CV: Mireille Broeders was born in 1970 in ... - Kreftregisteret
CV: Mireille Broeders was born in 1970 in ... - Kreftregisteret
CV: Mireille Broeders was born in 1970 in ... - Kreftregisteret
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Dr. M.J.M. (<strong>Mireille</strong>) <strong>Broeders</strong>, peer-reviewed publications<br />
Asadzadeh Vostakolaei F, <strong>Broeders</strong> M, Rostami N, van Dijck JAAM, Feuth TB, Kiemeney LALM, Verbeek ALM.<br />
Age at diagnosis and breast cancer survival <strong>in</strong> Iran. Int J Breast Cancer 2012;2012:517976. Doi:<br />
10.1155/2012/517976. .<br />
Van de Weter<strong>in</strong>g G, Woertman WH, Verbeek AL, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ, Adang EMM. Quantify<strong>in</strong>g short run costeffectiveness<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g a gradual implementation process. Eur J Health Econ 2012, Oct 27 [Epub ahead of pr<strong>in</strong>t].<br />
EUROSCREEN work<strong>in</strong>g group [review co-ord<strong>in</strong>ators: Paci E, <strong>Broeders</strong> M, Hofv<strong>in</strong>d S, Duffy SW]. Summary of the<br />
evidence of breast cancer service screen<strong>in</strong>g outcomes <strong>in</strong> Europe and first estimate of the benefit and harm<br />
balance sheet. J Med Screen 2012;19 Suppl 1:15-13.<br />
<strong>Broeders</strong> M, Moss S, Nyström L, Njor S, Jonsson H, Paap E, Massat N, Duffy S, Lynge E, Paci E, for the<br />
EUROSCREEN Work<strong>in</strong>g Group. The impact of mammographic screen<strong>in</strong>g on breast cancer mortality <strong>in</strong> Europe: a<br />
review of observational studies. J Med Screen 2012;19 Suppl 1:14-25.<br />
Moss SM, Nyström L, Jonsson H, Paci E, Lynge E, Njor S, <strong>Broeders</strong> M, for the EUROSCREEN Work<strong>in</strong>g Group. J<br />
Med Screen 2012;19 Suppl 1:26-32.<br />
Njor S, Nyström L, Moss S, Paci E, <strong>Broeders</strong> M, Segnan N, Lynge E, and the EUROSCREEN Work<strong>in</strong>g Group. Breast<br />
cancer mortality <strong>in</strong> mammographic screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Europe: a review of <strong>in</strong>cidence-based mortality studies. J Med<br />
Screen 2012;19 Suppl 1:33-41.<br />
Hofv<strong>in</strong>d S, Ponti A, Patnick J, Ascunce N, Njor S, <strong>Broeders</strong> M, Giordano L, Frigerio A, Törnberg S, for the EUNICE<br />
and EUROSCREEN Work<strong>in</strong>g Groups. False-positive results <strong>in</strong> mammographic screen<strong>in</strong>g for breast cancer <strong>in</strong><br />
Europe: a literature review and survey of service screen<strong>in</strong>g programmes. J Med Screen 2012;19 Suppl 1:57-66.<br />
Bluekens AM, Holland R, Karssemeijer N, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ, den Heeten GJ. Comparison of digital screen<strong>in</strong>g<br />
mammography <strong>in</strong> the early detection of cl<strong>in</strong>ically relevant cancers: a multicenter study. Radiology<br />
2012;265:707-14.<br />
Asadzadeh Vostakolaei F, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ, Mousavi SM, Kiemeney LA, Verbeek AL. The effect of demographic and<br />
lifestyle changes on the burden of breast cancer <strong>in</strong> Iranian women: A projection to 2030. Breast 2012, July 25<br />
[Epub ahead of pr<strong>in</strong>t].<br />
van Schoor G, den Heeten GJ, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ, Verbeek Al. Improv<strong>in</strong>g mammographic screen<strong>in</strong>g test sensitivity. J<br />
Med Screen 2012;19:105-6.<br />
Timmers JM, van Doorne-Nagtegaal HJ, Zonderland HM, van T<strong>in</strong>teren H, Visser O, Verbeek ALM, den Heeten<br />
GJ, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJM. The Breast Imag<strong>in</strong>g and Report<strong>in</strong>g and Data System (BI-RADS) <strong>in</strong> the Dutch breast cancer<br />
screen<strong>in</strong>g programme: its role as an assessment and stratification tool. Eur Radiol 2012;22:1717-23.<br />
van Schoor G, Otten JD, den Heeten GJ, Holland R, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ, Verbeek AL. Breast cancer among women over<br />
75 years: an important public health problem? Eur J Public Health 2012;22:422-4.<br />
Otto SJ, Fracheboud J, Verbeek AL, Boer R, Reijer<strong>in</strong>ck-Verheij JC, Otten JD, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ, de Kon<strong>in</strong>g HJ; for the<br />
National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screen<strong>in</strong>g. Mammography screen<strong>in</strong>g and risk of breast cancer<br />
death: a population-based case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2012;21:66-73.<br />
Visser R, Veldkamp WJH, Beijer<strong>in</strong>k D, Bun PAM, Deurenberg J, Imhof-Tas MW, Schuur KH, Snoeren MM, den<br />
Heeten GJ, Karssemeijer N, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJM. Increase <strong>in</strong> perceived case suspiciousness due to local contrast<br />
optimisation <strong>in</strong> digital screen<strong>in</strong>g mammography. Eur Rad 2012;22:908-14.<br />
Van Breest Smallenburg V, Duijm LEM, den Heeten GJ, Groenewoud JH, Jansen FH, Fracheboud J, Plaisier ML,<br />
van Doorne-Nagtegaal HJ, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJM. Two-view versus s<strong>in</strong>gle-view mammography at subsequent screen<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> a region of the Dutch breast screen<strong>in</strong>g programme. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:2189-94.
Timmers JMH, van Doorne-Nagtegaal HJ, Verbeek ALM, den Heeten GJ, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJM. A dedicated BI-RADS<br />
tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g programme: effect on the <strong>in</strong>ter-observer variation among screen<strong>in</strong>g radiologists. Eur J Radiol<br />
2012;81:2148-8.<br />
Timmers JM, den Heeten GJ, Adang EM, Otten JD, Verbeek AL, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ. Dutch digital breast cancer<br />
screen<strong>in</strong>g: implications for breast cancer care. Eur J Public Health 2012;22:925-9.<br />
Asadzadeh Vostakolaei F, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ, Kiemeney LA, Verbeek AL. Opportunity for breast cancer screen<strong>in</strong>g: a<br />
literature review and implications for Iran. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2011;12:2467-75.<br />
Paap E, Verbeek ALM, Puliti D, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJM, Paci E. M<strong>in</strong>or <strong>in</strong>fluence of self-selection bias on the effectiveness<br />
of breast cancer screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> case-control studies <strong>in</strong> the Netherlands. J Med Screen 2011;18:142-6.<br />
Verbeek AL, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ, van Schoor G, Moss SM, Otten JD, Donders R, Paap E, den Heeten GJ, Holland R.<br />
Reply: Flawed methods expla<strong>in</strong> the effect of mammography screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Nijmegen. Br J Cancer 2011;105:594-5.<br />
de Gelder R, Fracheboud J, Heijnsdijk EA, den Heeten G, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ, Draisma G, de Kon<strong>in</strong>g HJ. Digital<br />
mammography screen<strong>in</strong>g: weigh<strong>in</strong>g reduced mortality aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>in</strong>creased overdiagnosis. Prev Medic<strong>in</strong>e<br />
2011;53:134-40.<br />
van Schoor G, Paap E, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ, Verbeek AL. Residual confound<strong>in</strong>g after adjustment for age: a m<strong>in</strong>or issue<br />
<strong>in</strong> breast cancer screen<strong>in</strong>g effectiveness. Eur J Epidemiol 2011;26:585-8.<br />
van Schoor G, Moss SM, Otten JD, Donders R, Paap E, den Heeten GJ, Holland R, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ, Verbeek AL.<br />
Increas<strong>in</strong>gly strong reduction <strong>in</strong> breast cancer mortality due to screen<strong>in</strong>g. Br J Cancer 2011;104:910-4.<br />
Paap E, Verbeek ALM, Puliti D, Paci E, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJM. Breast cancer screen<strong>in</strong>g case-control study design: impact<br />
on breast cancer mortality. Ann Oncol 2011:22:863-9.<br />
van Schoor G, Moss SM, Otten JD, Donders R, Paap E, den Heeten GJ, Holland R, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ, Verbeek AL.<br />
Effective biennial mammographic screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> women aged 40-49. Eur J Cancer 2010;46:3137-40.<br />
Paap E, Holland R, den Heeten GJ, van Schoor G, Botterweck AA, Verbeek AL, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ. A remarkable<br />
reduction of breast cancer deaths <strong>in</strong> screened versus unscreened women: a case-referent study. Cancer Causes<br />
Control 2010;21:1569-73.<br />
Cox B, Ballard-Barbash R, <strong>Broeders</strong> M, Dowl<strong>in</strong>g E, Malila N, Shumak R, Tapl<strong>in</strong> S, Buist B, Miglioretti D, for the<br />
International Cancer Screen<strong>in</strong>g Network. Record<strong>in</strong>g of hormone therapy and breast density <strong>in</strong> breast screen<strong>in</strong>g<br />
programs: summary and recommendations of the International Cancer Screen<strong>in</strong>g Network. Breast Cancer Res<br />
Treat 2010;124:793-800.<br />
Verbeek AL, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ. Evaluation of cancer service screen<strong>in</strong>g: case referent studies recommended. Stat<br />
Methods Med Res 2010;19:487-505.<br />
Bluekens AM, Karssemeijer N, Beijer<strong>in</strong>ck D, Deurenberg JJM, van Engen RE, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJM, den Heeten GJ.<br />
Consequences of digital mammography <strong>in</strong> population-based breast cancer screen<strong>in</strong>g: <strong>in</strong>itial changes and long<br />
term impact on referral rates. Eur Rad 2010;20:2067-73.<br />
Otten JDM, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJM, den Heeten GJ, Holland R, Fracheboud J, de Kon<strong>in</strong>g HJ, Verbeek ALM. Life<br />
expectancy of screen detected <strong>in</strong>vasive breast cancer patients compared to women <strong>in</strong>vited to the Nijmegen<br />
screen<strong>in</strong>g program. Cancer 2010;116:586-91.<br />
Bouwman R, Young K, Lazzari B, Ravaglia V, <strong>Broeders</strong> M, van Engen R. An alternative method for noise analysis<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g pixel variance as part of quality control procedures on digital mammography systems. Phys Med Biol<br />
2009;54:6809-22.
Karssemeijer N, Bluekens AM, Beijer<strong>in</strong>ck D, Deurenberg JJ, Beekman M, Visser R, van Engen R, Bartels-Kortland<br />
A, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ. Breast cancer screen<strong>in</strong>g results 5 years after <strong>in</strong>troduction of digital mammography <strong>in</strong> a<br />
population-based screen<strong>in</strong>g program. Radiology 2009;253:353-8.<br />
Lemmers O, <strong>Broeders</strong> M, Verbeek A, den Heeten G, Holland R, Borm GF. League tables of breast screen<strong>in</strong>g<br />
units: worst-case and best-case scenario rat<strong>in</strong>gs helped <strong>in</strong> expos<strong>in</strong>g real differences between performance<br />
rat<strong>in</strong>gs. J Med Screen 2009;16:67-72.<br />
Otten JD, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ, Fracheboud J, Otto SJ, de Kon<strong>in</strong>g HJ, Verbeek AL. Impressive time-related <strong>in</strong>fluence of<br />
the Dutch screen<strong>in</strong>g programme on breast cancer <strong>in</strong>cidence and mortality, 1975-2006. Int J Cancer<br />
2008;123:1929-34.<br />
Paap E, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ, van Schoor G, Otten JD, Verbeek AL. Large <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> a Dutch woman’s lifetime risk of<br />
develop<strong>in</strong>g breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 2008;44:1485-7. Epub 2008 May 12.<br />
van Schoor G, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ, Paap E, Otten JD, den Heeten GJ, Verbeek AL. A rationale for start<strong>in</strong>g screen<strong>in</strong>g<br />
under age 50. Ann Oncol 2008;19:1208-9. Epub 2008 Apr 29.<br />
Perry N, <strong>Broeders</strong> M, de Wolf C, Törnberg S, Holland R, von Karsa L. European guidel<strong>in</strong>es for quality assurance<br />
<strong>in</strong> breast cancer screen<strong>in</strong>g and diagnosis. Fourth edition – summary document. Ann Oncol 2008;19:614-622.<br />
Kiemeney LA, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJ, Pelger M, Kil PJ, Schröder FH, Witjes JA, Vasen HF. Screen<strong>in</strong>g for prostate cancer <strong>in</strong><br />
Dutch hereditary prostate cancer families. Int J Cancer 2008;122:871-876.<br />
<strong>Broeders</strong> MJM, Verbeek ALM. Mammographic screen<strong>in</strong>g is only relevant <strong>in</strong> the precl<strong>in</strong>ical detectable period of<br />
breast cancer [Letter]. J Med Screen 2005;12:107.<br />
<strong>Broeders</strong> MJM, Scharpantgen A, Ascunce N, Gairard B, Olsen A-H, Mantell<strong>in</strong>i P, Cerdá Mota T, Van Limbergen E,<br />
Séradour B, Ponti A, Salas Trejo L, Nyström L, for the European Breast Cancer Network (EBCN). Comparison of<br />
early performance <strong>in</strong>dicators for screen<strong>in</strong>g projects with<strong>in</strong> the European Breast Cancer Network: 1989-2000.<br />
Eur J Cancer Prev 2005;14:107-116.<br />
Fracheboud J, Otto SJ, Dijck JAAM van, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJM, Verbeek ALM, Kon<strong>in</strong>g HJ de, and National Evaluation<br />
Team for Breast cancer screen<strong>in</strong>g (NETB). Decreased rates of advanced breast cancer due to mammography<br />
screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> The Netherlands. Br J Cancer 2004;91:861-867.<br />
Otto SJ, Fracheboud J, Looman CWN, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJM, Boer R, Hendriks JHCL, Verbeek ALM, de Kon<strong>in</strong>g HJ, and<br />
the National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screen<strong>in</strong>g. Initiation of population-based mammography<br />
screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Dutch municipalities and effect on breast-cancer mortality: a systematic review. Lancet<br />
2003;361:1411-1417.<br />
<strong>Broeders</strong> MJM, Onland-Moret NC, Rijken HJTM, Hendriks JHCL, Verbeek ALM, Holland R. Use of previous<br />
screen<strong>in</strong>g mammograms to identify features <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g cases that would have a possible ga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> prognosis<br />
follow<strong>in</strong>g earlier detection. Eur J Cancer 2003;39:1770-1775.<br />
Verbeek ALM, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJM. Evaluation of The Netherlands breast cancer screen<strong>in</strong>g programme. Ann Oncol<br />
2003:14:1203-1205.<br />
<strong>Broeders</strong> MJM, Verbeek ALM, Straatman H, Peer PGM, Pasker-de Jong PCM, Beex LVAM, Hendriks JHCL,<br />
Holland R. Repeated mammographic screen<strong>in</strong>g reduces breast cancer mortality along the cont<strong>in</strong>uum of age. J<br />
Med Screen 2002;9:163-167.<br />
Fracheboud J, Kon<strong>in</strong>g HJ de, Boer R, Groenewoud JH, Verbeek ALM, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJM, Ineveld BM van, Hendriks<br />
JHCL, Bruyn AE de, Holland R, Maas PJ van der. Nationwide breast cancer screen<strong>in</strong>g programme fully<br />
implemented <strong>in</strong> the Netherlands. Breast 2001;10:6-11.
<strong>Broeders</strong> MJM, Peer PGM, Straatman H, Beex LVAM, Hendriks JHCL, Holland R, Verbeek ALM. Diverg<strong>in</strong>g breast<br />
cancer mortality rates <strong>in</strong> relation to screen<strong>in</strong>g? A comparison of Nijmegen to Arnhem and the Netherlands,<br />
1969-1997. Int J Cancer 2001;92:303-308.<br />
Klabunde CN, Sancho-Garnier H, <strong>Broeders</strong> M, Thoresen S., Rodrigues VJL, Ballard-Barbash R. Quality assurance<br />
for screen<strong>in</strong>g mammography data collection systems <strong>in</strong> 22 countries. Int J Technol Assess Health Care<br />
2001;17(4):528-541.<br />
Ballard-Barbash R, Klabunde C, Paci E, <strong>Broeders</strong> M, Coleman EA, Fracheboud J, Bouchard F, Rennert G, Shapiro<br />
S, for the International Breast Screen<strong>in</strong>g Network. Breast cancer screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 21 countries: delivery of services,<br />
notification of results and outcomes ascerta<strong>in</strong>ment. Eur J Cancer Prev 1999;8:417-426.<br />
Fracheboud J, Kon<strong>in</strong>g HJ de, Beemsterboer PMM, Boer R, Verbeek ALM, Hendriks JHCL, Ineveld BM van,<br />
<strong>Broeders</strong> MJM, Bruyn AE de, Maas PJ van der. Interval cancers <strong>in</strong> the Dutch breast cancer screen<strong>in</strong>g<br />
programme. Br J Cancer 1999;81(5):912-917.<br />
Shapiro S, Coleman EA, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJM, Codd M, Kon<strong>in</strong>g HJ de, Fracheboud J, Moss S, Paci E, Stachenko S,<br />
Ballard-Barbash R, for the International Breast Screen<strong>in</strong>g Network (IBSN) and the European Network of Pilot<br />
Projects for Breast Cancer Screen<strong>in</strong>g. Breast cancer screen<strong>in</strong>g programmes <strong>in</strong> 22 countries: current policies,<br />
adm<strong>in</strong>istration and guidel<strong>in</strong>es. Int J Epidemiol 1998;27:735-742.<br />
<strong>Broeders</strong> MJM, Verbeek ALM. Breast cancer epidemiology and risk factors. Q J Nucl Med 1997;41(3):179-88.<br />
Dijck JAAM van, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJM, Verbeek ALM. Mammographic screen<strong>in</strong>g. Benefits for older women. Med<br />
Progress 1997;24:10-13.<br />
Dijck JAAM van, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJM, Verbeek ALM. Mammographic screen<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> older women. Is it worthwhile?<br />
Drugs Ag<strong>in</strong>g 1997;10(2):69-79.<br />
Murphy MFG, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJM, Carpenter LM, Gunnarskog J, Leon DA. Breast cancer risk <strong>in</strong> mothers of tw<strong>in</strong>s. Br J<br />
Cancer 1997;75(7):1066-68.<br />
<strong>Broeders</strong> MJM, Lambe M, Baron JA, Leon DA. History of childbear<strong>in</strong>g and colorectal cancer risk <strong>in</strong> women aged<br />
less than 60: an analysis of Swedish rout<strong>in</strong>e registry data 1960-84. Int J Cancer 1996;66:170-5.<br />
Leon DA, Carpenter LM, <strong>Broeders</strong> MJM, Gunnarskog J, Murphy MFG. Breast cancer <strong>in</strong> Swedish women before<br />
age 50; evidence of a dual effect of completed pregnancy. Cancer Causes Control 1995;6:283-91.