04.04.2013 Views

Michael Iden, General Director, Car & Locomotive Engineering

Michael Iden, General Director, Car & Locomotive Engineering

Michael Iden, General Director, Car & Locomotive Engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Freight rail, locomotives & fuels<br />

Natural Gas as a Transportation Fuel<br />

<strong>Michael</strong> <strong>Iden</strong>, P.E. , Union Pacific Railroad<br />

ASME Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Conference<br />

Vancouver, BC, Canada September 24-25, 2012<br />

1


Purpose<br />

• US energy sources & uses<br />

• Freight railroads<br />

• The network and the systems<br />

• How locos. are used by and between systems<br />

• Freight locomotive overview<br />

• Nuts, bolts and bytes<br />

• Distributed Power<br />

• Previous projects re gaseous fuels 1936-1998<br />

• Loco. & tender design factors & challenges<br />

• LNG as a freight RR fuel: challenges<br />

<strong>Michael</strong> <strong>Iden</strong>, P.E. , Union Pacific Railroad<br />

ASME Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Conference<br />

Vancouver, BC, Canada September 24-25, 2012<br />

2


Energy 101: where it comes from, what it does<br />

• Frt. RRs: ~3.5B US gal. diesel/year (0.5% of all US energy)<br />

1 Quad equals 7.2008 Billion US gallons = 27.258 Billion liters of diesel fuel equivalent *<br />

Ton-mile statistics from US DOT Bureau of Transportation Statistics<br />

<strong>Michael</strong> <strong>Iden</strong>, P.E. , Union Pacific Railroad<br />

ASME Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Conference<br />

Vancouver, BC, Canada September 24-25, 2012<br />

3<br />

Frt. RR 0.5 Quads/year<br />

= 0.5% total US energy<br />

& produces ~40% of<br />

total ton-miles *<br />

Trucks 4.8 Quads/year<br />

= 4.8% total US energy<br />

& produces ~29% of<br />

total ton-miles *


RRs 101: N. American freight rail network<br />

1 international network in 3 countries<br />

5 *Class I RRs in US<br />

2 *equiv. Class I in Canada<br />

2 *equiv. Class I in Mexico<br />

* Class I RR defined as having at least US$346.8 million revenue in 2006<br />

Interoperability of equipment based on:<br />

Standard track gauge (4' 8-1/2")<br />

Standard couplers, air brakes, etc<br />

Standards for rolling stock design<br />

~1.3 million freight cars , most for<br />

interchange service between RRs<br />

~25,000 locomotives<br />

(25,000+ internal combustion engines)<br />

<strong>Michael</strong> <strong>Iden</strong>, P.E. , Union Pacific Railroad<br />

ASME Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Conference<br />

Vancouver, BC, Canada September 24-25, 2012<br />

4<br />

Canada<br />

United States<br />

Mexico


RRs 102: Class I rail systems<br />

UP<br />

BNSF<br />

CN<br />

<strong>Michael</strong> <strong>Iden</strong>, P.E. , Union Pacific Railroad<br />

ASME Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Conference<br />

Vancouver, BC, Canada September 24-25, 2012<br />

KCS<br />

(incl. KCS de<br />

Mexico)<br />

Ferromex<br />

(not shown)<br />

5<br />

CP<br />

CSX<br />

NS


RRs 103: Locos. v RR systems<br />

• RRs increasingly "share" locos. to expedite trains<br />

• Keeping locomotives with a train at interchange points reduces time<br />

• "Run thru" trains: RR A gives entire train (w/ locos.) to RR B<br />

<strong>Michael</strong> <strong>Iden</strong>, P.E. , Union Pacific Railroad<br />

– Example: Stockton CA (UP) > Chicago IL (CSX) > Albany NY<br />

• Also, "trackage rights": RR A's train runs on RR B's track<br />

– Example: Oakland CA (BNSF operates on UP track) > Denver CO<br />

Joliet IL (UP operates on BNSF track) > Kansas City MO<br />

ASME Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Conference<br />

Vancouver, BC, Canada September 24-25, 2012<br />

Train operations<br />

<strong>Locomotive</strong>s Traffic flows<br />

Routes<br />

6


60-day GPS track of a UP locomotive*<br />

* 4000 HP DC locomotive normally assigned to long-distance operations<br />

<strong>Michael</strong> <strong>Iden</strong>, P.E. , Union Pacific Railroad<br />

ASME Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Conference<br />

Vancouver, BC, Canada September 24-25, 2012<br />

7<br />

Run-thru Run thru<br />

operation<br />

by CN<br />

Run-thru<br />

operation<br />

by CSX<br />

Run-thru<br />

operation<br />

by NS


Locos. 101: locos. have trucks (trucks have tires)<br />

Tier 3 line-haul<br />

locomotive ...<br />

<strong>Michael</strong> <strong>Iden</strong>, P.E. , Union Pacific Railroad<br />

Power<br />

electronics<br />

Truck (bogie)<br />

ASME Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Conference<br />

Vancouver, BC, Canada September 24-25, 2012<br />

11-to-15 liter/cylinder engine<br />

(400 gal. lube oil)<br />

5,000 gal. diesel tank<br />

8<br />

400 gal. cooling<br />

system<br />

~50,000 parts ~2 million lines of computer code<br />

Struct. steel underframe<br />

10'3" W x 16' H x ~73' L 208-to-217 tons fully-fueled


Locos. 102: Models v applications<br />

• Different models for different services (& requirements)<br />

<strong>Michael</strong> <strong>Iden</strong>, P.E. , Union Pacific Railroad<br />

ASME Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Conference<br />

Vancouver, BC, Canada September 24-25, 2012<br />

4300-4400 HP 6 AC motors long-distance trains<br />

4000 HP 6 DC motors long-distance trains<br />

3800 HP 6 DC motors regional operations<br />

3000 HP 6 DC motors regional operations<br />

1500-2300 HP 4 DC motors yard & local operations<br />

2000 HP 4-6 DC motors yard & local ops.<br />

> Tier 2 ultra-low-emitting Genset multiple engines<br />

9


Distributed Power: 1 train, multiple locos.<br />

<strong>Michael</strong> <strong>Iden</strong>, P.E. , Union Pacific Railroad<br />

ASME Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Conference<br />

Vancouver, BC, Canada September 24-25, 2012<br />

Head-end power (w/ crew)<br />

4400+4000 HP<br />

Mid-train DP power<br />

4400 HP<br />

Rear-end DP power<br />

4000+4400 HP<br />

10<br />

>65% of UP's<br />

gross ton-miles are<br />

generated by trains using<br />

DP technology<br />

Since year 2000, UP's<br />

fuel efficiency (ton-miles<br />

per gallon of fuel) has<br />

improved by 19%<br />

Train shown is a double-stack container train from Oakland to Chicago, at Donner Summit, California


Gas fuels for North American locomotives<br />

Plymouth<br />

<strong>Locomotive</strong><br />

Company<br />

builds propane<br />

locomotive<br />

1 spark (450hp)<br />

<strong>Michael</strong> <strong>Iden</strong>, P.E. , Union Pacific Railroad<br />

ASME Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Conference<br />

Vancouver, BC, Canada September 24-25, 2012<br />

UPRR tests an LPG fuel gas turbine locomotive<br />

between LA and Las Vegas<br />

Several railroads collaborate<br />

with committee on potential of propane<br />

SwRI develops a laboratory program<br />

to test fuel blends<br />

SwRI Two Cylinder Research<br />

BN CNG Effort<br />

11<br />

BN Effort with ECI and Air Products<br />

BN operations with natural<br />

gas-fueled locomotives<br />

UPRR LNG R&D program<br />

with engine builders<br />

GasRail Initiative<br />

MK Rail LNG switch<br />

locomotives<br />

1935 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010<br />

R&D which did not reach revenue operations<br />

R&D which did reach revenue operations<br />

1 spark<br />

1750hp<br />

Timeline from page 4: http://www.arb.ca.gov/railyard/ryagreement/112807lngqa.pdf<br />

1 turbine<br />

4500hp<br />

Southern California LNG line haul locomotive project<br />

CAPTS Rail project with ECI conversion kit<br />

2 low-P<br />

3000hp<br />

4 high-P<br />

3800-4000hp<br />

4 spark<br />

1200hp<br />

11 known locomotives operated<br />

in revenue train service<br />

on gaseous fuels in US 1936-1998


Union Pacific's dual-fuel project<br />

• $15 million+ program 1991-1998 (+ OEM investments)<br />

• (4) 3800-and-4000 HP line-haul locomotives @ 2 OEMs<br />

<strong>Michael</strong> <strong>Iden</strong>, P.E. , Union Pacific Railroad<br />

– 95% gas substitution using high-pressure injection<br />

• (2) 30,000 US gallon cryogenic fuel tenders<br />

• Program suspended in '98, locos. never reached revenue operation<br />

– Cryogenic pump & injector failures<br />

– OEM resources needed to focus on EPA Tier 0<br />

• (2) 1200 HP spark-ignition switchers (diesel-converted-to-gas)<br />

ASME Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Conference<br />

Vancouver, BC, Canada September 24-25, 2012<br />

12


LNG locomotives: design factors & challenges<br />

• Safety, reliability, efficiency,<br />

operability & maintainability<br />

• EPA loco. emissions regulations<br />

• Tier 0 in 2000, Tier 1 in 2002, Tier 2 in 2005, Tier 3 in 2012<br />

• Tier 4 (diesel aftertreatment) required for new locos. January 1, 2015<br />

<strong>Michael</strong> <strong>Iden</strong>, P.E. , Union Pacific Railroad<br />

– Tier 4 is a major R&D and engineering challenge for loco. OEMs<br />

– Repeat of late 1990s? (Engrg resources: dual-fuel v prep for emissions regs)<br />

• Tier 4 diesel ... Tier 4 diesel + gas ... or ... Tier 4 Gas-predominant<br />

• Need US EPA federal test protocol (FTP) emissions data<br />

ASME Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Conference<br />

Vancouver, BC, Canada September 24-25, 2012<br />

13


LNG tenders: design factors & challenges<br />

• Safety & compliance<br />

• Energy density (1 US gal diesel ~ 1.75 LNG)<br />

• CNG insufficient energy density; impractical to carry LNG onboard<br />

• Matching loco. fuel demand, tender cap'y. & fuel<br />

• Varying # of locomotives in a consist (1, 2, 3 or 4)<br />

• Distributed Power (DP) locomotives in trains (mid- and/or -rear)<br />

• Compatibility (standards)<br />

<strong>Michael</strong> <strong>Iden</strong>, P.E. , Union Pacific Railroad<br />

– Tender-to-locomotive & refilling connections<br />

– Fuel-to-locomotive criteria (liquid/gas, pressure?)<br />

• Refueling infrastructure & re-fueling criteria<br />

Tender photo from http://utahrails.net<br />

ASME Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Conference<br />

Vancouver, BC, Canada September 24-25, 2012<br />

14


LNG as a freight rail fuel: challenges<br />

1. Fuel source (gas)<br />

2. Fuel prep. (liquefaction) & refueling infrastructure<br />

<strong>Michael</strong> <strong>Iden</strong>, P.E. , Union Pacific Railroad<br />

Fuel demand Production capacity Storage Locations<br />

3. Tenders to carry the fuel<br />

Safety Design Capacity (vol.) Technology Manage & dispatch<br />

4. <strong>Locomotive</strong>s & engines which can use the fuel<br />

Safety Design Power Reliability Maintainability Shops<br />

5. Train & locomotive operational adjustments<br />

Safety Traffic flows Power demands DP Routes Schedules<br />

Interoperability (run-thru trains?) Refueling locations<br />

ASME Internal Combustion Engine Division Fall Conference<br />

Vancouver, BC, Canada September 24-25, 2012<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!