CV: Mireille Broeders was born in 1970 in ... - Kreftregisteret
CV: Mireille Broeders was born in 1970 in ... - Kreftregisteret
CV: Mireille Broeders was born in 1970 in ... - Kreftregisteret
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Timmers JMH, van Doorne-Nagtegaal HJ, Verbeek ALM, den Heeten GJ, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJM. A dedicated BI-RADS<br />
tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g programme: effect on the <strong>in</strong>ter-observer variation among screen<strong>in</strong>g radiologists. Eur J Radiol<br />
2012;81:2148-8.<br />
Timmers JM, den Heeten GJ, Adang EM, Otten JD, Verbeek AL, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ. Dutch digital breast cancer<br />
screen<strong>in</strong>g: implications for breast cancer care. Eur J Public Health 2012;22:925-9.<br />
Asadzadeh Vostakolaei F, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ, Kiemeney LA, Verbeek AL. Opportunity for breast cancer screen<strong>in</strong>g: a<br />
literature review and implications for Iran. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2011;12:2467-75.<br />
Paap E, Verbeek ALM, Puliti D, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJM, Paci E. M<strong>in</strong>or <strong>in</strong>fluence of self-selection bias on the effectiveness<br />
of breast cancer screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> case-control studies <strong>in</strong> the Netherlands. J Med Screen 2011;18:142-6.<br />
Verbeek AL, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ, van Schoor G, Moss SM, Otten JD, Donders R, Paap E, den Heeten GJ, Holland R.<br />
Reply: Flawed methods expla<strong>in</strong> the effect of mammography screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Nijmegen. Br J Cancer 2011;105:594-5.<br />
de Gelder R, Fracheboud J, Heijnsdijk EA, den Heeten G, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ, Draisma G, de Kon<strong>in</strong>g HJ. Digital<br />
mammography screen<strong>in</strong>g: weigh<strong>in</strong>g reduced mortality aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>in</strong>creased overdiagnosis. Prev Medic<strong>in</strong>e<br />
2011;53:134-40.<br />
van Schoor G, Paap E, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ, Verbeek AL. Residual confound<strong>in</strong>g after adjustment for age: a m<strong>in</strong>or issue<br />
<strong>in</strong> breast cancer screen<strong>in</strong>g effectiveness. Eur J Epidemiol 2011;26:585-8.<br />
van Schoor G, Moss SM, Otten JD, Donders R, Paap E, den Heeten GJ, Holland R, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ, Verbeek AL.<br />
Increas<strong>in</strong>gly strong reduction <strong>in</strong> breast cancer mortality due to screen<strong>in</strong>g. Br J Cancer 2011;104:910-4.<br />
Paap E, Verbeek ALM, Puliti D, Paci E, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJM. Breast cancer screen<strong>in</strong>g case-control study design: impact<br />
on breast cancer mortality. Ann Oncol 2011:22:863-9.<br />
van Schoor G, Moss SM, Otten JD, Donders R, Paap E, den Heeten GJ, Holland R, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ, Verbeek AL.<br />
Effective biennial mammographic screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> women aged 40-49. Eur J Cancer 2010;46:3137-40.<br />
Paap E, Holland R, den Heeten GJ, van Schoor G, Botterweck AA, Verbeek AL, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ. A remarkable<br />
reduction of breast cancer deaths <strong>in</strong> screened versus unscreened women: a case-referent study. Cancer Causes<br />
Control 2010;21:1569-73.<br />
Cox B, Ballard-Barbash R, <strong>Broeders</strong> M, Dowl<strong>in</strong>g E, Malila N, Shumak R, Tapl<strong>in</strong> S, Buist B, Miglioretti D, for the<br />
International Cancer Screen<strong>in</strong>g Network. Record<strong>in</strong>g of hormone therapy and breast density <strong>in</strong> breast screen<strong>in</strong>g<br />
programs: summary and recommendations of the International Cancer Screen<strong>in</strong>g Network. Breast Cancer Res<br />
Treat 2010;124:793-800.<br />
Verbeek AL, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ. Evaluation of cancer service screen<strong>in</strong>g: case referent studies recommended. Stat<br />
Methods Med Res 2010;19:487-505.<br />
Bluekens AM, Karssemeijer N, Beijer<strong>in</strong>ck D, Deurenberg JJM, van Engen RE, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJM, den Heeten GJ.<br />
Consequences of digital mammography <strong>in</strong> population-based breast cancer screen<strong>in</strong>g: <strong>in</strong>itial changes and long<br />
term impact on referral rates. Eur Rad 2010;20:2067-73.<br />
Otten JDM, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJM, den Heeten GJ, Holland R, Fracheboud J, de Kon<strong>in</strong>g HJ, Verbeek ALM. Life<br />
expectancy of screen detected <strong>in</strong>vasive breast cancer patients compared to women <strong>in</strong>vited to the Nijmegen<br />
screen<strong>in</strong>g program. Cancer 2010;116:586-91.<br />
Bouwman R, Young K, Lazzari B, Ravaglia V, <strong>Broeders</strong> M, van Engen R. An alternative method for noise analysis<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g pixel variance as part of quality control procedures on digital mammography systems. Phys Med Biol<br />
2009;54:6809-22.