. Each pregnant woman was given 30 food packets per month<br />
consisting <strong>of</strong> the different varieties scheduled for the month.<br />
18
Table 5. Three month Nutrina cycle menu<br />
Month1 Month2 Month3<br />
1. Panocha with peanut 1. Peanutbrittle 1. Gro (butter)<br />
2. Gro ( Choco) 2. Pilipit(type <strong>of</strong> biscuit) 2. Skimmilk (c<strong>of</strong>fee)<br />
3. Biscocho 3. Skimmilk (cocoa) 3. Sotanghon with skim milk/<br />
4. SkimMilk(mocha) 4. Kamatsili ( type <strong>of</strong> biscuit) galletas( biscuit)<br />
5. SweetBeans/Matamisna bao 5. Banana chips with sugar/ 4. Monggo with brown sugar/<br />
6. Banana chips with sugar/ ampao pinipig(rice biscuit> biscocho (toastedbread)<br />
galletas 6. Gabi with salr/ugoy-ugoy 5. Gabichips with sugar/panutsa<br />
. 7. Bucayo (coconut candy) (biscuit) with peanuts<br />
7. Nutri-noodle 6. Ugoy-ugoy (biscuit)<br />
7. Bucayo<br />
(b) Iron supplements called "FERRIN" - which come in the form <strong>of</strong> uncoated tablets <strong>of</strong> ferrous<br />
sulfatecontaining 60mg elemental iron and 250mg folate pertablet. The prescribed dosage<br />
was 2 tablets daily starting on the fifth month <strong>of</strong> pregnancy until child delivery. The iron<br />
tablets werepurchased through the UNICEFand repacked according to specifications for use<br />
<strong>of</strong> the project. Each pregnant woman was given one bottle containing 60 tablets monthly.<br />
(c) NlE materials -Two brochures namely the Anemiabrochure and FoodPrescriptionSlip were<br />
given to all the pregnant women to increase their level <strong>of</strong> awareness <strong>of</strong> proper health and<br />
nutrition during pregnancy especially on what food to eat .and how much to breastfeed. For<br />
the Iron And Food & Iron Groups additional two brochures namely Ferrin Brochure and<br />
Nutrina Brochure were given to motivate them to take food and iron supplements. These<br />
NlE materials supported the "face-to-face" counselling conducted by midwives among<br />
pregnant women during consultation and pre-natal visits.<br />
All pregnant women under the care <strong>of</strong> the rural health midwives were given the supplements<br />
appropriate to the treatment condition and/or NlE materials.<br />
Treatment Allocation<br />
Given the 3 forms <strong>of</strong> intervention, four treatment groups were designated to test the effect <strong>of</strong> food<br />
and/or iron supplements singly and in combination, namely: (t) Food Group, (2)Iron Group, (3)<br />
Food & Iron Group, and (4) NlE Group. .<br />
All 20 rural health units or municipalities <strong>of</strong> the province were included in the project. The RHUs<br />
were allocated to the 4 treatment groups purposively rather than at random using the following<br />
criteria:<br />
• expected number <strong>of</strong> 7-9 months PW at any given time<br />
• variability in the geographical features; and<br />
• homogeneity in the overall birth rate, death rate and infant mortality rate across treatment<br />
groups.<br />
Because <strong>of</strong> the budgetary constraints <strong>of</strong> the project, the number <strong>of</strong> pregnant women to be given<br />
food supplementation was limited to 200 per month per treatment group wherefood was part <strong>of</strong><br />
the intervention. Since only women 7-9 months pregnant would be given food supplementation,<br />
19
their expected numberwas used as one <strong>of</strong>the important criteria in groupingtogethermunicipalities<br />
for the assignment <strong>of</strong> treatment. For the whole province, the estimated number <strong>of</strong> women 7-9<br />
months pregnant at any time by 1984 was 2454. There was no limit set for the Iron and NIEGroups.<br />
Limits, however, were established for the Food and Food & Iron Groups.<br />
Amongso many possible combinations <strong>of</strong>municipalities which would give the above breakdown<br />
<strong>of</strong> women 7-9 months pregnant, the one which gavea good mixture <strong>of</strong> municipalities according<br />
to geographic features was chosen. This was done to ensure that each treatment group would have<br />
both coastal and mountainous municipalities, thereby controlling the effect <strong>of</strong> this factor lest it<br />
affect the efficiency <strong>of</strong> midwives and other primary health care workers in delivering the<br />
intervention assigned to their respective places. In addition, it was ascertained' that the overall<br />
birth rate, death rate and infant mortality rate were more or less homogeneous across treatment<br />
groups. Since these indices are indirect measures <strong>of</strong> the socio-economic status <strong>of</strong> a community,<br />
requiring their homogeneity across treatment groups is a step towards attaining comparability<br />
with respect to these variables at baseline. Table 6 shows the treatment group assignment<br />
following homogeneity in the pre-set variables while Figure 2 shows the location <strong>of</strong> each<br />
municipality under each treatment group.<br />
Project Operations Component<br />
The conceptual framework in P: 17 discusses that the project was implemented with both<br />
operations and research components. This section discusses in detail the activities conducted in<br />
the operations component particularly preparatory training, delivery and monitoring system.<br />
Preparation for Project Implementation<br />
Tohave more solid bases for the development and finalization <strong>of</strong> the various interventionschemes<br />
andstrategies to be adopted in the IFSDProject, a RHU BaselineStudy and PHCC BaselineStudy<br />
in La Union were conducted. The RHU Baseline Study was aimed specifically at establishing a<br />
baseline pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the RHU in terms <strong>of</strong>its actual and operatingprocedures for service delivery and<br />
monitoring systems especially for the control <strong>of</strong> anemia, and at assessing the training needs <strong>of</strong> the<br />
RHM as the key person in the proposed delivery system.<br />
Data were collected at the municipal and barangay level. The Municipal <strong>Health</strong> Officers (MHO)<br />
<strong>of</strong> the 20 municipalities were the main respondents at the municipal level, the Rural <strong>Health</strong><br />
Midwives (RHM)at the barangay level. The study focused on the following aspects <strong>of</strong> the RHU<br />
health delivery system: a) MOH-RHU organizational and functional set-up, b) funding sources/<br />
standard procedures in the procurement <strong>of</strong> medical supplies, c) standard procedures followed in<br />
the delivery for RHU Personnel.d) training program/activities for RHU Personnel, e) status <strong>of</strong><br />
anemia control in the area.f) RHU link with other PFNPline agencies in the locality, g) mid-wives'<br />
basic knowledge & practices on similar control programs, h) MOH-RHU evaluation and<br />
monitoring system.<br />
ThePHCC BaselineStudysought todeterminethe readiness <strong>of</strong> the PHC organization toimplement<br />
the project with the RHM. It would identify gaps in the PHC implementation for selection and<br />
development <strong>of</strong> project inputs. The minimum requirement <strong>of</strong> the project was for the PHC<br />
Committee to have been at least organized in the barangays and the members identified to<br />
undertake specific functions.<br />
20
Table 6. Treatment Group Assignments Based on Geographic Features and Selected <strong>Health</strong> Statistics.<br />
Crude Crude Infant<br />
Expected.# <strong>of</strong> Birth Death Mort.<br />
Treatment Geographic Women 5-7 Rate/ Rate/ Rate/<br />
Group Municipality Features mos.Pregnant 1000 1000 1000<br />
Food 211 27.4 5.8 45.1<br />
Tubao M<br />
51an Juan CM<br />
Food 204 23.3 5.2 41.3<br />
and Bacnotan ,CM<br />
Iron San Gabriel M<br />
Pugo M<br />
Iron 808 29.5 6.6 45.6<br />
Burgos M<br />
Sudipen CM<br />
Sto.Tomas CM<br />
Agoo CM<br />
Balaoan eM<br />
Santol M<br />
Naguilian M<br />
,<br />
NIE 1230 25.4 6.8 50.6<br />
Aringay CM<br />
Bagulin M<br />
Bauang C<br />
Caba C<br />
Luna M<br />
San Femando CM<br />
Bangar CM<br />
Legend:<br />
C - Coastal<br />
M - Mountainous<br />
CM Coastal/Mountainous<br />
Training system<br />
Orientation <strong>of</strong> Supervisors<br />
The implementation <strong>of</strong> the IFSD Project in La Union started with the orientation <strong>of</strong> the project<br />
supervisors at the 'provincial, district and municipal levels. The provincial health <strong>of</strong>ficer, his<br />
assistant and Provincial Task Force members, the district chief <strong>of</strong> hospitals and the municipal<br />
health <strong>of</strong>ficers were given an orientation on the project rationale, objectives, methodology and<br />
project design and on their roles and responsibilities in the project by the National Task Force. A<br />
22
separate and detailed training <strong>of</strong> the key implementors was conducted.<br />
Training <strong>of</strong> Project Implementors<br />
A training package for the different RHU health personnel was developed. Trainees were divided<br />
into two groups. The first group consisted <strong>of</strong> the direct implementors namely the public health<br />
nurses (PHNs) and the rural health midwives (RHMs)including their supervisors - the area nurse<br />
supervisor (ANS)and the district nutritionist (DN). The second group consisted <strong>of</strong> the auxiliary<br />
workers, i.e., the barangay health workers (BHWs). The objective <strong>of</strong> the training was to develop<br />
the knowledge, attitudes and skills <strong>of</strong> these key implementors <strong>of</strong> IFSDin their respective areas.<br />
There were 13Implementors' Manuals developed, i.e.,1 per type <strong>of</strong> implementor (PHN, RHM and<br />
BHW)for each treatment group and a common manual for the ANS/DN for all treatment groups.<br />
1) Training <strong>of</strong> PHN, RHM, ANS and DN<br />
The training package for these implementors was designed to develop their capabilities for the<br />
following project activities: enrollment <strong>of</strong> PW, requisitioning and delivery <strong>of</strong> supplies,<br />
monitoring <strong>of</strong> supplementation and pregnancy outcome and reporting. ..<br />
These implementors were trained by the National Task Force composed <strong>of</strong> OOH and NCP staffs<br />
with the assistance <strong>of</strong> theRegional and Provincial Task Force members. Since the intervention<br />
and some project protocols were specific to treatment groups, the training <strong>of</strong> midwives, nurses<br />
and their area supervisors was correspondingly done by treatment group. The training <strong>of</strong><br />
implementors in a specific treatment group was scheduled one month before the start <strong>of</strong> project<br />
operations i.e., the delivery <strong>of</strong> intervention in that treatment group.<br />
Avariety <strong>of</strong>training methods were employed. These included lecture-discussions, demonstrations<br />
and role-playing on project tasks. Workshops and group work exercises were also conducted<br />
using actual data <strong>of</strong> the implementors to ensure a thorough understanding <strong>of</strong> their tasks in the<br />
project. The two-day training covered the following topics:<br />
1. An Update on Maternal Nutrition<br />
2. Project Rationale and Objectives<br />
3. The IFSD in the context <strong>of</strong> Maternal and Child <strong>Health</strong> (MCH) services through the PHC<br />
Approach, and<br />
4. IFSDProject Operations<br />
The training tools used were NIE materials (Ferrin, Nutrina and Anemia Brochures and Food<br />
Prescription Slip) for module 1, Implementors' Manuals and delivery and monitoring forms for<br />
modules 2, 3 and 4. Other training aids were the Course Design and Syllabus, Instruction Sheets<br />
and a Training Syllabus for BHWs. A sample Implementor's Manual for RHM and the Course<br />
Design is shown in Appendix A and B.<br />
2) Training <strong>of</strong> BHWs<br />
The barangay health workers played a vital role in the implementation <strong>of</strong> the IFSDproject because<br />
they were assigned the task <strong>of</strong> recruiting and referring target pregnant women to the midwives.<br />
They were also tasked to assist the midwives in the delivery <strong>of</strong> the interventions and the<br />
monitoring <strong>of</strong>supplementation. Assuch, the training package for BHWs was designed to develop<br />
their capabilities in the delivery <strong>of</strong> these services.<br />
23
The barangay health workers were trained by the midwives and nurses assisted by the Provincial<br />
Task Force members one week after the latter's training on the project. The BHWs were grouped<br />
by barangay or groups <strong>of</strong> adjacent barangays in a midwife's catchment area.<br />
The training technique also consisted.<strong>of</strong> lecture-discussions, demonstrations and exercises<br />
particularly on the accomplishment <strong>of</strong> forms. The half-day training covered the following topics:<br />
1. Update on Maternal Nutrition<br />
2. Project Rationale and Objectives, and<br />
3. Project Operations<br />
Training tools also consisted <strong>of</strong> NIE materials, implementors' manuals, monitoring forms and the<br />
Course Design (Appendix A-C)..<br />
The Delivery System<br />
The delivery <strong>of</strong> interventions (i.e., iron and/or food supplements and NIE materials) for the<br />
pregnant women was done through the health caredeliverysystem <strong>of</strong>the <strong>DOH</strong>, primarilythrough<br />
the midwives within the framework <strong>of</strong> the PHC approach. Various strategies along the<br />
preparation <strong>of</strong>the area, the provision <strong>of</strong>iron and food supplements, training and nutritionsupport<br />
for the nurses, midwives and barangay health workers were developed in consideration <strong>of</strong> the<br />
existing delivery system. These schemes were integrated into the activities and functions <strong>of</strong> the<br />
midwives and BHWsat the barangay level within the existing maternal and child health program.<br />
Usually, the intervention should pass through regional, provincial and district levels before finally<br />
going to the municipal level. This was, however, considered a long channel which might entail<br />
delays and problems, e.g., transport. Also because <strong>of</strong> the variability <strong>of</strong> interventions at the place<br />
and time they were needed for the project, the interventions were delivered directly to the RHU.<br />
The PHN acted as the receiving and disbursing <strong>of</strong>ficer. To give maximum logistical support, the<br />
delivery <strong>of</strong> supplements in the Food and Food & Iron Groups was madedirectly to the BHSwhile<br />
in the Iron and NIE Groups, delivery was made to the RHU only. Thus, the RHMs in the latter two<br />
treatment groups obtained the supply for their catchment area from the nurse at the RHU.<br />
The BHWin tum received her supply for the PW in hercatchment <strong>of</strong> 20households from the RHM<br />
in the BHS. One month'ssupply <strong>of</strong> iron supplements was given regularly to the PW whereas the<br />
delivery <strong>of</strong> food supplements was done weekly or bi-weekly depending on the terrain <strong>of</strong> the<br />
catchment area. The NIE materials were delivered directly to the PW by the RHM, accompanied<br />
by face to face counselling on proper dietary habits and practices. The above delivery flow is<br />
shown in Figure 3.<br />
Project Monitoring System<br />
A monitoring system which kept a close watch over the two categories <strong>of</strong> indicators, the process<br />
and the outcomeindicators, was designed. The process indicators refer to the procedures by which<br />
the planned interventions were delivered to the intended targets and the problems which were<br />
encountered in the course <strong>of</strong> implementation. The outcome indicators refer to the amount <strong>of</strong><br />
intervention delivery vis-a-vis its effects/results/impact on the targets. This data gathering<br />
considered the existing forms in the <strong>DOH</strong> monitoring framework. The monitoring for the project<br />
was conducted covering the regional, provincial, district, municipal, and barangay levels through<br />
24
DELIVERY SYSTEM MONITORING SYSTEM<br />
PUBLIC HEALTH<br />
NURSE<br />
BARANGAY<br />
HEALTH WORKER<br />
•<br />
RURAL HEALTH<br />
MIDWIFE<br />
HOUSEHOLDS<br />
• Number <strong>of</strong>Tarl!et<br />
PW In the Munfclpallty<br />
• Compliance with<br />
Protocol<br />
• Number <strong>of</strong>Target PW<br />
In the Barangay<br />
• PregnancyStatus and<br />
Outcome<br />
• Compliance with<br />
Protocol and Supplementation<br />
• Number <strong>of</strong>PW In the<br />
Purok<br />
• Compliance wit;h<br />
Supplementation<br />
FIG. 3. IFSD DELIVERY AND MONITORING SYSTEM<br />
25
the existing system <strong>of</strong> the RHU. The specific indicators for each type are the following:<br />
• process indicators compliance with protocol by project implementors, stock inventory<br />
levelat the RHU/BHS; problemsencountered in makinginterventions<br />
available.<br />
• outcome indicators - pregnancy identified, pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong>pregnantwomen, pregnancyoutcome,<br />
birthweight, complaints and compliance with interventions by PW.<br />
At the municipal level, before the PHN received her supply for the RHU she prepared a Stock<br />
Receipt and Distribution Form which recorded the requirements <strong>of</strong> supplements for the RHU for<br />
the month. This form was updated during receipt <strong>of</strong> supplements from the Delivery Staff and<br />
distribution to the RHM. In the same manner, the RHM also kept almost the same forms for the<br />
recording <strong>of</strong> receipt and distribution <strong>of</strong> supplements from the PHN up to the BHWs. The BHW<br />
also kept a record <strong>of</strong> her deliveries to the PW at the back <strong>of</strong> her manual. After delivery <strong>of</strong> the<br />
supplements the BHW visited the PW weekly to follow up complaints and compliance with<br />
supplementation. These were recorded in the Pregnancy Monitoring/Supplementation Card.<br />
Each PW recipient no matter what treatment group she was in, was given a copy <strong>of</strong> the card. On<br />
the 28th day after the birth <strong>of</strong> the infant, the forms were forwarded to the RHM who submitted<br />
them to the PHN for relay to the Operations Staff. .<br />
A Master List <strong>of</strong> Pregnant Women was maintained at the BHS by the RHM. This recorded all<br />
pregnant women in the BHS by barangay and the schedule <strong>of</strong> receipt <strong>of</strong> supplements.<br />
One NIE Supply Form was also kept by the RHM for the 18 months <strong>of</strong> operation to record the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> copies <strong>of</strong> NIE materials received at the BHS. Problems during delivery and<br />
implementation were fed back through the Stock Receipt and Distribution Form. All these forms<br />
were submitted to the PHN for submission to the Operations Staff.<br />
The Operations Staff reviewed the problems in the Stock Receipt Distribution along with the<br />
RHM's observations and problems encountered in the delivery <strong>of</strong> the intervention, and fed these<br />
back to the <strong>Central</strong> Office. The <strong>Central</strong> Office in consultation with the National and Provincial<br />
Task Forces, then intervened to lessen the operational difficulties encountered. The monitoring<br />
flow presented above is also shown in Figure 3. Table 7 on the other hand,shows the flow <strong>of</strong> data<br />
collection using the different monitoring forms.<br />
The Research Component<br />
The research component was conducted separately from the implementing RHU system and was<br />
done by the Nutrition Center <strong>of</strong> the Philippines in consultation with the Steering and Management<br />
Committees and supervision by the <strong>DOH</strong>-NCP National Task Force. Since the main objective <strong>of</strong><br />
the research component <strong>of</strong> the project was to measure the program effect, the major activity was<br />
the conduct <strong>of</strong> baseline and follow-up surveys. The baseline survey was conducted before the<br />
training <strong>of</strong> project implementors and before the start <strong>of</strong> the delivery and monitoring operations;<br />
the follow-up survey was done at exactly 18 months after the start <strong>of</strong> the delivery <strong>of</strong> the<br />
intervention. Both surveys were cross-sectional rather than longitudinal in nature hence most if<br />
not all <strong>of</strong> the subjects differed between the two surveys. This approach was taken for the following<br />
reasons: 1) the main unit <strong>of</strong> analysis relative to the assessment <strong>of</strong> program effect is the community<br />
rather than the pregnant woman hence it was not necessary to follow up on the same subjects; 2)<br />
26
supposed to have a catchment area with a population <strong>of</strong> 5,000. Actual data from the field however<br />
showed that the midwives in La Union have catchmentareas which are highly variablein size, with<br />
populations ranging from 596to 10,964. Since variations in the size <strong>of</strong> the population beingserved<br />
were deemed to affect the efficiency <strong>of</strong> the health worker in delivering the assigned form <strong>of</strong><br />
intervention, this factor was used as stratification variable in the study. In particular, the expected<br />
number <strong>of</strong> women 5 to 9 months pregnant to be served by each midwife was projected considering<br />
the actual size <strong>of</strong> her catchment area. The midwives assigned to each treatment group were then<br />
stratified into three groups as follows: those serving less than 15 pregnant women at any given<br />
time, those serving 15 to 29 pregnant women, and those serving 30 and over. The percentage<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> the expected total number <strong>of</strong> women 5 to 9 months pregnant by stratum was<br />
computed, and the sample size <strong>of</strong> 200per treatment group was allocated to each <strong>of</strong> the 3 strata by<br />
proportional allocation. The corresponding number <strong>of</strong> midwives expected to serve the resulting<br />
number <strong>of</strong> sample women per stratum was determined and selected at random from the list <strong>of</strong><br />
midwives in each stratum. All pregnant women in the catchment area <strong>of</strong> each midwife drawn as<br />
sample were included in the research component <strong>of</strong> the project. .<br />
Mode <strong>of</strong> Data Analysis<br />
The analysis <strong>of</strong> the data derived from the research component <strong>of</strong> the project used different units'<br />
<strong>of</strong> analysis and different groups <strong>of</strong> subjects, depending upon the particular research objective that<br />
was addressed. The specific statistical techniques that were used to meet each objective are<br />
described in the following sections.<br />
Effect <strong>of</strong> Food and Iron Supplementation<br />
The primary consideration in the analysis <strong>of</strong> the data to assess the effect <strong>of</strong> food and iron<br />
supplementation is the fact that the main thrust <strong>of</strong> the project is not to determine the effect <strong>of</strong> the<br />
different forms <strong>of</strong> interventions per se, but to determine their effects given the health care delivery<br />
system actually being implemented, The patient then, in the context <strong>of</strong> the project, is not the<br />
individual pregnant woman but the community. Given this, the unit <strong>of</strong> analysis used to assess the<br />
effect <strong>of</strong> food and iron supplementation on anemia and birthweight is the RHU, rather than the<br />
mother or the infant.<br />
The response variable used in determining the effect <strong>of</strong> the different forms <strong>of</strong>intervention on<br />
anemia was the prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia by RHO, Two levels <strong>of</strong> analysis were done. At the crude<br />
level, the % relative change in the prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia between the.baseline and post-surveys was<br />
determined and comparisons were made among the treatment groups. This was computed for all<br />
women taken altogether as well as by age <strong>of</strong> gestation at the time <strong>of</strong> pricking. The second level <strong>of</strong><br />
analysis was intended to come up with a more refined estimate <strong>of</strong> the prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia per<br />
RHU and per treatment group after the implementation <strong>of</strong> the different forms <strong>of</strong> intervention,<br />
adjusting for the effect <strong>of</strong> other variables. This was done by multiple regression analysis using the<br />
arcsine transformation for the dependent variable, since it is in the form <strong>of</strong> proportions. The<br />
specific variables included in the model are outlined in Table 8.<br />
29
Table 8. List <strong>of</strong> Variables Used in Multiple Regression Analysis on Anemia Among Pregnant Women<br />
MODEL COMPONENT VARIABLE USED AS INDICATOR<br />
Dependent Variable:<br />
Effect<strong>of</strong> intervention on anemia prevalence % Anemic at post-survey per RHU<br />
Independent Variables:<br />
Intervention 3 dummy variables representing<br />
food, iron and food and iron groups,<br />
with the NIE group as reference<br />
BaselinePrevalence % anemic at baseline<br />
Level <strong>of</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> the % <strong>of</strong> eligible pregnant women who<br />
intervention received the supplementation<br />
Other forms <strong>of</strong> intervention received % <strong>of</strong> eligible pregnant women<br />
,. taking elemental iron from sources<br />
other than the project<br />
Food and dietary patterns <strong>of</strong> % with'adequate iron intake<br />
pregnant Women % with adequate ViI. C intake<br />
% With adequate calorie intake<br />
<strong>Health</strong> status <strong>of</strong> pregnant women % with hookworm<br />
% with trichuris<br />
% <strong>of</strong> pregnant women with normal<br />
nutritional status<br />
% Bleeder<br />
Socio-economic status <strong>of</strong> community Median per capita income <strong>of</strong> RHU<br />
% with at least high school education<br />
,<br />
The same approach was used in detennining the effect <strong>of</strong> the different forms <strong>of</strong> intervention on<br />
birthweight, with the incidence <strong>of</strong>lowbirthweight perRHU as the response variable. At the crude<br />
level <strong>of</strong> analysis, the % relative change between the incidence <strong>of</strong> low birthweight at baseline and<br />
post-surveys was also computed for all women taken altogether, as well as by age <strong>of</strong> the woman.<br />
Two categories were used for this, those at risk «20 or >35 years <strong>of</strong> age) and those not at risk<br />
(between 20 to 35 years old). At the second level <strong>of</strong> analysis, multiple regression analysis using the<br />
arc sine transformation was also applied to comeup with a refined estimate <strong>of</strong> the incidence <strong>of</strong>low<br />
birthweight at post-survey. The specific variables included in the model are outlined in Table 9.<br />
30
Table 9. List <strong>of</strong> Variables Used in Multiple Regression Analysis on Low Birthweight Among Infants<br />
MODELCOMPONENT VARIABLE USED AS INDICATOR<br />
Dependent Variable:<br />
Effect<strong>of</strong> intervention on incidence % with low birthweight babies per RHU<br />
<strong>of</strong> low birth weight<br />
Independent Variables:<br />
Intervention 3 dummy variables representing the<br />
food, iron, food and iron groups, with<br />
the NIE as reference<br />
Baseline incidence 1984 incidence <strong>of</strong> low birthweight<br />
per RHU, based on the records <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Provincial <strong>Health</strong> Office<br />
Level <strong>of</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> the % <strong>of</strong> eligible pregnant women who<br />
intervention received the supplementation<br />
Other forms <strong>of</strong> intervention received % <strong>of</strong> eligible pregnant women who<br />
received other forms <strong>of</strong> supplementation<br />
(c.g, elemental iron, multivitamin)<br />
from sources other than the<br />
project<br />
Food and dietary patterns <strong>of</strong> % with adequate calorie intake<br />
pregnant women<br />
Prevalence <strong>of</strong> risk factors % <strong>of</strong> women 35 years old<br />
% with gravida ,,5<br />
% <strong>of</strong> women with birth interval between<br />
last and present birth :5730 days<br />
% smokers<br />
% premature births<br />
SES <strong>of</strong> Community Median per capita income<br />
% with at least high school education<br />
The third response variable considered in assessing the effect <strong>of</strong> food and iron supplementation<br />
was the nutritional status <strong>of</strong> the infant 28 days after birth, To meet this objective, the infant was<br />
used as the unit <strong>of</strong> analysis.Logistic regression analysis was applied, with the nutritional status <strong>of</strong><br />
the child, categorized as moderately/severely underweight or otherwise, as the dependent<br />
variable. The list <strong>of</strong> independent variables are shown in Table 10.<br />
Relationship Between Socio-Economic. Dietary. Anthropometric Factors and Study Outcomes<br />
To determine the nature <strong>of</strong> the relationship between the different socio-economic, dietary and<br />
anthropometric variables and the response variable in the study (i.e., anemia and birthweight), it<br />
was deemed more meaningful to use the mother or the infant as the unit <strong>of</strong> analysis instead <strong>of</strong> the<br />
31
RHU. To refine the analysis further, mothers who had not received any supplementation at the<br />
time <strong>of</strong> pricking, or infants whose mothers did not get any supplementation for the duration <strong>of</strong> the<br />
pregnancy were excluded from the analysis. Logistic regression analysis was used to meet this<br />
objective, with anemia status (anemic or not) and birthweight status (low or normal) as the<br />
dependent variables. The list <strong>of</strong> independent variables are enumerated in Table 10.<br />
Parameters for Targetting Pregnant Mothers<br />
To identify the different parameters that can be used for targetting pregnant women for food<br />
supplementation, the responsevariable<strong>of</strong>interest islow birthweight. This isunderthe assumption<br />
that food supplementationis meant to affect the birthweight <strong>of</strong>thebaby. Since this objective is akin<br />
to identifying the significant predictors <strong>of</strong> low birthweight in the absence <strong>of</strong> any intervention, only<br />
mothers in the control or NIB group were included in the analysis. Logistic regression analysis was<br />
used to meet this objective, with the birthweight status <strong>of</strong> the infant (low or normal) as the<br />
dependent variable. The independent variables considered were those which were either<br />
routinely collected or could be easily gathered. The list <strong>of</strong> independent variables is shownin Table<br />
10.<br />
32
Table 10. List <strong>of</strong> independent variables used in logistic regression analysis for the different research<br />
objectives<br />
Effects<strong>of</strong> supplemen- Relationship between Relationship between Parameters for<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> tation on the NS <strong>of</strong> selected variables . selected variables targetting PW for<br />
variables infants after 28 days and anemia and birthweight food supplementation<br />
Dependent Dummy variables Dummy variables Dummy variable Dummy variables<br />
variable representing the NS representing the representing the representing the birth<strong>of</strong><br />
infant 28th days anemia status <strong>of</strong> PW birthweight status weight status <strong>of</strong> infant<br />
after birth with with normal as <strong>of</strong> infants with in the NIE group with<br />
normal or over- reference normal weight as normal weight as<br />
weight as reference reference reference<br />
Independent<br />
variables<br />
Intervention 3 dummy variables 3 dummy variables 3 dummy variables<br />
representing Food, representing Food, representing Food,<br />
Iron, Food & Iron Iron, Food & Iron Iron, Food & Iron<br />
Groups with the NIE Groups with the NIE Groups with the NIE<br />
Group as reference Group as reference Group as reference<br />
Level <strong>of</strong> Age <strong>of</strong> gestation at<br />
intervention the time <strong>of</strong> pricking<br />
Other forms Dummy Variable<br />
<strong>of</strong> representing receipt<br />
intervention <strong>of</strong> elemental iron<br />
with receipt as<br />
reference<br />
<strong>Health</strong> Dummy variable<br />
status representing the<br />
<strong>of</strong> the presence or absence<br />
family <strong>of</strong> other 2nd<br />
and 3rd degree I<br />
malnourished in the<br />
family with none<br />
as reference<br />
Dummy variable<br />
representing the<br />
birthweight status<br />
<strong>of</strong> the infant with<br />
normal as reference<br />
,<br />
33
Table 10. Continuation<br />
Effects <strong>of</strong> supplemen- Reiationship between Relationshi p between Parameters for<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> tation on the NS <strong>of</strong> selected variables selected variables targetting PW for<br />
variables infants after 28 days and anemia and birthweight food supplementation<br />
Obstetrical Dummy variables Number <strong>of</strong> livebirths Number <strong>of</strong> livebirths Number <strong>of</strong> livebirths<br />
history representing<br />
- history <strong>of</strong> previous Dummy variable Dummy variable<br />
pregnancy loss with representing representing<br />
none as reference - history <strong>of</strong> previous - history <strong>of</strong> previous<br />
- the length <strong>of</strong> pregnancy loss w / pregnancy loss w /<br />
gestation categorized none as reference none as reference<br />
as premature and<br />
fullterm with premature<br />
as reference<br />
<strong>Health</strong> Dummy variables Amount <strong>of</strong> sticks <strong>of</strong> Dummy variables<br />
status -hookworrn cigarettes smoked representing<br />
<strong>of</strong>PW infestation byPW - the NS <strong>of</strong> PW based<br />
categorized as on standard weight<br />
none, light & Dummy variables for height w /more<br />
very light & representing than or equal to 95%<br />
moderate & hca vy - the NS <strong>of</strong> PW based <strong>of</strong> standard weight<br />
with none as on standard weight as reference<br />
reference for height w/ more - positive for hyper-<br />
-the presence or thanor equal to 95% tension categorized<br />
absence <strong>of</strong> scurvy <strong>of</strong> standard weight as greater than or<br />
with absence as as reference equal to 140/90 and<br />
reference - the presence or less than; with less<br />
-the presence or absence <strong>of</strong> thyroid than as the reference<br />
absence <strong>of</strong> bleeding disorder with - the presence or<br />
with absence as the absence absence <strong>of</strong> thyroid<br />
reference as reference disorder with<br />
- the hemoglobin absence as reference<br />
status <strong>of</strong> PW with - the presence or<br />
below 10giml as absence <strong>of</strong> murmurs<br />
reference with absence dS<br />
reference<br />
- the presence or<br />
absence if kidney<br />
disease with absence<br />
as reference<br />
- the presence or<br />
- absence <strong>of</strong> edema<br />
with absence<br />
as reference<br />
- the presence or<br />
absence <strong>of</strong> lassitude<br />
with absence as<br />
reference<br />
.34
Table 10. Continuation<br />
,<br />
Effects <strong>of</strong> supplemcn- Relationship between Relationship between Parameters for<br />
Typc<strong>of</strong> tation on the NS <strong>of</strong> selected variables selected variables targetting PW for<br />
variables infants after 28 days and anemia and birthweight food supplementation<br />
Food and Dummy variables Dummy variables<br />
dietary representing representing<br />
pallems<strong>of</strong> - the adequacy <strong>of</strong> - the adequacy <strong>of</strong><br />
pregnant iron intake with calorie intake with<br />
women bclowRDA as inadequate intake<br />
reference as reference<br />
- the adequacy <strong>of</strong> - the adequacy <strong>of</strong><br />
ViI. C intake with protein intake with<br />
bclowRDAas inadequate intake<br />
reference as reference<br />
Knowledge KAPScores KAPScores KAPScores<br />
health and<br />
nutrition<br />
" .<br />
3S<br />
- the hemoglobin<br />
status <strong>of</strong> PW with<br />
below 10 g/ml as<br />
reference<br />
- Arm Circumference<br />
- history <strong>of</strong> TB with<br />
none as reference<br />
- smokers or nonsmokers-with<br />
smokers as reference<br />
- height <strong>of</strong> PW
"<br />
Table 10. Continuation<br />
Effects <strong>of</strong> supplemen- Relationship between Relationship between Parameters for<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> tation on the NS <strong>of</strong> selected variables selected variables targetting PW for<br />
variables infants after 28 days and anemia and birthweight food supplementation<br />
Socio- Annual per capita Annual per capita Annual per capita Age<strong>of</strong>PW<br />
economic income income income Household size<br />
status Age<strong>of</strong>PW Age<strong>of</strong>PW number <strong>of</strong> pre- number <strong>of</strong> preschoolers<br />
scholers<br />
Number <strong>of</strong>pre- Number <strong>of</strong> pre- in the family in the family<br />
schoolers in the schoolers in the Dummy variables<br />
family family representing Dummy variables<br />
Dummy variables Dummy variables - age <strong>of</strong> PW with representing<br />
representing educa- representing Educa- 20 - 35 as reference - education <strong>of</strong> PW<br />
tion <strong>of</strong> PW tion <strong>of</strong> PW - classifying PW as categorized as no<br />
categorized as no categorized as no with or without schooling, elemenschooling,<br />
elemen- . schooling, elernen- occupation with tary, high school &<br />
tary, high school & tary, high school & no occupation as vocational & college<br />
vocational, and vocational and reference with no schooling as<br />
college with no college with no - education <strong>of</strong> PW reference<br />
schooling as schooling as categorized as no - classifying PW as<br />
reference reference schooling. elemen- with or without<br />
tary, high school & occupation with no<br />
vocational & colleg occupation as<br />
with no schooling a reference<br />
reference<br />
Semi-Annual Validation <strong>of</strong> Level <strong>of</strong> Ii'lterventjon Implementation<br />
A vital component <strong>of</strong> both the monitoring system and research aspect <strong>of</strong> the IFSD Project was the<br />
conduct<strong>of</strong>validationstudies. Essentially the validationstudiessought to reviewtheimplementation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the project activities to gauge the efficiency and effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the delivery and monitoring<br />
systems. Specifically, the validation studies would determine:<br />
I. the extent <strong>of</strong> compliance <strong>of</strong> project implementors with a set <strong>of</strong> protocols in the delivery and<br />
. monitoring system.<br />
2. the extent <strong>of</strong> compliance with supplementation <strong>of</strong> PW<br />
3. the PHC support system obtained in the implementation <strong>of</strong> the IFSD Project,<br />
and<br />
4. the factors that affected the level <strong>of</strong> performance in the delivery <strong>of</strong> services <strong>of</strong> RHU personnel<br />
in the IFSD Project.<br />
Validation provides the basis for the assessment <strong>of</strong> the feasibility <strong>of</strong> using the PHC approach in the<br />
delivery <strong>of</strong> supplements.<br />
36,
To achieve thefirst objective, themidwives, nurses and barangay health workers who weredirectly<br />
involved in project implementation were interviewed. The interviews focused on how they<br />
actually implemented their specific tasks in the following activities: (1) identification and referral<br />
<strong>of</strong>PW; (2)requisitioning <strong>of</strong>supplies; (3)delivery <strong>of</strong> intervention; (4)monitoring <strong>of</strong>supplementation<br />
andG) reporting.<br />
To validate the responses <strong>of</strong> project implementors, the pregnant women who were the recipients<br />
<strong>of</strong> the services were likewise interviewed. '<br />
For the second objective, the pregnant women who received the intervention were interviewed on<br />
their receipt <strong>of</strong> the NIE materials and/or supplements. The amount <strong>of</strong> supplement intake for a<br />
period <strong>of</strong> one month was also determined including effects felt or complaints against the<br />
intervention.<br />
Forthe third objective, the midwives and nurses were interviewed on thesupport obtained from<br />
supervisors and organizations/agencies in their localities, The interview placed emphasis on<br />
validation <strong>of</strong> the involvement <strong>of</strong> the Barangay and Municipal Primary <strong>Health</strong> Care Committees<br />
as elicited from the midwives, nurses and municipal health <strong>of</strong>ficers. To have a more concrete<br />
assessment, however, <strong>of</strong>. the PHC Committee's involvement, the municipal and barangay PHC<br />
Committee chairmen were interviewed.<br />
The validation studies involved only a sample <strong>of</strong> pregnant women who were then receiving<br />
intervention at the time <strong>of</strong> the studies. The studies included, however, a complete listing <strong>of</strong> the<br />
municipal health <strong>of</strong>ficersand publichealth nurses, area nursesupervisorsand district nutritionists<br />
because <strong>of</strong> thesmall number<strong>of</strong> these types <strong>of</strong> implernentors. Itwas in thecoverage<strong>of</strong> themidwives<br />
that the three studies differed. The first and second studies covered only 80 sample midwives or<br />
53% <strong>of</strong> the total midwives in La Union. The third study, however, covered all 152 midwives to<br />
fulfill the fourth objective, i.e., determining the factors that affected performance in projects such<br />
as the IFSD.<br />
Project Management and Administration<br />
The Iron and 'Food Supplementation Delivery project was a joint undertaking <strong>of</strong> the Nutrition<br />
Center<strong>of</strong> the Philippines (NCP) and the <strong>Department</strong><strong>of</strong> <strong>Health</strong> (<strong>DOH</strong>). As such, the administration<br />
<strong>of</strong> the project was shared between the two agencies.<br />
This involvement was formally forged through a memorandum <strong>of</strong> agreement signed by the two'<br />
agencies. A copy <strong>of</strong> this Memorandum <strong>of</strong> Agreement is in Appendix E.<br />
In its organizationalstructure Figure 4, the project was headed by a SteeringCommitteesupported<br />
by a Management Committee. The Steering Committee's primary responsibility was to provide<br />
policy directions for the planning, implementation, dissemination and utilization <strong>of</strong> research<br />
findings. The Management Committee, on the other hand, was primarily tasked to provide<br />
directions in the form <strong>of</strong> technical guidance in the conduct <strong>of</strong> specific project activities at the area<br />
and central <strong>of</strong>fice levels.<br />
A project leader at both area and central levels was designated to coordinate and oversee the<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> activities. At the central level, the project leader, supported by a National Task<br />
37
Force planned project activities in these general categories:<br />
a) Research<br />
b) Training<br />
c) Delivery and Monitoring<br />
Project plans and schedules were discussed with and/or relayed to the area project leader and a<br />
Provincial Task Force, who in tumcoordinated and monitored the implementation <strong>of</strong> activities in<br />
the different RHUs in the province.<br />
The organizational structure, moreover, depicts the linkages between the OOH, particularly the<br />
Rural <strong>Health</strong> Units (RHU),and the Primary <strong>Health</strong> Care Committeesin the implementation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
project. In this set-up,not only were the health personnel in the OOH structuregiven specific tasks;<br />
PHC committees at various administration levels were also enjoined to assist in project<br />
implementation.<br />
Generally, the PHC Committees were asked to coordinate with the RHU/BHS personnel in<br />
activity implementation. Specifically, the PHCC<br />
• provided administrative support to the RHU/BHS staff in project<br />
implementation<br />
• tapped continuous BHW involvement<br />
• provided logistical support particularly in the delivery <strong>of</strong> supplements<br />
• monitored project status, problems encountered with RHU/BHS <strong>of</strong>ficers and recommended<br />
solutions<br />
• provided feedback on status to higher level committees.<br />
The specific tasks <strong>of</strong> various project implementors and PHC Committees are listed in Appendix<br />
F.<br />
Data Processing<br />
\ .<br />
The IFSQ.Project has a comprehensive data base consisting <strong>of</strong> several files. The various files fall<br />
into the two major components <strong>of</strong> the project i.e.,Research andOperations. The table belowshows<br />
the specific files and subfiles under each major category.<br />
Initial data processing was conducted at the field level. After each data collection day, initial<br />
processing was conducted as follows:<br />
1. Field Edit <strong>of</strong> Interview Schedule (IS)<br />
2. Corrections and Final Editing <strong>of</strong> IS<br />
3. Pre-coding <strong>of</strong> Pre-Determined Responses; and<br />
4. Listing <strong>of</strong> Responses for Open-Ended Questions<br />
Processing activities at the NCP, on the other hand, were as follows:<br />
1. Categorization <strong>of</strong> responses for open-ended questions<br />
2.. Coding <strong>of</strong> data<br />
39
3. Data encoding<br />
4. Machine editing<br />
5. Production and review <strong>of</strong> marginal runs; and<br />
6. Production and review <strong>of</strong> analysis runs<br />
The processing <strong>of</strong> data was done using an IBM-PC-XTand 1 PC compatible which were donated<br />
by USAID. The NCP bought another PC Compatible because <strong>of</strong> the bulk <strong>of</strong> data to be processed.<br />
The s<strong>of</strong>twares used for data analysis are 1984 SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) for<br />
the IBM-PC-XTand the 1981 BMDP s<strong>of</strong>twares, also donated b}' USAID.<br />
Table 11. IFSD data base<br />
ResearchFiles<br />
1. Pre-and post-survey<br />
1.1. Biochemical.<br />
1.2. Clinical<br />
1.2.1 Nutritional status <strong>of</strong> pregnant<br />
women<br />
1.2.2 Nutritional status <strong>of</strong> pre school<br />
.children<br />
1.3. Socio-econornic status<br />
1.4. Dietarydata<br />
1S. Knowledge,attitude and practices<br />
(KAPl<strong>of</strong> pregnant women<br />
1.6. Compliance with NlE materials<br />
1.7. Receipt<strong>of</strong> NIE materials<br />
2. Validation studies<br />
2.1. Implementors' compliance with protocol<br />
2.2. Compliance with supplementation <strong>of</strong> pregnant women<br />
2.3. PHC support system<br />
2.4. Factorsthat affectlevel<strong>of</strong> intervention implementation<br />
Implementation Schedule<br />
Operations Files<br />
1. Delivery<strong>of</strong> intervention and monitoring<br />
1.1. Target per BHS, RHU<br />
1.2. No. enrolled<br />
1.3. No. receivingsupplements<br />
1.4. Problems<br />
2. Operations data supplementation and<br />
pregnancy outcome <strong>of</strong> lFSD Project<br />
2.1. Socio-eco-derno pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />
2.2. Pregnancy pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />
2.3. Supplementation record<br />
2.4. Pregnancy outcome<br />
2.5. 28days post -natal outcome<br />
The IFSD Project underwent two phases <strong>of</strong> implementation namely: Phase I - Preparation for<br />
Project Implementation; and Phase II - Project Implementation Proper.<br />
Phase I started in March 1982 lasting up to September 1984.<br />
Phase I started with the conception and development <strong>of</strong> the IFSD project proposal in March 1982.<br />
In May <strong>of</strong> the same year, the proposal was submitted to USAID for funding. In September 1982,<br />
after some revisions on the proposal, approval for funding <strong>of</strong> the project was obtained. From<br />
September1982 to June 1983,a series <strong>of</strong> meetings among USAID, <strong>DOH</strong> and NCP <strong>of</strong>ficers and staff<br />
were conducted to finalize project design, schedule <strong>of</strong> activities and the budget.<br />
40
4. THE PROJECf AREA<br />
The Iron and Food Supplementation Delivery Project was conducted in the province <strong>of</strong> LaUnion.<br />
This province was chosen as the study area for the following reasons:<br />
. ,<br />
a, Its geographic area and population are both moderate in size, A small province may not<br />
present the typical problems <strong>of</strong> delivery systems related to size; a large province on the other<br />
hand will pose logistic and budgetary problems since the project design is for a province wide<br />
supplementation <strong>of</strong> all pregnant women,<br />
b. It has both coastal and mountainous areas, This enables the identification <strong>of</strong>problems in the<br />
delivery <strong>of</strong> supplementation for different types <strong>of</strong> terrain.<br />
c. Its proximityto Manila facilitates project monitoring and control.<br />
d. It has moderate birth and infant mortality rates, the typical setting for the type o{intervention<br />
being tested in this project.<br />
e. The Primary, <strong>Health</strong> Care approach to service delivery is functioning in theprovince, This is<br />
a fundamental requirement in the choice <strong>of</strong> the studyarea since this is the delivery system that<br />
is being tested. .<br />
f. The prevailing peace and order situation is good.<br />
A detailed description <strong>of</strong> the socio-economic, demographic and health pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> La Union is<br />
presented in the following section:<br />
Socio-Economic-Demographic Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> La Union<br />
La Union lies in the northwestern coast <strong>of</strong> Northern Philippines. It is a 275 kilometer drive from<br />
Manila, The western portion <strong>of</strong> the province is plain while the eastern portion gradually rises in<br />
elevation making the province one <strong>of</strong> the most mountainous in the region, Though the terrain is<br />
predominantly hilly, only 25%<strong>of</strong> its cultivated lands lies in the valley while 75%lies in the coastal<br />
plain. With farming, fishing and cottage industries as the most common source <strong>of</strong> income, 43% <strong>of</strong><br />
the families have a monthly income <strong>of</strong>P500,00 andbelowwhile 70 %belong to the P1,000and below<br />
income bracket (56),<br />
The total land area <strong>of</strong> the province is 149,309 hectares, It is made up <strong>of</strong>20 municipalities and a total<br />
<strong>of</strong> 575barangays, In 1984, it had a total population <strong>of</strong> 488,990, with a population growth <strong>of</strong> 1,80%,<br />
Preschoolers (0-83 months) comprised 20.8% <strong>of</strong> the total population while schoolers (7-14 years<br />
old) made up 19,8%,<br />
LaUnion has 20 Rural <strong>Health</strong> Units serving populations which varied in size from 4,535in Burgos<br />
to 73,453 in capital town <strong>of</strong> San Fernando. Likewise, the towns varied much in population density,<br />
with a minimum <strong>of</strong> ,68 persons per square kilometer for the RHU <strong>of</strong> Santol to 27,24 persons for<br />
Aringay. The average family size for half <strong>of</strong> the RHUs was 5;three others had an average <strong>of</strong> 4 while<br />
2 had an average <strong>of</strong> 7,<br />
45
<strong>Health</strong> Indices<br />
In 1984, La Union had 14,552 livebirths resulting in a crude birth rate (CBR) <strong>of</strong> 21.65 perl000<br />
population (57). This was slightly lower than the national figure <strong>of</strong> 27.8 per 1000population. At<br />
the level <strong>of</strong> the Rural <strong>Health</strong> Unit, twelve (60.0%) <strong>of</strong> the RHUs were serving municipalities which<br />
had1984crude birth rates ranging from 25to 34per100population. Three 05.0%) RHUs had CBR's<br />
below 20/1000 population with the minimum at 16.3per 1000 population for Caba. Agoo had the<br />
maximum CBR with a rate <strong>of</strong> 43.6 per 1000 population. The same RHUs have minimum and<br />
maximum levels, if the indication for natality is expressed in terms <strong>of</strong> the general fertility rate<br />
(GFR). The GFR for Caba was 72.5births per 1000women aged 15 to 44 corresponding figure for<br />
Agoo was 194.5births per 1000 women in the reproductive age groups.<br />
Seven <strong>of</strong> the municipalities with RHUs had crude death rates lower than 5.0 per 1000population.<br />
Only 3 RHUs had CDRs <strong>of</strong> at least 1000population, with Agoo having the highest rate at 12.31<br />
1000. The crude death rate for the whole province was only 7.4 per 1000 population, which was<br />
far lower than that <strong>of</strong>the national figure. Such low levels howevermay not necessarily reflect better<br />
health conditions. Rather, they could be an effect <strong>of</strong> underreporting and underregistration <strong>of</strong><br />
deaths. The leading causes <strong>of</strong> mortality were pneumonia, diseases <strong>of</strong> the heart and cardiorespiratory<br />
arrest.<br />
Very widevariations occured amongthe RHUs with respect to the infantmortaltiy rate. The lowest<br />
rate for 1984 was that <strong>of</strong> Sudipen with an IMR <strong>of</strong> 8.8 infant deaths per 100 livebirths. Four other<br />
RHUs had IMRs below 20.011000. On the other hand, 5RHUs had IMR's <strong>of</strong> at least 50.0/1000 with<br />
the highest rate being 72.5infant deaths per 1000livebirths for Caba. The three leading causes <strong>of</strong><br />
infant deaths in the RHUs were pneumonia, prematurityand congenital debility.<br />
There were 119 reported fetal deaths for the whole province in 1984. Of these 21 were from Agoo<br />
and 29 from San Fernando. In terms <strong>of</strong> rates, Agoo and Sto. Tomas had the highest figures with<br />
fetal death rates <strong>of</strong> 12.9and 17.43per 1000livebirths, respectively. Four RHUs namely in San Juan,<br />
Santol, Bagulin and Aringay did not report any fetal death.<br />
Data on abortions and stillbirths were also available, although theircompleteness and accuracy are<br />
questionable. In the case <strong>of</strong> abortions for example, only 33 cases were reported for the whole<br />
province in 1984, with data coming from only 3RHUs: 16from San Juan, 15from Bauang and 2 from<br />
Bagulin. The total number <strong>of</strong> stillbirths reported for the same year was 43 with data coming from<br />
only 9 RHUs. The incidence <strong>of</strong> maternal mortality was likewise rare, with only 9 maternal deaths<br />
for the whole province, occuring in 6 RHUs. Overall, the 20 RHUs varied much in terms <strong>of</strong> the<br />
different health status indicators.<br />
In 1984,estimated total <strong>of</strong> pregnancies computed from Iivebirths, stillbirth and abortion statistics<br />
in the province was 14,628 . The general fertility rate was 96.57 as against the national general<br />
fertility rate <strong>of</strong> 121.9. Total reported abortions and stillbirths were 33 and 43, respectively. The<br />
range <strong>of</strong> abortion cases per RHU was from 0-16cases for that year while stillbirths ranged from<br />
oto 10 cases. There were a total <strong>of</strong> 9 maternal deaths in the province with most municipalities<br />
having no reported case while the highest reported was 2 maternal deaths. Maternal death rate<br />
for the whole <strong>of</strong> La Union was 1.13 as against the national figure which was 9.<br />
In 1984, there were a total <strong>of</strong> 3,162deaths which is equivalent to a death rate <strong>of</strong> 6.47 (per 1,000<br />
population); the national figure was 5:9. The 3 leading causes <strong>of</strong> mortality were pneumonia,<br />
46'
diseases <strong>of</strong> the heart and cardio- respiratory arrest. The 3 leading causes <strong>of</strong> morbidity, on the<br />
other hand, were bronchitis, diarrhea and upper respiratory tract infection.<br />
The average and range values for the above population and health indices are shown in Table 13.<br />
Table 13. Provincial average and range <strong>of</strong> values (per municipality) <strong>of</strong> selected population and health<br />
indices San Fernando, La Union, 1985<br />
<strong>Health</strong> Indices Provincial Range<br />
,<br />
1. Population 488,990.00 4,535 - 73,543<br />
2. Population density 362.00 0.68 - 27.24<br />
3. Familysize 50.00 4-7<br />
4. Crude birth rate (per 1,000 population) 21.65 16.3 - 43.6<br />
.<br />
5. Generalfertilityrate (per 1,000 women) 96.57 72.5 - 194.5<br />
6. Crude death rate (per 1,000 population) 7.40 0-12.30<br />
7. Infant mortality rate (per 1,000 livebirths) 47.70 8.8-72.5<br />
8. Feotal death rate (per 1,000 population) 119.00 12.9 -17.43<br />
.<br />
9. No. <strong>of</strong> abortions 33.00 0-16<br />
10.No.<strong>of</strong> stil1births 43.00 0-10<br />
11. Maternaldeath rate 1.13 -<br />
.Source: Vital Statistics Report, IPHO, La Union<br />
The RHU Pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />
As shown by the RHU Baseline survey results <strong>of</strong> this study (70), the <strong>DOH</strong> structure in La Union<br />
.is headed by the Integrated Provincial <strong>Health</strong> Officer supported by an assistant Provincial <strong>Health</strong><br />
Officer. The IPHO implements and monitors the different projects <strong>of</strong> the <strong>DOH</strong> at the provincial<br />
level. The province is divided into 5 districts; thus, under the IPHO are 5 District <strong>Health</strong> Offices<br />
(DHO) each manned by the head <strong>of</strong> the District and Chief <strong>of</strong> Clinic from the district hospital. The<br />
DHO has a Special Field Services Task Force composed <strong>of</strong> supervisors <strong>of</strong> personnel counterparts<br />
at the municipal level or district coordinators <strong>of</strong> programs under the department. Under the<br />
District <strong>Health</strong> Office areRural <strong>Health</strong>Units (RHU). Each RHU is composed <strong>of</strong> a Municipal <strong>Health</strong><br />
Officer, a Public <strong>Health</strong> Nurse, a Rural SanitaryInspector anda number <strong>of</strong> Rural <strong>Health</strong> Midwives<br />
(RHM) depending on the total population <strong>of</strong> the municipality. If the Rural <strong>Health</strong> Unit is not<br />
attached to the district hospital, the RHtJ has a Public <strong>Health</strong> Dentist and a Dental Aide. Under<br />
each RHUs are several Barangay <strong>Health</strong> Stations each manned by a Rural <strong>Health</strong> Midwife. There<br />
area total <strong>of</strong> 152RHMs who are each deployed to servean average <strong>of</strong> 4 barangays per person. The<br />
highest number <strong>of</strong> barangays covered is equivalent to 8, and the average population size per<br />
catchment is 3,123. The services rendered by the RHM cover a wide range: immunization,<br />
47
maternal and child health services, environmental sanitation, family planning, Operation Timbang,<br />
mothercraft, Targetted Food Assistance, NIB, anemia control, under six clinic, diarrhea<br />
control, leprosy control, malaria control and TBcontrol.<br />
Among the rural health midwives interviewed, only 48% answered that iron supplements were<br />
availableat the RHU. Moreover, only 35%mentioned the pregnant womenas the recipients <strong>of</strong> this<br />
supplement. The problems encountered in the delivery <strong>of</strong> supplements were: a) lack <strong>of</strong> supplies,<br />
b) complaints <strong>of</strong> sideeffects and c) recipients' dislike for the taste <strong>of</strong> iron. In this study, it was seen<br />
that about 72% <strong>of</strong> PW visited the BHSmonthly for pre-natal check-tip. There were 15 monitoring<br />
forms accomplished regularly by the RHM (l form weekly, 8 monthly, 2 quarterly, 2 semiannually<br />
and 2 percase seen in the BHS). Eighty three percent <strong>of</strong> the RHMs encountered problems<br />
in the RHU monitoring system. These were lack <strong>of</strong>forms (48%) andtoo muchandtimeconsuming<br />
paperwork (26%). Fifty eight percent <strong>of</strong> the RHMs reported problems directly to the PHN, 49%to<br />
the MHO, and 5.3% to the PHO and DHO.<br />
The data also showed that the midwives claimed their knowledge on nutritional anemia was<br />
inadequate,(50% to 74%)hence the need for a refresher course or update on the currenttrends and<br />
management <strong>of</strong> anemia, its detection, prevention and control.<br />
PHC Implementation Pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />
The level <strong>of</strong>PHC implementation before the start <strong>of</strong>the project in 1984was as follows: 100%<strong>of</strong> the<br />
"barangays<br />
were beyond level 1(SocialPreparation/Awareness Level).Five Percent (5%) were then<br />
at level 2 (Organization Level) and 67% were already at level 3 (Implementation Level), and 28%<br />
<strong>of</strong> the barangays were at level 4 (Project Maintenance Level) (71).<br />
Results <strong>of</strong> the BPHCC survey before the start <strong>of</strong> the project showed that 8% <strong>of</strong> the barangay<br />
committees were inactive (71). Annual programs/work plans were not prepared and were not<br />
considered as important documents. Instead, activities were arranged orally or could only be<br />
gleaned from the minutes <strong>of</strong> past PHCC meetings. Membership in the BPHCC was limited toa<br />
specific segment <strong>of</strong> the community or a select few rather than including the whole community.<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> the members and <strong>of</strong>ficers<strong>of</strong> the BPHCCas well as the BHWs were not clear on the concept<br />
<strong>of</strong> the PHC and <strong>of</strong> the working relationship between the BPHCC and Municipal Primary <strong>Health</strong><br />
Care Committee (MPHCC). Thus, linkageandcoordinationbetween the BPHCCandMPHCC was<br />
lacking. The rural health midwives were the moving spirit <strong>of</strong> the BPHCC. The BPHCC was very<br />
much dependent on the RHMs even if they were functioning at level 4.<br />
Within the PHC approach, the Barangay <strong>Health</strong> Workers (BHWs)are the peripheral-level health<br />
workers in the community. The following are the target specific services rendered by the BHWs<br />
in La Union:<br />
48
5. RESULTS OF THE PROJECf OPERATIONS COMPONENT<br />
This chapter discusses the results <strong>of</strong> the implementation <strong>of</strong> the project's operations component<br />
specifically the training, delivery and monitoring systems.<br />
Training <strong>of</strong> Project Implementors<br />
Table 14 presents the number <strong>of</strong> RHMs and PHNs trained by treatment group during the actual<br />
training schedule. The implementors were trained by the Inter-agency National Task Force and<br />
<strong>DOH</strong> Regional and Provincial Task Forces. The data show that among the PHNs the Food groups<br />
had 100% training coverage. In contrast, only 62% in the Iron Group were trained, The reasons for<br />
non-attendance were nurses' leaves or resignations. Ninety three percent (93%) among the RHMs<br />
attended the training. All those who were not able to attend the scheduled training were followed<br />
up by the Project Supply Officer and public health nurse, and trained.<br />
Table 14. PHNIRHM Training Accomplishment<br />
PHN RHM<br />
Treatment Target Trained Target Trained<br />
Group No No % No. No. %<br />
Food 3 3 100 13 13 100<br />
Iron 8 5 62 47 45 96<br />
Food & Iron 4 4 100 21 21 100<br />
NIE 12 11 92 71 62 87<br />
TOTAL 27 23 85 152 141 93<br />
Table 15 presents the number <strong>of</strong> reported active BHWs lrained by municipality and treatment<br />
group before intervention implementation. Data show almost equal percentage <strong>of</strong> BHWs trained<br />
(82-85%), .<br />
Table 15. BHW Training Accomplishment<br />
Trained<br />
Treatment Group Target No. No. %<br />
Food 353 299 85<br />
Iron 1766 1501 85<br />
Food & Iron 440 364 83<br />
NIE 2310 1900 82<br />
Total 4869 4064 83<br />
,<br />
so
Coverage <strong>of</strong> the IFSD Project<br />
Delivery and Monitoring System Implementation<br />
Enrollment <strong>of</strong> pregnant women in the IPSD project started in December 1984 and lasted up to<br />
December 1986. Through these months <strong>of</strong> operation, a total <strong>of</strong> 14,609 PW were enrolled in the<br />
project.<br />
One way to assess the efficiency <strong>of</strong> the delivery system used was through a study <strong>of</strong> percentage<br />
coverage. The percentagecoverage was computed by comparing the total number<strong>of</strong>PW enrolled<br />
with the total number<strong>of</strong> pregnanciesduring the months <strong>of</strong> operation in each treatmentgroup.The<br />
number <strong>of</strong> pregnancies, on the other hand, was computed based on the number<strong>of</strong> Iivebirths and<br />
foetal deaths in the project area reported by each RHU. Percentage coverage by RHU and<br />
treatment group is shown in Table 16.<br />
Table 16. Coverage <strong>of</strong> the IFSD Project, December 1984- December 1986.<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> Pregnancies'? No. <strong>of</strong> Percentage<br />
Treatment/RHU (Livebirths & Foetal Enrollees" Coverage<br />
Deaths)<br />
I. FOODGROUP<br />
Sanjuan 980 842 86<br />
Tubao 749 991 132<br />
TOTAL 1729 1833 106<br />
II. Food & Iron Group<br />
San Gabriel 484 533 110<br />
Pugo 516 463 90<br />
Bacnotan 1106 1095 99<br />
TOTAL 2106 2091 Q9<br />
Ill. Iron Group<br />
Naguilan 1660 1150 - 69<br />
Santol 398 , 400 101<br />
Balaoan 1366 913 67 . ,<br />
Burgos 180 189 105<br />
Agoo 3159 1443 46<br />
StoTomas 884 511 58<br />
Sudipen 514 485 94<br />
TOTAL 8161 50Q1 62<br />
IV. NIEGroup<br />
Bagulin 366 430 117<br />
San Fernando 5065 2019 40<br />
Caba 460 467 102<br />
Bangar 1163 1079 93<br />
Luna 1027 1059 '. 103<br />
Rosario. 1366 1212 89<br />
Aringay 1690 1228 73<br />
Bauang 1997 1394 70<br />
TOTAL 13134 8888 68<br />
Overall Total 25130 . 17903 71<br />
Sourcel/RHU Data<br />
"IFSDMonitoringSystemData<br />
......<br />
, ."<br />
51
Overall results show that 72% <strong>of</strong> the total pregnant mothers in La Union were enrolled in IFSD.<br />
The coverage in the treatment groups with food supplement was significantly higher than that <strong>of</strong><br />
the without food treatment groups. The attractiveness <strong>of</strong> the supplement in the Food Group and<br />
in the Food & Iron Group contributed largely to the high coverage. In fact, an excess <strong>of</strong> coverage<br />
in the food groups was noted. The only reason for this other than the increased coverage in the<br />
treatment was the temporary migration <strong>of</strong>othermothers to these areas where the food supplement<br />
was available. Noted too was the excessive coverage insomemunicipalities in the Iron Group. The<br />
combined active/close supervision <strong>of</strong> MHOs and PHNsand the dedication <strong>of</strong> wokers contributed<br />
to this result. The lower coverage in the Iron and NIE Groups, on the other hand, may have been<br />
due to the interplay<strong>of</strong> the following factors: a) the Iron supplement or NIE materials alone may not<br />
have been sufficient to attract or encourage PW to enroll; and b) low involvement <strong>of</strong> BHWs in the<br />
identification and referral <strong>of</strong> PW for enrollment in the IFSDproject. Reason for the latter factors<br />
will be discussed in details in the section on Problems in Project Implementation (p, 64).<br />
Compliance with Protocol<br />
This' section shows the degree <strong>of</strong> compliance <strong>of</strong> project implementors with protocols in the<br />
performance <strong>of</strong>activities at different periods <strong>of</strong> project implementation. Results are discussed per<br />
major project activity using results <strong>of</strong> the 3 validation studies and data from the operations file.<br />
Identification and Referral <strong>of</strong> PW<br />
1) Place <strong>of</strong> Pre-Natal Check-up<br />
The identification and referral activity called for the BHW to identify and refer all pregnant women<br />
in her 'sector to the midwife for enrollment in the project. The validation studies reaffirm the high<br />
percentage use <strong>of</strong> the rural health facilities for pre-natal check-up. The results show that 93%<br />
in the first validation, 90% in the second and 88% in the third went to the barangay health station<br />
and/or main health center for their pre-natal check-up. (Refer to Table 17).<br />
Table 17. Percent distribution <strong>of</strong> pregnant women by place <strong>of</strong> pre-natal check-up,first to<br />
third validation studies<br />
Place<strong>of</strong> Validation studv<br />
pre-natalcheck-up First Second Third<br />
BHS 75.0 85.0 83.3<br />
MHC 18.0 5.0 7.9<br />
Others 7.0 7.1 9.1<br />
PW did not yet<br />
have any check-up 0.0 2.9 2.8<br />
A study <strong>of</strong> the masterlist <strong>of</strong> almost all pregnant women enrolled in the project, as retrieved from<br />
the nurses and midwives, supports the findings from the validation studies which included only<br />
a sample <strong>of</strong> PW. Results show that 95.7 % <strong>of</strong> all PW enrolled availed <strong>of</strong> the services <strong>of</strong> the main<br />
health center and BHS for pre-natal examinations. (Refer to Table 18).<br />
52
Table 18. Percent distribution <strong>of</strong> pregnant women by place<strong>of</strong> pre-natal check-up and treatment<br />
group<br />
Treatment Group' DH/IPH RHU BHS OTHERS<br />
I. FOODGROUP 1.4 30.5 64.3 3.9<br />
Sanjuan 2.1 31.9 61.2 4.8<br />
Tubao 0.7 29.0 67.4 2.9<br />
II. o<br />
FOOD& IRONGROUP 0.3 15.7 82.7 1.4<br />
San Gabriel 9.5 21.2 73.6 5.3<br />
Pugo 1.5 26.2 73.9 0.0<br />
Bacnotan . 0.6 27.6 91.8 0.0<br />
III. IRON GROUP 1.1 23.3 71.6 4.0<br />
Naguilian 1.3 42.2 54.0 2.5<br />
Santol 0.0 14.8 67.8 17.5<br />
Balaoan 0.4 12.1 84.1 3.4<br />
Burgos 0.0 73.5 23.0 3.6<br />
Agoo 3.1 1.9 94.9 0.1<br />
Sto. Tomas 0.0 43.7 56.3 0.0<br />
Sudipen 0.0 27.7 65.3 6.9<br />
IV. NIE GROUP 0.9 11.1 84.6 3.4<br />
Bagulin 0.9 14.2 73.0 11.8<br />
San Fernando 2.3 13.7 82.5 1.6<br />
Caba 0.0 3.3 96.3 0.3<br />
Bangar 0.0 10.1 89.1 0.8<br />
Luna 0.4 13.8 82.1 3.7<br />
Rosario 0.5 7.3 87.8 4.5<br />
Aringay 0.3 0.0 99.7 0.0<br />
Bauang 0.0 25.2 64.9 9.9<br />
LA UNION 1.0 17.9 77.9 3.3<br />
.<br />
2) Age <strong>of</strong> Gestation (AOG) on First Pre-Natal Check-up<br />
The project suggested that pregnant women should go for pre-natal check-up with the midwife<br />
and enroll in IFSD on or before the fifth month <strong>of</strong> pregnancy. Enlistment in the project before the<br />
fifth month <strong>of</strong> pregnancy was recommended because <strong>of</strong> the importance <strong>of</strong> early pre-natal checkups<br />
and also in order to attain the full benefits <strong>of</strong> supplementation. Data from the operations file<br />
show that compliance with enrollment in the project on or before the fifth month <strong>of</strong> pregnancy was<br />
highest in the Food & IronGroup (68.58%)., (Refer to Table 19.) Thesignificantly higher percentage<br />
<strong>of</strong> PW who enrolled on orbefore their fifth month in these treatment groups may be attributed to<br />
the protocol that a mother is already entitled to receive iron supplements on the fifth month <strong>of</strong> her<br />
pregnancy. This protocol may have therefore enticed more PW from the Iron and Food & Iron<br />
Groups to enlist inthe project earlier than in the Food Group. Table 18 also shows that enrollment<br />
on the 6th-7th months <strong>of</strong> pregnancy was greatest in the Food Group. This may be partlyattributed<br />
to the project protocol which entitled PW to receive food supplements from the 7th through the<br />
53
Table 22. Percent distribution <strong>of</strong> pregnant women by AOG (in months) on first intake <strong>of</strong> Nutrina<br />
supplements and treatment group, post survey<br />
Age <strong>of</strong> gestation Treatment \'TOUO<br />
(months) Food Food & Iron Overall<br />
5th 0.9 3.1 2.2<br />
6th 30.4 50.9 42.5<br />
7th 57.1 42.9 48.9<br />
8th 8.9 2.5 5.1<br />
9th 2.7 0.6 1.5<br />
n 112 163 275<br />
Table 23. Percent distribution <strong>of</strong> pregnant women by AOG (in months) on first intake <strong>of</strong> Ferrin<br />
supplements and treatment group, post survey<br />
Age <strong>of</strong> gestation Treatment \'TOUO<br />
(months) Iron Food & Iron Overall<br />
4th 22.1 28.2 26.5<br />
5th 44.1 51.2 49.2<br />
6th 26.5 13.5 17.2<br />
7th 7.4 4.7 5.5<br />
8th 0.0 1.8 1.3<br />
9th 0.0 0.6 0.4<br />
n 68 170 238<br />
3) Quantity <strong>of</strong> Nutrina Received<br />
A PW in the Food and Food & Iron Groups should receive 30 packets <strong>of</strong> the food supplement<br />
monthly. Results, however, show that this protocol was not always met. The three studies<br />
revealed that only 84%, 54% and 81% <strong>of</strong> the mothers interviewed received from 26-31 packs per<br />
month (Refer to Table 24). The irregularinvolvement <strong>of</strong> the BHW in the delivery <strong>of</strong> supplies to the<br />
PW or the delayed visit <strong>of</strong> the PW to the health center to get hersupplies could have largely caused<br />
the insufficient number <strong>of</strong> Nutrina received monthly. The other reasons cited by the midwives for<br />
56
the insufficient number <strong>of</strong> Nutrina packets received or the leakage in delivery were as follows:<br />
either the Nutrina was used as incentive to the BHW, or as a token or fare for the transport <strong>of</strong> the<br />
supplies to the midwives' catchment areas particularly in the far-flung barangays.<br />
Table 24. Percent distribution <strong>of</strong> pregnant women bynumber <strong>of</strong> Nutrina packs received per month and<br />
treatment group, first to third validation studies<br />
Ranges <strong>of</strong> Nutrina Food Food & Iron Overall Total<br />
packs /month 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3<br />
15 packs 33.3 14.3 0.0 0.0 21.4 26.3 14.8 17.9 16.1<br />
16-25 packs 8.3 35.7 0.0 0.0 21.4 5.3 3.7 28.6 3.2<br />
26-31 packs 58.3 50.0 100.0 100.0 57.1 68.4 81.5 53.6 80.6<br />
4) Frequency <strong>of</strong> Delivery <strong>of</strong> Nutrina<br />
While the delivery <strong>of</strong> Nutrina was designed to be done weekly for control and monitoring<br />
purposes, only 41% <strong>of</strong> the PW in the first validation, 57% in the second and 22% in the third,<br />
received their supplies on a weekly basis. (Refer to Table 25). For practical reasons, midwives,<br />
barangay workers or the PW found it more convenient to deliver or get the supplies bi-monthly<br />
or monthly.<br />
Table 25. Percent distribution <strong>of</strong> pregnant women by frequency <strong>of</strong> receipt <strong>of</strong> Nutrina and treatment<br />
group,lirst to third validation studies<br />
Fnnn 'nn.-! &,. ,nn I T,,tol<br />
Frequency 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3<br />
Weekly 33.0 78.6 25.0 46.7 35.7 20.0 40.7 57.1 21.9<br />
2x per Month 25.0 7.1 8.3 26.7 28.6 40.0 25.9 17.9 28.1<br />
Monthly 25.0 14.3 66.7 6.6 28.6 40.0 14.8 21.4 50.0<br />
Others 17.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 7.1 0.0 18.5 3.6 0.0<br />
5) Receipt <strong>of</strong> NIB Materials<br />
A pregnant woman, irrespective <strong>of</strong> the treatment group she was in, should receive an Anemia<br />
brochure and Food PrescriptionSlipuponenrollmentin the project. Inaddition to these brochures,<br />
PW in the Food Group were given a Nutrina brochure, in the Iron Group, a Ferrin brochure, and<br />
in the Food & Iron Group, both Nutrina and Ferrin brochures. Results <strong>of</strong> the validation studies,<br />
however, show that a substantial number<strong>of</strong> the PW did not receive the required brochures.
to Table 26). As far as the delivery <strong>of</strong> Anemia and Food Prescription Pad is concerned, a higher<br />
percentage <strong>of</strong> PW in the NIE Group recei ved their copies <strong>of</strong> the NIE materials from FirstValidation<br />
to Third Validation than in the other treatment groups.<br />
Table 26. Percent <strong>of</strong> pregnant women who received NIE materials by type and treatment group, first to<br />
thirdvalidation studies<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> brochure<br />
Treatment Anemia ' Nutrina Ferrin Food Rxpad<br />
group 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3<br />
Food 50.0 35.7 83.3 33.0 42.9 83.3 - - - 33.0 42.9 66.7<br />
Iron 65.0 605 50.0 - - - 71.0 80.0 67.9 43.0 60.9 40.0<br />
Food & Iron 50.0 75.0 65.0 75.0 60.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 75.0 55.0 70.0 47.4<br />
NlE 73.0 90.0 83.3 - - - - - - 55.0 75.0 82.0<br />
Overall 57.0 73.0 72.4 59.0 52.9 85.8 71.0 80.0 69.3 50.0 66.4 64.8<br />
Moreover, project protocol required the midwife to explain to the PW the contents <strong>of</strong> the brochures<br />
as part <strong>of</strong> the pre-natal counselling on health nutrition. Table 27 shows the non-eompliance with<br />
this protocol. Instead,a range <strong>of</strong>90 - 97% <strong>of</strong> the PW were given only instructions to read and follow<br />
the contents <strong>of</strong> the brochures upon receipt <strong>of</strong> the materials. Midwives claimed that explaining the<br />
contents <strong>of</strong> the brochures to the pregnant women required a lot <strong>of</strong> time and that they had other<br />
tasks and patients to attend to.<br />
Table 27. Percent distribution <strong>of</strong> pregnant women by action lad vice received during receipt <strong>of</strong> NIE<br />
materials and treatment group, first to third validation studies<br />
Action / Advice Given<br />
Treatment group Brochure given with instruction Explanation about the<br />
10 read/follow message brochure given<br />
1 2 3 1 2 3<br />
Food 100:0 83.4 90.0 0.0 16.7 10.0<br />
Iron 82.8 97.4 965 17.0 2.6 3.6<br />
Food & Iron 93.0 875 100.0 7.0 125 0.0<br />
NIE 94.0 90.8 975 6.0 9.3 25<br />
Overall 90.0 92.2 97.1 10.0 7.8 2.9<br />
58
Table 29. Percent <strong>of</strong> pregnantwomen by frequency <strong>of</strong>visit conducted by staff and treatment group, first<br />
to third validation studies<br />
Frequency<strong>of</strong> visit<br />
Treatment Weekly 2x/ Month Monthly Others<br />
group 1 2 3 1 2- 3 1 2 3 1 2 3<br />
Food 63.0 66.0 0.0 0.0 16.7 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.9 16.7 87.5<br />
Iron 58.0 73.6 8.0 0.0 18.4 2.0 0.0 7.9 4.0 42.0 0.0 86.0<br />
Food & Iron 41.0 70.6 26.7 0.0 17.6 0.0 0.0 11.8 13.3 59.0 0.0 60.0<br />
NIE 50.0 53.9 12.3 0.0 28.8 0.0 0.0 11.5 1.5 50.0 5.8 86.2<br />
Overall 53.0 63.8 11.5 0.0 _22.7 1.5 0.0 9.2 3.6 47.0 4.2 83.3<br />
2) Daily Intake <strong>of</strong> Ferrin<br />
The project prescribed a daily dosage <strong>of</strong> 2 tablets <strong>of</strong> the iron supplement. There was a high<br />
compliance rate as seen from the high percentage <strong>of</strong> PW found to be taking 2 tablets daily: 92.8%<br />
in the first, 88.7% in the second and only 78.6% in the third validation. This was gathered from<br />
interview <strong>of</strong> the mothers. Anotherinformation on the overall compliance<strong>of</strong> the mothers using the<br />
counting method showed a low compliance with iron supplementation. (See Table 30).<br />
Table 30. Percent distribution <strong>of</strong> pregnant women by Ferrin daily dosage and treatment group, first to<br />
third validation studies<br />
Dailyintake Iron Food & Iron Overall Total<br />
<strong>of</strong> Ferrin 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3<br />
1 tablet per day 6.0 7.1 18.1 0.0 5.0 10.0 4.3 6.5 16.5<br />
2 tablets per Day 92.0 90.5 75.9 95.0 85.0 90.0 92.8 88.7 78.6<br />
3 tablets per day 2.0 0.0 1.2 5.0 10.0 0.0 2.9 3.2 1.0<br />
PW stopped intake<br />
<strong>of</strong> Ferrin 0.0 2.4 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 3.9<br />
3) Immediate Effects <strong>of</strong> Ferrin Supplementation<br />
The pregnantwomenwho tookthe iron tabletsexperienced variedeffects <strong>of</strong> Ferrinsupplementation.<br />
In the first validation, 54 % <strong>of</strong> the PW claimed to have experienced positive effects, also 54% in the<br />
60
PHC Support System<br />
The IFSDproject was launched to help strengthen andbroaden the coverage <strong>of</strong> maternal andchild<br />
health care services in the barangays through the Primary <strong>Health</strong> Care Approach. The support <strong>of</strong><br />
the Barangay <strong>Health</strong> Workers and the PHC Committee at the barangay level in project<br />
implementation was therefore expected.<br />
BHW Involvement<br />
The IFSD Project required BHW involvement in three major activities: (a) identification and<br />
referral <strong>of</strong>pregnantwomen, (b) delivery<strong>of</strong>supplementsand(c)follow-up <strong>of</strong>PW'ssupplementation.<br />
The over-all picture showed that BHW involvement was highest in the first activity followed by<br />
monitoring <strong>of</strong> supplementation and least in delivery <strong>of</strong> supplements. Results <strong>of</strong> the first and<br />
second validation studies (Table32)showed that half (i.e.,54%,2nd validation) <strong>of</strong> the volunteer<br />
workers were involved in identification and referral activity, only one-fourth (i.e., 17% - 1st<br />
validation, 26% - 2nd validation) in delivery <strong>of</strong> supplements and only one-third (i.e., 30% - 1st<br />
validation, 42% - 2nd validation) in monitoring <strong>of</strong> PW's supplementation. Although a small<br />
percentage <strong>of</strong> the BHWs were involved, a general increase in their involvement in the activities<br />
can be noted from the first to the second validation studies. The increase is attributed to the<br />
motivational dialogues conducted with these worker by the midwives, which stressed the<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> their tasks for the success <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />
Table32. Percent<strong>of</strong> Barangay <strong>Health</strong> Workers involvedin IFSD activities by treatmentgroup, first and<br />
.second validation studies.<br />
Roles <strong>of</strong> BHW Focd Iron Food&Iron NIE Overall total<br />
I<br />
1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2<br />
,<br />
IDand referral 30 75 49 48 42 39 65 60 54<br />
Delivery 50 35 15 35 42 61 6 8 17 26<br />
Follow-up 30 42 36 35 32 61 25 42 30 42<br />
A study <strong>of</strong> the results by treatment group shows that the NIE Group had the highest percentage<br />
<strong>of</strong> BHWs involved in the identification activity, followed by the Food Group, the Iron Group and<br />
then the Food & Iron Group. While the Food & Iron Group fared the lowest in the first activity,<br />
it had the highest average number (from the 2 validation studies) <strong>of</strong> BHWs involved in both<br />
delivery and monitoring <strong>of</strong> supplementation activities. Furthermore, among the threegroups with<br />
supplementation, BHW involvement during delivery was significantly higher in the Food and<br />
Food & Iron Groups than in the Iron Group. This result is consistent with an earlier conclusion<br />
that the delivery <strong>of</strong> medicine was still entrusted to the midwife rather than to the BHW;<br />
Conversely, the delivery <strong>of</strong> food intervention was already entrusted by the PW to the auxiliary<br />
workers. The NIE Group showed only
Overall resultsshowed thatthe Food & Iron Groupobtained the most BHW support than the other<br />
treatment groups.<br />
Primary <strong>Health</strong> Care Committee Involvement<br />
To determine the involvement or non-involvement <strong>of</strong> the Municipal and Barangay.PHC<br />
Committees (MPHCC/BPHCC) in the IFSDProject, committeechairmen were interviewed. In the<br />
first validation study, only 51% <strong>of</strong> the barangay chairmen were aware and involved in the<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> the project in their areas. Concerned about this low participation, the project<br />
task force convened the municipal and barangaycommittee chairmen together with the RHU staff<br />
to fully orient them on the project and clarify their roles in implementation. The meetings also<br />
served as venue for the RHU and PHC activities. In the second validation, percentage awareness<br />
and involvement <strong>of</strong> barangay and municipal PHC committees improved: BPHCC - 73%'and<br />
MPHCC - 86%. The midwife who played a vital role in project implementation was also<br />
interviewed on the PHC Committee involvement. Results <strong>of</strong> the interview support the findings<br />
obtained from the PHCC chairmen <strong>of</strong>an increased involvement <strong>of</strong> the committees: 78% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
midwives in the first validation and 89% in the second obtained assistance from Barangay PHC<br />
Committees.<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> the third validation, however, show that this high level <strong>of</strong> involvement was not<br />
sustained: only 27% <strong>of</strong> the midwives obtained assistance from the barangay committees in the<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> IFSD activities in their barangays. The decrease was an effect <strong>of</strong>. a political<br />
upheaval in the country which resulted in the undefined status <strong>of</strong> many local organizations even<br />
up to the time <strong>of</strong> the third validation study.<br />
It was gathered from the interviews <strong>of</strong> midwives that it was in the identification and referral <strong>of</strong> PW<br />
where involvement was greatest, followed by the task <strong>of</strong> information dissemination. The other<br />
forms <strong>of</strong> assistance obtained by the midwives were in the (1) distribution <strong>of</strong> supplementsand NIE<br />
materials; (2) visitation <strong>of</strong> PW; (3) supervision/motivation <strong>of</strong> BHW and (4) coordination <strong>of</strong><br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> IFSDactivities in the barangay. Table 33 shows the percentages <strong>of</strong> midwives<br />
who obtained assistance from the barangay committee per type <strong>of</strong> involvement in the three<br />
validation studies.<br />
Table 33. Percent<strong>of</strong> RHMwho obtained assistancefrom BPHCC by type <strong>of</strong>assistancegiven,first to third<br />
validation studies<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> Assistance 1st validation 2nd validation 3rd validation<br />
1. Identification and referral <strong>of</strong> PW 44·0 49.0 34.2<br />
2. Distribution <strong>of</strong> N/F/NIE materials 7.0 6.0 7.9<br />
3. Infodisseminationabout IFSD, 22.0· 20.0 23.7<br />
H & N counselling <strong>of</strong> PW/ bgy<br />
. 4. Visitation <strong>of</strong> PW 11.0 6.0 13.2<br />
5. Supervision/Motivation <strong>of</strong> BHW 19.0 16.0 5.3<br />
6. Coordination<strong>of</strong> implementation <strong>of</strong> 14.0 16.0 21.0<br />
IFSD projectin the barangay and<br />
conducts meeting<br />
63
From the interviews <strong>of</strong> the municipal chairmen, it was learned that the involvement <strong>of</strong> the<br />
municipal PHC committee was limited to logistical and administrative functions. Logistical<br />
support took the form <strong>of</strong> providing for transportation in the delivery <strong>of</strong> supplements to the<br />
barangays, for the training <strong>of</strong> BHWsand for monitoring. Administrative support was in the form<br />
<strong>of</strong> meetings with committee members and barangay captains to elicit theircooperation. The PHC<br />
Committee also encouraged its members to disseminate information about IPSDin the course <strong>of</strong><br />
implementing agency projects in the barangays.<br />
Interviews with barangaychairmen on their specific involvement in the IPSDprojectconfiimed the<br />
forms <strong>of</strong> assistance mentioned by the midwives. Moreover, the logistical and-administrative<br />
supportgiven by the municipal committee was reportedly extended by the barangay counterpart.<br />
Aside from the Primary <strong>Health</strong> Care Committee, the midwives also noted the organizations or<br />
persons in the barangay who in one way or another helped in project implementation. The most<br />
commonly mentioned organizations were the Balikatan sa Kaunlaran, the Barangay Council,<br />
Catholic Relief Services (CRS), Kabataang Barangay, tbe workers <strong>of</strong> the Population Commission, .<br />
<strong>Department</strong>s<strong>of</strong>Agriculture and LocalGovernment and the teachers. Assistance rendered by these<br />
organizations was in the following areas: -<br />
1) identification and referral <strong>of</strong> PW<br />
2) distribution <strong>of</strong> supplements and NIE materials<br />
3) information dissemination about the project in Purok meetings or mothers' classes as well<br />
as in their own organization meetings, and<br />
4) logistical support e.g. provision <strong>of</strong> transport or fare for delivery <strong>of</strong> supplies, incentives to<br />
BHWs.<br />
Problems in Project Implementation<br />
In this project which aimed to assimilate the activities within the regular workload and functions<br />
<strong>of</strong> the RHU staff and PHC Committee, problems were expected. The problems encountered were<br />
as follows:<br />
On the Accomplishment <strong>of</strong> Project Monitoring Forms<br />
The operations component <strong>of</strong> the project relied on secondary daia collection. In the submitted<br />
Supplementation Cards some inaccuracies and incompleteness <strong>of</strong> information were observed.<br />
Only 53%<strong>of</strong> the Supplementation Cards, were retrieved from the total enrolled pregnant women.<br />
Midwives claimed the other cards were lost by the PW. Moreover, the forms needed for<br />
requisitioning and delivery <strong>of</strong> supplies by the midwives and nurses were sometimes<br />
unaccomplished.<br />
The common complaint from midwives and nurses was the bulk <strong>of</strong> paperwork required by the<br />
project. Though the importance <strong>of</strong> the monitoring forms was explained, their accomplishment was<br />
considered an additional task to what the personnel claimed was already a heavy workload.<br />
On Declining Participation <strong>of</strong> BHW and PHC Committees In Project Implementation<br />
The participation <strong>of</strong> BHWs is very vital for expanding the reach <strong>of</strong> health delivery sevices. The<br />
project had shown that it would be possible to solicit the support <strong>of</strong> the outreach workers. The non-<br />
64
participation <strong>of</strong> some BHWs in project activities may have been due to lack <strong>of</strong> proper orientation<br />
and motivation on the importance <strong>of</strong> the activities. Although BHWs were trained on their tasks,<br />
for onereason or anothersomewere unable or unavailable to perform their-tasks. This was partly<br />
due to the absence <strong>of</strong> incentive. Midwives and health workers had expressed their need for<br />
incentives because IFSO project activities were seen as an additional workload.<br />
The non-involvement <strong>of</strong> some PHC Committees in the project is believed to have been due to lack<br />
<strong>of</strong> proper communication and weak linkages at various implementing levels. .<br />
On Leakage <strong>of</strong> Project Supplement<br />
A certain amount <strong>of</strong> leakage in the delivery <strong>of</strong> Nutrina was experienced since Nutrina was used<br />
as incentive to the BHWs or as token or fare for their transport.<br />
A consequence <strong>of</strong> theleakage was the incompletedelivery <strong>of</strong> Nutrina to thePW, as shownin Figure<br />
8. The discrepancy may also have been due to the irregularity <strong>of</strong> the BHW/midwife's delivery<br />
or the irregularity <strong>of</strong> the PW's visit to the health center to obtain her supply.<br />
On Low Compliance with Protocol<br />
Validation results show the need for improvement in the compliance with a number<strong>of</strong> protocols.<br />
A major reason which contributed to this is that, the midwives already consider their workload<br />
heavy and their tasks in the IPSO make it heavier. A second reason is the inability <strong>of</strong> the project<br />
implementors to fully internalize or consider their tasksin the project as part <strong>of</strong> their task in the<br />
delivery <strong>of</strong> maternal and child health services, Consideration <strong>of</strong> the IPSO as a separate and<br />
additional work thereby led to low compliance with project protocols.<br />
On General Project Administration<br />
Because <strong>of</strong> the nature<strong>of</strong> the project, an outsideentity suchas the Nutrition Center<strong>of</strong> thePhilippines<br />
was called upon to do much coordination, monitoring and implementation. This was disadvantageous<br />
to a certain extent because the area tended to look upon the project as a separate activity,<br />
and total reliance on the NCr staff became a protocol which deviated from the general objective<br />
<strong>of</strong> PHC as a community participation-based approach.<br />
Early Response Schemes<br />
Cognizant <strong>of</strong> these problems, the IFSONational Task Force and projectstaff implementedvarious<br />
activities to minimize problems and improve project implementation.<br />
Dialogues and Reinforcement Training <strong>of</strong> Project ImpIementors<br />
In response to the problems that surfaced in the early months <strong>of</strong> operation, dialogues with the<br />
project implementors were conducted by the National Task Force and Project Staff. Thedialogue<br />
served as a venue not only for discussing problems but also for eliciting recommendations to<br />
minimize these problems. . '<br />
Continuing dialogues with implementors were conducted by the Project Operations Staff during<br />
the monthly delivery <strong>of</strong> supplements. Two such major dialogues where problemswere brought<br />
up with the implementors (RHMs, PHNs, MHOs and their supervisors at the district, provincial<br />
65
and regional levels) were conducted on April 18 & 19, 1985 (4 months after start <strong>of</strong> delivery) and<br />
in August 1985 (8 months after start <strong>of</strong> delivery). Outputs <strong>of</strong> these dialogues are shown in<br />
Appendix G and H.<br />
Revisions on Project Operations<br />
Based on the recommendations obtained from the dialogues with the implementors, some major<br />
changes in project operations were made:<br />
• simplification and reduction <strong>of</strong> monitoring forms<br />
• elimination <strong>of</strong> infant weighing on the 7th day after birth<br />
• introduction <strong>of</strong> the 3-monthcycle Nutrina menuconsisting <strong>of</strong> 18 varieties to keep the PW from<br />
being satiated with only 5 varieties<br />
• distribution <strong>of</strong> barscales to improve compliance with the weighing task<br />
Seminar-Workshop among RHU and PHC Committee Officers<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> the first validation study were fed back to the project implementors through a<br />
workshop. One <strong>of</strong> the major findings <strong>of</strong> the first validation study was the non-involvement <strong>of</strong><br />
many PHC Committees in implementation because <strong>of</strong> poor linkage between the RHU and the<br />
municipal andbarangay committees.<br />
Non-involvement was also due to the present inactive status <strong>of</strong> many PHC Committees. The<br />
seminar-workshop was then conducted primarily to help the RHUand PHCCommittees plan on:<br />
1. how to strengthen RHU - PHCC linkages<br />
2. how to reactivate the PHC Committees<br />
3. how to integrate the IFSD as an activity <strong>of</strong> PHC<br />
The output <strong>of</strong> the workshop was a Plan <strong>of</strong> Action is shown in Appendix I.<br />
Workshop with Provincial and District TaskForces<br />
To remove the notion that IFSD was a separate activity or to make the implementors realize that<br />
the IFSDwasa project <strong>of</strong>the localhealthdepartment,the planning<strong>of</strong>activities,projectadministration,<br />
implementationand monitoringweresharedwith the Provincial and District TaskForce members.<br />
The National Task Force conducted meetings with local task forces on the:<br />
• design and implementation <strong>of</strong> the Provincial Form<br />
• planning and assignment <strong>of</strong> the monitoring task to the local staff<br />
• consultation on protocols/content <strong>of</strong> project activities as well as on the conduct <strong>of</strong> these<br />
activities, e.g., 2nd, 3rd validation studies, RHU visits<br />
• plan <strong>of</strong> action and delegation <strong>of</strong> responsibilities for monitoring the implementation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Municipal Plan <strong>of</strong> Action designed during the seminar-workshop<br />
RHU Visits<br />
The Nationaland ProvincialTask Force membersconductedRHU visits to assist themunicipalities<br />
in implementingthe Plan <strong>of</strong> Action designed during the workshop. The RHU visits wereattended<br />
by members/<strong>of</strong>ficers <strong>of</strong> both municipal and barangay PHC Committees and RHU staff. Through<br />
66
these visits, the reactivation <strong>of</strong> the PHC Committees and their consequent involvement in the IPSD<br />
were expected to be achieved.<br />
Summary <strong>of</strong> the Operations Component<br />
The trainingactivities underthe operations component showed that all nursesand midwives were<br />
given training/follow-up and reinforcement training to effectively carry out their functions in the<br />
project. Eighty three percent (83%) <strong>of</strong> the BHWs were also given a half day formal training to<br />
effectively assist in the delivery system.<br />
From December 1984through December 1986, The IPSDproject covered a total <strong>of</strong> 17,903 PWs or<br />
77%<strong>of</strong> the targetted number. Findings show that Food supplements were an incentive for higher<br />
pre-natal coverage while the iron supplementation resulted in an earlier start <strong>of</strong> pre-natal checkup<br />
because <strong>of</strong> the early start <strong>of</strong> supplementation. On the average PW started to go for pre-natal .<br />
check-up when they were 5 months pregnant. However,almost one half<strong>of</strong> the mothers werefirst<br />
identified on dates beyond the prescribed start <strong>of</strong> iron supplementation. /<br />
AdecreasingBHWinvolvementin the project was noted. This is howevertrue not only for the IPSD<br />
project but for the entire health delivery services in the country. The RHM reported only 60% <strong>of</strong><br />
BHWs who were active at the end <strong>of</strong> the project as against 90% at the start. Reasons for low<br />
unsustained participation are: a) preoccupation with household or farm work, b) absence <strong>of</strong><br />
incentive and c) lack <strong>of</strong> appreciation <strong>of</strong> the importance <strong>of</strong> their role. Where the intervention was<br />
iron, the PW would rather get the supply from the RHU because they were afraid to get medicines<br />
from BHWs.<br />
Results show that orily 54%to 84%<strong>of</strong> PW received the correct number <strong>of</strong> food supplements. The<br />
reasons for this are the irregular BHW involvement and delayed visits <strong>of</strong> PW to BHS to get their<br />
supply. Food supplements were also used by BHWs as fare for transportation.<br />
The RHM, BHWand the PW found it more convenient to deliver or get the nutrina on a monthly<br />
or bi-monthly basis rather than weekly.<br />
Most frequently only 40-83% <strong>of</strong> PW received their NIE materials and a very low 2-16% received<br />
an explanation <strong>of</strong> the brochure upon receipt from the RHM. The RHMs found it time consuming<br />
to explain the 'brochures considering their hectic schedule.<br />
There was also a decreasing involvement <strong>of</strong> BHWs in monitoring. The RHMs ruled the gap as<br />
shown in the increasing percentage <strong>of</strong> mothers who claimed they were visited by the RHM. Only<br />
46-83 % <strong>of</strong> the PW were visited at least once: However a high percentage were visited weekly<br />
during the first and second validation. The frequency became irregular at the third validation<br />
period.<br />
The PW on the average took only 52% <strong>of</strong> the total tablets required during the entire supplementation<br />
period.<br />
The low compliance was attributed to the supplementation side effects, the PWs forgetting to take<br />
the tablet and lack <strong>of</strong> continuity <strong>of</strong> supply because <strong>of</strong> low BHW involvement and delayed visits<br />
to BHS.
The results show that BHW involvement is crucial to the delivery system. The low BHW<br />
involvement has been cited most frequently as the reason for the low level <strong>of</strong> accomplishment.<br />
Another vital force which could have improved the level <strong>of</strong> project accomplishments is the<br />
BPHCCinvolvement. Where the BPHCCwas involved, logistical, administrativeandcoordinative<br />
support was provided. The BPHCC also assisted in information dissemination regarding the<br />
project and conducted BHW activities like identification and referral <strong>of</strong> PW, delivery and<br />
monitoring <strong>of</strong> supplies. The decreasing BPHCC involvement in the project was due.to:a) the<br />
lack <strong>of</strong> communication/feedback system from the RHU to BPHCC,b) weak linkages, and c)<br />
inactive committees/<strong>of</strong>ficers.<br />
Other problems encountered during delivery were the following.ajoveralllow compliance with<br />
protocol because <strong>of</strong> heavy workload, andinability to internalize IFSDtasks as part<strong>of</strong> thedelivery<br />
<strong>of</strong> MHC services, b) low retrieval <strong>of</strong> pregnancy monitoring and supplementation cards, c)<br />
incompleteor inaccurate information in some monitoringdata,andd) complaints <strong>of</strong>implementors<br />
<strong>of</strong> heavy paperwork, heavy workload and IFSD tasks as additional load.<br />
Asignificant finding relates to the decreasing involvement <strong>of</strong> the BHWs. The PW were persuaded<br />
to go to the BHSor RHM to get their own supplies, in accordance with the principle <strong>of</strong> the primary<br />
health care approach to involve the targets themselves. An alternative strategy also involving the<br />
PW themselves in the delivery is to bring the supply depot closer, for instance, from the BHS to<br />
the house <strong>of</strong> a trusted and very active BHW.<br />
On the whole, since the project aimed to determine the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> a delivery system at the<br />
local level, certain inputs were provided and strategies modified to ensure the av.ailability <strong>of</strong> the<br />
supplements at the time when the targets needed them. Thus supplements were delivered<br />
directly to the RHU. In food intervention, additional transport direct to the BHS was provided.<br />
Also when the RHU-PHCC linkages was found to be inadequate or not functioning at all, 'the<br />
project facilitated andcoordinated the RHU visits which served asa fora for PHCC reorganization.<br />
Close feedback monitoring system was functioning between NCP and the provincial <strong>of</strong>fice such<br />
that requirements were immediately attended to. Monthly reinforcement training also during the<br />
first months<strong>of</strong> operations was conducted to familiarize project implementors on project protocols.<br />
That problems occurred inspite <strong>of</strong> these additional support systems shows that in future<br />
implementation, there is a need to apply the above mentioned inputs/ marketing strategies to<br />
ensure project impact. A deeper analysis <strong>of</strong> the delivery system to identify in greater detail the<br />
operational problems was also called for. Figure 6 presents the factors that may affect the<br />
effectiveness <strong>of</strong> an iron supplementation delivery project based on the lessons from the study. A<br />
detailed analysis <strong>of</strong> the factors affecting service delivery is also documented in a related study<br />
using the project's data (72).<br />
68
6. DESCRIPTIVE PROFILE OF SAMPLE PREGNANT WOMEN<br />
Chapters 6 to 9 <strong>of</strong> this report discuss the findings <strong>of</strong> the research component in relation to the<br />
objectives <strong>of</strong> the project namely: a) the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the project in terms <strong>of</strong> reducing the<br />
prevalence <strong>of</strong> iron deficiency anemia and low birthweight in the community (Chapter 7), b) cost<br />
effectiveness <strong>of</strong> iron and food supplementation (Chapter8), and c) socio-economic, demographic<br />
and intervention variables on mothers and children (Chapter 9). Chapter 6 presents the socioeconomic,demographic,<br />
healthand nutrition pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> thesamplemothers included in thestudy.<br />
Age <strong>of</strong> Gestation At Pre-and Post-Surveys<br />
The research component included data from a cross sectional sample <strong>of</strong> 807 pregnant women at<br />
baseline and 867 pregnant women at post-survey. Although the food supplementation covered<br />
only women who were at least in the 7th month <strong>of</strong> gestation, both the baseline and post-surveys<br />
included pregnant women in their 5th to 9th month <strong>of</strong> gestation in all treatment groups. This was<br />
done since one <strong>of</strong> the major objectives <strong>of</strong> the project was to determine the effect <strong>of</strong> the different<br />
forms <strong>of</strong> intervention on the over-all prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia among high-risk groups .in the<br />
community (i.e, those who are at least 5 months pregnant), rather than among the specific targets<br />
<strong>of</strong>the intervention. Table34 shows the distribution <strong>of</strong> the samplesaccording to theage <strong>of</strong> gestation<br />
and treatment group, for both surveys.<br />
Table 34. Distribution <strong>of</strong> pregnantwomen by age <strong>of</strong> gestation and treatmentgroup, pre-and post-survey<br />
Treatment group<br />
Age <strong>of</strong> gestation Total Food Iron Food & Iron NIE<br />
No. % No. % No. % No. % No. %<br />
Pre survey<br />
5 months 184 22.8 51 25.6 47 23.7 47 23.7 39 18.4<br />
6 months 189 23.4 51 25.6 45 22.7 39 19.7 54 25.5<br />
7 months 190 23.5 43 21.6 42 21.2 55 27.8 50 ·23.6<br />
8 months 186 23.0 42 21.1 46 23.2 47 23.7 51 24.0<br />
9 months 58 7.2 12 6.0 18 9.1 10 5.1 18 8.5<br />
TOTAL 807 100.0 199 100 198 100 198 100 212 99.94 ,<br />
Post survey<br />
5 months 159 18.3 38 18.8 35 17.6 48 20.0 38 16.8<br />
6 months 207 23.9 55 27.2 43 21.6 57 23.8 52 23.0<br />
7 months 242 27.9 63 31.2 64 32.2 67 27.9 48 21.2<br />
8 months 202 23.3 35 17.3 50 25.1 52 21.7 65 28.8<br />
9 months 57 6.6 11 5.4 7 3.5 16 6.7 23 10.2<br />
TOTAL 867 100 202 100 199 100' 240 100 226 100<br />
Socia Demographic Characteristics<br />
The pregnant women included in the sample were in the prime <strong>of</strong> their child bearing ages with a<br />
mean age <strong>of</strong>27.2 years. Their husbands were in general, 2 to 3 years older with a mean age <strong>of</strong> 30.4<br />
years. The mean household size was 5 - 6 members, which is larger than the mean family size <strong>of</strong><br />
70
Table 36. Distribution <strong>of</strong> pregnant women by educational attainment and treatment group, pre-survey<br />
Treatment group<br />
Educational Total Food Iron Food & Iron NIE<br />
attainment No. % No. % No. % No. % No. %<br />
No schooling 5 0.6 1 05 2 1.0 0 0.0 2 0.9<br />
Elementary 362 44.9 101 SO.8 85 42.9 87 43.9 89 42.0<br />
High schoolI 288 35.7 57 28.6 80 40.4 69 34.8 82. 38.7<br />
Vocational<br />
College 152 18.8 40 20.1 31 15.7 42 21.2 39 18.4<br />
TOTAL 807 100 199 100 198 100 198 100 212 100<br />
Past Pregnancy Outcome<br />
<strong>Health</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />
The mean number <strong>of</strong> pregnancies for all women taken altogether was 3.5. In terms <strong>of</strong> the number<br />
<strong>of</strong> livebirths, the reported.value ranged from 0 to 12, with a mean <strong>of</strong> 2.3. About two-thirds <strong>of</strong> the<br />
women (64.3%) had at most only 2livebirths while only one-tenth (9.8%) had 6 - 12 livebirths.<br />
The incidence <strong>of</strong> abortion among the women in the sample was 16%, with 7 <strong>of</strong> them having 3 to 4<br />
abortions in the past. The incidence <strong>of</strong> stillbirths was much lowerat 4.1%. Perinatal and neonatal<br />
deaths wereevenless common with corresponding proportions<strong>of</strong> 3.2%and 1.2%, respectively. In<br />
general, no significant difference existed between the four treatment groups with respect to the<br />
past pregnancy outcomes <strong>of</strong> the women if the ANOVA test is used. This is shown in Table 37.<br />
72
Very few pregnant women had a history <strong>of</strong> heart disease and malaria. Influenza and/or<br />
pneumonia was the most common, with a prevalence <strong>of</strong> 27.3 % for all women taken altogether.<br />
Moreover, the Z test reveals that the NIE Group had the highest percent With weak/irregular<br />
heartbeats compared to FoodGroupand Food & Iron Group; the Food and Iron Group the lowest<br />
percentwith murmurscomparedwith Food and NIE Groups; Food was highest with percentrales<br />
compared with Food & Iron and Iron Groups and NIE higher than Iron Group; the Food and Iron<br />
Group was highest with pretivial edema compared to the Food and NIE Groups.<br />
Among the differentcomplaints in relation to pregnancy, dizziness was the mostcommon (69.2%),<br />
followed by vomiting (46.8%) and lassitude (43.4%). Bleeding was experienced by only 33 (4.1 %)<br />
out<strong>of</strong> the807pregnantwomen in thesample. Again theZ test showed the NIE with highest percent<br />
<strong>of</strong> PW experiencing vomitting and dizziness, the Food & Iron Group higher than Iron Group .and<br />
the Food Group higher than Iron Group in percent <strong>of</strong> PW experiencing'vomitting.' However the<br />
treatment groupsare homogenousas far as sleeplessness, anorexia, lassitude, edemaand bleeding<br />
are concerned.<br />
Table 38. Number & percentage <strong>of</strong> pregnant women with clinical signs and symptoms by type and<br />
treatment group, pre survey<br />
Treatment £l"OUO<br />
Signs & Total Food Iron Food Iron NIE<br />
Svrnotoms No. % No. % No. % No. % No. %<br />
Pallor<br />
Conjunctiva 551 68.3 117 58.8 147 74.2 146 73.7 141 66.5<br />
Mucosa 248 30.7 59 29.6 74 37.4 64 32.3 51 24.1<br />
Nailbeds palm 154 19.1 49 24.6 49 24.7 32 16.2 24 11.3<br />
Scurvy 105 13.0 13 6.5 12 6.1 41 20.7 39 18.4<br />
Cheilosis 47 5.8 4 2.0 9 4.5 12 6.1 22 10.4<br />
Enlarged thyroid 85 10.5 15 7.5 17 8.6 36 18.2 17 8.0<br />
Weak,irregular<br />
heartbeats 28 3.5 5 2.5 6 3.0 3 1.5 14 6.6<br />
Murmurs 37 4.6 14 7.0 6 3.0 4 2.0 13 6.1<br />
Rales 36 4.5 14 7.0 4 2.0 5 2.5 13 6.1<br />
Abdominalscar 40 5.0 14 7.0 13 6.6 6 3.0 7 3.3<br />
Pretevialedema 107 13.3 18 9.0 27 13.6 41 20.7 21 9.9<br />
Other Med.&<br />
Related History<br />
TB 30 3.7 6 3.0 5 2.5 7 3.5 12 5.7<br />
Influenza/Bronco 222 27.5 56 28.1 49 24.7 41 20.7 76 35.8<br />
pneumonia<br />
Kidneydisease 41 5.1 17 8.5 4 2.0 7 3.5 13 6.1<br />
Heart disease 9 1.1 5 2.5 3 1.5 0 0.0 1 0.5<br />
Malaria 6 0.7 2 1.0 1 0.5 2 1.0 1 0.5<br />
Complaints related<br />
to pregnancy<br />
Vomitting 380 47.1 85 42.7 64 32.3 92 46.5 139 65.6<br />
Dizziness 560 69.4 128 64.3 122 61.6 140 70.7 170 80.2<br />
Sleeplessness 210 26.0 53 26.6 58 29,.3 45 22.7 54 25.5<br />
Anorexia 257 31.8 60 30.1 65 32:8 68 34.3 64 30.2<br />
Lassitude 351 43.5 85 42.7 77 38.9 88 44.4 101 47.6<br />
Edema 91 11.2 23 11.6 24 12.1 21 10.6 23 10.8<br />
Bleeding 33 4.1 8 4.0 6 3.0 7 3.5 12 5.7<br />
74
Parasitism<br />
Since parasitism is an established risk factor in anemia, a stool examination was also undertaken.<br />
However, only 686 (85.0%) <strong>of</strong> the 801 pregnant women submitted stool samples. The results are<br />
shown in Table 39.<br />
Table 39. Prevalence <strong>of</strong> parasites by type and treatment group,.pre-survey<br />
Treatment group<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> Total Food Iron Food & iron NIE<br />
parasites No. % No. % No. % No. % No. %<br />
n WI n WI n WI n WI n WI<br />
Hookworm 686 22 3.2 173 2 1.2 177 12 6.8 187 7 3.7 149 1 0.7<br />
Ascaris 686 176 25.7 173 40 23.1 177 60 33.9 187 40 21.4 149 36 24.2<br />
Trichuris 686 343 50.0 173 83 48.0 177 110 62.1 187 73 39.0 149 77 51.7<br />
Table 39 shows that <strong>of</strong> the 3 types <strong>of</strong> parasites, trichuris was the most common, with half (50.0%)<br />
<strong>of</strong> the women being positive for it. Hookworm had the lowest prevalence at 3.2%. Statistical<br />
differences exist among the four treatment groups with respect to the prevalence <strong>of</strong> the different<br />
types <strong>of</strong> parasites, with those in the iron group having the highest prevalence for hookworm,<br />
. ascaris and trichuris. The NIE on the other hand, showed higher prevalences <strong>of</strong> trichuris than the<br />
Food and Iron Group, while inversely for hookworm, the Food and Iron Group had higher<br />
prevalence than the NIE Group.<br />
Nutritional Status<br />
About seven out <strong>of</strong> every ten pregnant women(72%) in the sample were at-risk <strong>of</strong> delivering low<br />
birthweight babies based on their weight for age standards. The four/treatment groups were<br />
comparable with respect to the nutritional status <strong>of</strong> the pregnant women,which is shown in Table<br />
40.<br />
Table 40. Distribution <strong>of</strong> pregnant women by nutritional status and treatment group, pre-survey<br />
Treatment l'l'OUD<br />
Nutritional Total Food Iron Food & Iron' NIE<br />
status No. % No. % No. % No. % No. %<br />
Normal 226 28.0 53 26.6 58 29.3 58 29.3 57 26.9<br />
Nutritionally 581 72.0 146 73.4 140 70.7 140 70.7 155 73.1<br />
at-risk<br />
75
,<br />
Group (3.27% average). Table 43 shows the relative, and average change in the percentage <strong>of</strong><br />
PW with correct answers per K-item.<br />
Table 43. Percent relative change <strong>of</strong> pregnant women who obtained correct answers by K item from<br />
pre-to post-survey by treatment group<br />
Treatmentgroup<br />
K item Over-all Food Iron Food & Iron NIE<br />
What is anemia 1.1 2.0 1.2 -1.5 2.9<br />
Causes <strong>of</strong> anemia 2.9 2.4 2.5 5.0 1.6<br />
Effects <strong>of</strong> anemia on 6.1 11.0 1.7 5.3 6.4<br />
pregnant mother<br />
Effects <strong>of</strong> anemia on 10.8 8.0 7.2 4.0 12.0<br />
the fetus<br />
Iron rich food 2.4 3.4 5.1 3.5 -2.0<br />
Energyrich food -0.1 -{j.9 0.7 6.4 -0.9<br />
Protein rich food 2.3 -0.1 -0.1 7.1 2.2<br />
Bodyregulating 4.7 -0.5 1.7 11.8 53<br />
rich food<br />
Difference in the 17.6 7.3 12.0 28.6 20.8<br />
diet <strong>of</strong> a PWand<br />
anon-PW<br />
Reasonfor taking 2.4 6.1 1.0 2.1 0.4<br />
supplements<br />
The questions were also analyzed by major topics namely: (1) on anemia, (2) on sources <strong>of</strong><br />
nutrients and (3) on diet during pregnancy.<br />
There was an increase <strong>of</strong> knowledge <strong>of</strong> the PW on all the 4 anemia-related topics. The question<br />
on the correct cause <strong>of</strong> anemia obtained the highest relative change from pre- to post periods.<br />
However, a noticeably low percentage <strong>of</strong> PW knew the correct cause <strong>of</strong> anemia in both surveys<br />
(i.e., only 2.1% at pre and 5.0% at post).<br />
On the sources <strong>of</strong> nutrients, more than 60%knew the right sources <strong>of</strong> iron-rich and energy-giving<br />
foods while less than 40% knew the right sources <strong>of</strong> protein-rich and body-regulating foods.<br />
At baseline, only 7.4% <strong>of</strong> the respondents knew the correct difference in the diet <strong>of</strong> a pregnant and<br />
non-pregnant woman. At post, this increased to 25%, registering the highest relative change <strong>of</strong><br />
2.4%among the K-iterns. Inbothsurveys, more than 90%<strong>of</strong> the PW knew the importance <strong>of</strong> taking<br />
supplements during pregnancy.<br />
78
Pre-Natal Check-up<br />
Nutrition counselling during mother's classes and health center visits always stressed the<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> regular and early pre-natal check-up. This was also given emphasisin the IFSD NIE<br />
materials distributed to the PW. During the surveys, the PW were asked if they already had prenatal<br />
check-up during present pregnancy. Overall results showed an increased percentage <strong>of</strong>PW<br />
who already had pre-natal check-up from pre-to post-survey (7.4 to 82.5%). Across treatment<br />
groups, results showed a significant lowest percentage <strong>of</strong> PW who went for pre-natal check-up in<br />
the Food Group while the Iron Group is significantly higher compared to Food and Iron Group<br />
and the NIE Groupat baseline. At post, again the Food Group is significantly lower than the Iron<br />
Group and the Food and Iron Group; and the Food and Iron significantly higher than NIE<br />
(Table 44).<br />
Table 44. Percentage <strong>of</strong> PW who had pre-natal check-up prior to conduct <strong>of</strong> survey by treatment<br />
group, pre-and post-survey<br />
Treatment'group<br />
Period Total Food Iron Food & Iron NIE<br />
Pre survey 70.4 57.3 81.8 71.2 71.2<br />
Post survey 82.5 73.3 84.4 92.5 78.3<br />
% Relative 17.2 27.9 3.2 29.9 10.0<br />
Change<br />
The importance <strong>of</strong> early pre-natal check-up was among the messages stressed in PW counselling<br />
and in the NIE materials distributed. Results showed an increase <strong>of</strong> PW who had their first prenatal<br />
check-up within the 1st - 5th month <strong>of</strong> their pregnancy from pre-to post- period in the Iron<br />
and Food & Iron Groups while there was a decrease in the Food and NIE (control) Groups (refer<br />
to Table 45). For the Food and NIE Groups, however, there was an increase <strong>of</strong> mothers who went<br />
for their first check-up within the 6th-7th month while the reverse was true for the Iron and Food<br />
& Iron Groups. All the treatment groups showed a decrease in start <strong>of</strong> check-up only during the<br />
8th - 9th month <strong>of</strong> pregnancy.<br />
Table 45. Percentage distribution <strong>of</strong> PW by start <strong>of</strong> pre-natal check-up and treatment group, pre-and<br />
post-survey<br />
Treatmentgroup<br />
AOG at start <strong>of</strong> Total Food Iron Food & Iron NIE<br />
check-up(months) Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post<br />
Ist- 5th 68.3 70.1 68.4 58.8 67.9 73.2 68.8 77.5 68.2 67.2<br />
6th - 7th 27.1 27.8 27.2 39.2 27.2 25.0 27.7 20.7 26.5 29.9<br />
8th - 9th 4.6 2.1 4.4 2.0 4.9 1.8 3.5 1.8 5.3 2.8<br />
79
These findings show that the protocol for start <strong>of</strong> receipt <strong>of</strong> the IFSD Supplement somehow<br />
influenced the start <strong>of</strong> check-up <strong>of</strong> the mothers. More PW in the Food Group in the post-survey<br />
thanat pre-surveyhad the tendency to start their enrollment in IFSDonly on their 6th or7th month<br />
because the project protocol calls for the PW to receive Nutrina only from the 7th month <strong>of</strong><br />
pregnancy. Similarly, more PW in the Iron and Food & Iron Groups at post-survey had their first<br />
check-up on or before the 5th month when they were already qualified to receive Ferrin tablets.<br />
Results (pre-and post1also show an increased percentage <strong>of</strong> PW who preferred the RHU and BHS<br />
and a decreased percentage <strong>of</strong> those who availed <strong>of</strong> the government hospitals and the TBA<br />
(Table 46).<br />
Table 46. Percentagedistribution <strong>of</strong> PWby place<strong>of</strong> pre-natal check-upand treatment group, pre-andpostsurvey<br />
Treatmentgroup<br />
Place<strong>of</strong> Pre- Natal Tota! Food Iron Food & Iron NIE<br />
Check-up Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post<br />
1. RHU/BHS 80.1 87.1 70.2 83.8 88.3 89.3 85.8 91.9 73.5 81.9<br />
2. Government 11.4 6.6 16.7 10.8 8.6 8.0 7.1 3.2 14.6 7.9<br />
hospital<br />
3. Private clinic/<br />
Hospital 5.4 5.7 7.7 4.7 3.1 4.8 5.7 5.0 5.3 8.5<br />
4. Hilot 3.0 0.6 4.4 0.7 0.0 0.0 1.4 0.0 5.6 1.7<br />
Majority (i.e., 54% at pre, 57% at post) <strong>of</strong> the PW claimed that they were preoccupied with<br />
household or farm work, and thus did not have time for pre-natal check-up. One fifth (i.e., 20%<br />
at pre, 17% at post) <strong>of</strong> the PW believed that they were in good health and felt no need to go to the<br />
health center. A few did not realize the importance<strong>of</strong> earlypre-natalcheck-upbutopted for checkup<br />
only during the latter months <strong>of</strong> pregnancy. Others found the distance to the health station so<br />
exacting that they preferred going to the nearby hilot. Some other PW cited lack <strong>of</strong> moneyas the<br />
cause for not having a pre-natal check-up. Some <strong>of</strong> the PW even admitted laziness as their<br />
reason.The distribution <strong>of</strong> pregnant women according to their reasons for not having any checkup<br />
is presented in Table 47.<br />
80
Table 47. Percent distribution <strong>of</strong> PW by reason for no pre-natal check-up and.treatment group, preand<br />
post-survey<br />
Treatment group<br />
Reason for no Total Food Iron Food &:Iron NIE<br />
pre- natal Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post . Pre Post Pre Post<br />
check-up<br />
1. Preoccupied with<br />
household work 54.0 . 57.9 43.5 50.0 55.6 61.3 63.2 72.2 59.0 59.2<br />
(attitudinal)<br />
2. PW in good health 20.9 17.1 22.4 20.4 13.9 12.9 21.1 11.1 23.0 18.4<br />
3. Distance/Hilot 3.8 5.2 2.4 7.5 5.6 3.2 3.5 0.0 4.9 6.1<br />
4. No infonnation/<br />
Deferred check-up 10.4 14.5 13.0 14.9 19.4 19.4 3.5 16.7 6.6 102<br />
5. Lack <strong>of</strong> money 7.9 3.3 12.9 3.7 0.0 .0.0 . 8.8 0.0 4.9 5.1<br />
6. Others/Don't know 3.4 2.0 5.9 3.7 5.6 3.2 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0<br />
Dietary Intake<br />
The counselling <strong>of</strong>PW by midwivesand the IEC materialsincluded messagesonthe food sources<br />
<strong>of</strong> the different nutrients and on properdiet during pregnancy. To measure the effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />
the counselling.and IEC materials, the dietary intake <strong>of</strong> the PW wasdetermined using the 24-hour<br />
dietary recall method. Table 48 shows the mean intake <strong>of</strong> the sample mothers by nutrient and<br />
treatment groupat pre- and post-survey. Table 48 on the otherhand, shows the treatment groups<br />
with significantly increasing/decreasing (-) values from pre-and post-survey.<br />
,<br />
81
Table 48. Mean intake <strong>of</strong> pregnant women by nutrient and treatment group, pre-and post-survey<br />
Treatment group<br />
Tolal Food Iron Food & Iron NIE<br />
Nutrients Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post<br />
Calories (Kcal) 1738.6 2037.7 1676.1 2039.0 1785.6 1907.6 1798.7 2082.5 1697.2 2103.7<br />
Carbohydrates (gm) 319.3 364.4 312.6 362.0 320.5 338.1 332.9 378.3 312.0 374.8<br />
Protein (gm) 50.3 55.9 47.8 56.2 52.4 52.2 51.3 57.3 49.9 57.5<br />
Fats (gm) 26.4 36.7 24.1 37.8 30.0 35.8 26.3 34.7 25.2 38.5<br />
Iron (mg) 11.7 12.5 11.1 12.0 12.8 11.4 11.4 12.8 11.5 13.5<br />
Retinol (meg) 329.6 364.3 239.2 276.5 507.0 315.3 256.8 286.1 316.9 569.0<br />
Betacarotene (i.u.) 2425.0 2775.6 2186.3" 2073.5 2370.4 1766.3 2713.6 3015.2 2430.7 4037.3<br />
Thiamine (mg) 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.7 0.8<br />
Rib<strong>of</strong>lavin (rng) 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.5 0.7<br />
Niacine (rng) 16.4 18.5 15.9 18.8 17.5 17.7 16.3 18.7 16.0 18.7<br />
Ascorbic acid (mg) 99.9 66.3 153.5 52.4 109.6 54.3 71.9 69.8 66.8 85.5<br />
Caloric Intake<br />
The amount <strong>of</strong> caloric intake <strong>of</strong> the PW increased apparently from baseline to follow-up in the four<br />
treatment groups as shown in Table 48. Table 49 shows statistically significant increases in<br />
nutrient intake in all treatment groups except the Iron Group.<br />
An analysis <strong>of</strong> the mean intake from baseline to post shows that the mean intake increased in all<br />
treatment groups. However, intake deficiency was noticeable with 39% to 48% <strong>of</strong> the PW at<br />
baselineand 53% to 65% at post-survey going above 74% <strong>of</strong>RDA (refer to Table 1 <strong>of</strong> Appendix K).<br />
No significant difference among treatment groups was seen at baseline.<br />
82<br />
•
Table 49. Statistically significant differences innutrient intake from pre-to post-surveyby treatment<br />
group<br />
Nutrient Food Iron Food & Iron NIE<br />
Calories •• ... •••<br />
Protein • ••• •••<br />
Fat •• •• .............<br />
Carbohydrates .......... ,........<br />
Iron ••• ••<br />
Retinol<br />
Protein Intake<br />
Beta carotene "''''....<br />
Thiamine ••• ••<br />
Rib<strong>of</strong>lavin .......... •<br />
Niacine •• ....... .........<br />
VitaminC (-)".... '" (-).. ••<br />
LEGEND:<br />
• Lessthan 0.10<br />
•• Lessthan 0.05<br />
••• Lessthan 0.01<br />
•••• Lessthan 0.0001<br />
Table 48 shows statistically significant increases in intake <strong>of</strong> foods rich in protein by the subjects<br />
from pre-to post-period except for the Iron Group where mean intake remained the same. The<br />
general increase in intake <strong>of</strong> the nutrient may have reduced the number <strong>of</strong>PW who were getting<br />
below 50% <strong>of</strong> the protein RDA (refer to Table 2 <strong>of</strong> Appendix K). However, protein deficiency<br />
was still a problem with only 34% to 46% <strong>of</strong> PW at pre-survey and 46% to 60% <strong>of</strong> mothers at postsurvey<br />
getting above 74% <strong>of</strong> RDA. Again, no significant differences among treatment groups<br />
were seen during baseline.<br />
Fat Intake '<br />
Table 48 shows a higher fat intake <strong>of</strong> the PW at follow-up than at baseline in all treatment groups<br />
except the Iron Group. At baseline level, the iron group had the highest mean intake <strong>of</strong> 30 grams<br />
while the food group had the lowest with only 24 grams daily. However these differences are not<br />
statistically significant. At follow-up, the NIE group had the highest mean intake <strong>of</strong> 39 grams and<br />
the food & iron group the lowest mean<strong>of</strong>35 grams. In terms <strong>of</strong> increase in grams from pre-to post-<br />
83
survey, however, the NIE Group showed highly statistically significant results together with the<br />
Food and Iron arid the Food Groups.<br />
While there is no stipulated fat requirement in the diet in the Philippines, it is suggested that at<br />
least 20 %<strong>of</strong> caloric ROA be supplied by dietary fat. Table 50 shows that from pre-to post-survey,<br />
therewasanincrease<strong>of</strong> pregnant womenin all thetreatment groupswhosefat intakewasadequate<br />
in meeting thesuggested fat intake requirement. Overall, PW withadequate fat intake increased<br />
by 75% with the NIE group attaining the highest relative change <strong>of</strong> 119.0%.<br />
Although there was an increase <strong>of</strong> pregnant women with adequate fat intake from pre-to postperiod,<br />
fat intake deficiency was stilI a problem with 60-71 % and 46-48% <strong>of</strong> PW getting less than<br />
50% <strong>of</strong> fat ROA (refer to Table 3 <strong>of</strong> Appendix k),<br />
Table SO. Percent <strong>of</strong> PW with adequate intake <strong>of</strong> fat and carbohydrate by treatment group, pre-and postsurvey<br />
Fat Carbohydrates<br />
Treatment Group Pre Post % Relative Pre Post % Relative<br />
Change Change<br />
Food 13.1 25.2 92.4 46.7 63.9 36.8<br />
Iron 16.2 22.1 36.4 505 60.3 19.4<br />
Food & Iron 13.1 21.3 62.6 55.6 70.8 27.3<br />
NIE 12.1 26.5 119.0 48.6 67.7 39.3<br />
Carbohydrates Intake<br />
TOTAL 13.6 23.6 73.5 SO.3 66.0 31.2<br />
As indicated in Table 48, carbohydrates intake was higher at post-survey than at baseline period.<br />
The food & iron group consistently had the highest mean intake in both pre-and post-survey, i.e.,<br />
332 grams and 378 grams, respectively. At baseline, the food and NIE groups had the lowest mean<br />
intake <strong>of</strong> 312 grams while at post, the iron group was lowest with 333 grams. In terms <strong>of</strong> gram<br />
increasein meanintakefrom pretopost-period, the NIE group had thehighest increase <strong>of</strong> 63 grams,<br />
followed by the food group - 49 grams, the food & iron group -45 grams and; the iron group - 18<br />
grams. However, only the Food and Iron Group and the NIE Group were statistically significant.<br />
It is suggested that a level <strong>of</strong> 50 - 60% <strong>of</strong> total caloric requirements should be supplied by<br />
carbohydrates. Table 50shows also an increase <strong>of</strong>PWfrom pre-topost-surveywhosecarbohydrate<br />
intake was adequate (Le., at least 50 % <strong>of</strong> caloric ROA) in all treatment groups. There was a relative<br />
change (increase) oI-31.2% PW with adequate intake again, with the NIE Group attaining the<br />
highest relative change <strong>of</strong> 39.3%.<br />
84
Iron Intake<br />
At baseline, the Iron Groupshowed significantly higher iron intake compared to the three other<br />
treatment groups. From pre-to-post period (Table48),intake <strong>of</strong> iron increased in all the' treatment<br />
groups except in the iron group which experienced a slight decrease in mean intake at postsurvey.<br />
Further, only the NIE and the Food & iron Groups showed statistically significant<br />
increases. Iron intake deficiency as shown in Table 5 <strong>of</strong> Appendix K was worse than that <strong>of</strong><br />
protein and calorie with only 23-35% and 27-40% <strong>of</strong>the subjects getting above 74% <strong>of</strong> the RDA<br />
at pre- and post- period, respectively.<br />
Vitamin C<br />
For the micro-nutrient vitamin C, the mean intakesignificantly decreased from baseline to follow<br />
.up in the four treatment groups. Moreover, vitamin C deficiency was a problem even worse than<br />
iron deficiency with 45 -65% <strong>of</strong> the mothers at baseline and 54 - 72% at follow-up getting less<br />
than 50%<strong>of</strong> the RDA in the four treatment groups. The iron groups for both surveys registered<br />
the highest percentage <strong>of</strong> PW on this level <strong>of</strong> intake (i.e.,
In summary, while an over-all increase in mean intake was observed for the different nutrients<br />
from baseline to follow-up, with the exception <strong>of</strong> vitamin C, deficiency <strong>of</strong> intake vis-a-vis RDA<br />
was a common problem in all treatment groups. Moreover, deficiency <strong>of</strong> intake was more<br />
alarming' for the micro nutrients (except niacin) than for the macro nutrients with a higher<br />
percentage <strong>of</strong> PW getting less than 50% <strong>of</strong> the RDA in the former than in the latter.<br />
Thehigh percentage<strong>of</strong>PWwho wereunableto comply with RDA for various nutrients indicated<br />
economic difficulties. These results justify food supplementation as a priority intervention <strong>of</strong><br />
health and nutrition programs along with NIE materials,<br />
Moreover, the high and increased percentage <strong>of</strong>PW whocould not comply with Vitamin C RDA<br />
may justify the inclusion <strong>of</strong> Vitamin C tablets as an added supplement in health programs using<br />
iron as an intervention. The benefits from iron supplementation can best be attained if the vehicle<br />
for its enhanced absorption is assured.<br />
Common Misconceptions on Anemia and Related Topics<br />
A review <strong>of</strong> the answers to KAP questions showed many misconceptions on anemia and related<br />
topics. These are:<br />
On What is Anemia<br />
• low blood pressure<br />
On Causes <strong>of</strong> Anemia<br />
• lack <strong>of</strong> sleep<br />
• taking a bath at night<br />
• eating sour food<br />
• over-fatigue<br />
• impeded menstruation<br />
• irregular eating habits<br />
Effects <strong>of</strong> Anemia on Pregnant Women<br />
• vomiting<br />
• loss <strong>of</strong> appetite<br />
• weight loss<br />
• miscarriage<br />
• sleeplessness<br />
• beri-beri<br />
Effects <strong>of</strong> Anemia on the Fetus<br />
• child will be anemic/pale<br />
• child will have<br />
edema<br />
beri-beri<br />
convulsion<br />
abnormalities<br />
Differences in the Diet <strong>of</strong> a Pregnant Woman and a Non-Pregnant Woman<br />
• controlled intake <strong>of</strong> all food<br />
• food fallacies:<br />
eggplant and patola(sponge gourd) cause edema/beri-beri<br />
86
patola, katuray (sesban flower), carnote leaves (sweet potato tops) and prickly<br />
leafy vegetables cause anemia<br />
Reasons Why A Pregnant Woman Need Not Take Supplements<br />
• the pregnant woman doesn't feel any illness<br />
• the supplement might cause excessive growth <strong>of</strong> the fetus<br />
• food intake is sufficient<br />
These misconceptions along with the results <strong>of</strong> the knowledge items provide the bases for<br />
detennining which topics should be emphasized during counselling, e.g., mother's classes or<br />
during pre-natal check-up. The results also provide information on which topics should be highly<br />
stressed in future NIE materials to be distributed to project clientele.<br />
It is worthwhile to note that results <strong>of</strong> validation <strong>of</strong> compliance with project protocols show<br />
that only about 10% <strong>of</strong> the mothers were given explanations by the midwives on the contents <strong>of</strong><br />
the brochures. It can therefore be inferred that the increase in knowledge was largely due<br />
to the PW's own interpretation <strong>of</strong> the brochures, not to discount their stock knowledge. If the<br />
brochures were explained by the midwives, the increase in level <strong>of</strong> knowledge could have<br />
been greater. These results imply that effective training or counselling strategies should be<br />
considered for greater impact <strong>of</strong> messages on the health and nutrition <strong>of</strong> the clientele.<br />
87
7. EFFECfS OF FOOD AND IRON INTERVENTION<br />
ON THECOl\1MUNITY<br />
Themainobjective <strong>of</strong> this project was to determine the effect <strong>of</strong> food andiron supplementation as<br />
community interventions, using the existing health care delivery system. Since the primary<br />
interest was to assess the effect <strong>of</strong> the interventions on the community rather than on individual<br />
pregnantwomenandtheirinfants, theunit<strong>of</strong>analysisusedwastheRural<strong>Health</strong>Unit (RHU). The<br />
indicatorsused weresummary measuresat the communitylevel namely the prevalence<strong>of</strong> anemia<br />
among pregnant women and the incidence <strong>of</strong> low birthweight among their infants. The results <strong>of</strong><br />
the analysis are described in the following sections.<br />
Supplementation and Prevalence <strong>of</strong> Anemia<br />
The prevalence<strong>of</strong> anemiaamong women5 to 9 months pregnantbefore theimplementation<strong>of</strong> the<br />
project was 40.4 %. For the different treatment groups, it varied from 33,2 % among those in the<br />
food group to 46.2% in the NIE group.<br />
After the implementation <strong>of</strong> the project, the overall prevalence remained the same. Changes<br />
however occurred among the different treatment groups with decreases in prevalence occuring<br />
among those in the Iron, as well as in the Food & Iron Groups. Thelargest decrease wasin the food<br />
& iron group, whose post-intervention prevalence went down by 15.4 % from that at baseline<br />
surveylevel. In the case <strong>of</strong> the Food and NIE groups, theprevalence<strong>of</strong>anemia was higherat postsurvey<br />
thanat baseline levels. This increasing prevalence is consistent with trends shown by the<br />
nationwide FNRI surveys from 1982 to 1987. The FNRl nationwidestudyshoweda 33% increase<br />
in the prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia from 34 in 1982 to 45.2% in 1987. The detailed results are shown in<br />
Table 52.<br />
Table 52. Prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia before and after supplementation by treatment group<br />
Pre-Survey Post-Survey %Absolute %Relative<br />
Treatment Group No. % No. % Charige(2) Change(1)<br />
n Anemic Anemic n Anemic Anemic<br />
Food 199 66 33.2 202 81 40.1 6.9 20.9<br />
Iron 198 85 42.9 199 81 40.7 -2.2 -5.2<br />
Food & Iron 198 77 38.9 240 79 32.9 -6.0 -15.4<br />
NlE 212 98 46.2 226 110 48.7 2.4 53<br />
TOTAL 807 326 40.4 867 351 40.5 0.1 0.2<br />
(1)%RelativeChange = (% post-%Pre)/% Pre} • 100<br />
(2)%Absolute change = %post -%Baseline<br />
88
.The effect <strong>of</strong> iron supplementation on the other hand was shown at the sixth month <strong>of</strong> gestation:<br />
the prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia started to decrease among the groups given iron, with the largest<br />
decreaseoccurringin the food & irongroup. This group consistentlyshowed thelargest %relative<br />
decrease in prevalence among the different treatment groups for succeeding ages <strong>of</strong> gestation,<br />
except for the 9th month when the trend suddenly reverted. However, thesamplesizesat this age<br />
<strong>of</strong> gestation were too small for the rates to be stable.<br />
Thefood groupstarted to showdecreases in the prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemiaat the 8thmonth<strong>of</strong> gestation,<br />
or a month after the start <strong>of</strong> food supplementation. The NIB group on the other hand showed<br />
erratic trendsfrom oneage <strong>of</strong> gestation to another. One majorfactor which may haveaffected the<br />
absorption <strong>of</strong> dietary iron at these AOG is the high calorie intake <strong>of</strong> mothers. Data also show a<br />
relatively higher dietary intake <strong>of</strong> iron for the Food Group at this AOG.<br />
Since it is recognized that the above analysis is crudetn that it fails to adjust for the effect <strong>of</strong> some<br />
pertinent variables in which the different RHUs and the different treatment groups may not be<br />
comparable (e.g, % coverage <strong>of</strong> supplementation and health status <strong>of</strong> the pregnant women), a<br />
second level <strong>of</strong> analysis wasdone. A more refined estimate <strong>of</strong> the prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia per RHU<br />
and 'per treatment group after the implementation <strong>of</strong> the different forms <strong>of</strong> intervention was<br />
computed, adjusting for the effect <strong>of</strong> possible confounding variables using multiple regression<br />
analysis. Independentvariablesconsideredarelisted in thesection on mode <strong>of</strong> dataanalysis. The<br />
resulting prevalence figures at post-survey derived from the regression equation and the corresponding<br />
percent relative change are shown in Table 54.<br />
The results in Table54indicate that evenafteradjustment for the effects <strong>of</strong> otherfactors, thegroups<br />
given iron still showed decreases in the prevalence after implementation <strong>of</strong> the project, with the<br />
food & iron groupshowingthelargest decrease. The increase in the prevalenceamong those in the<br />
NIE group was magnified by the adjustment, the % relative change having increased from 5.1%<br />
to 12.1%.<br />
Table 54. Prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia before and adjusted prevalence after intervention by treatment group<br />
Pre Adjusted Post- % Absolute % Relative<br />
Treatment Group, Prevalence Survey Prevalence Change Change<br />
.<br />
Food 33.2 40.1 6.9 20.8<br />
Iron 42.9 41.2 -1.7 -4.0<br />
Food & Iron 38.9 33.7 -5.2 -13.4<br />
NIE 46.2 51.8 5.6 12.1<br />
TOTAL 40.4 41.6 1.2 3.0<br />
Although the main interest in the regression analysis was in the refinement <strong>of</strong> the-estimated<br />
prevalence after the intervention rather than in the identification <strong>of</strong> factors significantly affecting<br />
it, it may be worthwhile to note that among the independent variables considered, the following<br />
turned out to be significantly related to the prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia at post-survey in the community:<br />
90
1. Dummy variables for type <strong>of</strong> intervention<br />
2. % <strong>of</strong> pregnant women with supplementation<br />
3. % <strong>of</strong> pregnant women with hookworm<br />
4. % <strong>of</strong> pregnant women with trichuris<br />
5. % bleeder<br />
6. % with high school education<br />
These results indicate that the effects <strong>of</strong> the different treatments were significantly different from<br />
that <strong>of</strong> the control group. In addition, the coverage <strong>of</strong> the project, the health status<strong>of</strong> the pregnant<br />
women especially their being infected with parasitism and their educational attainment are<br />
important factors influencing the impact <strong>of</strong> the different forms <strong>of</strong> intervention on anemia, as<br />
measured in the post- survey.<br />
Supplementation and Incidence <strong>of</strong> Low Birthweight<br />
In 1984when the project was started in LaUnion, the incidence <strong>of</strong> low birthweight for the province<br />
based on the data from the Integrated Provincial <strong>Health</strong> Office (IPHO) was 4.5 %. Among the<br />
treatmentgroups,differences existed in the prevailingrates, with values rangingfrom 2.5%among<br />
RHUs belonging to the iron group, to 6.6%among those in the NIB group.<br />
After the implementation <strong>of</strong> the project, the incidence <strong>of</strong> low birthweight decreased to 3.2% for<br />
all treatment groups altogether, resulting in a % relative decrease <strong>of</strong> 28.9% below that <strong>of</strong> the<br />
baseline figure. This figures were based on the birhtweights recorded by the midwives, based on<br />
project protocol. Similar decreases were observed among the different treatment groups, except<br />
for the Irongroup. The Food & Iron group likewise showed the largest %relativedecreaseat 52.4%.<br />
This is showin in Table 55.<br />
Table 55. Incidence <strong>of</strong> low birthweight before and after supplementation by treatment group<br />
Post- Survey Incidence<br />
1984 A -h"l A"" _.....<br />
Treatment Incidence No. % % % %LBW % %<br />
Group (n %) n LBW LBW Absolute Relative Post Absolute Relative<br />
Change Change Survey Change Change<br />
Food 4.8 187 7 3.7 -1.1 -22.0 3.2 -1.6 -33.3<br />
Iron 25 143 4 2.8 0.3 11.9 2.1 -M -16.0<br />
,<br />
Food & Iron 4.2 204 4 2.0 -2.2 -53.3 15 -2.7 -{,4.3<br />
N1E 6.6 187 8 4.3 -2.3 -35.2 3.7 -2.9 -43.9<br />
TOTAL 4.5 721 23 3.2 -1.3 -29.1 2.6 -1.9 -42.2<br />
Since it is recognized that maternal age affects the incidence <strong>of</strong> low birthweight, it was also<br />
attempted to detemine the effect <strong>of</strong> the different types <strong>of</strong> intervention on low birthweight,<br />
controlling. for age <strong>of</strong> the mother. This analysis was however later disregarded since the sample<br />
sizes per treatment group for the age groups at risk (i.e., 35) were too small to come up<br />
with stable estimates.<br />
91
As in the prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia, a second level <strong>of</strong> analysis was also done, in orderto comeup with<br />
a more refined estimate <strong>of</strong> the incidence <strong>of</strong> low birthweight after project implementation. The<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> otherfactors wereadjusted through regressionanalysis. The set<strong>of</strong> Independentvariables.<br />
included in the analysis were earlier presented in the section on mode <strong>of</strong> data analysis. The<br />
resulting estimates after adjustment are shown in Table 55.<br />
The results indicate thatafteradjustingfor theeffects <strong>of</strong> otherfactors; all treatmentgroupsbrought<br />
about a decrease in the incidence <strong>of</strong> low birthweight, with the Food & Iron group still having the<br />
largestdecrease. Itis interestingto note that evenafterthe adjustment,thedecreasein theincidence<br />
<strong>of</strong> low birthweight in the NIE group is still larger than that <strong>of</strong> the Iron and the Food groups.<br />
Among the variables included in the model, the following turned out to be significantly related to<br />
the incidence <strong>of</strong> low birthweight at post-survey:<br />
1. dummy variables for the different types <strong>of</strong> intervention<br />
2•.% <strong>of</strong> PW with other types <strong>of</strong> supplementation<br />
3. % with adequate calorie intake<br />
4. % PW with gravida >= 5<br />
5. % PW with birth interval < 730 days<br />
6. % <strong>of</strong> PW < 20 or >35 years <strong>of</strong> age<br />
7. % premature<br />
8. median per capita income<br />
9. %PW with high school education<br />
These results indicate that the effects <strong>of</strong> the different treatment groups are significantly different<br />
from that <strong>of</strong> the controlgroup. The othervariables whichturnedoutto be significantareconsistent<br />
with those <strong>of</strong> other studies.<br />
92
8.: Cost Effectiveness<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the objectives <strong>of</strong> this study is to develop a method to facilitate the estimation <strong>of</strong> costs and<br />
health effects <strong>of</strong> intervention aimedat reducing the prevalence <strong>of</strong>anemiaamong pregnant women<br />
and incidence <strong>of</strong> low birthweight among infants <strong>of</strong> these pregnant women.<br />
Cost effectiveness analysis (CEA) is a formal analytical technique which involves the identification,<br />
measurement and comparison <strong>of</strong> all the significant costs and desirable consequences <strong>of</strong><br />
alternative means <strong>of</strong> addressinga given problem. One <strong>of</strong> its principal objectives is to structureand<br />
analyze information in a way that will inform and assist policy makers on how to make the most<br />
effective use <strong>of</strong> limited resources. Itcan be used as a planning tool by way <strong>of</strong> predicting costs and<br />
effectiveness <strong>of</strong> alternative future programs. As an evaluative tool, CEA involves an assessment<br />
<strong>of</strong> the realized costs and effectiveness <strong>of</strong> existing or past programs. Frequently, a retrospective<br />
evaluation assumesa prospectiveintentby addressing the following questions: should a program<br />
be continued? H so, how should it be modified? CEA facilitates the decision-making process by<br />
allowing the comparison <strong>of</strong> cost perunit <strong>of</strong> effectiveness among competing alternatives designed<br />
to achieve the same objective.<br />
CEA applied to this study measured the desirable program consequences in non-monetary units<br />
such as the reduction in prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia among pregnant women and the reduction in the<br />
incidence <strong>of</strong> low birthweight.among infants <strong>of</strong> these pregnant women. Specifically, the following<br />
indicators were used as measures <strong>of</strong> effectiveness: (a) absolute and relative change in anemia<br />
status from baseline levels and (b) absolute and relative change in low birthweight from baseline<br />
levels.<br />
Important cost components relevant to the actual implementation <strong>of</strong> the different intervention<br />
schemes being tested were identified and estimated. The cost per unit <strong>of</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> each<br />
alternative was then analyzed andcomputed. Results <strong>of</strong> the CEA became the basis in selecting the<br />
type <strong>of</strong> supplementation to be recommended for implementation.<br />
Determination <strong>of</strong> Program Costs<br />
The total cost <strong>of</strong> the program was derived by identifying and calculating the costs involved in the<br />
different processes undertaken. The project covered four main activities namely materials<br />
development, training <strong>of</strong> personnel, delivery oi supplements and monitoring compliance and<br />
impact. The amount<strong>of</strong> resources consumedundereach <strong>of</strong> theseactivities varied according to type<br />
<strong>of</strong> intervention given.<br />
In order to have a beller look into the nature <strong>of</strong> costs incurred by the project, the different cost<br />
categories were further classified and compared according to expense categories, type (capital vs<br />
recurrent) andsectoraldivision (<strong>DOH</strong> vs USAID). Per capita costs were also computedto facilitate<br />
comparisons between the different types <strong>of</strong> intervention. The details <strong>of</strong>.the computations and<br />
corresponding results are presented in the following sections.<br />
,<br />
Cost Components<br />
Four types <strong>of</strong> expense categories were considered in the project namely personnel services,<br />
maintenance and operating expenses, supplies and materials,and equipment outlay.<br />
The cost <strong>of</strong> personnel services covered costs for NCP-based personnel, <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Health</strong><br />
93
National Task Force (seven consultants), <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Health</strong> Local Task Force (provincial<br />
<strong>Health</strong> Officer, Asst. Provincial <strong>Health</strong> Officer, Senior Supervising Public <strong>Health</strong> Nurse, Senior<br />
<strong>Health</strong> Educator, Provincial Nutritionist), and Project Implernentors (MHO, ANS, ON, PHN,<br />
BHW). The honoraria, training allowances, transportation allowances <strong>of</strong> these people were also<br />
incorporated in this expense item.<br />
Animportantfactorconsidered in the computation <strong>of</strong> personnel cost is thefact that the RHU staff<br />
undertake several other activities in addition to those required by the project. Corresponding<br />
project costs therefore had to be pro-rated according to the amount <strong>of</strong> time spent by each type <strong>of</strong><br />
personnel on the project. Specifically, this was derived in the following manner:<br />
1. The averagenumber<strong>of</strong> hoursspentpermonthby each type <strong>of</strong> implementor for eachproject<br />
activity was determined. This was derived by interviewing a random sample <strong>of</strong> each<br />
category <strong>of</strong> implementors on the time spent by them for the project.<br />
2. The results <strong>of</strong> the validation studies and data from Project Operations were incorporated<br />
to determine the actual level <strong>of</strong> Involvement <strong>of</strong> a specific category <strong>of</strong> implementors in each<br />
activity per intervention;<br />
3. Thehourlysalary rates <strong>of</strong> the RHM, PHN, ANS, ON and MHO weredetermined from their<br />
monthly salary; those <strong>of</strong> the BHW were based on the minimum daily wage rate for<br />
agricultural workers;<br />
4. The total cost <strong>of</strong> involvement per type <strong>of</strong> implementor per intervention was computed<br />
using the relevant factors and hourly wage rates.<br />
In the case <strong>of</strong> BHWs, the correspondingcost <strong>of</strong> services rendered could not bedetermineddirectly<br />
since theyare volunteerworkersand hencedo not receive salaries. For purposes<strong>of</strong> cost estimation,<br />
their project-related activities were quantified by determining the opportunity cost <strong>of</strong> employing<br />
them in the service delivery <strong>of</strong> the different programs. A detailed description <strong>of</strong> the estimation<br />
method used is presented in a separate section. -<br />
The computation <strong>of</strong> maintenance and operating expenses (MOE) included rental <strong>of</strong> equipment<br />
and vehicles, repairand maintenance, travelling expenses, representation expenses (for meetings/<br />
seminars/workshops), gasoline, utilities and communication. The cost estimating procedures<br />
used for MOE was based on rental fees charged for computer services and vehicles.<br />
Supplies and materials covered <strong>of</strong>fice supplies, Nutrina - related, Ferrin-related as well as IEC<br />
related items. Equipment costs on the other hand included the cost <strong>of</strong> bar scales. Although other<br />
equipment like a computerwas purchased, its cost was excluded since it was utilized more for the<br />
research rather than the operations component <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />
All costs incurred in 1985and 1986werediscounted to their values in 1984which was the first year<br />
<strong>of</strong> project implementation. This was done to have a common reference date and hence facilitate<br />
comparison <strong>of</strong> cost figures. The discount factors applied were based on inflation rates as reported<br />
by the National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA).<br />
94
Computation <strong>of</strong> opportunity COSts<br />
As mentioned earlier, one <strong>of</strong> the problems met in cost estimation is the assigment<strong>of</strong> cost to services<br />
renderedby barangayhealthworkers (BHW) who were employed on a volunteerbasis. Since they<br />
do not have monthly salaries on which to base the cost <strong>of</strong> services, an alternateapproach taken was<br />
to compute for opportunity cost. Thisinvolved the determination <strong>of</strong> how much the BHWs would<br />
have earned had they been doing a paid job. Another decision needed was determining the type<br />
<strong>of</strong> job they were most likely to get had they not opted to become volunteer BHWs.<br />
A review <strong>of</strong> the population composition according to occupational groups shows that a higher<br />
percentage <strong>of</strong> the population are engaged as farmers or farm helpers compared with any other<br />
occupational groups. This implies that the BHWs would have most likely been agricultural<br />
workers had they opted to take a paid job. The 1984hourly wage rate <strong>of</strong> agricultural workers was<br />
therefore used as basis for the computation <strong>of</strong> opportunity cost.<br />
Asin the case <strong>of</strong> the other health workers, the first step in the costing process is to determine the<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> time spent by BHWs in the different activities assigned to them. According to project<br />
protocol, they have four main activities namely:<br />
1) Identification and referral <strong>of</strong> pregnant women<br />
2) Delivery <strong>of</strong> supplies<br />
3) Monitoring <strong>of</strong> PW supplementation<br />
4) Delivery <strong>of</strong> regular maternal and child health (MCH) services<br />
From the interviews <strong>of</strong> BHWs in the Food group, it was found that an average <strong>of</strong> 4.68hours were<br />
spent by a BHW in identifying and referring (accompanying) a pregnant woman for enrollment<br />
with the midwife at the barangay health station. To determine the actual level <strong>of</strong> involvement <strong>of</strong><br />
the BHWs in the identification and referral activity, relevant results <strong>of</strong> the validation studies and<br />
data from Project Operations were considered. These were (l) the number (or percentage) <strong>of</strong><br />
trained BHWs in the treatment group who were actually involved in the activity and (2) the<br />
average number <strong>of</strong> pregnant women enrolled in the treatment group per month. With data on<br />
these variables, the average number <strong>of</strong> pregnant women identified per month by a BHW was<br />
determined. In the case <strong>of</strong> the Food group for example, the computed mean number <strong>of</strong> pregnant<br />
women identified per BHW per month was 0.5, or 1 PW per BHW for every 2 months.<br />
On the basis <strong>of</strong> the daily minimum wage <strong>of</strong> P26.00 ($1.86) perday for non-plantation agricultural<br />
workers outside Metro Manila, an hourly wage rate <strong>of</strong> P3.25 ($0.23) was arrived at. Thus,<br />
considering the factors in determining actual involvement <strong>of</strong> BHW in identification and referral,<br />
the hourly wage rate and the number <strong>of</strong> months <strong>of</strong> project operations in an intervention, the total<br />
cost <strong>of</strong> involvement was computed. The total cost was first divided into capitaland recurrent costs.<br />
The recurrent costs <strong>of</strong> involvement from November to December <strong>of</strong> 1985 and from January to<br />
December <strong>of</strong> 1986were discounted to their 1984values. The discount factors <strong>of</strong> .870and .756for<br />
a I-year and 2-year adjustment, respectively were used, with a fixed economic internal rate <strong>of</strong><br />
return or hurdle rate <strong>of</strong> 15%.<br />
The relevant factors and the computation <strong>of</strong> opportunity cost <strong>of</strong> BHW involvement in identification<br />
and referral activity per treatment group are shown in Table 56. The same process was used<br />
in costing BHW involvement in other project activities and that <strong>of</strong> the nurses, midwives and<br />
doctors.<br />
95
Table 57. Total and Per Capita by Treatment Group<br />
Number<br />
Treatment Group Total rod <strong>of</strong>PW Per Capita<br />
Amount % Covered Cost<br />
IronSuplementation 1'612,062.00 205 1833 1'333.91<br />
$ 43,718.71 $ 23.85<br />
Food & Iron 1'711,884.00 23.8 2091 1'340.45<br />
$50,848.86 $ 24.32<br />
Iron 1'731,633.00 245 5091 1'143.71<br />
$ 52,25950 $10.27<br />
NIEC 1'932,530.00 31.2 8888 1'104.92<br />
$ 66,609.29 $ 7.49<br />
. TOfAL 1'2,988,109.00 100.0 17903 ··1'166.90<br />
$ 213,436.36 $ 1'1.92<br />
Cost by Expense Category<br />
A comparison <strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong> expenses incurred for the different treatment groups can be done by<br />
looking at the breakdown <strong>of</strong> the total cost according to expense category. This is shown in<br />
Table 58. The data show that for both the iron and NIB groups, the major cost component was<br />
personnel services, with about three-fourths <strong>of</strong> the total cost going to this expense category. In<br />
contrast, the correspondingfigure for the intervention groups involving food isat most only 31.8%.<br />
The four treatment groups also differed largely according to the proportion <strong>of</strong> total cost allocated<br />
for supplies and materials. Whereas this category accounted for about two-thirds <strong>of</strong> the expenditures<br />
<strong>of</strong> the intervention groups involving food, the corresponding proportions for the iron and<br />
NIE groups are only 8.9%and 7.6%, respectively.<br />
The above findings result from the large difference between the price <strong>of</strong> food (Nutrina) and iron<br />
(Ferrin) supplements. Whereas a pack <strong>of</strong> Nutrina costs t>3 on the average, one Ferrin tablet costs<br />
only 3 centavos.<br />
Thecost <strong>of</strong> the project percapita was also determined for each type <strong>of</strong> expensecategoryandfor each<br />
treatment group. This is shown in Table 59. The results show that the iron group has the largest<br />
per capita cost for personnel services while the food and iron group has the highest per capita cost<br />
for supplies and materials. The four treatment groups do not differ in terms <strong>of</strong> per capita cost for<br />
maintenance and operating expenses and for equipment outlay.<br />
97
Table 58. Breakdown <strong>of</strong> Total Cost by Item, Capital 8t Recurrent and Source<br />
OOH USAID<br />
Capital Cost<br />
Personnel Services P 467,106.11 P 117,245.54<br />
Maintainance & Operating P 171,576.33<br />
Expenses<br />
Supplies and Materials P 524,529.99<br />
Equipment Outlay P40,921.09<br />
Reccurent Cost<br />
Personnel Services P 960,666.59 P92,926.82<br />
Maintainance & Operating P 130,865.75<br />
Expenses<br />
Supplies and Materials P 428,778.29<br />
Equipment Outlay<br />
Table 59 Cost per capita by Expense Category and Treatment Group<br />
Cost Per Capita by Treatment Group<br />
ExpensesCategory Food Iron Food & Iron NIEC<br />
Personnel Services P 106.24 P87.57 P 111.75 P 77.77<br />
Maintainance & P 16.99 P 16.92 P 16.87 P 16.88<br />
Operating Expenses<br />
Supplies & Materials P 208.38 P 233.67 P 12.81 P 7.99<br />
Equipment Outlay P 2.30 P2.29 P 2.28 P 2.28<br />
TOTAL COST PER P 333.91 P 340.45 P 143.71 P 104.92<br />
CAPITA $23.9 $24.3 $10.3 $ 7.5<br />
Sectoral Division Cost<br />
The total cost <strong>of</strong> the project was borne by both the Philippine <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Health</strong> (OOH) and<br />
the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The OOH counterpart<br />
amounted to P604,417.00 ($43,172.64) covering 46.5% <strong>of</strong> the total project cost. This amount was<br />
solely for personnel services, <strong>of</strong> which 56.5% represented the opportunity cost <strong>of</strong> the 3352BHWs<br />
involved in the project. The rest <strong>of</strong> the OOH contribution covered the honoraria given to the 152<br />
RHMs, 20 MHOs and 25PHNs!ANSs!DNs in thestudyareas for the duration <strong>of</strong> the project. This<br />
98
is shown in Figur;:...e:....7:..... --,<br />
RHM<br />
24.9%<br />
PHNIANSIDN<br />
6.5%<br />
BHW<br />
56.5%<br />
Fig. 7 Percentage Distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>DOH</strong> Contribution to the Project Cost According to Type <strong>of</strong><br />
Personnel Paid.<br />
USArD fundson the other hand amounted to 1"1,598,511.00 ($114,179.36) covering 53.5% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
totalbudget, It was applied to all the four (4) types <strong>of</strong> expense categories.<br />
The sectoral division costs can be further broken down into capital and recurrent costs. Capital<br />
costs refer to the valuation <strong>of</strong> resources which are essential to start or launch the program.<br />
Recurrent costs on the other hand involve the valuation <strong>of</strong> resources which are necessary to keep<br />
the program gomg.<br />
Of the capital costs <strong>of</strong> the project, two-thirds (66.2%) was borne by USAID funds. The pattern<br />
however reversed in the case <strong>of</strong> recurrent costs, with the <strong>DOH</strong> counterpart being higher than <strong>of</strong><br />
USAID. This is shown in Fig. 8.<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
66.2<br />
43.4<br />
o -I--.L.-----""---+-.l...---_-L--t<br />
Becarrent<br />
Legend:<br />
2J R8QJrrent<br />
o Captal<br />
Fig. 8 Percentage Distribution <strong>of</strong> Capital and Recurrent Costs According to Source and Funds.<br />
99
Cost Effectiveness Analysis .<br />
The cost effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the different forms <strong>of</strong> intervention considered in this project wasassessed<br />
using the cost percapita perunit <strong>of</strong> effectiveness as the main parameter. This wasdoneseparately<br />
for anemia and low birthweight. The cost effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the different interventions was also<br />
determined using different cost components. These are presented in the following sections.<br />
Prevalence <strong>of</strong> Anemia<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> this study showed that the two treatment groups involving iron brought about a<br />
significant reduction in the percentage <strong>of</strong> mothers with anemia before and after the intervention.<br />
Table 60showsa comparison<strong>of</strong> the cost percapitaand the percentage relative changefor thesetwo<br />
interventions. It also shows the resulting values for the cost per capita per unit <strong>of</strong> effectiveness.<br />
A closerlookat Table 75 shows that while the cost percapita for the food and iron supplementation<br />
is 2.4 times higher than that <strong>of</strong> iron supplementation, it is also 3.3 times moreeffective. As a result,<br />
food and iron supplementation is more cost effective than iron supplementation alone, as<br />
evidenced by its lower cost per capita per unit <strong>of</strong> effectiveness.<br />
Table 60. Comparison <strong>of</strong> Adjusted Relative Change in Anemia Status And Cost Per Capita <strong>of</strong> 2<br />
Interventions<br />
Relative Change (%) Cost Per Unit <strong>of</strong><br />
Treatment Group in Anemia Cost Per Capita Effectiveness<br />
Iron Group -4.0 J> 143.71 J> 35.93<br />
Food & Iron Group -13.4 J> 340.45 J> 25.41<br />
A more practical parameter for assessing the cost effectiveness <strong>of</strong> a program is the cost <strong>of</strong><br />
preventing onecase <strong>of</strong> anemia. This entails dividing the total cost for each type <strong>of</strong> intervention by<br />
the expected number <strong>of</strong> anemia cases prevented out <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> pregnant women<br />
covered, using the absolute percentage change. The values which resulted were J> 8,453.59 and<br />
J> 6,547.14for the iron group and the food and iron groups respectively. The extremely high costs<br />
for preventing an individual case results from the following factors:<br />
1. The total cost includes all the four expense categories. This would be relevant only if the<br />
project to be implemented starts from zero and would have to pay for all the personnel<br />
involved. In the <strong>DOH</strong> setting however, the delivery system is already in existence and<br />
the only additional costs to be incurred as a result <strong>of</strong> the project are the costs <strong>of</strong><br />
supplementation and training <strong>of</strong> personnel.<br />
2. The cost represents the cost for mass rather than t".rgetted intervention, since the project<br />
included all pregnant women irrespective <strong>of</strong> whether they are at-risk or not.<br />
As a result <strong>of</strong> the first factor indicated above, a recomputation <strong>of</strong> different parameters for cost<br />
effectiveness was done, using different cost components. This is presented in Section 8.3.<br />
100
Incidence <strong>of</strong> Low Birthweight<br />
In the case <strong>of</strong> low birthweight, all the four treatment groups were found to. bring about a decrease<br />
in its incidence before and after the program. A comparison <strong>of</strong> the %relative change, the cost per<br />
capita and the cost per capita perunit <strong>of</strong> effectiveness among the different intervention groupsare<br />
shown in Table 61.<br />
Table 61. Comparison<strong>of</strong> Adjusted Relativechange(%) in low Birthweigltt Status and costper capitafor<br />
Different Treatment Groups<br />
Relative Change(%) Cost Per Capita Unit<br />
TreatmentGroup in LowBirthweight CostPer Capita <strong>of</strong> Effectiveness<br />
FoodSupplementation -33.3 1'333.91 1'10.03<br />
Food & Iron Supplementation -64.3 1'340.45 1'5.29<br />
NIEC -43.9 1'104.91 1'2.39<br />
Iron- -16.0 1'143.71 1'8.98<br />
The table shows that <strong>of</strong> the four treatment groups, intervention in the form <strong>of</strong> NIE is the most cost<br />
effective. Although the food and iron supplementation is more expensive than food alone, it is<br />
twice more effective and has ended up to be more cost effective.<br />
In terms <strong>of</strong> the cost <strong>of</strong> preventing one case <strong>of</strong> low birthweight the resulting values ranged from<br />
1'3,617.93 ($258.42) for the NIEC group to 1'35,927.76 ($2566.27) for the iron group. The contributing<br />
factors behind the excessively high cost which were earlier enumerated also apply to the above<br />
figures.<br />
Sensitivity Analysis<br />
The cost effectivenessanalysis presented earlierincludedall forms <strong>of</strong>expenses bornebythe project<br />
including the salary <strong>of</strong> <strong>DOH</strong> personnel and the opportunitycosts <strong>of</strong> volunteer workers. Itaccounts<br />
for the total cost that would have been incurred if the project were to start from zero and hire its<br />
own personnel for its implementation. It represents what it costs for an agency other than <strong>DOH</strong><br />
to implement a project <strong>of</strong> the same nature and extent <strong>of</strong> coverage.<br />
In the context <strong>of</strong> <strong>DOH</strong> however, such a setting is not realistic, since the personnel who can be<br />
utilized for project implementation are already in existence. Their salaries are already paid<br />
irrespective <strong>of</strong> the existence <strong>of</strong> the project. All that is needed is to train them on the various<br />
aspects <strong>of</strong> project delivery. In the case <strong>of</strong> BHWs, their utilization as volunteer workers is part <strong>of</strong><br />
the community involvement aspect <strong>of</strong> the PHC approach hence their opportunity cost need not<br />
be accounted for.<br />
-'-<br />
101
In view <strong>of</strong> this observation, a separate analysis <strong>of</strong> cost effectiveness was done using different cost<br />
components representing different assumptions andsettings. Such an approach is called sensitivity<br />
analysis and aims to determine whether changes in the assumptions made as basis for the'<br />
computations result in changes in the corresponding conclusions.<br />
Three forms <strong>of</strong> cost components were considered as follows:<br />
Cost 1<br />
Cost 2<br />
Cost 3<br />
Includes cost <strong>of</strong> supplementation and training <strong>of</strong> personnel, MOE for delivery <strong>of</strong><br />
suppliesand staff supervision, salary <strong>of</strong> personnel and opportunitycost <strong>of</strong> volunteer<br />
workers.<br />
Includes cost <strong>of</strong> supplementation and training <strong>of</strong> personnel, MOE for delivery <strong>of</strong><br />
supplies and staff supervision<br />
Includes cost <strong>of</strong> supplementation and training <strong>of</strong> personnel<br />
Cost 1 is the same as the total cost used in the analysis and discussions presented in the earlier<br />
sections. Cost 2 considers the fact that the delivery system is already in existence in the <strong>DOH</strong><br />
networkand hence no additionalcosts are needed for the services <strong>of</strong> <strong>DOH</strong> personnel. Cost 3 further<br />
assumes that the delivery <strong>of</strong> supplements and supervision <strong>of</strong> staff are part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>DOH</strong> responsibilities<br />
and hence the corresponding costs are already borne by the agency irrespective <strong>of</strong> the<br />
program's existence.<br />
Table 62 shows a comparison <strong>of</strong> the project cost per capita and cost per capita per unit <strong>of</strong><br />
effectiveness for the 3 types <strong>of</strong> cost components. The results showthat indeed, the results change<br />
with changes in the cost components. If either Cost 2 or Cost 3 is used, iron supplementation<br />
becomes more cost -effective than food and iron combined as intervention fo'rthe prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />
anemia. In the case <strong>of</strong> the incidence <strong>of</strong> low birthweight, NIEis the most cost-effective intervention<br />
followed by iron 'supplementation.<br />
102
Table 62. Comparison<strong>of</strong>Cost per Capita and CostperCapitaper Unit i1fEffectivenessfor Three Different<br />
Types <strong>of</strong> Cost Components<br />
Cost per Capita per<br />
Parameter/Treatment Cost per Capita Unit <strong>of</strong> Effectiveness<br />
Group Cost 1 Cost 2 Cost 3 Cost 1 Cost 2 Cost 3<br />
Anemia Status<br />
Food and Iron 1'340.45 1'252.88 1'230.78 1'25.41 1'18.87 1'17.22<br />
$ 24.32 $18.06 $16.48 $1.82 $1.35 $1.23<br />
,<br />
Iron 143.71 31.96 8.86 35.93 7.99 2.22<br />
$10.27 $228 $0.63 $ 2.57 $0.57 $0.16<br />
Low Birthweight<br />
Food and Iron 1'340.45 1'252.88 1'230.78 1'5.29 1'3.93 1'3.59<br />
$ 24.32 $18.06 $16.48 $ 0.38 $0.28 $0.26<br />
Food 333.91 227.68 205.76 10.03 6.84 6.18<br />
$ 23.85 $16.26 $14.70 $0.72 $0.49 $0.44<br />
Iron 143.71 31.96 8.86 8.98 2.00 0.55<br />
$10.27 $2.28 $0.63 $0.64 $0.14 $0.04<br />
NIEC 104.91 27.15 4.86 2.39 0.62 0.11<br />
$ 7.49 $1.94 $ 0.35 $0.17 $0.04 $0.01<br />
As in the earlieranalysis, the cost <strong>of</strong> preventing one case <strong>of</strong> anemia and low birthweight was also<br />
determined using the different cost components. The resulting values arestill extremely high. In<br />
the case <strong>of</strong> anemia for example, the cost <strong>of</strong> preventing one case using Cost 3 is 1'521.35 for iron<br />
supplementation and 1'4,438.08 for food and iron combined. These resulting high values <strong>of</strong><br />
prevention even after retaining only the most basis cost components leads to question the<br />
practicality <strong>of</strong> the mass intervention approach which was used in this project. In the same vein, it<br />
emphasizes the need for studies for the development <strong>of</strong> easily collectible and sensitive indicators<br />
<strong>of</strong> anemiaandlow birthweightwhichcan be used by field workers for targetting pregnant women<br />
for supplementation.<br />
103<br />
•
9. EFFECTS OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC, DEMOGRAPHIC AND<br />
INTERVENTION VARIABLES ON MOTHERS AND CHILDREN<br />
Although the main objective <strong>of</strong> the project was to determine the effect <strong>of</strong> the different forms <strong>of</strong><br />
intervention at the community level, the data that were generated also enabled the determination<br />
<strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> food and iron supplementation using the mothers and their infants as units <strong>of</strong><br />
analysis. The specific response variables considered were the anemia status <strong>of</strong> each pregnant<br />
woman (normal or anemic), the birhtweight <strong>of</strong> each infant (normal or low) and the nutritional<br />
status<strong>of</strong> each child28days afterbirth (normal or malnourished). In addition to the differentforms<br />
<strong>of</strong> intervention, the effects <strong>of</strong> selected socio-economic and demographic factors on each <strong>of</strong> these<br />
response variables were also-assessed.<br />
Inaddition to thedetermination <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> selected variables on anemiaand lowbirthweight,<br />
this study also intended to identify matenal and/or household parameters which can be used for<br />
targettingpregnantwomenfor food supplementation. Althoughin thisstudyall pregnantwomen<br />
in the community were given supplementation irrespective <strong>of</strong> whether or not they belonged to<br />
high-risk groups, this cannot always be done, especially for expensive forms <strong>of</strong> intervention like<br />
food. This leads to theproblem <strong>of</strong> identifying variables whichcanbe used to identify target groups<br />
for such forms <strong>of</strong> supplementation.<br />
Selected Variables and Anemia Status <strong>of</strong> Pregnant Women<br />
To determine the nature <strong>of</strong> the relationships among the different socio-economic, demographic<br />
and intervention variables and anemia status, logistic regression analysis was applied, using the<br />
pregnant woman as the unit <strong>of</strong> analysis. Only those who had received any form <strong>of</strong> supplementation<br />
at the time <strong>of</strong> pricking were considered in the analysis. This included 434 pregnant women,<br />
<strong>of</strong> whom 166 were anemic and 268 had normal hemoglobin levels. The independent variables<br />
included in themodel werepresented in Table 12<strong>of</strong> Chapter3 <strong>of</strong> this report. The results areshown<br />
below.<br />
Table 63. Results <strong>of</strong> the LogisticRegression Analysis on the interrelationships between anemia status<br />
and socio-economic, demographic and intervention variables<br />
Significant Regression<br />
Variables Coefficient (Bi ) Standard Error (Bi ) EXP. (Bi)<br />
Food & Iron Group -0.2.015 0.1042 0.1370<br />
Moderate to above 0.37011 0.2103 5.810<br />
hookworm inrestation<br />
.<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> Livebirths 0.11241 0.0561 1.1200<br />
The results once again indicate that <strong>of</strong> the four treatment groups, the combined food and iron<br />
supplementation was the one which showed significant effects on anemia status, even if the<br />
pregnantwomanis used as the unit<strong>of</strong> analysis. Hookworminfection hada very significant effect,<br />
with the odds <strong>of</strong> becoming anemic being 5.8 times as much for a pregnant woman with at least<br />
moderate infestation compared to one with only light infestation or none at all. The number <strong>of</strong><br />
livebirths in the past is another risk factor <strong>of</strong> anemia. The effects <strong>of</strong> all the other variables<br />
considered in the model were not statistically significant.<br />
104
Selected Variables and Low Birthweight<br />
In terms <strong>of</strong> the relationship between socio-economic, demographicand intervention variables and<br />
birthweight, not one <strong>of</strong> the four treatment groups turned out to be statistically significant. This<br />
result could however be due to small sample sizes with only 14 out <strong>of</strong> the 499 infants included in<br />
the analysis having low birthweight. Of the other independent variables considered, only the<br />
length <strong>of</strong> gestationand educational attainment turned out to be significant. Results show that the<br />
odds<strong>of</strong> a prematurechild to have lowbirthweight were 1.93 times higher than those <strong>of</strong> a full term<br />
child. The results with respect to educationalattainment is contrary to expectations in that a Child<br />
with a college-educated mothershowed greater odds <strong>of</strong> having low birthweight than one whose<br />
mother had not been to school at all. These are shown in Table 64.<br />
Table 64. Results <strong>of</strong> the Logistic Regression Analysis on the intenelationships betweenbirth_ight<br />
and socio-economic, demographic and intervention variables<br />
Significant Regression<br />
Variables Coefficient (Bi ) Standard Error (Bi ) EXP. (Bi)<br />
Food & Iron Group -0.2.715 0.1042 0.137<br />
Length <strong>of</strong> Gestation 0.6557 0.3428 1.9300<br />
College Education 0.5226 0.5226 1.6900<br />
In view <strong>of</strong> the sample problem in the application <strong>of</strong> logistic regression analysis to the data, an<br />
alternate method <strong>of</strong> analysis was done to determine the relationship between the different socioeconomic,<br />
demographicand intervention variables, and birthweight. Multiple regression analysis<br />
was applied using the actual birthweight <strong>of</strong> the child as independent variable, instead <strong>of</strong> the<br />
birthweight status (low vs. normal) which was used earlier. This approach makes full use <strong>of</strong> the<br />
data on birthweight but differs from logistic regression analysis in the interpretation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
regression coefficients.<br />
Tenvariables were identified to be significant predictors <strong>of</strong> birthweightusingmultipleregression<br />
analysis. 'Theseare showninTable 65,withthe correspondingregressioncoefficientsandstandard<br />
errors. Among the four treatment groups, the effects <strong>of</strong> food and 'iron combined, as well as iron<br />
alone turned out to be significantly different from that <strong>of</strong> the control group. The-regression<br />
coefficients <strong>of</strong> 19.41 and 23.34 grams respectively represent the difference between the mean<br />
birthweight<strong>of</strong> children whose mothers belonged to these treatment groups and thecontrol group.<br />
Of the different diseases considered, hypertension was the only significant predictor <strong>of</strong> birthweight.<br />
Theregressioncoefficient <strong>of</strong>-24.76grams means that on theaverage, themean birthweight<br />
<strong>of</strong> infants with hypertensivemothers is lower than those with normal mothers by 24.76 grams. As<br />
in logistic regression analysis, educational attainment is a significant predictor<strong>of</strong> birthweight,<br />
with the mean birthweight <strong>of</strong> children whose mothers never went to school at all being significantly<br />
lower than those whose mothers have either an elementary ora high school education. The<br />
level <strong>of</strong> nutrition knowledge, attitudes and practices, as measured by the'KAP score, was also<br />
directly related to birthweight. All the 10 significant predictors accounted for 14.4% <strong>of</strong> the total<br />
variability in the birthweight <strong>of</strong> the child.<br />
105
The above results indicate that <strong>of</strong> the four treatment groups it was again the Food & Iron group<br />
which had a significant effect on the nutritional status <strong>of</strong> the infant. The odds that a child could be<br />
malnourishedifthe mother was given Food & Iron supplementation during pregnancy wasonly<br />
29.5% <strong>of</strong> thecorresponding odds <strong>of</strong> a mother who was in the NIB group during pregnancy..The<br />
weight at birth is another important risk factor in that the odds <strong>of</strong> being malnourished is 23 times<br />
higher for a child with lowbirthweightas comparedto anotherchild with normal birthweight. Per<br />
capita income and history <strong>of</strong> previous pregnancy loss are other variables with significant effects<br />
on the nutritional status <strong>of</strong> the infant.<br />
Parameters for Targetting Pregnant Women<br />
To identify the parameters for targetting women for food supplementation, only women who had<br />
not received any form <strong>of</strong> supplementation(i.e., those in the NIB group) were included in the<br />
analysis. Since this objective is akin to identifying the predictons <strong>of</strong> low birthweight for possible<br />
intervention, the response variable used was the birthweight status <strong>of</strong> the child, categorized as<br />
normal or low. Of only 187 mothers included in this part <strong>of</strong> the analysis, 8 had infants with low<br />
birthweight. The results are shown in Table 67.<br />
Table 67. Res\llts <strong>of</strong> the Logtstic Regression Analysis to identify predictors <strong>of</strong> low birthweight among<br />
pregnant women without intervention .<br />
Significant Regression<br />
Variables Coefficient (Bi ) Standard Error (Bi ) EXP. (Bi)<br />
Height <strong>of</strong> PW -0.01180 0.0096 0.9800<br />
Presenceor Absence <strong>of</strong> 1.47014 '0.6768 4.3800<br />
murmurs<br />
Arm Circumference -0.0387 0.0224 0.9600<br />
Age <strong>of</strong> PW(20 or >35) 0.8774 0.4935 2.4000<br />
College Education 0.7538 . 0.4337 2.1200<br />
The results in Table 68 show that <strong>of</strong> the independent variables considered, the significant<br />
predictors which can be used as parameters for targetting women for food intervention are those<br />
whichare related to health (presence <strong>of</strong> murmurs) and nutrition (height, armcircumference). Age<br />
is another risk factor associated with the very young and older mothers (35). These age<br />
groups have a greater chance (2.4 times ) <strong>of</strong> having low birthweight babies compared to those in<br />
the 20-35 age group. Once again, the result on educational attainment is contrary to expectations,<br />
with college-educated women being more likely to have low birthweightbabies than to thosewho<br />
have no education at all.<br />
107
10. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS AND.RECOMMENDATIONS<br />
The Iron and Food Supplementation Delivery for Pregnant Women was conducted<br />
to test strategies and evaluate the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> food and iron supplementation on<br />
the prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia among pregnant women and incidence <strong>of</strong> low birthweight<br />
among their infants within the framework <strong>of</strong> the PHC approach. The findings <strong>of</strong> the<br />
study are summarized in the following conclusions and recommendations.<br />
Extent <strong>of</strong> the anemia problem among pregnant women<br />
High prevalence <strong>of</strong> nutritional anemia among pregnant women<br />
Statistics show that nutritional anemia among pregnant women remains highly<br />
prevalent worldwide especially in developing countries (43). Nutritional anemia is<br />
already an established cause <strong>of</strong> maternal and infant morbidity and mortality, low<br />
birthweight babies and poor infant development (4-10).<br />
Royston reported that nutritional anemia affected over half the pregnant women in<br />
Asian countries. The prevalence rate was found to be as high as 80% in some areas<br />
(43). The Philippine National Survey in 1987 has shown that 45.2% <strong>of</strong> Filipino<br />
pregnant women were suffering from anemia (11).<br />
These statistics are similar to the data gathered in this study, i.e. 40.4% <strong>of</strong> the PW are<br />
anemic. Comparable, too with the prevalence data is the finding on low intake <strong>of</strong><br />
iron wherein 38% <strong>of</strong> the sample PW had less than 50% intake based on RDA and<br />
34% had only 50-74% intake.<br />
Increasing prevalence <strong>of</strong> nutritional anemia<br />
Not withstanding significant advances in knowledge and technology on the<br />
prevention and control <strong>of</strong> nutritionalanemia, the problem has worsened as shown<br />
. in the Philippine nationwide .survey results (1,11,26). In this study, the prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />
anemia in the Food Group where there was completely no iron intervention<br />
increased by 21 %. Like other nutrition problems, anemia is closely related with the<br />
economic and financial stability <strong>of</strong> the population. Thus with inflation and<br />
worsening economic conditions in the country, there is need to give priority to a<br />
comprehensive prevention and control program for nutritional disorders especially<br />
anemia among pregnant women.<br />
108
Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> Food and iron supplementation and NIE Intervention<br />
Reduction <strong>of</strong> anemia among pregnant women<br />
The study showed that iron supplementation using the present health delivery<br />
system within the framework <strong>of</strong> PHC was effective in reducing the prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />
anemia among pregnant women. The reduction <strong>of</strong> prevalence by 4% in this study<br />
was trebled (13.4%) when iron was combined with food supplementation. The low<br />
percentage reduction, however, may be due to the low compliance (only 52%) among<br />
pregnant women with the prescribed dosage and the high prevalence <strong>of</strong> parasitic<br />
infection particularly hookworm and trichuris.<br />
On the other hand, the NIE intervention was not enough to reduce anemia in the<br />
community as shown in the increased prevalence in the treatment groups without<br />
iron, i.e., the prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia increased by 20.8% in the Food Group and 12.1 %<br />
in the NIE group. The lower increase in the NIE group may be due to the fact that<br />
some <strong>of</strong> the mothers received iron supplements distributed by the <strong>DOH</strong>.<br />
Reduction <strong>of</strong> the incidence <strong>of</strong> low birthweight<br />
On the other hand all the treatment groups brought about a reduction in the<br />
incidence <strong>of</strong> low birthweight. The Food and Iron Group registered 64.3% reduction<br />
followed by the NIE Group (43.9%), the Food Group (33.3%) and the Iron Group<br />
(16.0%).<br />
The problem <strong>of</strong> low birthweight is more complex. Literature has traced the causes <strong>of</strong><br />
the problem to the birthweight <strong>of</strong> the mother, the mother's .height which is a<br />
measure <strong>of</strong> her nutritional status since birth, her immediate weight gain during<br />
pregnancy, maternal age and education, and other health practices like smoking and<br />
alcohol drinking 03-21).<br />
In this study alone, the following factors were found related to the birthweight <strong>of</strong> the<br />
infants: height, household size, mother's education, KAP Score, food and iron, and<br />
iron supplementation, presence <strong>of</strong> other supplementation.adequacy <strong>of</strong> calorie intake<br />
and presence <strong>of</strong> hypertension. The prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia in the study' was estimated<br />
controlling for the effect <strong>of</strong> these confounding variables. That the NIE group also<br />
showed a higher percent reduction in incidence <strong>of</strong> LBW can be explained by the<br />
possible presence <strong>of</strong> other major confounding factors which might not have been<br />
controlled for.<br />
Another possible reason was the poor compliance. with the distribution <strong>of</strong> the food<br />
supplements i.e., so many <strong>of</strong> the targets (at least 30%) were not able to receive their<br />
required allotment <strong>of</strong> supplements particularly because <strong>of</strong> the' irregular involvement<br />
<strong>of</strong> the BHWs and late enrollment. Compliance with iron supplementation was also<br />
low, i.e., mothers on the average complied only with 52% <strong>of</strong> prescribed dosage.<br />
A further possible explanation for the NIE performance was that the NIE group<br />
showed a highest mean intake in calorie, iron, protein, carbohydrates, beta carotene<br />
and Vitamin C during the post-survey. The same group also showed the highest<br />
109
increases in mean intake from pre-to post-surveys for calories, irori, Vitamin C, fats<br />
and carbohydrates. One contributing factor to this better dietary performance is the<br />
higher percentage <strong>of</strong> PW who received their NIB brochures. This assumption is<br />
supported by the result <strong>of</strong> the one way ANOVA test on the receipt <strong>of</strong> anemia<br />
brochures and knowledge scores and dietary intake. Test results showed 'that PW<br />
who received their anemia brochures, showed significantly higher knowledge scores<br />
and iron intake than those who did not receive the material. Similarly, the PWs<br />
who received their Food Prescription Slip had significantly higher knowledge scores<br />
and protein intake than those who did not. These mothers also showed a higher<br />
calorie intake but the result was not significant.<br />
Cost <strong>of</strong> intervention<br />
Cost effectiveness analysis <strong>of</strong> iron and food supplementation<br />
The costs <strong>of</strong> a food and iron supplementation program which would depend on its<br />
own resources and provide compensation for manpower including volunteer<br />
workers (opportunity cost), would amount to 11333.91 ($23.9) to provide food<br />
supplements to a pregnant woman, P340.45 ($24.3) for a combined food and iron<br />
supplementation, P143.71 ($10.3) for iron supplementation and P104.91 ($7.5) for NIB<br />
intervention (based on 1984 peso values).<br />
With support, however, from the ongoing program <strong>of</strong> the Philippine government,<br />
and the concept <strong>of</strong> PHC promoting self reliance through the volunteer health<br />
workers, the amount is only P205.76 ($14.7) for food, P230.78 ($16.5) for combined<br />
food and iron, P8.86 ($0.6) for iron and P4.86 ($0.4) for NIB, per pregnant woman.<br />
Cost effectiveness analysis<br />
Although higher in cost, the combined food and iron group was more cost effective<br />
than the Iron Group in the reduction <strong>of</strong> anemia.<br />
In the reduction <strong>of</strong> low birthweight, however, the NIE Group was the most cost<br />
effective intervention. The Food and Iron Group, the Iron Group and the Food<br />
Group followed in that order.<br />
With an already existing health delivery system, the Iron Group was more cost<br />
effective than the combined Food and Iron Group in the reduction <strong>of</strong> anemia.<br />
Likewise, the Iron Group was more cost effective than the Food and Iron Group in<br />
the reduction <strong>of</strong> low birthweight.<br />
Issues and policies on anemia and iow birthweight prevention and control program<br />
Need for Iron and Food Supplementation<br />
The iron intervention was effective in the reduction <strong>of</strong> both the anemia <strong>of</strong> PW and<br />
LBW <strong>of</strong> the infant, while the NIB intervention was not able to reduce the prevalence<br />
<strong>of</strong> anemia among PW. The iron treatment was cost effective in the reduction <strong>of</strong> both<br />
110
I<br />
l<br />
Other components <strong>of</strong> intervention packages for the reduction <strong>of</strong> anemia and low<br />
birthweight<br />
At the community level, other significant factors related to the prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia<br />
are the prevalence <strong>of</strong> parasitic infection (e.g. hookworm and trichuris), incidence <strong>of</strong><br />
bleeding, coverage <strong>of</strong> the project and education. These factors influence the impact<br />
<strong>of</strong> the different interventions on anemia.<br />
Significant factors in the incidence <strong>of</strong> low birth weight are: presence <strong>of</strong> other types <strong>of</strong><br />
supplement mostly multi-vitamins, the number or percentage <strong>of</strong> PW with adequate<br />
calorie intake, with gravida greater or equal to 5, with birth interval <strong>of</strong> less than 730<br />
days, <strong>of</strong> less than 20 or more than 35 years <strong>of</strong> age, median per capita income, with<br />
high school education and percentage <strong>of</strong> premature babies.<br />
These nutrition problems interface with other health problems and the socioeconomic<br />
and demographic situation in the community. Therefore there is a need <strong>of</strong><br />
integrating control programs for these problems in other national or local<br />
development programs. Agriculture, population,economic and health policies have<br />
to be developed in relation to one another. With the number <strong>of</strong> agencies<br />
implementing their respective programs, intersectoral coordination is a crucial<br />
issue and should be well defined.<br />
Close supervision and monitoring<br />
A major factor <strong>of</strong> effectiveness is the lew compliance with iron supplementation<br />
\, because <strong>of</strong> its side effects among pregnant women, as well as low compliance with<br />
iron and food supplementation delivery because <strong>of</strong> decreasing BHW involvement.<br />
Compliance can be improved through close supervision and monitoring. This<br />
should start with a proper orientation <strong>of</strong> <strong>DOH</strong> staff on the significance <strong>of</strong> the work to<br />
develop their sense <strong>of</strong> ownership <strong>of</strong> the project. The supervisors should motivate<br />
the workers on their roles and closely supervise them to help them identify and.<br />
solve their problems. A Pilot Iron Supplementation Study for the control <strong>of</strong> anemia<br />
among pregnant women by Solon et. al. showed the advantages <strong>of</strong> close supervision<br />
in increasing program effectiveness. The study concluded that the 60 mg iron given<br />
without supervision for 100 days seemed inadequate to bring about substantial<br />
improvement in the hemoglobin picture, but that with supervision or an assurance<br />
<strong>of</strong> regular intake <strong>of</strong> the full dosage, the 60 mg dose produced significant effect. The<br />
mean compliance rate among the supervised group was significantly higher at 93%<br />
than that <strong>of</strong> the unsupervised (77%) (59).<br />
Results <strong>of</strong> the delivery system<br />
Delivery System within the PHC Framework<br />
The study showed an increase in the number <strong>of</strong> pregnant women going for pre-natal<br />
check-up and an increase in PW getting their NIE materials from the RHU/BHS and<br />
BHW. The following problems, however were also encountered: a) difficulty to<br />
convince mothers to participate in iron supplementation, b) lack <strong>of</strong> awareness <strong>of</strong><br />
LMP/late enrollment <strong>of</strong> PW, c) the problem <strong>of</strong> sharing to family members especially<br />
112
Revision <strong>of</strong> projeel tools<br />
Some project inputs have to be revised. The monitoring system must be made<br />
simpler and motivation <strong>of</strong> workers in its implementation must be prioritized in the<br />
development <strong>of</strong> the training system.<br />
114
22. Wiener G et al. Correlates<strong>of</strong> low birthweight: Psychological slatusat six to seven years <strong>of</strong> age.<br />
Pediatrics 1965; 35:434-444.<br />
23. Angara A A. Observations on the Rural <strong>Health</strong> Care Delivery Systems in the Philippines.<br />
1978. WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific, Manila. 1978.<br />
24. MOH. A national strategy and plan <strong>of</strong> action for achieving health for all Filipinos by the Year<br />
2000. MOH,Philippines, 1980.<br />
25. <strong>DOH</strong>. Primary <strong>Health</strong> Care status. <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Health</strong>, Philippines, 1983.<br />
26. FNRI. First National Nutrition Survey Philippines, 1978. Food & Nutrition Research Institute,<br />
<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology, Manila, 1979.<br />
27. Churchill JA, Neff JW, Caldwell OF. Birthwcight and intelligence. Obstetric andGynecology<br />
1966; 23:425-429.<br />
28. Singer JE,Westphal M, Niswander K. Relationship <strong>of</strong> weight gain during pregnancy to birthweight<br />
and infact growth & development in the first year <strong>of</strong> life. Obstetric & Gynecology 1968;<br />
31(3): 417-423.<br />
29 Antonov AN. Children born during the siege <strong>of</strong> Leningrad in 1942. Journal <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics 1947;<br />
30:250.<br />
30. Nutrition Foundation<strong>of</strong>India. Maternal nutrition, laclationand infantgrowthin urbanslums.<br />
Scientific Report #9, New Delhi, 1988.<br />
31. Solon FSet. al. The NutritionSurveillance Project Report. Nu trition Center<strong>of</strong> the Philippines,<br />
Metro Manila Philippines, 1980.<br />
32. Lechtig A et al. Effect<strong>of</strong> food supplementation during pregnancy on birthweight, Pediatrics<br />
1975; 56(4): 508 -519<br />
33. Mora JO et al. Nutritional supplementation and the outcome <strong>of</strong> pregnancy. The American<br />
Journal <strong>of</strong>Clinical Nutrition 1979; 32:455 -462.<br />
34. Kotelchuck M et al. WIC participation & pregnancyoutcomes: I. Birthweight, Massachusetts<br />
Statewide Evaluation Project. American Journal <strong>of</strong> Public <strong>Health</strong> 1984; 74(10): 1086-1092.<br />
35. Prentice A et al. Prenatal dietary supplemenlation <strong>of</strong> African women & birthweight, LAncet<br />
1983; 489-491.<br />
36. Tontisirin K et al. Formulation and evaluation <strong>of</strong> supplementary foods for Thai pregnant<br />
women. American Journal <strong>of</strong>Clinical Nutrition 1986; 43: 931 -939.<br />
37. NNe. Implementing guidelines <strong>of</strong> the Philippine Food & Nutrition Program. National<br />
Nutrition Council, Makati, 1981.<br />
38. NNe. 1981 Philippine Nutrition Program Annual Report. National Nutrition Council,<br />
Makati,1981.<br />
39. NNe. 1982 Philippine Nutrition Program Annual Report. National Nutrition Council,<br />
Makati,1982.<br />
40. NNe. 1983 Philippine Nutrition Program Annual Report. National Nutrition Council,<br />
Makati,1983.<br />
41. NNe. 1984 Philippine Nutrition Program Annual Report. National Nutrition Council,<br />
Makati,1984.<br />
42. <strong>DOH</strong>. <strong>DOH</strong>-CARE Targetted Food Assistance Program Implementing Guidelines. <strong>Department</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>Health</strong>, Philippines, 1987.<br />
43. Royston E. The prevalence <strong>of</strong> nutritional anemia in women in devclopingcountries. Acritical<br />
review <strong>of</strong> available information. World <strong>Health</strong> Statistics Quarterly 1982; 35(2):52-66.<br />
44. WHO. Nutritional Anemias. WHO, Geneva, 1968.<br />
116
45. WHO. Control <strong>of</strong> nutritional anemia with special references to Iron deficiency. Report <strong>of</strong> an<br />
IAEA/USAID/WHO Joint meeting. WHO, Geneva, 1975.<br />
46. INACG. Guidelines for the eradication<strong>of</strong> iron deficiency anemia. The NutritionFoundation,<br />
New York, 1977.<br />
47. Bothwell TH. Iron Deficiency in Women. INACG, The Nutrition Foundation, Washington<br />
D.e., 1981.<br />
48. Levy S et al. A therapeutic trial in anemia <strong>of</strong> pregnancy. Israel Journal Medical Science 1968;<br />
4(1):218-222.<br />
49. Iyengar L. Effect <strong>of</strong> dietary supplements on birth weight <strong>of</strong> infants, First Asian Congress on<br />
Nutrition, Hyderbad India. 20 Kamal Printers. 1971.<br />
50. Basu RN et al. Etiopathogenesis <strong>of</strong> nutritional anemia in pregnancy: A therapeutic approach.<br />
TheAmerican Journal <strong>of</strong>Clinical Nutrition1973; 26:591-594.<br />
51. Sood Sket al. WHO SponsoredCollaborativeStudieson nutritional anemiain India. Quarterly<br />
Journal <strong>of</strong>Medicine, New Series 1975; XLI.\': 241-258.<br />
52. Aung - Than- Batu, Thane -Toe, Khin-Kgi-Nyunt. A prophylactic trial <strong>of</strong> iron and folic acid<br />
supplements in pregnant Burmese women. Israel Journal Medit.,1 Science 1976; 12(12):1410<br />
1417.<br />
53. Charocnlarp, Iron Supplementation Studies in Bangkok Thailand, Progress in Clinical and<br />
Biological Research 1981; 77:355-361.<br />
54. Thane-Toe, Thein-Than. The effects<strong>of</strong>oral iron supplementationon ferritin levels in pregnant<br />
Burmese women. American Journal <strong>of</strong>Clinical Nutrition 1982; 35:95-99.<br />
55. Jackson RY, Latham Me. Anemia <strong>of</strong> pregnancy in Liberia, West Africa: A therapeutic trial.<br />
American Journal <strong>of</strong>Clinical Nutrition1982; 35: 710-714.<br />
56. Vijayalakshoni P, Shobana R. Impact <strong>of</strong> iron and folic acid supplementation on expectant<br />
mothers and their <strong>of</strong>fspring. The Indian Journal <strong>of</strong>Nutritionand Dietetics 1982; 19:363.<br />
57. SrisupanditSet al. Aprophylactic supplementation<strong>of</strong>iron and folate in pregnancy. Southeast<br />
AsianJournal <strong>of</strong>Tropical Medicine 1983; 14(3): 317-322.<br />
58. Valyasevi et. al. The study<strong>of</strong> iron supplementation <strong>of</strong>PWin Ubol Province Thailand. Institute<br />
<strong>of</strong> Nutrition, Medical Faculty University, Bangkok, Thailand. 1985.<br />
59. Solon FS et al. Iron Supplementation for the control <strong>of</strong> ntritional anemia among pregnant<br />
women. Food and nutrition research division. Nutrition Center <strong>of</strong> the Philippines, Metro<br />
Manila, Philippines, 1984(unpublished terminal report).<br />
60. Narasinga Rao BS. Physiology <strong>of</strong> iron absorption on supplementation. British Medical Bulletin<br />
1981; 37(1):25 -30.<br />
61. Gomez T. The educational value <strong>of</strong> supplemental feeding. Philippine Journal <strong>of</strong> Nutrition<br />
Education 1979; 32(4):189-192.<br />
62. BoweringJ et al. Role<strong>of</strong> EFNEPaides in improvingdiets <strong>of</strong> pregnant women. Journal Nutrition<br />
Education 1976; 8(3).<br />
63. Cerqueira T et al. A comparison <strong>of</strong> mass media technique and a direct method for nutrition<br />
education in rural Mexico. Journal Nutrition Education 1979; 11(2).<br />
64. WHO.Final Report <strong>of</strong> the First Regional Working Group on Basic<strong>Health</strong> Services, Manila 21<br />
29 Sept. 1976, Manila 1976.<br />
65. WHO. International Conference on Primary <strong>Health</strong> Care, Alma Ata (1978, USSR) PHe. WHO,<br />
Geneva, 1978.<br />
66. <strong>DOH</strong> La Union Primary <strong>Health</strong> Care Annual Reports 1984-88. <strong>Department</strong>, <strong>of</strong> <strong>Health</strong>,<br />
Philippines, 1984-1988 (Unpublished).<br />
117
67. Flahault 0, Raemer Ml. Leadership for primary health care: Levels, functions and requirements<br />
based on twelve case studies. WHO, Geneva, 1986.<br />
68. ScrimshawNS. Integratingnutrition into programmes<strong>of</strong>PHC. Food andNutrition Bulletin/988;<br />
10(4):19-28.<br />
69. Shah PM, Shah KP. Provision <strong>of</strong> health and nutrition services at the grassroots level in the<br />
Palghar and Kasa projects and the possibility <strong>of</strong> their replication. Food and Nutrition Bulletin<br />
/976; 3(1):1-7.<br />
70. NCP IFSO Operations manual. Nutrition Center <strong>of</strong> the Philippines, Metro Manila Philippines,<br />
1984.<br />
71. Solon FSCommunication to the !PHO, La Union Province. 1984.<br />
72. Solon FS et, al. Factors affecting service delivery, IFSO Project. Nutrition Center <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Philippines, Metro Manila Philippines, 1989.<br />
73. Hallberg L,Ryttinger L,SolvellL. Side effects<strong>of</strong>oral iron therapy. ActaMedica Scandinauia /966;<br />
Suppl 459:3-10.<br />
74. <strong>DOH</strong>. Family Pr<strong>of</strong>ile. OHO, IPHO, La Union, 1985.<br />
118
Appendix A<br />
IMPLEMENTORS' GUIDE FOR MIDWIVES<br />
IRON AND FOOD SUPPLEMENTATION FOR PREGNANT WOMEN<br />
IN<br />
PRIMARY HEALTH CARE<br />
•<br />
NUTRITION CENTER OF THE PHILIPPINES<br />
AND<br />
MINISTRY OF HEALTH<br />
January, 1985<br />
119
PREFACE<br />
The pregnant womaninyourcommunityand the child she carriesin herwombneedyou! Asonepriority<br />
group <strong>of</strong> our country's health and nutrition program, they need proper attention from you to ensure that they:<br />
• get prompt and adequate pre-natal care;<br />
• receive and understand nutritional advice for health foetal growth and normal childbirth;·and<br />
• learn and follow the specific steps to maintain good health during this delicate period.<br />
Our iron and Food Supplementation Project for Pregnant Women was launched specifically to answer<br />
these needs. This Guide was developed to help you serve them properly and effectively as an implementor <strong>of</strong><br />
the Project.<br />
To do this, every effort must be taken:<br />
,<br />
• to pass on to the mother timely INFORMAnON upon which she can make decisions;<br />
• to shape the right ATITIUDES by correcting harmful practices and motivating and promoting<br />
acceptable ones; and<br />
• to follow-up her PRACTICES withhome visits and pre-natal counselling, reinforcing everypositive<br />
behavior and gently guiding her until she makes a HABIT<strong>of</strong> the health and nutrition practices that<br />
she has learned.<br />
This is then your opportunity to demonstrate your dedication to the services you have committed<br />
yourself to do for your community. It is an opportunity that caIlson you to help make pregnancy a happy and<br />
fulfilling experience for both the mother and her child.<br />
GOOD LUCK AND MAYGOOD BLESS YOU IN YOURWORK!<br />
, .<br />
121
These NIB materials consist <strong>of</strong> the following:<br />
• ANEMIA Brochure<br />
• Food Prescription slip<br />
• FERRIN Brochure<br />
• NUTRINA Brochure (How Much to Eat and Why><br />
The Anemia Brochure provides information on what anemia is, its causes, signs, symptoms, treatment<br />
and prevention<br />
The Food Prescription Slip gives information on the three basic food groups to guide mothers on what<br />
and how much food to eat.<br />
The FERRIN Brochure gives information on what, why and when they need iron supplementation. Its<br />
purpose is to motivate the mothers to take the iron tablets being given to them.<br />
The FERRIN iron tablets are distributed directly to you at the Barangay <strong>Health</strong> Station. You will issue<br />
these in turn to the Barangay <strong>Health</strong> Workers for distribution to pregnant women on their scheduled dates <strong>of</strong><br />
receipt <strong>of</strong> supplements. But in cases where the BHW's are-unable to do the distribution, you may issue iron<br />
supplies to mothers who go to you directly.<br />
YOUR ROLE IN PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION<br />
You will.be primarychannel for the delivery <strong>of</strong> iron and food intervention to our target pregnant women<br />
in your catchment area. Also in our efftort to have'the local community responsive and involved in this health<br />
improvement program, their chosen representatives, the Barangay <strong>Health</strong> Workers will be collaborating with<br />
you. You will therefore need to work very closely with the BHWs in your catchment area in this undertaiking..<br />
The following are the different operations to be conducted at your level to implement and monitor the<br />
project.<br />
A. Oganizational and Training <strong>of</strong> BHWs<br />
B. Pre-natal activities<br />
1. Identifying and Enrolling Pregnant Women<br />
2. Requisitioning and Receiving Supplies<br />
3. Distributing Supplies<br />
4. Monitoring Compliance to<br />
4.1 Supplementation<br />
4.2 Protocol<br />
C. Natal activities<br />
Monitoring Pregnancy Outcomes <strong>of</strong><br />
1. Deliveries You or the Hilots Have Attended<br />
2. Deliveries Attended by Hospital Attendants<br />
D. Post-natal activitie<br />
Conducting Post-Natal Follow-up <strong>of</strong>:<br />
1. Mother<br />
2. Infant<br />
124
B1. Pre-natal activities<br />
1. Identifying and enrolling pregnant women<br />
No.<br />
1<br />
You and your Barangay <strong>Health</strong> Workers are continuously identifying pregnant women in<br />
your catchment area for iron and food supplementation. Pregnant women are referred to you for<br />
pre-natal check-up and enrollment in our FERRINand NUTRlNA Supplementation Project.<br />
When to be Conducted<br />
Tools to Use<br />
Your Responsiblities<br />
1.1 Verify the pregnancy status <strong>of</strong> women<br />
you have identified or were referred to<br />
you by the Barangay <strong>Health</strong> Workers<br />
in your catchment area<br />
1.2 Enroll all the pregnant women living<br />
in one barangay in a Barangay Master<br />
List <strong>of</strong> Pregnant Women<br />
Your Responsibilities<br />
Date <strong>of</strong><br />
Name <strong>of</strong> Pregnant Woman Address<br />
Registry<br />
(3) (4)<br />
(2) .<br />
1 11-9-84 Bumatay, Asuncion S.<br />
12 Gomez<br />
St. Bo. Abo<br />
2 11-10-84 Padilla, Rosa R. Bo. San Luis<br />
3 11·15-84 Balagat, Teresita D. Bo. San Luis<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> BHW<br />
(5) DH<br />
Place <strong>of</strong> Pre-Natal<br />
Care (6)<br />
0-<br />
PH RHU BHS<br />
THERS<br />
LMP<br />
(7)<br />
PACITACRUZ v 10-15-84<br />
GLORIA PEREZ .> 8-28-84<br />
127<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
As soon as pregnant women are identifted by<br />
you or are referred to you in the Barangay<br />
<strong>Health</strong> Station by BHWs.<br />
Barangay Master List <strong>of</strong> Pregnant women (to<br />
be accomplished with a duplicate copy)<br />
Maternal <strong>Health</strong> Record<br />
(to be accomplished with a duplicate copy)<br />
Anemia Brochure<br />
Food Prescription Slip<br />
FERRINand NUTRINA Brochures<br />
How to Accomplish Each<br />
Do a pre-natal check-up on all pregnant<br />
women that you and your BHWs have<br />
identified in your catchment area<br />
Fillup items (1) to (43)<strong>of</strong> the Maternal <strong>Health</strong><br />
Record (See the Explanatory Notes on MHR).<br />
Fillup items (l) to (10)<strong>of</strong> the BarangayMaster<br />
List <strong>of</strong> Pregnant Women.<br />
How to Accomplish Each<br />
NUMBER. Number each pregnant woman that<br />
you enroll in the Master List.<br />
DATE OF REGISTRY. Record the date <strong>of</strong> the<br />
pregnant woman's initial visit with you .<br />
NAME OF PREGNANT WOMAN. Write the<br />
pregnant woman's family name, given name, and<br />
her middle initial.<br />
ADDRESS. Write the house number (if any) and<br />
the name <strong>of</strong> the street or purok.<br />
NAME OF BHW. Identify the name <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Barangay <strong>Health</strong> Worker assigned to her area <strong>of</strong><br />
residence.<br />
PLACE OF PRE-NATAL CARE. Indicate with<br />
a check mark the place where she usually goes or<br />
intends to go for her pre-natal consultation.
"Maternal <strong>Health</strong> Record (tobe filled up<br />
in duplicate copy) for each newly identified<br />
pregnant woman.<br />
"FERRIN brochures and Supplementation<br />
Cards to be given together withthe<br />
inititial supply <strong>of</strong> FERRINiron tablets.<br />
"NUTRINA brochures (to be given<br />
together with the inititial supply <strong>of</strong><br />
NUTRINA)<br />
"Other delivery/monitoring forms<br />
B2.1.2 Fill up the NIE Material Supply Form<br />
in requisitioning supplies from the<br />
PHN at the RHU during the first week<br />
<strong>of</strong> the succeeding month.<br />
Materials Dec Jan Feb<br />
1. No. <strong>of</strong> New Enrollees for<br />
the current month - 7<br />
2. No. received per material<br />
3. 2.1 NIE Materials<br />
2.1.1 Anemia Brochures 4Ll 8<br />
2.1.2 FERRIN Brochures ,0 '0<br />
2.1.3 NUTRINA Brochure .!lr q<br />
2.1.4 Prescription Slip s» B<br />
B2.2 Get your monthly supply <strong>of</strong> NIE materials<br />
during the first week <strong>of</strong> the succeeding<br />
month.<br />
3. Distributing supplies<br />
"The number <strong>of</strong> Maternal <strong>Health</strong> Records to be requested<br />
is equal to the total new enrollees <strong>of</strong> the<br />
current monthplus 10%allowance multiplied by 2<br />
"Count all the number <strong>of</strong> pregnant women who will<br />
start their iron supplementation on the succeeding<br />
monthi.e.,those at the 5thmonth<strong>of</strong>pregnancy. The<br />
number <strong>of</strong> FERRIN brochures and Supplementation<br />
Cards is equivalent to this number.<br />
"Countall the number<strong>of</strong> pregnantwomenwho will<br />
start their food supplementation on the succeeding<br />
monthi.e.,those at the 7th month<strong>of</strong> pregnancy. The<br />
number <strong>of</strong> NUTRINA brochures to be requested is<br />
equivalent to this number.<br />
"The following quantities <strong>of</strong> delivery and monitoring<br />
forms will be required for the duration <strong>of</strong> the<br />
project (18 months):<br />
1) BarangayMasterList - fourforms perbarangay<br />
2) Stock Card - one card for each barangay and<br />
another one for your whole catchment area per<br />
supplement<br />
3) NIE Material Supply Form - one form for your<br />
catchment area.<br />
Fill up item (1) <strong>of</strong> NIE Material Supply Form with<br />
the number <strong>of</strong> new enrollees during the current<br />
month.<br />
Fill up item (2) with the number <strong>of</strong> materials to be<br />
received. Update the number with the actual<br />
number received from the PHN.<br />
2.2 Delivery/Mon itoring Forme<br />
2.2.1 Form I B<br />
2.2.2 Form rc -5 -<br />
2.2.3 Form 101/102 f<br />
2.2.4 Form IEIIIB q<br />
2.2.5 Form IIA<br />
2.2.6 Maternal <strong>Health</strong><br />
1 -<br />
Record<br />
"Getyoursupply from the PHNattheRHU. Present<br />
your accomplished NIE Material Supply Form with<br />
the attached Barangay Master Lists <strong>of</strong> Pregnant<br />
Women.<br />
"Record other NIE materials you have received for<br />
distribution to pregnantwomenon the NIE Material<br />
Supply Form. Record in the Remarks portion any<br />
problemyou haveencountered in the requisitioning<br />
and delivery <strong>of</strong> NIE materials.<br />
Care in the distribution <strong>of</strong> supplies to Barangay <strong>Health</strong> Workers is important to ensure that these<br />
reach yourtarget mothers. This needs propercoordinationandproperrecording<strong>of</strong> receipt<strong>of</strong> suppliesduring<br />
distribution.<br />
132<br />
I'"
When to be conducted Two to three days before scheduled dates <strong>of</strong> iron andlor<br />
food supplementation by pregnant women for the distribution<br />
<strong>of</strong> NliTRINA and FERRIN'supplements and brochures.<br />
First pre-natal consultation <strong>of</strong> the pregnant woman with<br />
you for the distribution <strong>of</strong> the Anemia brochure and the<br />
Food Prescription Slip.<br />
Tools to Use Supplementation Card<br />
Barangay Master List <strong>of</strong> Pregnant Women<br />
Anemia Brochure<br />
Food Prescription Slip<br />
FERRIN and NUTRINA Brochures<br />
3J Coordinate with your BHWson specific<br />
dates when they can get Food<br />
Prescription Slip, their supplies <strong>of</strong><br />
FERRINandNUTRINAsupplements<br />
FERRIN and NUTRINA brochures<br />
and Supplementation Cards for distribution<br />
to pregnant women.<br />
In cases when the mothers get their<br />
FERRIN/NUTRINA stocks directly<br />
from you, coordinate the scheduIe<br />
with them so that it coincides with<br />
their predetermined dates <strong>of</strong> receipt<br />
found in column(9)<strong>of</strong> yourBarangay<br />
Master Lists.<br />
Inform the BHW <strong>of</strong> their receipt <strong>of</strong><br />
supplies so she can conduct monitoring<br />
and follow-up activities.<br />
LA UNION INTEGRATED PROVINCIAL HEALTH OFFICE<br />
DISTRICT: _<br />
RURAL HEALTH UNIT: _<br />
BARAN GAY HEALTH STATION: _<br />
BARANGAY: _<br />
1. NAME OF MOTHER _<br />
Family Given Middle<br />
2. ADDRESS _<br />
# Street/Purok<br />
133<br />
How to Accomplish Each<br />
'Determine number <strong>of</strong> women who are about to<br />
start FERRININUTRINAsupplementationin the<br />
current month, as reflected in column (9) <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Barangay Master List. Allot a Supplementation<br />
Card and a FERRIN/NUTRINA brochure for<br />
each <strong>of</strong> them.<br />
Fillup the identification page(items I t06) <strong>of</strong>each<br />
Supplementation Card.<br />
(1) NAME OF MOTHER - Write the family name,<br />
given name and middle initial <strong>of</strong> the pregnant<br />
woman.<br />
(2) ADDRESS - Write the house number (if any),<br />
the street and the purok,<br />
(3) LMP - Indicate the date <strong>of</strong> her last menstrual<br />
period.<br />
(4) EDCB - Indicate her Expected Date <strong>of</strong> Childbirth.<br />
(5) NAME OF BHW - Write the name <strong>of</strong> the BHW<br />
assigned to her area <strong>of</strong> residence.<br />
(6) NAME OF MIDWIFE· - Write your name.
3.2 Distribute the FERRIN/NU1RINA supplies,<br />
FERRIN/NU1RINA brochures and supplementation.<br />
Cards to the BHWs on predetermined<br />
dates. Ideally, these dates should not be<br />
longer than two to three days before the pregnant<br />
women are scheduled to received their<br />
supplements (start, <strong>of</strong> the 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th and<br />
9th months <strong>of</strong> pregnancy for·FERRIN and start<br />
<strong>of</strong> the 7th, 8th, and 9th months for NUTRINA).<br />
3.3 Update the Barangay Master List <strong>of</strong> Pregnant<br />
Women during the distribution <strong>of</strong> supplies to<br />
BHWs.<br />
3.4 Distribute the Anemia brochure and Food Prescription<br />
Slip to pregnant women during their<br />
first consultation with you and conduct nutrition<br />
information and education. .<br />
3.5 Remind the pregnant women to keep their<br />
Supplementation Cards in a safe place during<br />
their pre-natal consultation with you.<br />
Ask them to bring their Cards to the BHSeach<br />
time they come to see you.<br />
During pre-natal visits, check whether the<br />
pregnant women have read the four NIE brochures<br />
that were given to them by asking them<br />
some questions on the messages contained in<br />
the materials.<br />
4. Monitoring compliance<br />
( 1111. DATE SUPPlEMENTC<br />
•<br />
RECEIVED<br />
"Refer to column (9) <strong>of</strong> your Barangay<br />
Master List<strong>of</strong> PregnantWomen. Upon distribution<br />
<strong>of</strong> FERRIN/NUTRINA supplies<br />
to the BHWs,encircle the dates marked for<br />
receiving the supplements in column (9)<strong>of</strong><br />
the Barangay Master List.<br />
"Upon validation/verification <strong>of</strong> the pregnancy<br />
status <strong>of</strong> the mothers, i.e., on their<br />
first pre-natal check-up with you, give<br />
them one Anemia brochure and one Food<br />
Prescription Slip.<br />
The conduct <strong>of</strong> spot check to find out if pregnant women take FERRIN /NUTRINA regularly and<br />
correctly is necessaryto ensurecompliance. Monitoring results willhelp you assess the progress <strong>of</strong> the project<br />
and find out problems in the field and provide solutions for them as early as possible. Through careful<br />
inquiries from the motheryou willbeable toassess the BHWin terms <strong>of</strong>compliance to protocol and effectivity<br />
in the performance <strong>of</strong> their tasks. The following monitoring guide will help you undertake this task<br />
efficiently.<br />
Your Responsibilities<br />
A. Compliance to FERRIN/NUTRlNA<br />
Supplementation<br />
When to be conducted<br />
Tools to Use<br />
134<br />
How to Accomplish Each<br />
Spot checks during the 5th, 7th and 9th<br />
month pre-natal check-ups<br />
Supplementaton Cards<br />
Maternal <strong>Health</strong> Records
Your Responsibilities<br />
A4.1 Review the Supplementation Cards<br />
broughtby the pregnantwomen to the<br />
BHS during pre-natal check-ups to<br />
monitor:<br />
A4.1.1 Actual distribution <strong>of</strong> supplies<br />
A4.1.2 Compliance <strong>of</strong> mothers to<br />
supplementation<br />
A4.1.3 Problems affecting regular com<br />
pliance and actions taken on<br />
problems<br />
A4..2 Motivate mothers to continue taking<br />
FERRIN/NUTRINA until her<br />
delivery<br />
A4.3 Review the utilization <strong>of</strong>NIE materials<br />
by mothers.<br />
Check whether mother is<br />
practising proper nutrition<br />
during pregnancyby checking<br />
her diet during her prenatal<br />
check-ups.<br />
A4.4 Accomplish items (33) to (43) <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Maternal <strong>Health</strong> Record for the results<br />
<strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> your pre-natal visits.<br />
B. Compliance to protocol<br />
When to be conducted<br />
Tools to Use<br />
•<br />
135<br />
How to Accomplis Each<br />
"Check whether the BHW properly distributed the<br />
amounts alloted for each pregnant woman (NO. OF<br />
SUPPLEMENTS GIVEN) on the prescribed dates <strong>of</strong><br />
distribution (DATE SUPPLEMENTS GIVEN). Compare<br />
the dates <strong>of</strong> distribution in the Supplementation<br />
Cards with the dates indicated under your Barangay<br />
Master Lists to verify the distribution <strong>of</strong> FERRIN and/<br />
orNUTRINA.<br />
Likewise,ask the motherwhenshe received her supply<br />
<strong>of</strong> FERRIN and/or NUTRINA and compare this with<br />
her scheduled date <strong>of</strong> receipt as shown in her Supplementation<br />
Card.<br />
"Check whether the BHW monitored amounts <strong>of</strong><br />
FERRIN/NUTRINA consumed by mother each week<br />
(COMPLIANCE) and the amounts left over after a<br />
month <strong>of</strong> supplementation (NO. OF SUPPLEMENTS<br />
LEFD.<br />
"Reviewthe problems recorded and the actions recommended<br />
by the BHW. Checksufficiency<strong>of</strong>actions. Ask<br />
mother if she has other problems and recommend<br />
actions.<br />
"Reinforce the importance <strong>of</strong> FERRIN/NUTRINA.<br />
Correct any misconceptions and wrong nutritional<br />
practices during the conduct <strong>of</strong> NIE activities.<br />
"Ask the mother what her usual diet has been since the<br />
last time she has seen you and record these in item (30)<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Maternal <strong>Health</strong> Record (MHR).<br />
Determine sufficiency<strong>of</strong> food and nutrient intake as to<br />
quality and quantity based on the Food Prescription<br />
Slip. .<br />
Record the food prescription given in item (31)<strong>of</strong> the<br />
MHR.<br />
During your regular health clinic in the different<br />
barangays <strong>of</strong> your catchment area.<br />
Training Handout No.4<br />
Supplementation Cards
Your Responsibilities<br />
Spot check the BHW on the<br />
following:<br />
B4.t Identification and referral <strong>of</strong> pregnant<br />
women<br />
B4.2 Delivery <strong>of</strong> supplements to intended<br />
targets<br />
B4.3 Monitoring <strong>of</strong> pregnant women's<br />
compliance to supplementation<br />
B4.4 Reminding pregnant women<br />
about their pre-natal check-up<br />
schedule<br />
B4.5 Assisting you in the MCH Program<br />
B4.6 Reporting <strong>of</strong> her accomplishments<br />
to you.<br />
Problems You May Encounter<br />
A. Identifying and enrolling pregnant women<br />
At BHW does not assist in the identification<br />
and enrollment <strong>of</strong> pregnant women.<br />
AU Attitudinal BHW does not believe<br />
in the project.<br />
A1.2 Time constraints BHW has other<br />
jobs/preoccupations.<br />
136<br />
How to Accomplish Each<br />
"Refer to Training Handout No.4 for actions to take in<br />
cases <strong>of</strong> non-compliance,<br />
"Ask the BarangayPHCC Chairmanwho the pregnant<br />
women are in the area during yourbarangay visits for<br />
other health services.<br />
•Ask pregnant women when they see you at the BHS<br />
about other pregnant women they know <strong>of</strong> in their<br />
purok. Find out during their initial visit who referred<br />
them to you.<br />
"Spot check Supplementation Card<br />
(Supplementation Records portion) for the date <strong>of</strong><br />
receipt <strong>of</strong> supplements and the quantity received.<br />
"Check the Supplementation Records portion <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Supplementation Card for the weekly follow-up <strong>of</strong> the<br />
BHW (NO. OF SUPPLEMENTSTAKEN/REASONfor<br />
SUPPLEMENTATION) and the actions she recommended<br />
(ACTION TAKEN).<br />
"Ask mothers during their pre-natal visits who<br />
instructed them to come to you. Also check presence<br />
<strong>of</strong> BHWs duringthesepre-natalcheck-ups<strong>of</strong> the mothers.<br />
Action to be Taken<br />
• Determine reasons for disinterest or lack <strong>of</strong><br />
cooperation.<br />
• Reorient the BHW on proper nutritionduring<br />
pregnancy. Explain food supplementation<br />
and the use <strong>of</strong> nutrition information and education(NIE)<br />
materials, Presenttheactivitynot<br />
as an additional task but ratheras an opportunity<br />
to gain knowledge. Give importance to<br />
her role as project implementor in the field.<br />
• Adjust to the BHW's availability. Otherwise,<br />
inform the Barangay PHCC for a substitute<br />
BHW or for other remedial actions.
Problem You May Encounter<br />
r. Monitoring compliance to supplementation and<br />
protocol<br />
C1. The pregnant woman complains about the<br />
taste <strong>of</strong> FERRIN/NUTRINA.<br />
C2. The Pregnant woman forgets to take her supplements<br />
regularly. -<br />
C3. The pregnant woman complains about the<br />
side effects <strong>of</strong> iron supplements.<br />
C3.1 Diarrhea<br />
C3.2 Constipation<br />
C3.3 BlackStool<br />
b. Conducting post-natal follow-up <strong>of</strong> the mother<br />
and the infant<br />
01. The pregnant woman does not want to go<br />
for pre-natal check-up.<br />
02. The pregnancy <strong>of</strong> the woman.<br />
03. Record <strong>of</strong> delivery outcome is difficult to<br />
collect.<br />
04. Delivery record was not filled up.<br />
138<br />
Action to be Taken<br />
• Advise her to eat something e.g.,:banana, or tc<br />
drink water to wash down any aftertaste <strong>of</strong> thc<br />
FERRINiron tablets or NUTRINA food supple<br />
ments. Advise her to alternate the food supple<br />
ments she takes each day to vary her merienda.<br />
• Advise the BHW to assign a member <strong>of</strong> thc<br />
pregnant woman's family who will remind he<br />
about her daily intake <strong>of</strong> NUTRINA and FER<br />
RIN supplements.<br />
• Tell the mother to stop taking supplements fo<br />
three days. If diarrhea still persists, refer her tc<br />
the Municipal <strong>Health</strong> Officer (MHO) for treat<br />
ment. If it stops, tell her to resume her supple<br />
mentation but to lower the dosage to one table<br />
per day for one week. If after this period diar<br />
rhea has completely stopped, return the dosag<br />
to two tablets per day.<br />
• Stop supplementationfor threedays. Adviseth<br />
pregnantwoman to drink plenty<strong>of</strong> waterand t<br />
eat fruits. Ifconstipation persists, refer her to th<br />
MHO. Ifit stops, lower the dosage for one wee<br />
after which you can return to the prescribec<br />
dosage if there are no side effects.<br />
• Before the mother starts iron supplementatior<br />
tell her to expect a change in the color <strong>of</strong> he<br />
stool.<br />
• Ask the BHWtocall the attention <strong>of</strong> the pregnan<br />
woman to the improtance<strong>of</strong>pre-natal care. Visi<br />
the pregnant woman at home at least once te<br />
motivate her to see you at the BHSfor pre-nata<br />
check-up.<br />
• Refer her to the PHN/MHO for the assessmen<br />
<strong>of</strong> her enrollment in the project and for clos<br />
follow-up <strong>of</strong> her pregnancy<br />
• Follow-up/remind the motherabout theaccom<br />
plishment <strong>of</strong> the Supplementation Card.<br />
• List the births/pregnancy-outcomes that wer<br />
not recorded by the hospital attendants anr<br />
submit these to the PHN.
Your.Responsibilities<br />
2. Deliveries Attended by Hospital<br />
Attendants<br />
Follow up the pregnancy<br />
outcome <strong>of</strong> births delivery in the<br />
How to Accomplish Each<br />
'Follow up accomplishment <strong>of</strong> the Supplementation<br />
Card by hospital birth attendant during your home<br />
visits to facilitate post-natal follow-up.<br />
Accomplish Maternal <strong>Health</strong> Record using the data in<br />
the Supplementation Card.<br />
In case the Supplementation Card was not accomplished<br />
by the delivery attendant, submit the Card to<br />
the Public <strong>Health</strong> Nurseso that she can forward it to the<br />
Area Nurse Supervisor for data collection and accomplishment<strong>of</strong><br />
the needed information. Make the necessary<br />
notations if this is so (i.e., the Supplementation<br />
Card was filled up using hospital reeords.) ,<br />
D. Post-Natal Activities<br />
The mother has now delivered her baby. This is one <strong>of</strong> the most critical periods <strong>of</strong> our project and<br />
you need to monitor the progress <strong>of</strong> both the mother and the newborn to see if they have been spared <strong>of</strong> the<br />
risks <strong>of</strong> pregnancy and childbirth.<br />
When to be Conducted At least two times coinciding with the cord dressing<br />
for post-natal follow-up <strong>of</strong> the mother.<br />
7th and 28th day after birth for post-natal follow-up <strong>of</strong><br />
the infant. Only one dayis allowed in case data collection<br />
is not really possible during these scheduled<br />
dates.<br />
For each infant follow-up, indicate if child is:<br />
ALIVE (indicate weight in kilograms)<br />
DEAD (specify cause)<br />
140<br />
•
REMEMBER .<br />
The pregnant woman in your community and the child she carries in her womb have placed their<br />
confidence in you and the way, you discharge your work.<br />
As an implementor <strong>of</strong> the IRON AND FOOD SUPPLEMENTATlON PROJECT,assess everyeffort you<br />
have given and ask yourself?<br />
• What could have done Better?<br />
• What More should I have done?<br />
• What services could I have done More Often?<br />
Bylooking into ourselves moreclosely and truthfully, we learn to make out tasks more challenging for us<br />
and fulfulling for those whom we serve.<br />
Our pregnant women and children need you.<br />
Let us not fail them.<br />
143
AppendixB<br />
COURSE DESIGN<br />
A. COURSE DESCRIPTION<br />
COURSE TITLE: IRON AND FOOD SUPPLEMENTATION DELIVERY PROJECT TRAINING<br />
FOR RURAL HEALTH MIDWIVES, PUBLIC HEALTH NURSES, &< SUPERVISORS<br />
RATIONALE:<br />
In support to the Iron and Food Supplementation Delivery Project (lFSD),<br />
a system for training was developed to facilitate field operations effectively. Since the<br />
project will be implemented within the approach <strong>of</strong> the primary health care (PHC),<br />
targets for training are the RHU field health personnel. First group to be trained are<br />
the implementors and supervisors, Le. Area Nurse Supervisor (ANS), Public <strong>Health</strong><br />
Nurse (PHNl, Municipal Primary <strong>Health</strong> Care Chairman, District Nutritionist, and Rural<br />
<strong>Health</strong> Midwives (RHM). The second group to be trained are the barangay health<br />
health workers (BHW). The trained midwives will conduct.the training <strong>of</strong> the BHW.<br />
Since the role <strong>of</strong> the midwives and other implementors is important in the<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> the project, this training protocol Wasdeveloped for them. Itis<br />
expected that the results <strong>of</strong> this training will develop their capabilities in the implementation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the IFSD project.<br />
OBJECTIVES:<br />
General:<br />
Specific:<br />
CONTENTS:<br />
To improve the knowledge, attitude and skills <strong>of</strong> implementors, i.e. Dietary<br />
Nutritionist, Public <strong>Health</strong> Nurses and Rural <strong>Health</strong> Midwives, in the implementation<br />
<strong>of</strong> Iron and Food Supplementation Delivery Project in the province <strong>of</strong> La Union.<br />
At the end <strong>of</strong> the training, participants will be able to:<br />
1. explain the rationale, objectives, structure and methodology <strong>of</strong> the project,<br />
2. discuss the relationship <strong>of</strong> proper nutrition during pregnancy to the<br />
health <strong>of</strong> both mother and the newborn,<br />
3. carry out their respective roles and functions in the operation <strong>of</strong> the project,<br />
4. do specific tasks pertinent to their role and function, and<br />
5. integrate IFSDactivities to the nutrition program <strong>of</strong> La Union<br />
through the Primary <strong>Health</strong> Care Approach.<br />
I. Update on Maternal Nutrition<br />
1. Nutrition and <strong>Health</strong> in Pregnancy<br />
2. Causes and Effects <strong>of</strong> Maternal Undernutrition<br />
3., Signs <strong>of</strong> Malnutrition Among Pregnant Women<br />
4. Review <strong>of</strong> Nutritional Anemia (definition, causes and symptoms).<br />
5. Effects <strong>of</strong> Nutritional Anemia<br />
6. Magnitude <strong>of</strong> Anemia Problem in the Philippines<br />
7. Prevention, Treatment and Control <strong>of</strong> Iron Deficiency Anemia.<br />
144
II. Overview <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
1. Rationale and Objectives <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
2. Methodology and Organizational Structure <strong>of</strong> the Project.<br />
3. Roles, Duties and Responsibilities <strong>of</strong> the Participants.<br />
III. IFSD in the Context <strong>of</strong> MCH Services through the PHC Approach<br />
1. The PHC System (A Review)<br />
2. The MCH Services at Barangay Level<br />
3. IFSD Delivery and Monitoring System Through the PHC Approach<br />
4. Organization and Training <strong>of</strong> the BHW<br />
IV. Project Operations in the MCH Services Within the PHC Approach<br />
A. Prenatal Activities<br />
1. Identification and Enrollment <strong>of</strong> Pregnant Women.<br />
2. Requisitioning for Food and Iron Supplements (Nutrina & FERRIN)<br />
3. Distribution <strong>of</strong> Nutrina and Ferrin, and Using NlE Materials<br />
4. Monitoring Compliance with Supplementation and with Protocols<br />
B. Deliveries<br />
1. Attending to Deliveries<br />
2. Monitoring <strong>of</strong> Deliveries Attended by Gov. Hospitals/Hilots<br />
e. Post Partum Follow Up Activities<br />
1. Monitoring Nutritional Status <strong>of</strong> Child<br />
EXPECTED TRAINEES: Participants are the Public <strong>Health</strong> Nurse, District Nutritionists,<br />
Area Nurse Supervisors, Rural <strong>Health</strong> Midwives, and Primary <strong>Health</strong> Care<br />
Committee Chairmen<br />
VENUE: REGIONAL HEALTH OFFICE, REGION 1, SAN FERNANDO, LA UNION<br />
DAY/TlME: December 8 and 9,1984, 8:00 - 5:00<br />
TRAINING STRATEGIES:<br />
Training Method: A variety <strong>of</strong> teaching methods will be used such as<br />
lecture-discussion, workshop, group workexercises, demonstration<br />
and return demonstration, role playing.<br />
Training Aids: Training handouts on Course Design, Instruction Sheets,<br />
delivery and monitoringforms,brochure on anemia, Ferrin and<br />
Nutrina, Food Prescription Pad, and Training Syllabus for BHW,<br />
and Implementor's Manual.<br />
145
B. COURSE SYLLABUS<br />
IFSD TRAINING FOR RURAL HEALTHMIDWIVES, PUBLIC HEALTH<br />
NURSES, AND DIETARY NUTRITIONISTS<br />
Learning Content Training<br />
Day Time Objective. Outline Methodology Material. Lecturer<br />
12/8/84 At the end <strong>of</strong> this<br />
8:00<br />
session, each parti-<br />
cipant should be<br />
able to:<br />
-8:30 • Register Registration Registration M. Enero/<br />
8:30 • Participate in A. Opening Cere-<br />
-8:45 Opening ceremony mony<br />
9:00-<br />
I<br />
Phil. Nat. Anthem<br />
Forms D.David<br />
Invocation N. Dalinguez<br />
Inspirational Talk Dr. Unite<br />
Introduction <strong>of</strong><br />
Trainors Mrs. Felix<br />
9:30 React to Course B. Course Object- Presentation Hand out #1 E. Felix<br />
Objectives,expect- ives, Expected Out-<br />
9:30-<br />
ations, & syllabus puts, Content,<br />
Mechanics &<br />
Schedule<br />
10:15 At end <strong>of</strong> this MODULE 1. UP· Lecture/ Flip chart, Dr. E.<br />
session, the partici- DATE ON MATER· Discussion Discussion Gonzalez<br />
pants should be NAL NUTRITION Guide in<br />
able to: the module<br />
• discuss the im- • Nutrition and content<br />
portance <strong>of</strong> proper <strong>Health</strong> in<br />
nutrition during Pregnancy<br />
pregnancy<br />
e identify the causes • Causes & Effects<br />
& effect. <strong>of</strong> mater- <strong>of</strong> Maternal Under-<br />
nal undernutrition nutrition<br />
-recognize the signs • Signs <strong>of</strong> Mal<strong>of</strong><br />
malnutrition nutrition Among<br />
among pregnant Prcgnant Women<br />
women<br />
146
Learning Content Training<br />
Day Time Objectives Outline Methodology Materials Lecturer<br />
10:15-<br />
• identify/ enume- • Review <strong>of</strong> N utrirate<br />
causes and tional Anemia<br />
symptoms <strong>of</strong> nutri- (definition, causes<br />
tional anemia & symptoms)<br />
• review the mag- • Anemia Problem<br />
nitude <strong>of</strong> anemia in the Philippines<br />
problem in the<br />
Phils.<br />
• enumerate the • Effects <strong>of</strong> Nutrieffects<br />
<strong>of</strong> nutri- tional Anemia<br />
tional anemia<br />
.·enumerate prac- • Prevention, Treat-<br />
tical approaches ment and Control<br />
toward preven tion, <strong>of</strong> Iron Deficiency<br />
treatment and Anemia<br />
control <strong>of</strong> nutri-<br />
tional anemia<br />
among pregnant<br />
women<br />
10:30 B R E A K<br />
At the end <strong>of</strong> the MODULE II. Lecture/ Flip Chart M. Lopez<br />
10:30- session, each parti- PROJECT ORIENT- Discussion<br />
11:00 cipant should be AllON<br />
able to:<br />
• describe the • Rationale &<br />
rationale & object- Objectives <strong>of</strong> the<br />
ives <strong>of</strong> the project Project<br />
• describe the • Methodology &<br />
methodology and Organiza tional<br />
organizational Structure <strong>of</strong> the<br />
structure <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />
project<br />
• define their res- • Roles, Duties & Elicit chalk, board<br />
peetive roles & Responsibilities participants'<br />
functions in the <strong>of</strong> the Participants reaction<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong><br />
specific activities<br />
<strong>of</strong>the project<br />
147
Learning Content Training<br />
Day Time Objectives Outline Methodology . Materials Lecturer<br />
11:00- At the end <strong>of</strong> this MODULE Ill. IFSD Dr. J. Draculan<br />
12:00 session, each parti- IN THE CONTEXT<br />
cipant should be OF MCH SERVICES<br />
able to: THROUGH THE<br />
12:00-<br />
PHC APPROACH<br />
- review what is • PHC Overview Lecture/ hand-out<br />
Primary <strong>Health</strong> discussion<br />
Care (PHC)<br />
- review the mater- • MCH Overview<br />
nal and child health<br />
care services<br />
«relate her role in • IFSD Delivery & Implemen- Flipchart M. Crisostomo<br />
the IFSD in the Monitoring System tor's Manual<br />
context <strong>of</strong> the MCH for Midwives<br />
services thru the<br />
PHC Approach<br />
1:00 L U N C H B R E A K<br />
1:00-<br />
2:30 • plan for the orga- Organization & Workshop Flicharts A. Ramos<br />
nization & training Training <strong>of</strong> BHW Discussion worksheets<br />
<strong>of</strong> BHW by: exercises,<br />
1. assessing the demonstra-<br />
BHW in her catch- tion<br />
ment area,<br />
2. developing a<br />
program <strong>of</strong> work to<br />
ensure presence <strong>of</strong><br />
BHW in all her<br />
catchment areas,<br />
3. describing the Training M.Enero<br />
training design for Design<br />
BHW on the IFSD,<br />
and<br />
4. scheduling the<br />
BHW training<br />
prior to deli very <strong>of</strong><br />
food supplements<br />
148
Learning Content Training<br />
Day Time Objectives Oulline Methodolog> Materials Lecturer<br />
2:30- • Describe the Lecture/Dis- Sample food M. David<br />
5:30 characteristics <strong>of</strong> cussion supplements<br />
the Food and Iron demonstra- brochure on<br />
Supplements tion Nutrina<br />
• Demonstrate her A. Pre-Natal Discussion, Flipcharts M. Crisostomo<br />
specific roles along Activities Systems role playing, worksheets<br />
the following: and Procedures dernonstra-<br />
1. 10 and enroll- • Identification & ses<br />
ment <strong>of</strong> PW, Enrollment <strong>of</strong> PW<br />
2. requisitioning • Requisitioning &<br />
& Distribution <strong>of</strong> Distribution <strong>of</strong><br />
supplies, and Supplies<br />
3. monitoring <strong>of</strong> • Monitoring <strong>of</strong><br />
compliance to pro- Compliance<br />
tocols & to supple-<br />
mentation<br />
tion, exerci-<br />
• Preparation & B. Delivery Role playing worksheet M. Crisostomo<br />
submission <strong>of</strong> Attendance demonstra- forms<br />
reports tion, exerci-<br />
C. Post Partum<br />
Follow-up Activi-<br />
ties Systems &<br />
Procedures<br />
9-Nov At the end <strong>of</strong> this Workshop on the Exercise on Monitoring & E. Felix<br />
(2nd session each parti- Following Project actual filling IEC Materials M. Crisostomo<br />
day) dpant should be able Systems & Proce- up <strong>of</strong> forms M. Enero<br />
able to: dures based on j. Lacson<br />
ses<br />
targets & Dr. Gonzales<br />
role play data Dr.Draculan<br />
• Implement the A. Pre-natal A. Ramos<br />
prescribed systems Activities Participants<br />
and procedures & will be<br />
demonstrate her grouped tor<br />
specific role on: this activity<br />
8:00- 1. 10 & enrollment 1. ID/Enrollment<br />
8:30 <strong>of</strong>PW <strong>of</strong>PW<br />
•<br />
149
C. TRAINING HANDOUTS FOR TRAINORS<br />
BHW TRAINING<br />
MODULE I. UPDATE ON MATERNAL NUTRITION<br />
Leaming Teaching Materials!<br />
Objectives Content Techniques Aids<br />
At the end <strong>of</strong><br />
the sessions<br />
each participant<br />
should be able A. NUTRITION AND HEALTH<br />
to: DURING PREGNANCY<br />
• Explain the What happens to the mother when she Ask BHW their<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> is pregnant? knowledge on the<br />
proper nutrition importance <strong>of</strong><br />
during preg- When the mother is pregnant, a new proper nutrition<br />
nancy person is being formed inside her body.<br />
Growth and development <strong>of</strong> the fetus<br />
during pregnancy<br />
takes place. The unborn child is com- 1. What happens<br />
pletely dependent on the health and to the mother<br />
well being <strong>of</strong> the mother and all when she is<br />
nutrients are needed to develop a pregnant<br />
healthy baby. 2. What are the BHWlmplesigns<br />
and symp- mentor's<br />
toms <strong>of</strong> pregnancy Guide page 7<br />
Why is proper nutrition important<br />
during pregnancy?<br />
Proper nutrition is important during<br />
pregnancy:<br />
• to meet the nutritional needs <strong>of</strong><br />
the baby<br />
• to meet the nutritional needs <strong>of</strong><br />
the fetus<br />
• to build nutrient reserve in preparation<br />
for delivery and lactation<br />
• Identify the Causes <strong>of</strong> Maternal Undernutrition<br />
causes <strong>of</strong> mater- • inadequate food intake<br />
nal under- • poor absorption<br />
nutrition • infection<br />
• wrong beliefs and practices<br />
150<br />
.
Learning Teaching Maerialsl<br />
Objectives Content Technique Aids<br />
• Identify the Effects <strong>of</strong> Maternal Undernutrition: Ask BHW their BHW Impleeffects<br />
<strong>of</strong> mater- • low birthweight babies experiences with mentor's<br />
nal under- • stillbirth and prematurity undernourished Guide Page 1<br />
nutrition • complications during pregnancy pregnant women.<br />
What are the<br />
effects on the<br />
mother? on the<br />
baby<br />
• Recognize the Signs <strong>of</strong> Malnutrition in Pregnant<br />
signs <strong>of</strong> mal- Women<br />
nutrition<br />
among preg- The appearance <strong>of</strong> a pregnant woman car AskBHWhow<br />
nant women suggest whether or not she is malnouri- they recognize<br />
shed. Observe the following: maternal under-<br />
• thinness or emaciation nutrition<br />
. • failure to gain weight Diet Prescrip-<br />
• sickly condition tion Leaflet<br />
• Identify An adequate diet is the most important 1) discuss and remeans<br />
<strong>of</strong> pre- for the pregnant mother view the three<br />
venting and • she should eat more food and a food groups<br />
treating under- variety <strong>of</strong> foods 2) Ask BHWto<br />
nutrition among • she should eat 25% more food than enumerate foods<br />
pregnant she was eating before she became included in each<br />
women pregnant food group<br />
B. NUTRITIONAL ANEMIA<br />
• Define Nutri- What is Nutritional Anemia?<br />
tionaI<br />
Anemia Nutritional anemia is a condition AskBHWto Anemia<br />
brought about by a deficiency <strong>of</strong> nutrient enumeratesigns Brochure<br />
needed for blood formation. These and symptoms <strong>of</strong><br />
nutrients are iron, folate, Vitamin B12 anemia<br />
and other nutrients<br />
• Explain why Why should anemia be controlled<br />
anemia should among pregnant women?<br />
be controlled<br />
among pregnan t Anemia should be prevented among Ask BHW to Anemia<br />
women pregnant women because: enumerate effects Brochure<br />
1. the anemic pregnant women may <strong>of</strong> anemia among<br />
become susceptible to diseases and in- pregnant women<br />
. fections; weak and inactive; sickly<br />
151
Leaming Teaching Maerialsl<br />
Objectives Content Technique Aids<br />
2. the anemic pregnant women may have<br />
low birthweight infants<br />
• Identify Treatment and Prevention:<br />
means <strong>of</strong> pre- 1. diet which is rich in iron Ask BHW to Anemia<br />
venting and Iron rich foods include: malunggay, enumerate foods Brochure<br />
treating anemia liver, kulitis, saluyot, alugbati, rich in iron<br />
amongpreg- munggong pula, ampalaya leaves<br />
nantwomen 2. Iron Tablets - easily increase the intake<br />
<strong>of</strong> iron<br />
MODULE 11. PROJECT OVERVIEW<br />
Leaming Teaching Maerialsl<br />
Objectives Content Technique Aids<br />
At the end <strong>of</strong><br />
the session<br />
participant<br />
should be able<br />
to:<br />
• Explain what What is the Food Supplementation<br />
is the IFSD Delivery Project within the<br />
project Primary <strong>Health</strong> Care Approach<br />
The activity is piloted in La Union • Give an overprovince<br />
to strengthen and broaden the view <strong>of</strong> the MCHS<br />
coverage <strong>of</strong> the Maternal and Child activities conducted ,<br />
<strong>Health</strong> Services (MCHS) at the Bgy. <strong>Health</strong><br />
Station<br />
• Recognize the The activity aims to:<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> • improve the nutritional status <strong>of</strong> the • Ask the BHW BHW Imple-<br />
the project mother activities <strong>of</strong>, MCHS mentor's<br />
Food supplementation will help meet where she has Guide Page 3<br />
the increased food needs <strong>of</strong> the mother been involved<br />
as a results risk and complication in the past<br />
associated w/ pregnancy and child birth<br />
is prevented<br />
• reduce the incidence <strong>of</strong> low birth- • lecture/<br />
weights among their newborn, thereby discussion<br />
producing more health Filipinos<br />
152
Leaming Teaching MaerialsJ<br />
Objectives Content Technique Aids<br />
Iron supplementation will help meet<br />
the increased HB requirement <strong>of</strong> the<br />
mother during pregnancy<br />
• reduce the prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia and<br />
its effects<br />
You the BHW will be greatly involved<br />
in its implementation and the project<br />
success lies greately in your hands<br />
• Identify what What are the interventions to be lecture/discussion<br />
are the inter- given to all the pregnant women<br />
vention to be in the barangay?<br />
given<br />
,<br />
To meet these objectives there are<br />
three interventions to be given:<br />
1) NUTRINA food supplementation<br />
2) Ferrin iron supplementation<br />
3) Nutrition Information and<br />
Education (NIE) materials<br />
NUTRINA Food Supplemenets Show samples <strong>of</strong><br />
(Discuss the following in detail using the theNUTRINA<br />
BHW Implementor's Guide page 3 and food supplement<br />
NUTRINA Brochure)<br />
• What food supplements to be given<br />
- type/varieties<br />
- # <strong>of</strong> calories given per day per mother<br />
• Who will be given<br />
• When to take<br />
Ferrin Iron Sipplements<br />
• What iron supplements will be given:<br />
- mg elemental iron tablet<br />
- dosage per day<br />
• Who will be given<br />
• When to take<br />
• Side effects & intervention to<br />
minimize<br />
NIE Materials Read the content NUTRINA<br />
<strong>of</strong>the3 NIE Brochure<br />
Discuss the following in detail using materials Anemia<br />
BHW Implementor's Guide page 4 Brochure Pre-<br />
• What are the three brochures to be scription<br />
given Leaflet<br />
• when will it be given to each mother<br />
153
Appendix C<br />
COURSE DESIGN FOR TRAINING OF FOOD, FOOD & IRON & IRON GROUPS<br />
A. COURSE DESCRIPTION<br />
COURSE TITLE: IRON AND FOOD SUPPLEMENTATION DELIVERY PROJECT TRAINING<br />
FOR BARANGAY HEALTH WORKERS AND BARANGAY PHCC CHAIRMAN<br />
RATIONALE:<br />
The Barangay <strong>Health</strong> Workers (BHW) playa vital role in the implementation <strong>of</strong> the IFSD<br />
Project because they are assigned the task <strong>of</strong> recruiting and referring target pregnant mothers<br />
to the Rural <strong>Health</strong> Midwives (RHM). They will also assist the midwives in the delivery <strong>of</strong><br />
supplements and other interventions.<br />
This training will therefore, be conducted to improve the knowledge attitude and skills (KAS)<br />
<strong>of</strong> the BHW in the delivery <strong>of</strong> these services for the IFSD project.<br />
COURSE OBJECTIVES:<br />
General: To improve the knowledge, attitude and skills <strong>of</strong> the BHW in the delivery <strong>of</strong><br />
IFSD services within the concept <strong>of</strong> Primary <strong>Health</strong> Care (PHC)<br />
Specific: At the end <strong>of</strong> the training the participants will be able to:<br />
1. explain the rationale and objectives <strong>of</strong> the IFSD Project to the pregnant woman,<br />
2. explain nutritional anemia and how to control anemia in a pregnant woman,<br />
3. identify pregnant women in her assigned purok for referral to<br />
Public <strong>Health</strong> Midwives,<br />
4. deliver iron and food supplements, NIE material to target pregnant<br />
mother in her purok, and<br />
5. Inonitor the food supplement intake among the target pregnant mothers<br />
CONTENTS:<br />
1. Update on Nutritional Anemia<br />
1. Maternal Nutrition<br />
2. What is Nutritional Anemia<br />
3. Why Should Anemia be Controlled<br />
4. How Can We control Anemia<br />
II. Project Overview<br />
1. What is the IFSD Project<br />
2. Why is IFSD Important to the Mother, BHW and the Community<br />
3. Whose Project is the IFSD Project<br />
4. What are the Roles and Functions <strong>of</strong> BHW in the Project<br />
III. Project Operations<br />
1. The BHWs Role in the control <strong>of</strong> Nutritional Anemia<br />
1.1 Identification and Referral <strong>of</strong> Pregnant Mothers<br />
1.2 Distribution <strong>of</strong> Iron and Food Supplements to Target Pregnant Women<br />
1.3 Monitoring Compliance to Supplementation <strong>of</strong> Target Pregnant<br />
Mothers in her Purok<br />
2. Tools to Enable the BHW to do her Task Effectively<br />
2.1 Implementor's Guide for BHWs<br />
2.2 NIE Materials - Brochures on a) Anemia, b) FERRIN, c) NUTRINA and<br />
d) Food Prescription Slip<br />
DATE: Dec. 1984<br />
VENUE: La Union<br />
DURATION: 1/2 day<br />
METHODOLOGY: Lecture. discussion and demonstration<br />
154
B. COURSE SYLLABUS<br />
Fadli-<br />
Dayt Teaching Training tatorsl<br />
Title Learning Objectives Content Outline Technique Materials Lecturers<br />
DEC.<br />
1984 MODULE 1.<br />
LA At the end <strong>of</strong> this module, UPDATE ON Lecture/ implementor's<br />
UNIOl'i each participant should MATERNAL Discussion Manual for<br />
112 be able to: NUTRITION BHW<br />
DAY NIE materials:<br />
AskBHW:<br />
1) Describe proper nutri- - Maternal nutrition 1. Whathappens • anemia<br />
tion during pregnancy to mother when brochures<br />
and lactation she is pregnant e.prescription<br />
2. Importance <strong>of</strong> leaflet<br />
proper nutrition • nutrina<br />
during pregnancy brochures<br />
• Ferrin<br />
2) Describe nutritional - What is anemia: 3. Signs & Symp- brochures<br />
anemia • signs/symptoms/ toms found<br />
• causes/effects/ among anemic<br />
• prevention/control cases<br />
3) Know why anemia, - Why should anemia 4. Effects<strong>of</strong><br />
among pregnant women be controlled anemia among<br />
be controlled PW<br />
4) Know and identify the - What are the iron- S. Iron rich foods<br />
iron-rich foods rich foods<br />
5) Familiarize wi th the - Project's NIE 6. Read the broproject's<br />
supplies/ materials and sup- chures & enumematerials<br />
for the preg- plements for the rate important<br />
nantwomen target pregnant messages<br />
mothers<br />
, ...' .<br />
ISS
Facili-<br />
Dayl Teaching Training tatorsl<br />
Title Learning Objectives Content Outline Technique Materials Lecturers<br />
At the end <strong>of</strong> this module, MODULE II. Lecture/Discus- Implementor's<br />
each participant should be PROJECT sion Manual for<br />
able to: ORIENTATION AskBHW: BHW<br />
1. MCH Services<br />
she is involved<br />
1) Describe the rationale & - What is IFSD Proj. with<br />
objectives <strong>of</strong> the project The PHC Approach<br />
- Why is it important<br />
2) Describe his role and - Whose project is it<br />
functions in the irnple- - Who are encourage<br />
mentation <strong>of</strong> specific to participate in<br />
activities the project<br />
3) Clarify and assume the - Roles and function Demonstration<br />
specific tasks pertinent to <strong>of</strong>BHW<br />
his'role and functions<br />
At the end <strong>of</strong> this module, MODULE III. Lecture Implementor's<br />
each participant should PROJECT Manual for<br />
be able to: OPERATION BHW<br />
1) Enumerate his specific - How can BHW Demonstration <strong>of</strong><br />
role in the prevention assist in the pre- the BHW particiand<br />
control <strong>of</strong> anemia vention/control <strong>of</strong> pation from In &<br />
among pregnant women anemia at the Referral to Monibarangay<br />
level toring<br />
.<br />
2) Follow specific project<br />
instructions on how to<br />
use the project tools<br />
properly<br />
- filling-up <strong>of</strong> forms - instructions in demonstra- Forms<br />
filling-up forms tion on the<br />
forBHW filling-up<br />
<strong>of</strong> forms<br />
- utilization <strong>of</strong> imple- - how to use the<br />
mentor's manual implementor's<br />
manual<br />
156
Appendix D<br />
UST OF VARIABLES<br />
IRON AND FOOD SUPPLEMENTATION DELIVERY FOR PREGNANT WOMEN WITInN lHE<br />
pRIMARy HEALlH CARE PROGRAM<br />
I. OPERATIONS DATA<br />
1. Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> PW and Husband<br />
1.1 Age<br />
1.2 Educational attainment<br />
1.3 Occupation<br />
2. Obstetrical History<br />
2.1 Number <strong>of</strong> pregnancies<br />
2.2 Number <strong>of</strong> children born alive<br />
2.3 Number <strong>of</strong> living children<br />
2.4 Number <strong>of</strong> abortions<br />
2.5 Number <strong>of</strong> stillbirths<br />
2.6 Number <strong>of</strong> perinatal death<br />
.3. Data on present pregnancy<br />
3.1 IMP<br />
3.2 EDCB<br />
3.3 3 fundic height measurements at different AOG<br />
4. Data on Supplementation<br />
4.1 Type<strong>of</strong> supplements taken in<br />
4.2 Compliance to supplementation<br />
as per dosage given<br />
number <strong>of</strong> tablets for the whole duration <strong>of</strong> pregnancy<br />
frequency <strong>of</strong> taking supplements<br />
reason for irregular/stopped supplementation<br />
other problems/complaints<br />
5. Pregnancy Outcome<br />
5.1 Delivery date<br />
completion <strong>of</strong> pregnancy term (premature, full term, post term)<br />
5.2 Condition <strong>of</strong> infant<br />
Iivebirth<br />
stillbirth<br />
spontaneous abortion<br />
5.3 Birthweight<br />
5.4 Pregnancy complications<br />
normal<br />
hemorrhage<br />
toxemia<br />
placenta previa/abruptia sepsia<br />
nature <strong>of</strong> delivery<br />
abnormality<br />
attendant<br />
5.5 Weight <strong>of</strong> infant at 28th 'day after delivery<br />
II. BASruNE AND POST-SuRVEYS<br />
1. Pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />
1.1 Age<br />
1.2 LMP<br />
1.3 EDCB<br />
1.4 AOG<br />
157
2. Clinical Assessment<br />
2.1 BP, pulse rate<br />
2.2 Head and neck - presence/absence <strong>of</strong><br />
eyes, conjunction pallor<br />
scurvey<br />
cheilosis<br />
neck - enlarged thyroid<br />
2.3 Heart - presence/absence <strong>of</strong><br />
heart beats, strong, regular<br />
murmurs<br />
others, specify<br />
2.4 Lungs- presence/absence <strong>of</strong><br />
breaths sounds, not impaired<br />
rales<br />
2.5 Abdomen - presence/absence <strong>of</strong> abdominal scar<br />
2.6 Fundic height in centimeters<br />
2.7 Upper extremities - presence/absence <strong>of</strong> palm pallor<br />
2.8 Lower extremities - presence/absence <strong>of</strong> pretevial edema<br />
2.9 Other medical and related history - presence/absence <strong>of</strong><br />
heart disease<br />
malaria<br />
TB<br />
influenza/pneumonia<br />
kidney disease<br />
2.10 Complaints in relation to present pregnancy:<br />
vomiting<br />
dizziness<br />
sleeplessness<br />
anorexia<br />
lassitude<br />
.edema<br />
bleeding<br />
others<br />
3. Anthropometric and BiochemicalAssessment <strong>of</strong> PW and PS<br />
3.1 Weight <strong>of</strong> PW in kg.<br />
3.2 Height <strong>of</strong> PW in em.<br />
3.3 Arm circumferencein em.<br />
3.4 Time <strong>of</strong> blood collection<br />
3.5 Hemoglobin values - Ist, 2nd samples<br />
3.6 Number <strong>of</strong> preschoolers in the Family<br />
3.7 Nutritional status <strong>of</strong> preschoolers weight for height<br />
3.8 Nutritional status <strong>of</strong> preschoolers weight for age<br />
3.9 Stoolexam - egg counts .<br />
4. Socio-economicand Demographic Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> PW<br />
4.1 Household size<br />
4.2 Family size<br />
4.3 Type <strong>of</strong> family <strong>of</strong> respondent<br />
4.4 Distribution <strong>of</strong> family member by age and sex<br />
4.5 Educational attainment <strong>of</strong> household members<br />
4.6 Occupation <strong>of</strong> household members: Primary and Secondary<br />
158
On Smoking Habits<br />
6.24 Type smoked<br />
6.25 Frequency<strong>of</strong> smoking<br />
6.26 No. <strong>of</strong> sticks per month<br />
6.27 Reason for smoking<br />
6.28 Type <strong>of</strong> alcohol consumed<br />
6.29 Frequency <strong>of</strong> drinking<br />
6.30 Amount consumedpermonth<br />
On Mother's Activity<br />
6.31 Daily activities<br />
6.32 Ranking <strong>of</strong> activities from most to least extrenuous<br />
6.33 Source <strong>of</strong> health and nutrition information during pregnancy<br />
6.34 24-hour Dietary Recall <strong>of</strong> PW<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> nutrient eaten<br />
% adequacy <strong>of</strong> intake (occupation w/ RDA)<br />
.Food practices<br />
6.35 Compliance to supplementation and protocol (only during post-survey)<br />
supplements taken during presentpregnancy<br />
manner by which PW receives Nutrina/Ferrin other supplements<br />
AOG at the start <strong>of</strong> supplementation<br />
Frequency<strong>of</strong> receipt/buying <strong>of</strong> supplements<br />
, number <strong>of</strong> supplements received/bought in one month<br />
compliance to supplementation - actual vs. prescribed dosage<br />
compliance to supplementation - no. <strong>of</strong> tablets/mg. <strong>of</strong> elemental iron<br />
6.36 Receipt for IEC materials<br />
receipt <strong>of</strong> specific materials<br />
personnel who issued IECmaterials<br />
when materials was received<br />
explanation given to PW upon receipt <strong>of</strong> materials<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> IEC materials<br />
160
Objectjye yariableslData<br />
3. To determine<br />
accuracy <strong>of</strong> informationsubmitted<br />
through<br />
the monitoring forms<br />
3.1 SES/pregnancy<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ile 3.1.1<br />
3.2Pregnancy<br />
Outrome<br />
3.3 Compliance<br />
to supplementation<br />
Review <strong>of</strong><br />
FonnID1<br />
Pregnant Women (PW)<br />
- date <strong>of</strong> birth/age<br />
- educ, attainment<br />
- occupation<br />
- LMP<br />
- EDCB<br />
3.1.2 Husband <strong>of</strong> PW<br />
- date <strong>of</strong> birth/age<br />
- educ. attainment<br />
- occupation<br />
3.1.3 Household Size<br />
3.1.4 OB History<br />
- no. <strong>of</strong> pregnancies<br />
- no. <strong>of</strong> children born alive<br />
- no. <strong>of</strong> abortions<br />
- no <strong>of</strong> stiJIbirths<br />
- no. <strong>of</strong> deaths one<br />
month after delivery<br />
3.2.1 Date <strong>of</strong> birth<br />
3.2.2 Place <strong>of</strong> birth<br />
3.2.3 Condition at birth<br />
3.2.4 Pregnancy complication<br />
3.2.5 Nature <strong>of</strong> Delivery<br />
3.2.6 Attendant at Birth<br />
3.2.7 Weighing conducted at:<br />
- birth<br />
- one month after birth<br />
3.2.8 Instrument used<br />
3.3.1 Food & Iron Supplements<br />
received/bought<br />
3.3.2 AOG when initital supply<br />
was received/bought<br />
3.3.3 Frequency<strong>of</strong> receipt/buying<br />
3.3.4 Total supplements taken<br />
since start<br />
3.3.5 Dosage required--?<br />
3.3.6 No. given in the last delivery<br />
3.3.7 Date <strong>of</strong> last delivery/buying<br />
3.3.8 No.ronsumed<br />
162<br />
Source Interview <strong>of</strong>:<br />
RUM BHW S'yjsors pw MOther<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x x<br />
x x<br />
x x<br />
x x<br />
x x<br />
x x<br />
x x<br />
x x<br />
x x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x
Objes:tiye yariableslData<br />
3.4 Compliance<br />
to" Protocol<br />
IV. RHU STUDY VARtABLES<br />
Revinv<strong>of</strong><br />
fomtIDl<br />
3.3.9 Frequency <strong>of</strong> taking supplements<br />
3.3.10 Time <strong>of</strong> taking supplements<br />
3.3.11 Changes/side effects observed<br />
3.3.12 Extent/degree the changes/side<br />
effects was felt before supplementation<br />
3.3.13 Extent/degree the changes/side<br />
effects was felt during supplementation<br />
3.3.14 Action taken'<br />
3.3.15 Person consulted<br />
3.3.16 Recommendation given<br />
3.4.1 Person consulted for pre-natal<br />
check-up<br />
3.4.2 Frequency <strong>of</strong> pre-natal<br />
3.4.3 No. <strong>of</strong> BHW visits<br />
3.4.4 Purpose <strong>of</strong> BHW visits<br />
Source Interview <strong>of</strong>:<br />
RUM BHW S'yjSOJll pW MOther<br />
A.l Knowledge<br />
Project implementors/recipients knowledge on anemia related topics:<br />
VARIABLES Respondent<br />
MHO PHN ANS/DN RHM BHW PW pp<br />
1. What is (nutritional)<br />
anemia? ..J ..J ..J ..J ..J ..J<br />
2. Age group most vulnerable<br />
to anemia ..J ..J ..J ..J<br />
3. Effects <strong>of</strong> anemia on an<br />
individual ..J ..J ..J ..J<br />
4. Effects <strong>of</strong> anemia on<br />
pregnant women ..J ..J ..J ..J ..J ..J<br />
5. Effects <strong>of</strong> anemia on fetus ..J ..J ..J ..J ..J ..J<br />
6. Causes <strong>of</strong> anemia ..J ..J ..J ..J ..J ..J<br />
7. Signs and symptoms <strong>of</strong><br />
anemia ..J ..J ..J ..J ..J<br />
8. Methods <strong>of</strong> assessing iron<br />
status ..J ..J ..J ..J<br />
9. Recommended hemoglobin<br />
cut-<strong>of</strong>f level ..J ..J ..J ..J<br />
10. Recommended form <strong>of</strong><br />
iron for treatment <strong>of</strong> iron<br />
deficiency anemia ..J ..J ..J ..J<br />
11. Iron content <strong>of</strong> Ferrin .<br />
tablet ..J ..J ..J ..J ..J<br />
, 163<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x
VARIABLES Respondent<br />
MHOPHN ANSIDN RHM BHW PW ipp<br />
12. Iron content <strong>of</strong> 133mg<br />
ferrous sulfate V V V V<br />
13. Measures to undertake if<br />
patient vomits and experience<br />
gastro-intestinal<br />
disturbances from iron<br />
supplementation V V V V v<br />
14. Normal effects <strong>of</strong> iron<br />
supplementation v v v v v v<br />
15. Measures to undertake to<br />
minimize iron requirements<br />
V V V v<br />
16. Period in which iron in-<br />
take is mandatory among<br />
v v<br />
pregnant women V V<br />
17. Which food enhances iron<br />
absorption<br />
18. Iron-rich foods<br />
19. Body-building foods<br />
20. Energy-rich foods<br />
21. Source <strong>of</strong> body-regulating food<br />
22. Calorie content <strong>of</strong> Nutrina<br />
23. Normal birthweight<br />
24. Breastfeeding practices<br />
25. Start <strong>of</strong> weaning period<br />
V<br />
V<br />
V<br />
V<br />
V<br />
V<br />
V<br />
V<br />
V<br />
V<br />
V<br />
V<br />
V<br />
V<br />
V<br />
V<br />
V<br />
V<br />
v<br />
V<br />
V<br />
V<br />
v<br />
V<br />
v<br />
V<br />
v<br />
V<br />
v<br />
V<br />
v<br />
V<br />
v<br />
v<br />
v<br />
26. Practices to observe to<br />
·Iessen incidence <strong>of</strong> anemia<br />
amonz infants V V V V V<br />
A.2 Project Implemenors/recipients' KAP on project protocol<br />
VARIABLES RESPONDENTS<br />
MHO PHN ANS/DN RHM<br />
1. Start <strong>of</strong> enrollment in IFSD (AOG) V V V V<br />
2. Activities to undertake during<br />
enrollment <strong>of</strong> PW v v<br />
3. Identification <strong>of</strong> at-risk PW V V<br />
4. Action on at-risk PW prior to enrollment v v<br />
5. Schedule <strong>of</strong> requisitions <strong>of</strong> supplies v v v v<br />
6. Procedure for detemining number<br />
<strong>of</strong> PW for IEC/Supplementation v<br />
7. Validation procedure <strong>of</strong> PHN/RHM's<br />
requisitions V V V<br />
8. Schedule <strong>of</strong> submission <strong>of</strong> requisitions<br />
V V<br />
164<br />
.'<br />
•
VARIABLES RESPONDENTS<br />
MHO PHN ANS/DN RHM<br />
9. Activities undertaken to determine·<br />
Ferrin requisitions for the whole<br />
municipality<br />
10. Activities undertaken to determine<br />
IEC requisitions for the whole<br />
municipality<br />
11. Start <strong>of</strong> nutrina supplementation oJ oJ oJ<br />
12. Start <strong>of</strong> ferrin supplementation oJ oJ oJ<br />
13. AOG when NIE materials should<br />
have been received oJ oJ oJ oJ<br />
14. Activities undertaken during deli-<br />
very <strong>of</strong> supplements/IEC materials<br />
to the BHS<br />
oJ<br />
15. Protocol for handling <strong>of</strong> stock onhand<br />
oJ oJ<br />
16. Activities undertaken to conduct an<br />
Inventory Control <strong>of</strong> Stocks oJ oJ oJ oJ<br />
17. Number <strong>of</strong> Stockcards to maintain oJ oJ<br />
18. Who should keep the Supplementation<br />
Card oJ oJ oJ oJ<br />
19. Schedules for spotchecking <strong>of</strong> PW's<br />
compliance to supplementation/NIE oJ oJ<br />
20. Activities undertaken to spotcheck<br />
PW's compliance to supplementa-<br />
tion<br />
21. Activities undertaken/forms to<br />
spotcheck in monitoring com-<br />
pliance to protocols<br />
22. Activities undertaken to spotcheck<br />
compliance to delivery <strong>of</strong> supplies<br />
and compliance to monitoring <strong>of</strong><br />
oJ<br />
oJ<br />
oJ oJ oJ<br />
oJ oJ<br />
supplementation by BHW<br />
oJ oJ<br />
23. Schedule for monitoring <strong>of</strong> submission<br />
<strong>of</strong> forms by RHM oJ<br />
24. Actions undertaken in complaints<br />
from Iron Supplementation oJ oJ<br />
25. Frequency <strong>of</strong> PW's prenatal checkup<br />
26. Activities undertaken during<br />
attendance <strong>of</strong> birth deliveries<br />
27. Retrievalfsubmission schedule <strong>of</strong><br />
Supplementation Cards oJ oJ.<br />
28. Protocol for handling missing data<br />
in pregnancy outcome oJ oJ<br />
29. Schedule for follow-up weight<br />
taking <strong>of</strong> infants oJ oJ<br />
30. Information to gather during post<br />
natal check-up oJ<br />
,.<br />
, .<br />
165<br />
oJ<br />
·oJ<br />
,
VARIABLES RESPONDENTS<br />
MHO PHN ANS/DN RHM<br />
31. From whom should status <strong>of</strong> project<br />
be monitored V<br />
32. To whom should project status be<br />
fedback V<br />
33. What monitoring forms are regularly<br />
submitted to project operations<br />
staff V V<br />
34. Activities undertaken by NIE<br />
counselling v v<br />
Bt. Attitude: Attitudinal questions determined the degree <strong>of</strong> agreement/disagreement <strong>of</strong> the<br />
staff on the followin statements.<br />
VARIABLES RESPONDENTS<br />
MHO PHN ANS/DN RHM BHW<br />
t. The IFSD improves NS <strong>of</strong> PW v v v v<br />
2. IFSD reduces the incidence <strong>of</strong> LBM among<br />
infants V V V v<br />
3. IFSD is beneficial to the PW and to the com. V V V v<br />
4. That all PW in my catchment area should<br />
be enrolled in IFSD V V v v<br />
5. PW should be given pre-natal checkup<br />
at least once a month V V V v<br />
6. IFSD NIE ma terials are useful for<br />
pre-natal counselling V V<br />
7. The explanation <strong>of</strong> the content <strong>of</strong> the<br />
brochures to PW during pre-natal<br />
check-up is time consuming V<br />
8. IFSD brochure for requisitioning and<br />
receipt <strong>of</strong> supplies is necessary V V V v<br />
9. The BHW is the appropriate person<br />
to deliver Nutrina to PW V V V V v<br />
10. The BHW is the appropriate person<br />
to deliver Ferrin to PW V V V V v<br />
11. Nutrina is useful to the PW and her baby V V v v v<br />
12. Ferrin is useful to the PW and her baby v v v v v<br />
13. Nutrina supplementation should<br />
start earlier than 7th month <strong>of</strong> pregnancy V V V v<br />
14. Ferrin supplementation should start<br />
earlier than 5th month <strong>of</strong> pregnancy v v v v<br />
15. NIE materials are useful guides to<br />
proper health and nutrition prac-<br />
V<br />
V v<br />
tices during pregnancy v v v<br />
16. Monitoring <strong>of</strong> PW's supplementation<br />
is necessary V V V V v<br />
17. Monitoring <strong>of</strong> PW's supplementation<br />
maybe done on a monthly basis V V v v v<br />
18. Monitoring <strong>of</strong> PW's supplementation<br />
is also the task <strong>of</strong> the RHM/BHW v v v v v<br />
------------------------------------- ------<br />
166
B2. Attitude <strong>of</strong> Pregnant Women on BHSServices<br />
Information on the following variables were asked from the pregnant mothers to<br />
determine their attitude towards the delivery <strong>of</strong> health center services.<br />
1. The BHS/RHU have adequate personnel to attend to patients need. Why?<br />
Scales used were as follows:<br />
- very adequate inadequate<br />
- adequate very inadequate<br />
- uncertain<br />
2. Do you find it difficult to ask help from the health center workers? Why?<br />
Scales used were as follows:<br />
- very difficult easy<br />
- difficult very easy<br />
- uncertain<br />
3. Do you think the health center workers show sufficient concern for the health <strong>of</strong> the<br />
patients? Why?<br />
Scales used were as follows:<br />
- very much concern little concern<br />
- muchconcern very little concern<br />
- uncertain<br />
4. Do the health center personnel always treat patients equally? Why?<br />
Scales used were as follows:<br />
- always sometimes<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten never<br />
uncertain<br />
5. Do health workers loose their temper over the patients? Why?<br />
Scales used were as follows: .•<br />
never <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
sometimes always<br />
- uncertain<br />
C. Practice Questions in the Practice Interview Schedule intended to determine the<br />
actual practice <strong>of</strong> specific activities assigned to the project implementors.<br />
Their actual practice mayor may not be according to the protocol designed<br />
for project implementaiton.<br />
1. Municipal <strong>Health</strong> Officer<br />
1. Frequency <strong>of</strong> MHO meeting with RHM<br />
2. Frequency by which IFSD is part <strong>of</strong> the agenda<br />
3. Frequency<strong>of</strong> RHM feedback to MHO about lFSD<br />
4. Frequency <strong>of</strong> PHN feedback to MHO about IFSD<br />
5. Validation <strong>of</strong> protocol for Nurses' feedback to MHO about RIM services<br />
6. Activities undertaken in monitoring compliance to protocol<br />
7. Frequency<strong>of</strong> monitoring<br />
8. Problems feedback regarding IFSD<br />
9. Action undertaken by MHO<br />
to. Recommendations for IFSDimplementation<br />
168<br />
.,
B. On monitoring <strong>of</strong> PW's compliance to supplementation function<br />
8. Activities undertaken to monitor PW's compliance to supplementation<br />
9. Frequency <strong>of</strong> interview<br />
10. Information asked<br />
c. On Other Fucntions<br />
1. Handling <strong>of</strong> missing data in pregnancy outcome<br />
2. From whom is project status monitored<br />
3. Frequency <strong>of</strong> monitoring project status<br />
4. To whom is project status feedback<br />
5. Frequency <strong>of</strong> feedback<br />
6. Activities undertaken with regards to nutrition information<br />
7. Forms monitored for regular submission to operations staff<br />
4. Rural <strong>Health</strong> Midwife<br />
A. Identification, referral and enrollment <strong>of</strong> PW<br />
1. Date or AOG for PW enrollment<br />
2. Activities undertaken during enrollment<br />
3. Action taken on at-risk PW cases<br />
B. Requisitioning and receiving <strong>of</strong> supplies<br />
4. Schedule <strong>of</strong> preparation <strong>of</strong> requisitions<br />
'5. Protocol followed in determining number <strong>of</strong> stocks to be requisitioned<br />
6. Schedule <strong>of</strong> submission <strong>of</strong> requisitions<br />
7. handling <strong>of</strong> stock-on-hand<br />
8. What stock cards to maintain<br />
C. Delivery <strong>of</strong> Supplements and NIE Materials<br />
9. What NIE materials to give to PW<br />
10. Activity undertaken/instructions given when issuing NIE materials<br />
11. Start <strong>of</strong> Nutrina supplementation<br />
12. Start <strong>of</strong> Ferrin supplementation<br />
13. Date or AOG <strong>of</strong> receipt <strong>of</strong> each NIE material<br />
14. Activities undertaken to monitor compliance to delivery <strong>of</strong> supplies<br />
D. Monitoring <strong>of</strong> PW's Supplementation<br />
15. Who keeps the supplementation card?<br />
16. Schedule <strong>of</strong> spotchecks <strong>of</strong> PW's compliance to supplementation<br />
17. Activities undertaken during spotchecks <strong>of</strong> supplementation<br />
18. Action taken on complaints from iron supplementation<br />
E. Monitoring <strong>of</strong> Pregnancy Status and Outcome<br />
19. Frequency <strong>of</strong> PW's pre-natal check-up<br />
20. Activities undertaken during attendance <strong>of</strong> birth deliveries<br />
21. Activities undertaken during post natal check-up<br />
22. Schedule <strong>of</strong> follow-up weight taking <strong>of</strong> infants<br />
23. Schedule <strong>of</strong> RHM's submission <strong>of</strong> supplementation card to PHN<br />
170
5. Barangay <strong>Health</strong> Workers<br />
v. Pregnant Women<br />
A. Identification, referral and enrollment <strong>of</strong> PW<br />
1. Date or AOG <strong>of</strong> PW identification/enrollment<br />
2. Activities undertaken to assist the RHM in the enrollment <strong>of</strong> all PW in<br />
the catchment area<br />
3. Activities undertaken after identification <strong>of</strong> a PW<br />
4. Forms used in enlisting PW<br />
5. Information obtained upon PW's enrollment<br />
B. Delivery <strong>of</strong> Supplies<br />
6. IEC materials delivered by BHW<br />
7. IEC materials delivered by BHW<br />
8. Schedule <strong>of</strong> delivery <strong>of</strong> IEC materials<br />
9. Activity undertaken/instruction given when issuing IEC materials<br />
10. AOG start <strong>of</strong> Nutrina supplementation<br />
11. AOG start <strong>of</strong> Ferrin supplementation<br />
12. Protocol followed in determining the!.'W in the sector for supplementation<br />
13. Schedule <strong>of</strong> requisition <strong>of</strong> supplies from RHM<br />
14. Schedule <strong>of</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> supplies to PW<br />
15. Frequency <strong>of</strong> delivery <strong>of</strong> Nutrina to each PW<br />
16. Information asked during delivery <strong>of</strong> supplies<br />
17. Frequency <strong>of</strong> delivery <strong>of</strong> Ferrin to each PW<br />
18. Number <strong>of</strong> Nutrina packs received by PW<br />
19. Number <strong>of</strong> Ferrin received by each PW<br />
C. Monitoring <strong>of</strong> Pregnancy Outcome<br />
20. Frequency <strong>of</strong> monitoring <strong>of</strong> PW supplementation<br />
21. Information asked during monitoring<br />
22. Forms used during monitoring<br />
23. Who keeps supplementation card<br />
D. Monitoring <strong>of</strong> Pregnancy Outcome<br />
24. Assistance given to RHM in monitoring <strong>of</strong> pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes<br />
1. Validation <strong>of</strong> Accuracy <strong>of</strong> Information Recorded in the Monitoring Forms - this is determined<br />
by matching the answers <strong>of</strong> the PW during the interview with the information 'recorded in the<br />
monitoring forms on the following variables:<br />
1.1 Birthdate <strong>of</strong> PW<br />
1.2 Educational attainment <strong>of</strong> PW<br />
1.3 Occupation <strong>of</strong> PW<br />
1.4 LMP<br />
1.5 EDCB<br />
1.6 Birthdate <strong>of</strong> husband<br />
1.7 Occupation <strong>of</strong> husband<br />
1.8 Educational attainment <strong>of</strong> husband<br />
1.9 Household size<br />
1.10 Gravida<br />
1.11 Number <strong>of</strong> children born alive<br />
,.-'{ .<br />
171
1.12 Number <strong>of</strong> living children<br />
1.13 Number <strong>of</strong> abortion<br />
1.14 Number <strong>of</strong> stillbirths<br />
1.15 Number <strong>of</strong> neonatal deaths<br />
2. Validation <strong>of</strong> Protocol - pregnant women were interviewed for 2 purposes: (1) to validate<br />
compliance with various protocols by both RHM and BHW and (2) to validate compliance <strong>of</strong><br />
the PW with supplementation. Information on the following variables were obtained.<br />
2.1 Identification and enrollment <strong>of</strong> PW<br />
AOG or date <strong>of</strong> enrollment <strong>of</strong> PW<br />
length <strong>of</strong> stay <strong>of</strong> PW in barangay<br />
AOG <strong>of</strong> PW during interview<br />
2.2 Delivery <strong>of</strong> supplements/IEC materials<br />
manner by which PW receives Nutrina/Ferrin<br />
AOG start <strong>of</strong> receipt <strong>of</strong> Nutrina/Ferrin<br />
frequency <strong>of</strong> receipt <strong>of</strong> Nutrina/Ferrin<br />
prescribed daily consumption <strong>of</strong> Nutrina/Dosage <strong>of</strong> Ferrin<br />
number <strong>of</strong> supplements received per month<br />
validation <strong>of</strong> PW's receipt <strong>of</strong> IEC materials<br />
personnel who issued IEC materials<br />
date/AOG <strong>of</strong> receipt <strong>of</strong> IEC materials<br />
explanation given to PW during receipt <strong>of</strong> materials<br />
rating <strong>of</strong> IEC materials<br />
2.3 Monitoring <strong>of</strong> pregnancy and compliance to supplementation<br />
place <strong>of</strong> pre-natal check-up<br />
number <strong>of</strong> times PW went for pre-natal check-up<br />
personnel who conducts pre-natal check-up<br />
personnel who conducts follow-up visit <strong>of</strong> PW's supplementation<br />
frequency <strong>of</strong> visit <strong>of</strong> personnel<br />
activities conducted during follow-up visit<br />
actual daily consumption <strong>of</strong> Nutrina/Ferrin<br />
changes felt from Nutrina/Ferrin supplementation<br />
positive effects felt from Nutrina/Ferrin supplementation<br />
start <strong>of</strong> positive effects felt<br />
duration <strong>of</strong> positive effects felt<br />
negative effects felt from Nutrina/Ferrin supplementation<br />
validation whether "Negative Effect" felt even before supplementation<br />
AOG negative effects felt before supplementation<br />
duration "Negative Effects" felt before supplementation<br />
start <strong>of</strong> "Negative Effects" felt during supplementation<br />
duration <strong>of</strong> negative effect felt during supplementation<br />
action taken on Negative Effect/s<br />
other iron supplements taken by mother during present pregnancy<br />
AOG start <strong>of</strong> supplementation<br />
change felt from supplementation <strong>of</strong> other supplements<br />
positive effect/s felt from supplementation<br />
start positive effect/s felt<br />
Negative Effect/s felt from supplementation<br />
validtaion whether Negative Effect was felt even before start <strong>of</strong> supplementation<br />
AOG "Negative Effect" felt before supplementation<br />
start "Negative Effect" felt during supplementation<br />
action taken in Negative Effect/s felt<br />
172
2. Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the Midwife's Catchment Area<br />
2.1 Socio-economic and demographic data<br />
2.2 BHW Involvement<br />
3. Assessment <strong>of</strong> IFSDInputs<br />
3.1 Adequacy <strong>of</strong> IFSDSupplies Delivered<br />
3.2 Adequacy <strong>of</strong> Implementor's Manual<br />
Specifically, information on the following variables were obtained:<br />
A. Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the staff<br />
a) Socio-eeonomic and demographic data"<br />
1. source <strong>of</strong> staffs salary<br />
2. place <strong>of</strong> residence <strong>of</strong> staff<br />
3. place <strong>of</strong> residence <strong>of</strong> family<br />
4. frequency <strong>of</strong> going home to family<br />
5. duration <strong>of</strong> stay with family<br />
6. travel time to family residence<br />
7. pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> household<br />
household size<br />
family size<br />
type <strong>of</strong> family respondent<br />
no. <strong>of</strong> schoolers in the family<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> family residnce by age and sex<br />
household/family employment status: number unemployed<br />
health personnel status: age, sex, eudcational attainment, other<br />
occupation, total annual income<br />
health personnel's spouse status: same variables as household/family<br />
status<br />
total household/family income<br />
educational attainment <strong>of</strong> household members<br />
"Personnel Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> MHO and PHN was limited to Socio-Economic and<br />
Demographic Variables<br />
b) Activities/Functions <strong>of</strong> the Midwife<br />
8. regular activities undertaken<br />
9. ranking <strong>of</strong> activities from most to least prioritized<br />
10. number <strong>of</strong> hours spent per week per regular activity<br />
11. number <strong>of</strong> hours spent per week per IFSDmajor activity<br />
12. other daily activities undertaken by health personnel<br />
13. number <strong>of</strong> hours spent per day per activity<br />
c) Employment History<br />
14. number <strong>of</strong> years in service as midwife<br />
15. number <strong>of</strong> years in service in the municipality<br />
16. number <strong>of</strong> years in service in the present catchment area<br />
17. validation <strong>of</strong> any change <strong>of</strong> catchment area from October 1984 - October 1986<br />
18. Date/s <strong>of</strong> change<br />
19 Reason for change/s<br />
d) Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the Midwife's Catchment Area<br />
20. name <strong>of</strong> BHS<strong>of</strong> current assignment<br />
174
21. number <strong>of</strong> barangays in catchment area<br />
22. total population <strong>of</strong> the catchment area (1985)<br />
23. total number <strong>of</strong> infants (1 yr. old) in the CA. (1985)<br />
24. total preschoolers (0-6 yrs. old) in the A. (1985)<br />
25. total pregnant women in the CA. (1985)<br />
26. total number <strong>of</strong> households in the C A. (1985)<br />
27. total number <strong>of</strong> families in the CA. (1985)<br />
28. weighted average family income <strong>of</strong> CA. (1985)<br />
29. weighted average household income <strong>of</strong> CA. (1985)<br />
30. nutritional status <strong>of</strong> catchment area - number normal, first degree, second<br />
degree, third degree, overweight PS<br />
.31. total births per year in catchment area - 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986<br />
32, topographic description per barangay<br />
33. Barangay road description<br />
34. mode <strong>of</strong> transportation to barangay hea.th station<br />
35. amount <strong>of</strong> fare from RHM residence to BHS<br />
36. travel time<br />
37. distance in kilometers<br />
VIII: Availabilitv and adequacv <strong>of</strong> inputs<br />
\<br />
\<br />
VARIABLES<br />
A. IFSD Training<br />
1. Attendance <strong>of</strong> IFSD Training<br />
2. rating <strong>of</strong> adequacy <strong>of</strong> training<br />
given:<br />
MHO<br />
x<br />
PHN<br />
x<br />
RESPONDENTS<br />
ANS/DNRHM<br />
x x<br />
BHW PW PP<br />
duration- x x x x<br />
content x x x x<br />
method used<br />
effectiveness <strong>of</strong> resource<br />
x x x x<br />
speakers x x x x<br />
\<br />
\<br />
3.<br />
venue<br />
if non-attendance <strong>of</strong> training<br />
reason for non-attendance<br />
personnel who later gave<br />
x x x x<br />
(<br />
i, \ ,<br />
t<br />
\<br />
! ,<br />
I<br />
}<br />
B.<br />
orientation in the project x<br />
Supervision<br />
1. Who supervises the staff x<br />
2. How is Supervision undertaken x<br />
3. Frequency <strong>of</strong> supervisor's visit to<br />
monitor activities x<br />
4. Adequacy <strong>of</strong> visit x<br />
5. Frequency <strong>of</strong> meeting/consultation<br />
with supervisor to discuss<br />
status and problems in BHS<br />
services x<br />
6. Frequency <strong>of</strong> meeting consultation<br />
with suprvisor to discuss status and<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
x<br />
problems in IFSD x x x x<br />
7. Rating given on conduct <strong>of</strong><br />
supervision x x x x<br />
8. Reason for rating x x x x<br />
\<br />
l<br />
1<br />
\<br />
175
RESPONDENTS<br />
VARIABLES MHO PHN ANS/DN RHM ,BHW PW PP<br />
C. Level <strong>of</strong> motivation from supervisor<br />
1. Rating given to supervisor on<br />
the following:<br />
1.1 Is he encouraging x x x x<br />
1.2 Is he supportive <strong>of</strong> your tasks x x x x<br />
1.3 Is he considerate x x x x<br />
1.4 Does he give criticism<br />
constructively?<br />
Does he give recommendations<br />
on? x x x x<br />
1.5 How to improve your work? x x x x<br />
1.6 Does he motivate your in<br />
the performance <strong>of</strong> your tasks? x x x x<br />
2. Motivational activities conducted<br />
by supervisors x x x x<br />
D. Support system Obtained by staff<br />
1. persons/agencies who give<br />
support in implementation <strong>of</strong><br />
IPSO project x x x x<br />
2. Kind <strong>of</strong> support given x x x x<br />
3. Problems encountered re coordination<br />
with agencies in IPSO<br />
implementation x x x x<br />
4. Actions undertaken<br />
E. Monitoring<br />
1. Frequency <strong>of</strong> attendance <strong>of</strong> RHU<br />
meetings x x x x<br />
2. Frequency by which IPSOstatus/<br />
problems are discussed in RHU<br />
meetings x x x x<br />
3. Frequency <strong>of</strong> attendnace <strong>of</strong><br />
District meetings x x x x<br />
4. Frequency by which IPSO status<br />
problems are discussed in<br />
district meetings x x x x<br />
5. Comments on: •<br />
5.1. RHU meetings x x x x<br />
5.2 District meetings x x x x<br />
176
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:<br />
AppendixE<br />
MEMORANDUMOF AGREEMENT<br />
This Agreement made and entered into and executed by and between:<br />
The NUTRITION CENTER OF THE PHILIPPINES, a private foundation, with <strong>of</strong>fice<br />
address at NCP Bldg. , South Superhighway, Makati, Metro Manila, represented by its Deputy<br />
Executive Director, .Mcrcedes A. Solon, hereinafter referred to as the party <strong>of</strong> the first part,<br />
-a n d-<br />
The MINISTRY OF HEALTH, with <strong>of</strong>fice address at San Lazaro Compound, Rizal<br />
Avenue, Sta. Cruz, Manila, represented by the Minister <strong>of</strong> <strong>Health</strong>, Jesus c. Azurin, hereinafter<br />
referred to as the party <strong>of</strong> the second part.<br />
WHEREAS, one <strong>of</strong> the major thrusts <strong>of</strong> the Nutrition Center <strong>of</strong> the Philippines and the<br />
Ministry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Health</strong> is the reduction <strong>of</strong> the prevalence <strong>of</strong> nutritional anemia and calorie<br />
deficiencyainong pregnant women;<br />
WHEREAS, the Ministry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Health</strong> has a well established network <strong>of</strong> personnel<br />
engaged in Primary <strong>Health</strong> Care;<br />
WHEREAS, the Nutrition Center <strong>of</strong> the Philippines is the lead agency in mobilizing<br />
the private sector for participation in the Philippine Nutrition Program;<br />
WHEREAS, the Nutrition Center <strong>of</strong> the Philippines and the Minsitry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Health</strong> are<br />
actively engaged in operaions research;<br />
WHEREAS, the existing situation empahsizes the need for an intensive and<br />
collaborative effort to promote IRON AND FOOD SUPPLEMENTATION FOR PREGNANT<br />
WOMEN WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE;<br />
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration <strong>of</strong> the foregoing premises and the mutual<br />
convenants, agreements and stipulations herein made, the parties agree to undertake a project<br />
"Iron and Food Supplementation for Pregnant Women Within the Framework <strong>of</strong> Primary<br />
<strong>Health</strong> Care" and to carry out the following functions and responsibilities hereinafter set<br />
forth:<br />
1. OBJECTIVES OF THE PROJECT<br />
To develop and test strategies to reduce the prevalence <strong>of</strong> nutritional<br />
anemia among pregnant women and <strong>of</strong> low birth weight among their infants,<br />
under the present health care delivery system.<br />
II. FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES<br />
177
AREAOF RESPONSIBILITIES<br />
Phase I<br />
I) That the party <strong>of</strong> the first part shall<br />
a ) Prepare a workable protocol for the study<br />
b) Prepare pre-test questionnaires and other tools necessaary for the<br />
project<br />
c) Identify and pre-test a food supplement; negotiate with potential<br />
manufacturers for subsequent food supplementation<br />
d) Conduct a baseline pr<strong>of</strong>ile on the RHU system <strong>of</strong> the chosen study<br />
area<br />
e) Develop training and NIEC materials for use in thestudy<br />
2. That the party <strong>of</strong> the second part shall:<br />
a) Review the project protocol<br />
b) Provide technical advice on project planning and implementation<br />
c) Endorse the project to the Regional and Provincial <strong>Health</strong><br />
Offices<br />
d) Provide awareness and monitoring <strong>of</strong> the project at the national<br />
level<br />
Phase 1\<br />
I) That the party <strong>of</strong> the first part shall:<br />
a) Recruit and train personnel for the conduct <strong>of</strong> the study (see<br />
attached)<br />
b) Provide funds for:<br />
I) Logistical requirements<br />
2) Honoraria for consultants and project participants from the<br />
Ministry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Health</strong><br />
3) Equipment and supplies<br />
4) Travel expenses and per diems <strong>of</strong>. Nutrition Center <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Philippines personnel and Ministry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Health</strong> project<br />
participants<br />
c) Implement study as per approved protocol<br />
d) Produce IECmaterials and food supplement<br />
e) Submit progress reports and terminal report<br />
2) That the party <strong>of</strong> the second part shall:<br />
a) Provide required personnel complement for the study<br />
(Attachment)<br />
b) Permit health personnel to travel in connection with the<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> the project<br />
c) Participate in the preparation <strong>of</strong> reports<br />
III. WORKING RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND<br />
NUTRITION CENTER OF THE PHILIPPINES<br />
Designated personnel from each agency are to work closely in the<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> all activities connected with the project. Task forces<br />
consisting <strong>of</strong> personnel from both agencies will be formed as a strategy to<br />
maintain the close working relationship. Moreover, dissemination and<br />
adoption <strong>of</strong> the research outputs in whatever form will be a shared<br />
responsibility <strong>of</strong> the two parties under defined operational guidelines and<br />
expected outputs. Project participants shall be entitled to credits for<br />
authorship and/or co-authorship <strong>of</strong> research paper(s) commensurate to their<br />
178
participation in the conduct <strong>of</strong> the study and/or preparation <strong>of</strong> technical<br />
reports.<br />
IV. GENERAL PROVISIONS<br />
The Project Protocol shall form an integral part <strong>of</strong> this Memorandum <strong>of</strong><br />
Agreement. It shall contain the detailed description <strong>of</strong> the project including<br />
objectives. Methodologies and schedule which shall serve as implementing<br />
guidelines for the conduct <strong>of</strong> the study.<br />
V. EFFECTIVITY<br />
This Agreement shall be for a period <strong>of</strong> three (3) years from the date<br />
signing.<br />
This Agreement shall be valid and binding by and between the parties,<br />
their successors-in-interest and assignees.<br />
IN WITHESS WHEREOF, the parties have affixed their signatures<br />
this second day <strong>of</strong> December. 1983. Makati, Metro Manila.<br />
MERCEDES A, SOLON<br />
Deputy Executive Dirtector<br />
Nutrition Center <strong>of</strong> the Philippines<br />
WITNESSES:<br />
Rornuaida M Guirriee<br />
Nutrition Center <strong>of</strong> the Philippines<br />
179<br />
JESUSC. AZURIN, M.D.<br />
Minister<br />
Ministry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Health</strong><br />
Aurora S. Villarosa<br />
Ministry <strong>of</strong> <strong>Health</strong><br />
•
•<br />
Appendix F. Duties &: Responsibilities <strong>of</strong> Project Implementcra<br />
Projed<strong>of</strong> Duties & Responsibilities Per Implementors<br />
Operation BHW-PHCC <strong>Health</strong> Officers/<br />
Members RHM PHN PSO DN PHCC Chairman<br />
Level <strong>of</strong> Implementation<br />
Barangay Municipal Provincial District MunIReg'l<br />
• Pre-imple- • train BHWs & -acts as resource • prepares initial • Act as resource ein charge <strong>of</strong><br />
mentation Bgy PHCC chair- person'in the request <strong>of</strong> supply person on the Nut. supervision,<br />
activities men on the ratio- training <strong>of</strong> BHW based in estimates &0 lEC delivery monitoring k<br />
nale &: mechanics <strong>of</strong> target PW for in the training <strong>of</strong> control <strong>of</strong> pro].<br />
<strong>of</strong> the project the province BHW implementation<br />
at their own<br />
level &c: areas <strong>of</strong><br />
concern<br />
A. Continuous Continuously <strong>Health</strong> Officers:<br />
identification identifies preg- • on the delivery<br />
&: enrollment nant women (PW) ImmRHUto<br />
<strong>of</strong>PW in their catch- BHW<br />
ment areas -on medical<br />
management <strong>of</strong><br />
fills-in notebook PW<br />
usingformat <strong>of</strong> - on monitoring <strong>of</strong><br />
FORM lA-I health services<br />
record<br />
Refers PW to<br />
RHM<br />
validates status<br />
<strong>of</strong> PW in the bgy<br />
Accomplishes<br />
FORM IBI<br />
B. Monthly Re- Consolidates on Consolidates on a Consolidates on PHCC Chairmen<br />
quisitioning <strong>of</strong> a monthly basis monthly basis a monthly basis - on the delivery<br />
Supplies pregnant mothers target PW for targets for supple- <strong>of</strong> supplies from<br />
who are in their implementation mentation for BHWto PW<br />
5th-9th month in the municipa- each municipality - on supplementaage<br />
<strong>of</strong> gestation Iity based on past and assess suffi- tion follow-up<br />
(AOG) from the month's FORM ciency <strong>of</strong> supply <strong>of</strong>PW<br />
FORM lB 1 &. ICIlIA submitted - on continous<br />
prepares FORM by all midwives Prepares RSO for strengthening<br />
ICIlIA in the municipa- needed supplies <strong>of</strong> organization<br />
Iity and send to NCP building for the<br />
Submits FORM for delivery <strong>of</strong> needs <strong>of</strong> the<br />
IC/II A at PHN Records this tar- supplies project and<br />
wI attached get on the FORM similar under-<br />
FORM lBI !for the IC/11A accompli- Acknowledge re- taking for the<br />
previous months shed FORMiC/ ceipt <strong>of</strong> supplies good <strong>of</strong> the<br />
form IC/IIA for IIA w / attach- upon delivery community<br />
the bgy &: awaits ments for validaapraval<br />
&: re- tion <strong>of</strong> request &:<br />
leases <strong>of</strong> request release <strong>of</strong> supply<br />
Acknowledged acknowledges<br />
1.80
Project Duties 8< Resoonsibtlitiee Per Imnlementers<br />
Operation BHW-PHCC <strong>Health</strong> Officersl<br />
Members RHM PHN PSO ON PHCC Chairman<br />
Level <strong>of</strong> Implementation<br />
Baran.av Municipal Provincial District MunIR..'1<br />
2. Update FORM 2. Update FORM 2. Submits past 2. Process data<br />
IA1 (in notebook) IB1 after each months FORM for entry to the<br />
after each sup- supplementation lC/llA to PSO micro-computer<br />
plementation &:: &:: medical for monitoring<br />
medical follow- follow-ups analysis<br />
ups 2.1 edit consistencyand<br />
accuracy<br />
3. Let mother 3. Accomplish 3. Collectsthe<br />
acknowledge re- FORM IC/llA accomplished<br />
ceipt <strong>of</strong> supple- for request <strong>of</strong> monitoring forms<br />
ments in the supplies from from RHMs <strong>of</strong><br />
FORM IC/llA the RHM level all barangays in<br />
Form prepared and distribution the municipality<br />
by RHM for the to PW (the latter & submits to PSO<br />
barangay upon w /the assistance<br />
issuance <strong>of</strong> sup- <strong>of</strong> BHW for sup·<br />
plements plements).<br />
4. Accompllshes 4. Accompllshes<br />
Supplementation FORM M: after<br />
Records portion each regular<br />
<strong>of</strong> FORM 101 consultation<br />
during issuance withPW<br />
<strong>of</strong> supplements<br />
5. Accomplishes<br />
FORM ID1 for<br />
the pregnancy<br />
outcome and infant<br />
follow-up<br />
portions<br />
183<br />
2.2 enter data for<br />
each PW i n the<br />
master Table <strong>of</strong><br />
PWData<br />
2.3 Pack andsends<br />
to NCP the ff.<br />
- accomplished<br />
I<br />
monitoring forms<br />
- completely<br />
filled-up Master<br />
Table <strong>of</strong>PW<br />
Data<br />
- empty bottles<br />
for cleaning<br />
,<br />
e
•<br />
Project Duties &: Responsibilities Per Implementors<br />
Opention BHW-PHCC <strong>Health</strong> Officersl<br />
Members RHM. PHN PSO DN PHCC Chainnan<br />
Level <strong>of</strong> Implementation<br />
Barangev Municipal Provincial District MunlRe.'\<br />
6. AceoIDl'lishes<br />
FORM C. for<br />
each 3 - 6 months<br />
follow-up after<br />
birth<br />
7. Submits all<br />
completely<br />
accomplished<br />
forms to PHN<br />
- FORM IBI<br />
- FORM IC/IlA<br />
-FORMIDl<br />
-FORM"M"<br />
-FORM "c-<br />
F. Organiza- • Continuous in- • Assist PHCC • Act as resource • Act as resource<br />
tional building volvement in the duringprogram- person during person during<br />
for theproject implementation ming and plan- programming nutritionprog<strong>of</strong>the<br />
project ning<strong>of</strong>PHCC and planning ramming and<br />
<strong>of</strong>PHCC planning <strong>of</strong><br />
PHCC<br />
,<br />
184<br />
.
Re: FERRIN<br />
83. Problem - Side effects <strong>of</strong> FERRIN which include the following:<br />
a) chest pain<br />
b) edema<br />
c) severe nape pain<br />
d) dizziness<br />
e) vomi tting<br />
f) gastro intestinal pain<br />
g) L8M<br />
Action Taken - A validation team will be investigating this sometime in June.<br />
Samples <strong>of</strong> FERRIN and other iron preparation in the area were presented to FDA for<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> potency and contamination.<br />
84. Problem - Fishy taste <strong>of</strong> iron causing nausea and vomitting among PW.<br />
Recommendation - Can the project consider coating the iron tablets with sugar?<br />
85. Problem - Refusal <strong>of</strong> mother to take FERRIN<br />
Recommendation - investigate the reasons and further motivation<br />
B6. Problem - midwife complaints on the retrieval <strong>of</strong> iron bottles.<br />
Recommendation - this should be done to lessen additional cost <strong>of</strong> supplementation.<br />
Re: NIE and Forms<br />
B7. Problem - delayed distribution <strong>of</strong> Supervisor's Manual for PHN<br />
B8. Problem - need additional forms in the RHU in case the RHM goes on leave with her<br />
locker locked.<br />
Action Taken - Extra forms to be kept at RHU has been distributed this May, 1985<br />
delivery.<br />
C. Re: Monitoring<br />
Cl. Problem - Filling in <strong>of</strong> the Maternal Record is time consuming and too many forms to<br />
accomplish.<br />
Action Taken - variables and forms were restudied. Form 101 and 102 have been<br />
revised to include the most significant variables from the MHR. MHR will be dropped<br />
unless desired by municipality/province. Form 1C will be accomplished per BHS<br />
instead <strong>of</strong> per barangay.<br />
C2. Problem - Submitted forms by the RHM were not properly completely and accurately<br />
filled in.<br />
Recommendation - Proper filling-in <strong>of</strong> forms should be discussed during monthly staff<br />
meetings.<br />
C3. Problem - Delays in consolidation because <strong>of</strong> delayed submission by RHM<br />
186
O. Re: Overall Project Implementation<br />
01. Problem - failure <strong>of</strong> some BHWand PW to get their supply on time<br />
Recommendation - mobilization <strong>of</strong> the barangay PHCC is needed, MHO should<br />
coordinate with the municipality PHCC for the administration <strong>of</strong> this project<br />
02. Problem - non-cooperation <strong>of</strong> some RHMs<br />
03. Problem - Non-cooperating <strong>of</strong> some BHWsbecause <strong>of</strong><br />
a) too many forms<br />
b) overloaded wi work<br />
c) need incentives<br />
Recommendation - Ayerage no. <strong>of</strong> PW per BHW is less than one. ·This means that a<br />
BHW has the average one visit to make every week to her PW neighbor and which<br />
will also take her one or two minutes <strong>of</strong> recording the PW's compliance to<br />
supplementation.<br />
Problem - What help can be given to AP's aside from NIE materials (This was from<br />
the Control Group).<br />
Recommendation - The project is a research <strong>of</strong> whose objective is to compare<br />
effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the 4 treatments. As such modifications like giving <strong>of</strong> FERRIN in<br />
control should not be made. However, existing interventions to APs before the project<br />
maybe given which may include distribution <strong>of</strong> available ferrous sulfate tablets to<br />
anemic mothers.<br />
187
Project Activity<br />
1. ID and Enrollment <strong>of</strong> PW<br />
2. Requisitioning/Receipt <strong>of</strong><br />
Supplies<br />
3. Delivery <strong>of</strong> .Supplies<br />
AppendixH<br />
Findings on IFSD Project Implementation<br />
(August 1985)<br />
IECGroup<br />
1.1 Coverage - only 74% <strong>of</strong> PW were enrolled for IFSD<br />
intervention compared with the 75% target (PW)<br />
coverage <strong>of</strong> the project<br />
1.2 BHW Involvement - 78% <strong>of</strong> the BHW interviewed<br />
were involved in the ID and enrollment <strong>of</strong> PW<br />
1.3 Place <strong>of</strong> Pre-Natal - 91% <strong>of</strong> the PW interviewed go to<br />
the MHC/BHS for their pre-natal check-up<br />
2.1 Schedule <strong>of</strong> Requisitioning - 68% <strong>of</strong> RHM submit<br />
their requisitions to the PHN before delivery<br />
schedule; as a result, stocks unloaded for some BHS<br />
were based on estimates.<br />
2.2 On Accomplishment <strong>of</strong> Project Forms - Some midwives<br />
do not fill up the required forms for requisition and<br />
receipt <strong>of</strong> supplies<br />
2.3 On validation <strong>of</strong> Requests - PHN sometimes fails to<br />
double check requistions <strong>of</strong> midwives which may<br />
result to under or over supply <strong>of</strong> supplements and<br />
forms.<br />
3.1 Percentage <strong>of</strong> PW who Received IEC materials:<br />
Anemia Brochure 73%; Food Prescription Slip - 55%.<br />
The project expects that all PW enrolled should<br />
receive these IEC materials .<br />
3.2 Importance <strong>of</strong> IEC materials - IEC materials are<br />
given to assist the BHW/RHM to motivate the PW<br />
on compliance to supplementation practices.<br />
However, the BHW/RHM do not always give<br />
explanations on the contents and imprortance <strong>of</strong> the<br />
lEC materials upon issuance to the PW. Hence, the<br />
objectives <strong>of</strong> these brochures are not fully achieved<br />
3.3 Other Problems<br />
- Difficulty <strong>of</strong> RHM in getting lEC materials<br />
from the MHC due to distance<br />
accessibility problems<br />
- Frequent request for incentives for<br />
BHW/RHM<br />
188
4. Monitoring Compliance to<br />
Supplementation and<br />
Protocol<br />
5. Monitoring <strong>of</strong> Pregnancy<br />
Outcome<br />
4.1 Follow-up Visits: Follow-up visits <strong>of</strong> PW to monitor<br />
and record compliance to supplementation on RHU <br />
given medicines is found out to be difficult for<br />
RHM/BHW. Reasons for this difficulty are as<br />
follows:<br />
a) distance/accessibility to PW's house<br />
b) BHW has no time because <strong>of</strong> her work and. no<br />
incentives<br />
c) laziness <strong>of</strong> BHW<br />
d) workload <strong>of</strong> RHM<br />
4.2 Accomplishment <strong>of</strong> supplementation Card<br />
This card records among other the PW pr<strong>of</strong>ile which<br />
will provide da ta on compliance and pregnancy<br />
outcome. Among the PW who were given/prescribed<br />
to take-in supplements (medicines), only 64% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
cards seen during validation were filled up.<br />
Moreover, some FW do not have a supplementation<br />
card.<br />
5.1 Monitoring <strong>of</strong> Weight Data<br />
Compliance to weighing <strong>of</strong> infants by RHM at birth<br />
was 84%; and weighing infants 28 days after birth<br />
was only 59%. Reasons cited by the midwives for<br />
their failure to weigh are as follows:<br />
a) MW was not informed immediately by hilot<br />
about delivery<br />
b) PW delivered in hospital<br />
c) Distance/inaccessibility to PW's house<br />
d) Tight schedule <strong>of</strong> MW particularly for the 28th<br />
day follow-up weighing<br />
5.2 Submission <strong>of</strong> Monitoring Reports:<br />
difficulty/delays in retrieval <strong>of</strong><br />
monitoring forms<br />
incomplete/inconsistent information in ID2and<br />
MHR<br />
189
Project Activity<br />
1. 1D and Enrollment <strong>of</strong> PW<br />
2. Requisitioning/Receipt <strong>of</strong><br />
supplies<br />
3. Delivery <strong>of</strong> Supplies<br />
Findings on IFSD Project Implementation (August, 1985)<br />
Food Gll!I!P<br />
1.1 Coverage - Only 52% <strong>of</strong> PW were enrolled for IFSD<br />
intervention compared with 75% target (PW)<br />
coverage <strong>of</strong> the project<br />
1.2 BHW Involvement - 36% <strong>of</strong> the BHW interviewed<br />
were involved in the 1Dand enrollment <strong>of</strong> PW<br />
1.3 Place <strong>of</strong> Pre-natal - 91% <strong>of</strong> the PW inierviewed go to<br />
the MMC/BHS for their pre-natal check-up<br />
2.1 Schedule <strong>of</strong> Requisitioning: 71% <strong>of</strong> RHM prepare<br />
their requisitions before delivery schedule<br />
2:2 On accomplishment <strong>of</strong> project forms: Some midwives<br />
do not fill-up the required forms for requisitioning<br />
and receipt <strong>of</strong> supplies<br />
2.3 On validation <strong>of</strong> requests: PHN sometimes fails to<br />
double check requisitions <strong>of</strong> midwives which may<br />
result to under or oversupply <strong>of</strong> supplements and lEC<br />
materials<br />
3.1 Source <strong>of</strong> Supply: 92% <strong>of</strong> the PW receive their<br />
supplements from the BHW 8% <strong>of</strong> the PW receive<br />
their supplements from the RHM<br />
3.2 No. <strong>of</strong> Nutrina Received Per Month: 42% <strong>of</strong> PW<br />
received S 25 packs per month; 58% <strong>of</strong> PW received<br />
26- 30 packs per month (Required packs to be received<br />
= 30 packs/mo.) Linkage happen anywhere within<br />
the delivery channel (RHM>BHW>PW). Possible<br />
reasons for linkages are as follows: Nutrina used as<br />
incentive to the BHW; Nutrina used as "payment" for<br />
transport <strong>of</strong> supply; irregular involvement <strong>of</strong> BHW in<br />
delivery; failure <strong>of</strong> RHM to check regularity <strong>of</strong><br />
delivery <strong>of</strong> supply to PW.<br />
3.3 Percentage <strong>of</strong> PW who received IEC materials:<br />
Anemia Brochure - 50%; Nutrina Borchure - 33%.<br />
Food Prescription Slip - 33%; The project expects that<br />
all PW enrolled should receive these IEC materials<br />
3.4 Importance <strong>of</strong> IEC materials: IEC materials are given<br />
to assist the BHW/RHM to motivate the PW on<br />
compliance to supplementation and improve<br />
knowledge on maternal health and nutrition<br />
practices. However, the BHW/RHM do not always<br />
give explanations on the contents and importance <strong>of</strong><br />
the IEC materials upon issuance to the PW. Hence,<br />
the objectives <strong>of</strong> these brochures are not fully<br />
achieved.<br />
190
4. Monitoring Compliance to<br />
Supplementation and<br />
Protocol<br />
3.5 ' Other Problems:<br />
- Difficulty <strong>of</strong> RHM in the transport <strong>of</strong> Nutrina<br />
to BHS not reached by delivery vehicle<br />
Frequent request for incentives for BHW/RHM<br />
Non-involvement/irregular involvement <strong>of</strong> BHW<br />
in delivery due to work and attitude<br />
4.1 Intake <strong>of</strong> Nutrina -<br />
50%<strong>of</strong> PW consume 1 pack per day<br />
33% <strong>of</strong> PW consume 2 packs perday<br />
17% <strong>of</strong> PW consume 3 packs perday<br />
Intake <strong>of</strong> more than one pack/day may suggest that<br />
Nutrina is used not just as a supplement for the PW<br />
but for the other household member especially the<br />
children as some mothers were honest enough to<br />
admit<br />
4.2 Effects <strong>of</strong> Supplementation - No reported negative<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> Nutrina. However, there are<br />
apprehensions among some PW that-too much intake<br />
<strong>of</strong> sweets might result to having a big baby, hence the<br />
difficulty in deliver<br />
, 4.3 Follow-up Visits: Weekly follow-up visits <strong>of</strong> PW to<br />
monitor and record compliance was found out to be<br />
difficult for the RHM/BHW. Reasons for this<br />
diffuculty are as follows:<br />
a) distance/accessibility to PW's house<br />
b) BHWhas no time because <strong>of</strong> her work and no<br />
incentives<br />
c) laziness <strong>of</strong> BHW<br />
d) workload <strong>of</strong> RHM<br />
4.4 Accomplishment <strong>of</strong> Supplementation Card:<br />
This card records among others the pregnant women's<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ile which will provide data on compliance and<br />
pregnancy outcome. However, among the<br />
supplementation cards seen during validation, only<br />
42% were filled-up. Moreover, some PW do not have<br />
a supplementation card.<br />
191
5. Monitoring <strong>of</strong> Pregnancy<br />
Outcome<br />
5.1 Monitoring <strong>of</strong> Weight Data. Compliance to weighing<br />
<strong>of</strong> infants by RHM at birth was 83%; weighing <strong>of</strong><br />
infants 28 days after birth was also 83%. Reasons<br />
cited by the midwives for their failure to weigh are<br />
as follows:<br />
a) MW was not informed immediately by hilot<br />
about delivery<br />
b) PW delivered in hospital<br />
c) Distance/Inaccessibility to PW's house<br />
d) Tight schedule <strong>of</strong> MW particularly for the<br />
28th day follow-up weigh<br />
5.2 Submission <strong>of</strong> monitoring reports:<br />
difficulty / delays in retrieval <strong>of</strong><br />
monitoring forms<br />
incomplete/inconsistent information in IDI and<br />
MHR<br />
192
Project Activity<br />
1. ID and Enrollment <strong>of</strong> PW<br />
2. Requisition/Receipt <strong>of</strong><br />
Supplies<br />
3. Delivery <strong>of</strong> Supplies<br />
Findings onIFSD Project Implementation (August, 1985)<br />
IronGroyp<br />
1.1 Coverage - Only 43% <strong>of</strong> PW were enrolled for IFSD<br />
intervention compared with 75% target (PW)<br />
coverage <strong>of</strong> the project<br />
1.2 BHW Involvement - 49% <strong>of</strong> the BHW interviewed<br />
were involved in the ID and enrollment <strong>of</strong> PW<br />
1.3 Place <strong>of</strong> Pre-natal - 95% <strong>of</strong> the PW interviewed go to<br />
the MHC/BHS for their pre-natal check-up<br />
2.1 Schedule <strong>of</strong> Requisitioning: 72% <strong>of</strong> RHM submits<br />
their requests to the PHN before delivery schedule;<br />
as a result stocks unloaded for some BHS were based<br />
on estimates<br />
2.2 On accomplishment <strong>of</strong> project forms: Some midwives<br />
do not fill-up the required forms for requisitioning<br />
and receipt <strong>of</strong> supplies<br />
2.3 On validation <strong>of</strong> requests: PHN sometimes fails to<br />
double check requisitions <strong>of</strong> midwives which may<br />
result to undersupply or oversupply <strong>of</strong> supplements<br />
and IEC materials<br />
3.1 Source <strong>of</strong> Suply: 11% <strong>of</strong> the PW receive their<br />
supplements from the BHW; 62% <strong>of</strong> the PW receive<br />
their supplements from the RHM; 27% <strong>of</strong> the PW go<br />
to the BHS/MHC to get their supplements<br />
3.2 Receipt <strong>of</strong> IEC materials - Percentage <strong>of</strong> PW who<br />
receive IEC materials Anemia Brochure 65%, Ferrin<br />
Brochure, 71%; and the Food Prescription Pad 43%.<br />
The project expects that all PW enrolled should<br />
receive these IEC materials.<br />
3.3. Importance <strong>of</strong> IEC materials - IEC materials are<br />
given to assist the BHW/RHM to motivate the PW<br />
on compliance to supplementation and improve<br />
knowledge on maternal health and nutrition<br />
practices. However, the BHW/RHM do not always<br />
give explanation on the content and importance <strong>of</strong> the<br />
IEC Materials upon issuance to the PW. Hence, the<br />
objective <strong>of</strong> these brochures are not fully achieved.<br />
3.4 Other Problems in delivery:<br />
Difficulty <strong>of</strong> RHM in the transport <strong>of</strong> Ferrin<br />
from MHC due to distance and inaccessibility<br />
problems<br />
Frequent request for incentives for BHW/RH¥<br />
Non-involvementlirregular involvement <strong>of</strong> BHW<br />
in delivery due to work and atittude<br />
193
4. Monitoring Compliance to<br />
Supplementation and<br />
Protocol<br />
5. Monitoring <strong>of</strong> Pregnancy<br />
Outcome<br />
4.1 . Intake <strong>of</strong> Ferrin -<br />
92% <strong>of</strong> PW take 2 tablets/day<br />
6% <strong>of</strong> PW take 1 tablet per day<br />
2% <strong>of</strong> PW take 3 tablets per day<br />
4.2 Effects <strong>of</strong> Supplementation - 64.5% have experienced<br />
the positive effects while only 12.5% <strong>of</strong> the PW<br />
interviewed experienced negative effects, 23%<br />
experienced no change at all<br />
4.3 Follow-up Visits: Weekly follow-up visits <strong>of</strong> PW to<br />
monitor and record compliance was found out to be<br />
difficult for the RHM/BHW. Reasons for this<br />
diffuculty are as follows:<br />
a) distance/inaccessibility to PW's house<br />
b) BHW has no time because <strong>of</strong> her work and no<br />
incentives<br />
c) laziness <strong>of</strong> BHW<br />
d) workload <strong>of</strong> RHM<br />
4.4 Accomplishment <strong>of</strong> Supplementation Card:<br />
This card records among others the pregnant women's<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ile which will provide data on compliance and<br />
pregnancy outcome. However, among the<br />
supplementation cards seen during validation, only<br />
37% were filled-up. Moreover, some PW do not have<br />
supplementation,card.<br />
5.1 Monitoring <strong>of</strong> Weight Data. Compliance to weighing<br />
<strong>of</strong> infants by RHM at birth was 69% and weighing <strong>of</strong><br />
infants on the 28th day after birth was only 54%.<br />
Reasons cited by the midwives for their failure to<br />
weigh are as follows:<br />
a) MW was not informed immediately by hilot<br />
about delivery<br />
b) PW delivered in hospital<br />
c) Distance/Inaccessibility to PW's house<br />
d) Tight schedule <strong>of</strong> MW particularly for the<br />
28th day follow-up weighing<br />
5.2 Submission <strong>of</strong> monitoring reports:<br />
difficulty/ delays in retrieval <strong>of</strong><br />
monitoring forms<br />
incomplete/inconsistent information in form<br />
ID1 and MHR<br />
194<br />
;.
Project Activity<br />
1. ID and Enrollment <strong>of</strong> PW<br />
2. Requisition/Receipt <strong>of</strong><br />
Supplies<br />
3. Delivery <strong>of</strong> Supplies<br />
Findings on IFSD Project Implementation
4. Monitoring Compliance to<br />
Supplementation and<br />
Protocol<br />
3.5 Other Problems in delivery:<br />
- Difficulty <strong>of</strong> RHM in the transport <strong>of</strong><br />
Nutrina/Ferrin from MCH due to distance<br />
and inaccessibility problems.<br />
Frequent request <strong>of</strong> incentives for<br />
BHW/RHM<br />
Non-involvement/irregular involvement <strong>of</strong><br />
BHW in delivery due to work and atittude<br />
4.1 Intake <strong>of</strong> Nutrina/Ferrin -<br />
93% <strong>of</strong> PW consume take 1 pack/day<br />
7% <strong>of</strong> PW take 3 packs per day<br />
Intake <strong>of</strong> more than 1 pack/day may suggest that<br />
Nutrina is used not just as a supplement for the PW<br />
but for the other household members especially the<br />
children as some mothers were honest enough to<br />
admit. 95% <strong>of</strong> PW take 2 tablets per day; 5% take 3<br />
tablets per day<br />
42 Effects <strong>of</strong> Supplementation - 64.5% have experienced<br />
the positive effects while only 12.5% <strong>of</strong> the PW<br />
interviewed experienced negative effects, 23%<br />
experienced no change at all for Ferrin.<br />
No reported side effects <strong>of</strong> Nutrina. However, there<br />
are apprehensions among some PW that too much<br />
intake <strong>of</strong> sweets might result to having a big baby,<br />
hence, the difficulty in delivery.<br />
4.3 Follow-up Visits - Weekly follow-up visits <strong>of</strong> PW to<br />
monitor and record compliance was found out to be<br />
difficult for the RHM/BHW. Reasons for this<br />
diff iculty are as follows:<br />
a) distance/inaccessibility to PW's house<br />
b) BHWhas no time because <strong>of</strong> her work and no<br />
incentives<br />
c) laziness <strong>of</strong> BHW<br />
d) workload <strong>of</strong> RHM<br />
4.4 Accomplishment <strong>of</strong> Supplementation Card<br />
This card records among others the pregnant women's<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ile which will provide data on compliance and<br />
pregnancy outcome. However, among the<br />
supplementation cards seen during validation, only<br />
75% were filled-up. Moreover, some PW do not have<br />
supplementation card.<br />
196
5. Monitoring <strong>of</strong> Pregnancy<br />
Outcome .<br />
5.1 Monitoring <strong>of</strong> Weight-Data Compliance to weighing<br />
<strong>of</strong> infants by RHM at birth was 100%; weighing <strong>of</strong><br />
infants 28 days after birth was only 80%. Reasons<br />
cited by the midwives for their failure to weigh are<br />
as follows:<br />
a) MW was not informed immediately by hilot<br />
about delivery<br />
b) PW delivered in hospital<br />
c) Distance/lnaccessibiliIy to PW's house<br />
d) Tight schedule <strong>of</strong> MW particularly for the<br />
28th day follow-up weighing<br />
5.2 Submission<strong>of</strong> monitoring reports<br />
difficulIy/delays in retrieval <strong>of</strong><br />
monitoring forms<br />
incomplete/inconsistent<br />
information in form 101 and MHR<br />
197
.<br />
Appendix I. Plan <strong>of</strong> Action for the Integration <strong>of</strong> the IFSD PRoject in PRe<br />
Food GroUI><br />
Person in October November December<br />
Problems<br />
1. Problems<br />
Constraints<br />
• resignation <strong>of</strong> some<br />
Solutions<br />
• reorganize-<br />
Activities<br />
• dialogue w/<br />
charee<br />
MHO<br />
1<br />
x<br />
2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4<br />
Affecting members <strong>of</strong> the MPHCC tion existing mem-<br />
PHC bers <strong>of</strong> the<br />
. Structure<br />
2. None<br />
3. None<br />
MPHCC regarding<br />
vacancy<br />
• filling up <strong>of</strong><br />
the vacancy<br />
4.110& • Late enrollment <strong>of</strong> the ·IEC by the re-motivation RHU x<br />
enrollment PW due to unawareness RHM and PHN and recruit- staff<br />
<strong>of</strong>PW <strong>of</strong> the on-going project in chaircatch- ment <strong>of</strong> new<br />
eNon-involvement e.g. ment areas volunteer<br />
attending school, work- «motivation & workers<br />
ing, no incentives recruitment <strong>of</strong><br />
new volunteer<br />
workers .<br />
4.2 Requisi- •.non-accomplishment • motivation • re-orienta- PHO,DN x<br />
tion and <strong>of</strong> the required project on the part <strong>of</strong> tion <strong>of</strong> RHM on<br />
receipt <strong>of</strong> forms - added work theRHM the importance<br />
supplies<br />
<strong>of</strong>thediff.<br />
forms<br />
43 Delivery<br />
<strong>of</strong> Supplies • PW does not receive th • frequent dial- dialogue bel. x<br />
right amount <strong>of</strong> Nutrina ogue <strong>of</strong> the theRHM&<br />
because <strong>of</strong> the under- RHM,BPHCC BHW<br />
delivery <strong>of</strong> required and RHM<br />
(packs) supply by the<br />
PW<br />
4.4 Monitor- • Difficulty to conduct • motivation on follow-up x<br />
<strong>of</strong>Compli- follow-up visi Is <strong>of</strong> PW BHW on imporance<br />
to sup· by BHW/RHM - due to tance <strong>of</strong> follow<br />
plementation distance, workload up <strong>of</strong> supple-<br />
- to protocol mentation date<br />
4.5 Monitor- • insufficient weighing • BHWshould barangay<br />
ing <strong>of</strong> for BHW and hilots make arrange- <strong>of</strong>ficials<br />
Pregnancy • non-follow-up <strong>of</strong> mcnt in the<br />
Outcome hilot deliveries due to rotation <strong>of</strong><br />
distance and terrain weighing<br />
scales<br />
198
Iron GroUD<br />
Problems Constraints Solutions<br />
• coordinate WI<br />
the local gov't<br />
(MLG) wi regards<br />
to the<br />
construction <strong>of</strong><br />
better roads<br />
1. Problems<br />
Affecting<br />
PHC<br />
Structure<br />
2. Problems<br />
on Specific<br />
Roles <strong>of</strong><br />
MPHCCI<br />
MHO<br />
1) No regular meetings<br />
conducted<br />
2) No RCG organized<br />
due to lack <strong>of</strong> orientation<br />
and it is not a felt<br />
need<br />
1) there shld.<br />
be a regular<br />
meeting to be<br />
conducted on a<br />
fixed date to be<br />
decided upon<br />
by the committee<br />
members<br />
Person ir Odober November December<br />
Adivities charge 1 '2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4<br />
1) special mlngs MPHCCI<br />
to set date <strong>of</strong> MHO<br />
regular mtngs,<br />
2) and possible MPHCC<br />
restructuring<strong>of</strong><br />
the MPHCC<br />
1) Lack <strong>of</strong> proper orient- 1) there shld. 1) re-briefing<br />
ation and coordination be a formal 2) periodic<br />
<strong>of</strong> IFsD both with the briefing & coor- dialogue bet.<br />
MPHCC and MHO dination in the NCP represen-<br />
2) Lack <strong>of</strong> supervision implementa- tatives, MHO,<br />
and control on the part tion <strong>of</strong> IFSD MPHCC on<br />
<strong>of</strong> the MHO brought 2) involvement the progress<br />
aboui by the non - in- <strong>of</strong> MHO from <strong>of</strong> the program<br />
volvement since the the start<strong>of</strong> and problems<br />
start <strong>of</strong> the program the program encountered<br />
3) there shld.<br />
be a periodic<br />
appraisal <strong>of</strong><br />
the program<br />
together wi<br />
the problems<br />
encountered.<br />
3. Problemson 1) no regular meetings<br />
PHC Linkage conducted<br />
4.1 In the<br />
IFSD Activities<br />
- ID<br />
and Enrollment<strong>of</strong><br />
PW<br />
1) Distance, terrainand<br />
accessibility<br />
2) inadequate information<br />
on the concept <strong>of</strong><br />
the orozrarn<br />
- periodic<br />
meetings shld.<br />
be conducted b)<br />
MPHCCand<br />
I)HW<br />
1) maximize<br />
utilization <strong>of</strong><br />
BHW<br />
2) Intensification<br />
<strong>of</strong> IEC<br />
1) re-training<br />
<strong>of</strong>BHW<br />
199<br />
15<br />
program not later than Oct. 30,1985<br />
coordina<br />
tor at the<br />
prov'!.<br />
level<br />
RHU personnel<br />
NCP personnel
FOOD AND IRON GROUP<br />
Person ir October November December<br />
Problems<br />
4.2..........none<br />
Constraints Solutions Activities charge 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4<br />
4.3......... none<br />
4.4.........none<br />
4.5 ....... none<br />
1. Problems I) irregular meeting I) Dialogue I) Atleast PHO/ x<br />
Affecting w / the chair- quarterly chairman<br />
PHC man <strong>of</strong> the meeting MPHCC<br />
Structure MPHCC chairman<br />
2. Problems Orientation on lFSD -to call a meeting/ Chairman x<br />
on Specific between BPHCC and meeting/dia- dialogue MPHCC<br />
Roles <strong>of</strong> MPHCC members logue between<br />
MPHCC/ members<br />
MHO<br />
3. Problems Written reports to duplicate all duplicate <strong>of</strong> Nurse x x x<br />
onPHC Mayors regarding reports so as reports<br />
Linkages project therefore to have a copy<br />
additional forms be for the mayro<br />
given per RHU<br />
4.1 !Dand - BHW involvement in . Intensive dialogue Nurse x x x<br />
Enrollment <strong>of</strong> identification <strong>of</strong> PW motivation<br />
PW is only 53%<br />
4.2 Requisi- - requisition forms not - closer super- supervisor Nurse x x x<br />
tion and re- filled up on time vision bynurse<br />
ceipt <strong>of</strong> - failure <strong>of</strong> nurse to onPW<br />
supplies check requisitions <strong>of</strong><br />
4.3 Delivery 1) low participation <strong>of</strong> I) motivation meeting bel. x x x<br />
Supplies BHW in the distribu- to midwife and<br />
tion <strong>of</strong> Ferrin (Adv, <strong>of</strong> proj.) BHWw/in<br />
2) transport <strong>of</strong> supplies carchment<br />
,<br />
area<br />
-confer w.<br />
BPHCCand<br />
ask help<br />
4.4 Monitoring- weekly follow-up <strong>of</strong> - follow-up<br />
<strong>of</strong> Comolianc4PW comoliance bv PW at risk<br />
200<br />
-.<br />
,<br />
,.'
FOOD AND IRON GROUP<br />
Person ir October November December<br />
Problems Constraints Solutions Activities cheree 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4<br />
-to suppleme RHM and BHW os low only, for<br />
ation normalPW-<br />
- to protocol monthly<br />
4.5 Monitorin - Monitoring <strong>of</strong> weight - closer super<strong>of</strong><br />
Pregnancy on the 28th day after vision <strong>of</strong> PW<br />
Outcome birth (80%) only byNurse/MlK<br />
- delegate<br />
weighing to<br />
BHW<br />
1. Problems 1) no representative/ 1) convince<br />
Affecting action <strong>of</strong>ficers PHC/rep]ace<br />
PHC 2) lack <strong>of</strong> regular members who<br />
Structures meetings dropped<br />
3) lack <strong>of</strong> manpower/ 2) agreementorganization<br />
MPHCC quarterly semichairman<br />
very busy quarterly, etc.<br />
4) difficultyin conven- 3) one group reing<br />
the group sponsible for<br />
training course<br />
2. Problems 0 1) role <strong>of</strong> chairman 1) further cla- meeting/ Chairman<br />
Specific Roles not clear rification <strong>of</strong> dialogue MPHCC<br />
<strong>of</strong>MPHCC/ the role <strong>of</strong> the<br />
MHO MPHCCby<br />
provincial<br />
primary action<br />
group<br />
3. Problems 0 1) lack <strong>of</strong> coordination 1) coordination<br />
PHC Linkage between linkages with other<br />
agencies<br />
4.1 .....none<br />
4.2 ..... none<br />
4.3 ......none<br />
4.4 ...... none<br />
45 Monitorin 1) Difficulty in moni- 1) follow-up 1) follow-up<br />
<strong>of</strong> Pregnancy toring pregnancy out- visit to PW visit to PW<br />
Outcome come by the hilots delivered by<br />
and the hospital the hilots and<br />
hospitals<br />
201
Level:<br />
Appendix J. Summary<strong>of</strong> Plan <strong>of</strong> Action for the Integration <strong>of</strong> IFSD Project in PHC(t)<br />
District<br />
Planned Activities Plan <strong>of</strong> Work to Implement<br />
(As ID in the Seminar-WorksholJ Role Identified Role Schedule Staff Assi2ned<br />
L PHC Structure<br />
1. Reorganization/Reactiva- - takecharge<strong>of</strong> reactiva- - ID and prioritizemunition<br />
<strong>of</strong> PHC Com ting MPHC Com by cipalities which need ANS,DNand<br />
frequent dialogue reorganization Before End <strong>of</strong> Special Field<br />
- schedulereorganization <strong>of</strong> 1985 Services Task<br />
<strong>of</strong> MPHC Force<br />
IT. Reorganization <strong>of</strong> Roles on - provide assistance to the . simultaneous w / reorgani-<br />
- PHCC municipalitieson orient- zation<br />
- IFSD ation <strong>of</strong> roles<br />
2.1 Reorientation on Roles - coordinator<strong>of</strong> orienta- - ANS/DN to give feed- Before End <strong>of</strong> ANS,DNand<br />
<strong>of</strong> MPHCCom/BPHCCc tion back on progress <strong>of</strong> IFSD 1985 Special Field<br />
on IFSDand on PHC and on restructuring to - Monthly Services Task<br />
district chief Force<br />
2.2 Dialogue between Projec - ANS/DN to get regular<br />
Coordinators and Imple feedbacks from PHN /<br />
mentors on IFSD status RHN<br />
and problems<br />
IlL PHCLinkages<br />
3.1 Periodic Dialogue - Coordinators . simultaneous or immediate- ANS,DNand<br />
between Mun.
\<br />
Level: IPHO<br />
Integration <strong>of</strong> IFSD Project In PHC<br />
Planned Activities Plan <strong>of</strong> Work to Implement Staff<br />
(Asm in the Semtnar-worksbce Role Identified' Role Schedule Assllllted<br />
I. PHC Structure<br />
1. Reorganization/Reactiva- - provide technicalassist- - frequent / informal dialogue during routin Dr.Ord<strong>of</strong>la<br />
tion <strong>of</strong> PHC Com ance to districton re- with district staff during routine PHOCstaff<br />
organization and reorient- visitations visits PRM<br />
ation <strong>of</strong> roles, whenever - dialogue w / district chief whenever<br />
necessaryor requested. neccessary<br />
monthly<br />
II. Reorganization<strong>of</strong> Roles on meeting<br />
- PHCC<br />
- IFSD<br />
2.1 Reorientation on" Roles<br />
<strong>of</strong> MPHCCom/BPHCCom<br />
on IFSDand on PHC<br />
2.2 Dialogue between Projec -coordinate w/proj.<br />
Coordinators and Imple coordinators on project<br />
mentors on IFSD status status<br />
and problems<br />
m. PHC Linkages<br />
IV. Project Activities<br />
4.1 Retraining/Recruitment<br />
<strong>of</strong>BHW<br />
4.2 Dialogues/motivation - provide technical - informal dialogue during<br />
<strong>of</strong>BHW support to staff visits<br />
4.3 Follow-up <strong>of</strong> RHMs re - Municipality<br />
accomplislunent <strong>of</strong> Forms<br />
4.4 Frequent dialogues - Monitoring . Monitoringcompliance <strong>of</strong><br />
between RHM & BHW reports Monthly<br />
on delivery <strong>of</strong> supplies Routine<br />
4.5 Dialogue between RHM - provide feedback to RHO<br />
& BPHCCom on project thru a Prov'l consolidated.<br />
status/problems Report<br />
4.6 Admin & Technical<br />
Support to MHO & PHN<br />
4.7 Follow-up <strong>of</strong> RHM by<br />
PHN on submission <strong>of</strong><br />
101/102<br />
203
Table 3: Distribution <strong>of</strong> pregnant women by fat intake adequacy.level and treatment group, pre-and posl-sun'ey<br />
Fat Pre-Survey Post-Survev<br />
Intake<br />
I'" OFRDA)<br />
Food<br />
No.<br />
Imn<br />
No.<br />
FoodIt Ieo<br />
No.<br />
NIE<br />
No.<br />
Total<br />
No. No.<br />
ood Imn-' .<br />
No,<br />
Food 6: 11'0<br />
,No. .'"<br />
NIE<br />
No.<br />
Total<br />
No.<br />
'"<br />
'"<br />
'"<br />
'"<br />
'"<br />
(<br />
Table 5: Distribution <strong>of</strong> pregnant women by iron intake adequacy level and treatment group, pne-uul po.Hurvey<br />
Iron Pre-Survey Post-Survev<br />
Intake<br />
(" OFRDA)<br />
Food Iron Food &:1m NIE Total<br />
No. No.<br />
" "<br />
Food Iron food 6: 1m NIE Total<br />
No.<br />
" No.<br />
" No.<br />
"<br />
No. No. No. " " " No. " No.<br />
"<br />
0-24 10 5.0 12 6.1 9 4.5 9 42 40 5.0 4 20 6 3.0 1 0.4 7.0 3.1 18 21<br />
25-49 67 33.7 65 328 57 28.8 77 363 266 33.0 63 31.2 83 41.7 56 233 45 19.9 247 28.5<br />
50-74 63 31.7 51 25.8 85 4.29 77 363 276 34.2 75 37.1 57 28.6 86 35.8 83 36.7 301 34.7<br />
75-99 40 20.1 32 16.2 28 14.1 25 11.8 125 15.5 33 163 32 16.1 66 27.5 52 23.0 183 21.1<br />
'100 19 9.5 38 19.2 19 9.6 24 113 100 12.4 27 13.4 21 10.6 31 12.9 39 17.3 118 13.6<br />
TOTAL 199 100 198 100 198 100 212 100 8117 100 202 100 199 100 240 100 226 100 867 100<br />
Table 6: Distribution <strong>of</strong> pregnant women by Vit C intake adequacy level and treatment gmup, pre-andpost-survey<br />
Vit.C Pre-Survev Post-Survev<br />
Intake Food Iron Food &:Ire NIE Total Food Iron Food &:11'0 NIE Total<br />
(.. OFRDA) No. .. No• .. No. No.<br />
" .. No. No. .. No. .. No• .. No. .. No.<br />
"<br />
..<br />
0-24 52 26.1 81 40.9 67 33.8 63 29.7 263 32.6 91 45.0 96 48.2 72 30.0 SO 35.4 339 39.1<br />
25-49 37 18.6 49 24.7 50 25.3 69 32.5 205 25.4 54 26.7 48 24.1 78 32.5 42 18.6 222 25.6<br />
50-74 24 12.1 22 11.1 31 15.7 35 16.5 112 13.9 28 13.9 24 12.1 38 15.8 32 14.2 122 14.1<br />
75-99 19 9.5 7 3.5 19 9.6 10 4.7 55 6.8 8 4.0 9 4.5 17· 7.1 22 9.7 56 6.5<br />
'100 67 33.7 39 19.7 31 15.7 35 16.5 172 213 21 10.4 22 11.1 35 14.6 50 221 128 14.8<br />
TOTAL 199 100 198 100 198 100 212 100 807 100 202 100 199 100 240 100 226 100 867 100<br />
207
Table': Distribution <strong>of</strong> prrgnanl women byretinol intake adequacy level and tru.tm.mt group, preoand poskurvey<br />
Retinol Pre-Survev Post-Survev<br />
1nbk. Food Iron Food&:11'0 NlE ToW Food Iron Food &: 1m NIE Total<br />
('" OFRDA) No. ... No. ... No. ... No. ... No. ... No. ... No • ... No • ... No. ... No. ...<br />
0-24 65 32.7 49 24.7 56 28.3 63 29.7 233 28.9 64 31.7 70 35.2 7S 31.3 53 235 262 30.2<br />
25-49 80 40.2 83 41.9 83 41.9 80 37.7 326 40.4 86 42.6 64 32.2 89 37.1 89 39.4 328 37.8<br />
50-74 36 18.1 36 18.2 40 20.2 29 13.7 141 175 28 13.9 35 17.6 51 21.3 49 21.7 163 18.8<br />
75-99 11 55 14 7.1 10 5.1 23 10.8 58 7.2 13 6.4 17 85 12 5.0 16 7.1 58 6.7<br />
> 100 7 35 16 8.1 9 4.5 17 8.0 49 6.1 11 5.4 13 65 13 5.4 19 8.4 56 65<br />
TOTAL 199 100 198 100 198 100 212 100 807 100 202 100 199 100 240 100 226 100 867 100<br />
Table 8: Distribution level <strong>of</strong> pregnant women by thiamine intake adequacy level and treatment group, pre-and posHurvey<br />
Thiamine Pre-suwev Post-Surv_<br />
Inlne Food Iron Food &:tre NlE Total Food Iron Food II; 1m NIE Total<br />
(","OFRDA) No. ... No. ... No. .... No. ... No. ... No. ... No . ... No. ... No. ... No. ...<br />
0-24 27 13.6 29 14.6 18 9.1 25 11.8 99 12.3 16 7.9 24 12.1 9 3.8 19 8.4 68 7.8<br />
25-49 97 48.7 84 42.4 84 424 94 44.3 359 445 88 43.6 88 44.2 86 35.8 82 36.3 344 39.7<br />
50-74 42 21.1 37 18.7 64 32.3 63 29.7 206 255 56 'Zl.7 62 31.2 83 34.6 76 33.6 277 31.9<br />
75-99 14 7.0 30 15.2 22 11.1 21 9.9 87 10.8 21 10.4 16 8.0 32 13.3 23 10.2 92 10.6<br />
>100 19 95 18 9.1 10 5.1 9 4.2 56 6.9 21 10.4 9 45 30 125 26 115 86 9.9<br />
TOTAL 199 100 198 100 198 100 212 100 807 .100 202 100 199 100 240 100 226 100 867 100<br />
208<br />
\<br />
)<br />
;
,<br />
Table9: DUtrlbution <strong>of</strong> pregnant women by rib<strong>of</strong>lavinintakeadequacylevel and treatment poup, pre-&nd. post-sarvey<br />
RIB Pre-SurveY Post-SurveY<br />
Intake Food Iron Food 6: Ire NIE 'ToUl Food Iron Food 6: 110 NIE ToUl<br />
('" OPRDA) No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No.<br />
'"<br />
'"<br />
'"<br />
'"<br />
0-24 48 24.1 46 232 G 21.7 48 22.6 185 22.9 32 15.8 36 18.1 21 8.8 31 13.7 120 13.8<br />
25-49 106 53.3 97 49.0 106 53.5 111 52.4 420 52.0 109 54.0 114 57.3 124 51.7 109 48.2 456 52.6<br />
50-74 33 16.6 34 172 36 18.2 41 19.3 144 17.8 46 22.8 39 19.6 68 28.3 61 27.0 214 24.7<br />
75-99 7 35 16 8.1 9 45 7 3.3 39 4.8 9 45 7 35 18 75 17 75 51 5.9<br />
2100 5 2.5 5 2.5 4 2.0 5 2.4 19 2.4 6 3.0 3 15 9 3.8 8 3.5 26 3.0<br />
TOTAL 199 100 198 100 198 100. 212 100 807 100 202 100 199 100 240 100 226 100 861 100<br />
Table 10: Distribution <strong>of</strong> prepnt women by Niacin intake adequacy level and treatment group, pre-andposkurvey<br />
Niacin Pre-survev Post-Survev<br />
!nUke Food Iron Food AtIro NIE ToUl Food Iron Food" Iro NIE Total<br />
('" OPRDA) No. No. No. No. .. No. No. No. No. No. No.<br />
'"<br />
'"<br />
'"<br />
0-24 2 1.0 I 05 0 0.0 2 0.9 5 0.6 2 1.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 I 0.4 3 0.3<br />
25-49 18 9.0 13 6.6 9 4.5 14 6.6 54 6.7 4 2.0 9 45 12 5.0 9 4.0 34 3.9<br />
50-74 41 20.6 37 18.7 51 25.8 59 27.8 188 23.3 30 14.9 39 19.6 26 10.8 27 11.9 122 14.1<br />
75-99 56 28.1 42 212 47 237 52 245 197 24.4 50 24.8 G 21.6 50 20.8 56 24.8 199 23.0<br />
.,00 82 412 105 53.0 91 46.0 85 40.1 363 45.0 116 57.4 108 54.3 152 63.3 133 58.8 509 58.7<br />
TOTAL 199 100 198 100 198 100 212 100 807 100 202 100 199 100 240 100 226 100 861 100<br />
..<br />
o<br />
209<br />
'"<br />
'"<br />
'"<br />
'"<br />
'"<br />
'"<br />
'"<br />
'"<br />
'"<br />
'"<br />
'"<br />
'"
Table 11 : Distribution <strong>of</strong> pregnant women by B carotene intake adequacy level and treatment group, pre-and post-survey<br />
B carotene Pre-survev Post-Survev<br />
Intake<br />
(,. OFRDA)<br />
Food Imn Food ok lro NlE Total<br />
No.<br />
"<br />
Food Imn Food ok lro NIE Total<br />
No.<br />
" No.<br />
" No.<br />
" No.<br />
"<br />
No.<br />
" No.<br />
" No.<br />
" No.<br />
" No.<br />
0-24 71 38.7 83 41.9 75 37.9 .. 39.6 319 395<br />
.' , "<br />
82 40.6 90 45.2 69 28.8 72 31.9 313 36.1<br />
25-49 50 25.1 38 19.2 37 18.7 48 22.6 173 21.4 50 24.8 52 26.1 50 20.8 21 9.3 173 20.0<br />
50-74 29 14.6 32 16.2 23 11.6 28 13.2 112 13.9 28 13.9 22 11.1 41 17.1 33 14.6 124 14.3<br />
75-99 13 65 13 6.6 18 9.1 15 7.1 59 7.3 11 5.4 13 65 20 8.3 17 7.5 61 7.0<br />
>tOO 30 15.1 32 16.2 45 22.7 37 175 144 17.8 31 15.3 22 11.1 60 25.0 83 36.7 196 22.6<br />
TOTAL 199 100 198 100 198 100 212 100 807 100 202 100 199 100 2.0 100 226 100 867 100<br />
210