4. description of the environment - Gujarat Pollution Control Board

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Final Feasibility Report Preparation of Feasibility– cum-Preliminary Design for 4/6 Laning of Jetpur-Somnath section of NH 8D, Package No: NHAI/DBFOII/DPR/02 VOLUME III: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT S.No. Date/Venue of Consultation/Participants Issues Raised Remarks 2 3 4 Vakeria-Farmer, Balvanth Bhai Jeena Dhami-Builder, Girish Kumar K Bhutani-Builder, Bhimji Bhai Patel-Owner of Patel,Harish Kumar Chandali-Secretary of Chambers of commerce Consultation at Jetpur bypass 25/11/2008 at Village Vadala in district Junagadh at Panchayat Office- Pravin Bhai-Factory owner, Ashok Batuk Bhai-Pan shop owner, Bipin Bhai Chagan Bhai-Business, Ramesh Bhai Kapadiya-Business, Kanji Bhai Buta Bhai Gajera-Business, Vipul Bhai Kalu Kumbhani-Pan shop owner, Mansukh Bhai Mohan Bhai Dhumar-Shop, Ramesh Shirji Bhai Patoria-Business-Business, Kishor Bhai Natha Bhai Dhudhana-Resident cum Commercial Shop and Dinesh Bhai Takharsi Bhai Donaria-Commercial Godown Consultation at Village Vadala 26/11/2008 in Village Agatrai in Keshod Taluka in Junagadh district at Sarpanch House- Hingora Iqbal Ibrahim- Pan Shop, Krishan Dhiraj Lal Maru-Barber, Harun Ala Rakha- Tea Shop, Kishan Bhaguandi Kataria-Garage, Chandu Govind- Barber, Chawda Rajwala-Pan Shop, Atul Jayanti lal Parmar- Barber, Gahil Arvind Khinji-Cycle Store, Tida Nata Labari-Tea Shop and Hingara Amin Ibrahim- Cold Drink Shop. Consultation at Village Agatrai 26/11/2008 at Keshod Bypass in Junagadh district at a Farmer’s house- Babul Gela Barat-Farmer, Amba Premji should be considered in the preparation of the design. The negative impacts raised could be the loss of many medicinal and valuable plant species like Arjuna, Coconut, Neem, Peepal, Eucalyptus. The villagers also stated that fair monetary compensation as per market price should be given to them for the loss of property or land. The villagers demanded for the relocation of public utilities like well etc. and street lights along the road. A group of villagers who are directly impacted by the project are consulted. The villagers opine that the road should be widened on the LHS as RHS has dense structures. The temple along the road can be enhanced and relocated in the Panchayat land available in the village. The people have opposed the construction of the Toll Plaza as it would require more land acquisition. The villagers have demanded fair monetary compensation. Provision for an underpass should be included in the proposed project design. This would be helpful for the regular commuters and would ensure safety for the students. A group of villagers including shop-keepers are consulted at this place. The villagers are of the views that the project would involve loss of employment as their commercial establishments would be removed. Villagers stated that fair compensation should be given to them as per the policy. They also hold the opinion that the project would benefit in the development of the village. A cattle underpass requires to be constructed. An appropriate crossing should also be given to ensure the safety of school-going children. The villagers also wanted a Higher Secondary School to be built in their area. The villagers stated that the compensation provided by the The land on the left hand side as well as on the right hand side is under PWD, but the construction is illegal. According to the villagers, the land 5-2
Final Feasibility Report Preparation of Feasibility– cum-Preliminary Design for 4/6 Laning of Jetpur-Somnath section of NH 8D, Package No: NHAI/DBFOII/DPR/02 VOLUME III: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT S.No. Date/Venue of Consultation/Participants Issues Raised Remarks 5 6 Barat-Farmer, Laxman Bhai Karman Bhai-Farmer, Nathi Ben Maran Bhai Moran-Farmer, Karsan Bhai Ranjhan Bhai Gajera-Farmer, Vilji Bhai Ramji Bhai- Farmer, Mansukh Bhai Amba Bhai-Farmer, Maldev Bhai-Owner of Mill. Consultation at Keshod Bypass 26/11/2008 at Village Kanza in District Junagadh district- Navneet Kumar Jhiladia-Mobile Shop owner, Irfan Iqbal Hasan Bhai- Pan Shop, Ramadev Singh-Pan Shop,Changan Bhai & Jeeva BHai Parmar Consultation at Village Kanza 27/11/2008 at Jetalsar in Panchayat office in Junagadh district- J K Joshi-Book Stall, Hukah Bhai Manji Bhai Ghuashop. Shiva Bhai maji Bhai Parmar-Resident, Arvind Bhai Manji Bhai- Motor Repair Shop, Hansraj Bhai Aryan Bhai Ghadiya-Pan Shop, Chandu Bhai Huka Bhai Puah-Pan Shop Owner, Valabh Bhai Natha Bhai Bhua-Motor Cycle Repair, Atul Bhai Mohan Bhai Saruiya- Pan Shop, Manu Narsi Maladiya-Tea Shop, Valabh Bhai Rudah Bhai-Pan Shop, Mansukh Bhai Devji Bhai Bhua-Tea Shop, Teja Ghusa Hanat-Electrician Shop, Daya Gopal Lakhani-Shop, Nukesh Jaithi-Pujari, Savita Ben Nandlan Ghua-Shop, Hans Ramji Bhai Luah, Paresh Ram ji Bhai Babaria-Pan shop, Sauji Mohan Bhai Babaria,Kalyan Bhai Ramji Bhai Veshno, Bipin Bhai Jadav Bhai Veshno, Hemant Bhai Ranjho Bhai Koldara government is too less and they have registered a case in the court against the compensation provided. The people were of the opinion that the government should provide appropriate compensation as per market price of land i.e. Rs.20-25 lac per acre of land as this is the price of land along the road and on the bypass. The villagers also stated that if residential structures fall in the bypass area, then the compensation for the cost of construction should be given by NHAI. The villagers also wanted a less median width so that the land acquisition should be more on the other side and the residential structures along the road should also get correct compensation for new construction. The villagers are in favor of the road development and find the project good for better economic condition as it would generate commercial activities. The villagers demanded land to land compensation and money for construction of new shop. The land should be provided in the same village or nearby area or along the road. The villagers also wanted cross sections to move to Gadhila village on LHS and to Kanjala village on RHS. The villagers were in favor of the road development a sit would solve the problems of traffic. The people wanted a community hall and public park to be constructed for all religions. The villagers stated that fair compensation for land and money for construction of new house should be given to them. The people wanted that the land should be provided under the guidelines of Panchayat and should be within the village, but there is no land available in the village at present. The people informed that land should be provided on the other side (LHS) because it is under the Gram Panchayat. The people wanted that acquisition for the bypass had already been done and many farmers had registered a court case for fair compensation to be given to them after land acquisition. The villagers were not against the road development provided they should be given fair compensation. They have not been given fair compensation till now by the government. According to one of the villagers, a 25 year old Pan shop should be considered during the road development. The villagers wanted appropriate medical facilities in the area as the existing hospital did not have appropriate staff during emergency. The villagers wanted an appropriate crossing to move safely on either side of the road with a proper Bus shelter, toilet and drinking water facilities. The people did not want any over- 5-3
Page 1 and 2: 4. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT T
Page 3 and 4: Final Feasibility Report Preparatio
Page 39: 5. PUBLIC CONSULTATION Public consu

4. description of the environment - Gujarat Pollution Control Board

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?