04.04.2013 Views

CV: Mireille Broeders was born in 1970 in ... - Kreftregisteret

CV: Mireille Broeders was born in 1970 in ... - Kreftregisteret

CV: Mireille Broeders was born in 1970 in ... - Kreftregisteret

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Timmers JMH, van Doorne-Nagtegaal HJ, Verbeek ALM, den Heeten GJ, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJM. A dedicated BI-RADS<br />

tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g programme: effect on the <strong>in</strong>ter-observer variation among screen<strong>in</strong>g radiologists. Eur J Radiol<br />

2012;81:2148-8.<br />

Timmers JM, den Heeten GJ, Adang EM, Otten JD, Verbeek AL, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ. Dutch digital breast cancer<br />

screen<strong>in</strong>g: implications for breast cancer care. Eur J Public Health 2012;22:925-9.<br />

Asadzadeh Vostakolaei F, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ, Kiemeney LA, Verbeek AL. Opportunity for breast cancer screen<strong>in</strong>g: a<br />

literature review and implications for Iran. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2011;12:2467-75.<br />

Paap E, Verbeek ALM, Puliti D, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJM, Paci E. M<strong>in</strong>or <strong>in</strong>fluence of self-selection bias on the effectiveness<br />

of breast cancer screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> case-control studies <strong>in</strong> the Netherlands. J Med Screen 2011;18:142-6.<br />

Verbeek AL, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ, van Schoor G, Moss SM, Otten JD, Donders R, Paap E, den Heeten GJ, Holland R.<br />

Reply: Flawed methods expla<strong>in</strong> the effect of mammography screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Nijmegen. Br J Cancer 2011;105:594-5.<br />

de Gelder R, Fracheboud J, Heijnsdijk EA, den Heeten G, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ, Draisma G, de Kon<strong>in</strong>g HJ. Digital<br />

mammography screen<strong>in</strong>g: weigh<strong>in</strong>g reduced mortality aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>in</strong>creased overdiagnosis. Prev Medic<strong>in</strong>e<br />

2011;53:134-40.<br />

van Schoor G, Paap E, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ, Verbeek AL. Residual confound<strong>in</strong>g after adjustment for age: a m<strong>in</strong>or issue<br />

<strong>in</strong> breast cancer screen<strong>in</strong>g effectiveness. Eur J Epidemiol 2011;26:585-8.<br />

van Schoor G, Moss SM, Otten JD, Donders R, Paap E, den Heeten GJ, Holland R, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ, Verbeek AL.<br />

Increas<strong>in</strong>gly strong reduction <strong>in</strong> breast cancer mortality due to screen<strong>in</strong>g. Br J Cancer 2011;104:910-4.<br />

Paap E, Verbeek ALM, Puliti D, Paci E, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJM. Breast cancer screen<strong>in</strong>g case-control study design: impact<br />

on breast cancer mortality. Ann Oncol 2011:22:863-9.<br />

van Schoor G, Moss SM, Otten JD, Donders R, Paap E, den Heeten GJ, Holland R, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ, Verbeek AL.<br />

Effective biennial mammographic screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> women aged 40-49. Eur J Cancer 2010;46:3137-40.<br />

Paap E, Holland R, den Heeten GJ, van Schoor G, Botterweck AA, Verbeek AL, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ. A remarkable<br />

reduction of breast cancer deaths <strong>in</strong> screened versus unscreened women: a case-referent study. Cancer Causes<br />

Control 2010;21:1569-73.<br />

Cox B, Ballard-Barbash R, <strong>Broeders</strong> M, Dowl<strong>in</strong>g E, Malila N, Shumak R, Tapl<strong>in</strong> S, Buist B, Miglioretti D, for the<br />

International Cancer Screen<strong>in</strong>g Network. Record<strong>in</strong>g of hormone therapy and breast density <strong>in</strong> breast screen<strong>in</strong>g<br />

programs: summary and recommendations of the International Cancer Screen<strong>in</strong>g Network. Breast Cancer Res<br />

Treat 2010;124:793-800.<br />

Verbeek AL, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ. Evaluation of cancer service screen<strong>in</strong>g: case referent studies recommended. Stat<br />

Methods Med Res 2010;19:487-505.<br />

Bluekens AM, Karssemeijer N, Beijer<strong>in</strong>ck D, Deurenberg JJM, van Engen RE, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJM, den Heeten GJ.<br />

Consequences of digital mammography <strong>in</strong> population-based breast cancer screen<strong>in</strong>g: <strong>in</strong>itial changes and long<br />

term impact on referral rates. Eur Rad 2010;20:2067-73.<br />

Otten JDM, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJM, den Heeten GJ, Holland R, Fracheboud J, de Kon<strong>in</strong>g HJ, Verbeek ALM. Life<br />

expectancy of screen detected <strong>in</strong>vasive breast cancer patients compared to women <strong>in</strong>vited to the Nijmegen<br />

screen<strong>in</strong>g program. Cancer 2010;116:586-91.<br />

Bouwman R, Young K, Lazzari B, Ravaglia V, <strong>Broeders</strong> M, van Engen R. An alternative method for noise analysis<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g pixel variance as part of quality control procedures on digital mammography systems. Phys Med Biol<br />

2009;54:6809-22.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!