The Truth about Lockerbie - MartinFrost.ws

A tale of three atrocities
was the only time I knew of anyone from the NSC or the White House taking an active interest and an
operational role in the case.” The US Government must have been very alarmed by the CBS story and
the effect it could have on the Lockerbie trial for the President to take a personal interest.
After interviewing a man who called himself Behbehani, Marquise concluded that the man was “a
fabricator” who claimed he was born in 1968 and was therefore “far too young to have been the person
responsible for ordering the Pan Am bombing. If he had any information, he was unable to provide it.
He said there was a CD which documented his claims, but said he had no way of getting it, further
hurting his credibility.”
Yet I found something very odd about Marquise's interview. He was thwarted at every turn by the
Turkish authorities, which made it hard to fulfil his brief to “not leave out any detail.” He was allowed
just one interview with Behbehani. The morning after the CBS report was aired, he learned that the
“Turkish authorities would allow the FBI access... but no later than Thursday of that week”.
Unfortunately for Marquise, he had "taken the day off but was thousands of miles away, with only a
couple of days to get there and no visa.” Upon arriving in Turkey, he was told by the Legat 28 (the FBI
legal official) there that “the Turks had told him that, if this story appeared in the news media once
more, the interview would never take place.” The Turkish authorities also denied the Scots permission
to participate in the interview.
Marquise and the CIA didn't have the best relationship. According to Marquise, during the Lockerbie
investigation, they were concerned about "CIA attempts to slow down the investigation” and "the CIA's
incursion into avenues better explored by law enforcement”.
So it's my view that Marquise and Hakakian didn't see the same Behbehani – Marquise was set up by
the CIA and swallowed the bait hook, line and sinker. I have managed to find a picture of the
Behbehani that Hakakian interviewed, and he was a fairly well-built man who looked almost a decade
older than Marquise's man claimed to be. So the younger man seems like a put up job by the CIA,
possibly with the assistance of the Iranians.
As I looked into it further, I found there was a Behbehani with family connections to Rafsanjani who
seemed the right age to be the man in Hakakian's pictures. So it's unsurprising that the Turks 29 were so
reticent about letting the FBI see their man more than once.
The real Behbehani's links to Lockerbie are perhaps greater than the claims he made while in Turkey.
Shortly after Lockerbie, he was promoted to Head of the Intelligence Section of the Revolutionary
Guard in the President's Office. This timing seems more than a coincidence – perhaps it was a reward
for "services rendered". Certainly, the man was a favourite of the Rafsanjani regime - he rose to the
senior rank of brigadier-general before he fled into exile. Marquise said a man called Behbehani could
have been involved in Iranian terror. In his book, he says that, although he believed the man he met
was a fake: “It was possible a man by the same name was formerly in charge of terrorist operations.”
I therefore think, although this is no more than a hypothesis at the moment, that Behbehani was the
Iranian at Heathrow. As a man with family links to the Iranian regime, he was perfectly placed to
avenge a Qesas crime. No one knows what happened to Hakakian's Behbehani after those fateful
interviews.
28 http://www.justice.gov/oig/reports/FBI/a0418/exec.htm This contains a useful description of the work of
the Legat and their worldwide distribution
29 http://www.silkroadstudies.org/new/inside/turkey/2009/090605B.html
17