4. description of the environment - Gujarat Pollution Control Board

4. description of the environment - Gujarat Pollution Control Board 4. description of the environment - Gujarat Pollution Control Board

03.04.2013 Views

Final Feasibility Report Preparation of Feasibility– cum-Preliminary Design for 4/6 Laning of Jetpur-Somnath section of NH 8D, Package No: NHAI/DBFOII/DPR/02 VOLUME III: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT 5.2.1.11 Place of Consultation: Hanuman Shani Dev Mandir at Somnath The temple is Pucca Government structure about more than 300 years old. Consultation was held with priest. He agreed for relocation of structure on area behind Somnath trust. However, government should take care of all expenses of relocation and shifting of utilities. 5.3 PUBLIC HEARING (IN ACCORDANCE TO PROCEDURES OUTLINED IN THE MOEF NOTIFICATION SEPT 2006 & IT’S SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS) The project is category – A. Thus, the user agency (NHAI) had submitted application for Public Hearing to Regional Offices at two districts, namely Rajkot and Junagadh. The proceedings of the Public Hearing is provided below. 5.3.1 Public Hearing in Rajkot District Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Rajkot has published advertisement on 14 th November 2009 in Gujarati daily namely “Sandesh” and “Divyabhaskar” and in English daily “Times of India” where in it was circulated for the general public that Public Hearing for the Project in Rajkot district shall be carried out at Group Kumar School, Village-Jetalsar, Taluka Jetpur, District Rajkot on 15 th December 2009 at 11:00 hr. The Project Proponent in coordination with GPCB, Rajkot had sent copy of the EIA Report along with Summary of the EIA (in English and Gujrati), Summary of the Project Report, Resettlement Action Plan (one hard copy and one soft copy of each) to District Magistrate, Zila Parishad, District Industries Office, Regional office of MoEF and MoEF, New Delhi. In addition to this, Project Proponent in coordination with GPCB, Rajkot had also sent copy of the Summary of EIA in Gujarati and in English to the village panchayat office of villages through which project corridor passes for wide publicity about the project. Mr Pankaj Thakar, Additional District Mangitrate, Rajkot, Mr S M Jha, Regional Officer, GPCB- Rajkot, Mr H K Bhatt, DGM cum Project Director, NHAI, PIU-Rajkot, Mr Mehul Bhatt, Manager- Tech, PIU-Rajkot Dr S D Badrinath, Environmental Expert, LASA (Consultant) and Mr Debashis Pal, Sr Manager (Environment) were present during the Public Hearing at the aforesaid venue on 15 th December 2009. Mr Mehul Bhatt presented the project describing the proposed improvement, likely impacts due the project and mitigation measures proposed to minimize the anticipated impact, the land acquisition procedure and likely compensation package. The Public Hearing Proceedings (including the minutes) for Rajkot district is enclosed as Annexure-5.1. 5-10

Final Feasibility Report Preparation of Feasibility– cum-Preliminary Design for 4/6 Laning of Jetpur-Somnath section of NH 8D, Package No: NHAI/DBFOII/DPR/02 5.3.2 Public Hearing in Junagadh District VOLUME III: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Rajkot has published advertisement on 3rd December 2009 and 4 th December 2009 in Gujarati daily namely “Sandesh” and “Divyabhaskar” and on 4 th December in English daily “Times of India” where in it was circulated for the general public that Public Hearing for the Project in Junagadh district shall be carried out at Shamaldas Gandhi Town Hall (Mahanagar Sevasadan Hall) Kalwa Chalk, District Junagadh-362001 on 5 th January 2009 at 12:00 hr. The Project Proponent in coordination with GPCB, Junagadh had sent copy of the EIA Report along with Summary of the EIA (in English and Gujarati), Summary of the Project Report, Resettlement Action Plan (one hard copy and one soft copy of each) to District Magistrate, Zila Parishad, District Industries Office, Regional office of MoEF and MoEF, New Delhi. In addition to this, Project Proponet in coordination with GPCB, Junagadh had also sent copy of the Summary of EIA in Gujrati and in English to the village panchayat offices of villages through which project corridor passes for wide publicty about the project. Mr A M Parmar IAS, District Mangitrate, Junagadh, Mr G M Sadhu, Regional Officer, GPCB- Junagadh, Mr H K Bhatt, DGM cum Project Director, NHAI, PIU-Rajkot, Mr Mehul Bhatt, Manager-Tech, PIU-Rajkot, Dr S D Badrinath, Environmental Expert, LASA (Consultant) and Mr Debashis Pal, Sr Manager (Environment), LASA were present during the Public Hearing at the aforesaid venue on 5 th January 2010. Mr Mehul Bhatt presented the project describing the proposed improvement, likely impacts due the project and migigation measures proposed to minimize the anticipated impact, the land acquisition procedure and likely compensation package etc. The Public Hearing Proceedings (including the minutes) for Junagadh district is enclosed as Annexure-5.2. Compliance status of the Public Hearing for Rajkot district and Junagadh district is enclosed as Annexure-5.3. 5.4 CONCLUSION The predominant means of livelihood in the project region is agriculture. There are land owners and agriculture labourers who do not own the land but get a share of the yield from the land owner. Despite the fact that the proposed project would require significant area of agriculture land, the consultation process reflected that majority of villagers in the project area are in favour of the project as it would enhance the development of the region and improve infrastructure facilities. They are ready to part with their land but demand adequate and rightful compensation from the State Government. 5-11

Final Feasibility Report<br />

Preparation <strong>of</strong> Feasibility– cum-Preliminary Design for 4/6 Laning<br />

<strong>of</strong> Jetpur-Somnath section <strong>of</strong> NH 8D, Package No:<br />

NHAI/DBFOII/DPR/02<br />

5.3.2 Public Hearing in Junagadh District<br />

VOLUME III:<br />

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT<br />

<strong>Gujarat</strong> <strong>Pollution</strong> <strong>Control</strong> <strong>Board</strong>, Rajkot has published advertisement on 3rd December 2009 and<br />

4 th December 2009 in <strong>Gujarat</strong>i daily namely “Sandesh” and “Divyabhaskar” and on 4 th December<br />

in English daily “Times <strong>of</strong> India” where in it was circulated for <strong>the</strong> general public that Public<br />

Hearing for <strong>the</strong> Project in Junagadh district shall be carried out at Shamaldas Gandhi Town Hall<br />

(Mahanagar Sevasadan Hall) Kalwa Chalk, District Junagadh-362001 on 5 th January 2009 at<br />

12:00 hr.<br />

The Project Proponent in coordination with GPCB, Junagadh had sent copy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EIA Report<br />

along with Summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> EIA (in English and <strong>Gujarat</strong>i), Summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Project Report,<br />

Resettlement Action Plan (one hard copy and one s<strong>of</strong>t copy <strong>of</strong> each) to District Magistrate, Zila<br />

Parishad, District Industries Office, Regional <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> MoEF and MoEF, New Delhi. In addition to<br />

this, Project Proponet in coordination with GPCB, Junagadh had also sent copy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Summary<br />

<strong>of</strong> EIA in Gujrati and in English to <strong>the</strong> village panchayat <strong>of</strong>fices <strong>of</strong> villages through which project<br />

corridor passes for wide publicty about <strong>the</strong> project.<br />

Mr A M Parmar IAS, District Mangitrate, Junagadh, Mr G M Sadhu, Regional Officer, GPCB-<br />

Junagadh, Mr H K Bhatt, DGM cum Project Director, NHAI, PIU-Rajkot, Mr Mehul Bhatt,<br />

Manager-Tech, PIU-Rajkot, Dr S D Badrinath, Environmental Expert, LASA (Consultant) and Mr<br />

Debashis Pal, Sr Manager (Environment), LASA were present during <strong>the</strong> Public Hearing at <strong>the</strong><br />

aforesaid venue on 5 th January 2010.<br />

Mr Mehul Bhatt presented <strong>the</strong> project describing <strong>the</strong> proposed improvement, likely impacts due<br />

<strong>the</strong> project and migigation measures proposed to minimize <strong>the</strong> anticipated impact, <strong>the</strong> land<br />

acquisition procedure and likely compensation package etc.<br />

The Public Hearing Proceedings (including <strong>the</strong> minutes) for Junagadh district is enclosed as<br />

Annexure-5.2.<br />

Compliance status <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Public Hearing for Rajkot district and Junagadh district is enclosed as<br />

Annexure-5.3.<br />

5.4 CONCLUSION<br />

The predominant means <strong>of</strong> livelihood in <strong>the</strong> project region is agriculture. There are land owners<br />

and agriculture labourers who do not own <strong>the</strong> land but get a share <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> yield from <strong>the</strong> land<br />

owner.<br />

Despite <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> proposed project would require significant area <strong>of</strong> agriculture land, <strong>the</strong><br />

consultation process reflected that majority <strong>of</strong> villagers in <strong>the</strong> project area are in favour <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

project as it would enhance <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> region and improve infrastructure facilities.<br />

They are ready to part with <strong>the</strong>ir land but demand adequate and rightful compensation from <strong>the</strong><br />

State Government.<br />

5-11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!