4. description of the environment - Gujarat Pollution Control Board

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Final Feasibility Report Preparation of Feasibility– cum-Preliminary Design for 4/6 Laning of Jetpur-Somnath section of NH 8D, Package No: NHAI/DBFOII/DPR/02 5.2.1 Cultural Property Consultations VOLUME III: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT The proposed project corridor has many temples, shrines, dargahs along the stretch. Consultations were carried out at few cultural properties falling within the ROW and at few temples where somw part of the land is to be acquired. 5.2.1.1 Place of Consultation: Hanuman Mandir at Village Ektanagar, Timbavadi The temple is a pucca structure and is 12-15 years old. Consultation was held with local people of community. Alternative relocation site for temple was preferred just along the proposed RoW or inside village, along with enhancement of structure. 5.2.1.2 Place of Consultation: Neelkanth Nagar The temple is a semipucca structure and 5 -6 years old. Consultation was held with local people of community. They expressed plans for construction of temple. Alternative relocation site for temple was preferred just along the proposed RoW. 5.2.1.3 Place of Consultation: Yogi Park Society, Vanthali Highway The temple is a pucca structure owned by the public and is 15-20 years old. Consultation was held with local people. They suggested that temple could be relocated inside the village. While a community meeting is to be done then only final decision can be taken. 5.2.1.4 Place of Consultation: Manekwada The temple is a pucca structure owned by the public and is 10-15 years old. Consultation was held with local people and sarpanch of community. They suggested that alternative relocation site for temple is available inside the village. 5.2.1.5 Place of Consultation: Manekwada Consultation was held with trustees of mandir. The temple is famous among adjoining communities and people from various villages visit it. Main mandir structure is located at distance of 29 meters from the carriageway. About 500 devotees visit temple daily. Trust members were reluctant for relocation of main temple. For compensation of land acquired for widening, they preferred to take land available at backside of existing temple and also construction of new compound wall at government expense. 5-8
Final Feasibility Report Preparation of Feasibility– cum-Preliminary Design for 4/6 Laning of Jetpur-Somnath section of NH 8D, Package No: NHAI/DBFOII/DPR/02 5.2.1.6 Place of Consultation: Khodiya Maa Ashram VOLUME III: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT The temple is a pucca private structure about 13 years old.Consultation was held with priest and few devotees of temple. The main temple structure is at a distance of 30 m from the carriageway, but there is a hand pump of religious importance which is falling within the ROW at a distance of 25 meters. The hand pump is famous for generating sweet water, as a result, the villagers use this water for drinking purpose. On an average, 60-70 people visit the temple on daily basis. The priest of the temple is reluctant about the relocation of the temple, especially the hand pump. 5.2.1.7 Place of Consultation: Dargah at Agatrai The dargah is a semi-pucca structure about 400-500 years old. Consultation was held with local people. They opposed the shifting or relocation of the structure and suggested that the dargah could be retained as a median during the widening of the project road. However, the people were in the favor of the project road because of the poor condition of the existing road. 5.2.1.8 Place of Consultation: Mugal Mata Mandir at village Panidhra Consultation was held with local people. They agreed for relocation of temple in near by area provided all relocation expenses should be bared by government. However, permission from owner needs to be taken, as he was not available at time of consultation. 5.2.1.9 Place of Consultation: Hanuman Mandir at Village Koilana Consultation was held with local people and sarpanch of the village. They agreed for relocation of structure if appropriate compensation provided. Site of relocation can be decided after discussion with all the community people. However, final decision of relocation will be taken only after community meeting. 5.2.1.10 Place of Consultation: Chandra Moleshwar at Somnath-Veraval Bypass Consultation was held with MLA of the local area. He suggested that moderate opposition by local people can be faced for relocation of structure. If possible widening at other side must be considered. However, after detail discussion with community member’s final decision shall be taken. 5-9
Page 1 and 2: 4. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT T
Page 3 and 4: Final Feasibility Report Preparatio
Page 39 and 40: 5. PUBLIC CONSULTATION Public consu
Page 45: Final Feasibility Report Preparatio

4. description of the environment - Gujarat Pollution Control Board

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?