PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
NUMBER 89 25<br />
TABLE 10.—Dimensions (mm) of the main bones of the extinct Fulica newtonii from Mauritius (MNHN) and Reunion.<br />
(a = maximum length in median plane, b=width between sterno-coracoidal processes, c=width between ventral labial<br />
prominences, d=measured with cnemial crests, e=measured without cnemial crests; «=number of specimens.)<br />
Measurement<br />
Sternum (Reunion)<br />
length (a)<br />
width (b)<br />
width (c)<br />
keel depth<br />
Coracoid (Reunion)<br />
internal length<br />
proximal width<br />
proximal depth<br />
midshaft width<br />
midshaft depth<br />
Humerus (Mauritius)<br />
total length<br />
proximal width<br />
proximal depth<br />
distal width<br />
distal depth<br />
midshaft width<br />
midshaft depth<br />
Ulna (Reunion)<br />
distal width<br />
external condyle depth<br />
midshaft width<br />
midshaft depth<br />
Carpometacarpus (Reunion)<br />
total length<br />
proximal width<br />
proximal depth<br />
distal width<br />
distal depth<br />
Mean (ri)<br />
66.7(1)<br />
36.6(1)<br />
27.7(1)<br />
20.7(1)<br />
39.4(1)<br />
10.60(2)<br />
6.70 (2)<br />
5.1(1)<br />
3.8(1)<br />
85.40<br />
17.15(2)<br />
9.6(1)<br />
12.15(2)<br />
7.10(2)<br />
5.50(2)<br />
4.70 (2)<br />
7.2(1)<br />
7.3(1)<br />
4.6(1)<br />
5.1(1)<br />
49.1 (1)<br />
4.6(1)<br />
9.3(1)<br />
3.5(1)<br />
4.8(1)<br />
Range<br />
10.4-10.8<br />
6.5-6.9<br />
83.5-87.3<br />
16.7-17.6<br />
11.7-12.6<br />
6.9-7.3<br />
5.3-5.7<br />
4.5-4.9<br />
identical to that from Mauritius illustrated by Newton and Gadow<br />
(1893, pl. 35: figs. 5-7). It presents a ventral manubrial<br />
spine (spina externa) that is wide, with two small lateral points<br />
separated by a shallow notch. This characteristic cannot be<br />
considered as different from Fulica, however, for in numerous<br />
living species of that genus the ventral manubrial spine is very<br />
variable among individuals. Some individuals have a narrow,<br />
short point prolonged by a median ventral ridge, others have a<br />
short, wide point, and others have two points separated by a<br />
notch, as in F. newtonii. We have observed that the shape of<br />
the ventral manubrial spine is very variable in F. cristata Gmelin<br />
(7 individuals), F. americana Gmelin (20), F. caribaea<br />
Ridgway (3), and F. leucoptera Vieillot (7) from the USNM. In<br />
F. ardesiaca Tschudi (1) and F. rufifrons Philippi and Landbeck<br />
(3), the ventral manubrial spine is wide and short. Three<br />
of seven individuals of F. cristata and two of seven individuals<br />
of F. leucoptera have two points separated by a notch, rather<br />
than a single point.<br />
In Fulica newtonii the anterior carinal margin is more posteriorly<br />
displaced than in F. cristata, but the carina is still well<br />
developed. The shape of this carina is very different from that<br />
of the flightless species Tribonyx mortierii Du Bus, in which<br />
the carina is low and the anterior carinal margin is wide and is<br />
formed by two ridges separated by a median groove. It is still<br />
more different from that of Aphanapteryx bonasia, in which the<br />
Measurement<br />
width metacarpale majus<br />
depth metacarpale majus<br />
Tibiotarsus (Mauritius+Reunion)<br />
total length (d)<br />
total length (e)<br />
proximal width<br />
proximal depth<br />
distal width<br />
distal depth<br />
midshaft width<br />
midshaft depth<br />
Tarsometatarsus (Mauritius+Reunion)<br />
total length<br />
proximal width<br />
proximal depth<br />
distal width<br />
distal depth<br />
midshaft width<br />
midshaft depth<br />
Phalanx 1 digit II (Reunion)<br />
total length<br />
proximal width<br />
Phalanx 1 digit III (Mauritius+<br />
Reunion)<br />
total length<br />
proximal width<br />
Phalanx 2 digit III (Reunion)<br />
total length<br />
proximal width<br />
Mean (n)<br />
3.9(1)<br />
3.2(1)<br />
129.24(5)<br />
122.54(5)<br />
12.56(5)<br />
18.60(5)<br />
12.06(9)<br />
11.67(3)<br />
6.75 (8)<br />
5.14(8)<br />
84.15(6)<br />
13.53 (7)<br />
12.35(2)<br />
13.95(6)<br />
10.80(6)<br />
6.51 (7)<br />
5.09 (7)<br />
37.25 (2)<br />
5.27 (3)<br />
34.30 (2)<br />
7.20 (2)<br />
27.3(1)<br />
6.5(1)<br />
Range<br />
126.8-131.3<br />
120.2-124.6<br />
12.1-13.0<br />
17.7-19.4<br />
11.2-12.8<br />
11.5-11.8<br />
6.2-7.0<br />
4.6-5.7<br />
76.7-89.3<br />
-12.5-14.2<br />
11.4-13.3<br />
12.4-14.8<br />
9.7-11.7<br />
6.0-6.8<br />
4.7-5.3<br />
36.2-38.3<br />
5.1-5.5<br />
34.3-34.3<br />
-7-7.4<br />
anterior carinal margin is very wide, with two ridges separated<br />
by a wide groove, and the carina itself is strongly displaced<br />
posteriorly and is very low (Newton and Gadow, 1893, pl. 35:<br />
figs. 14-16). In conclusion, the characteristics of the sternum<br />
indicate only a slight reduction in flying ability.<br />
Milne-Edwards (1867, 1867-1871) wrote that the shape of<br />
the posterior iliac crests of the pelvis of F. newtonii was more<br />
similar to that of F. atra Linnaeus than to that of F cristata.<br />
Although the two pelves from Reunion are not complete<br />
enough to see if this characteristic is constant in F. newtonii,<br />
we think that by the marked widening of the pelvis at the level<br />
of the acetabula and by the strong projection of the antitrochanters<br />
externally, F. newtonii is more similar to F. cristata<br />
than to F. atra (see Milne-Edwards, 1867-1871, pl. 99: figs.<br />
1-5, pl. 107: figs. \^).<br />
In Fulica newtonii the bones of the scapular girdle and the<br />
wing (coracoid, humerus, carpometacarpus) are the same size<br />
as in a large male of F. cristata, the tibiotarsus and the phalanx<br />
of pedal digit II are slightly larger, and the femur and the tarsometatarsus<br />
are much larger (Figure 10). Compared to F. cristata,<br />
F. newtonii was a poorer flier as indicated by the reduction<br />
of the coracoid and wing bones. For comparison we<br />
present the curves of Tribonyx mortierii, the flightless Tasmanian<br />
Native-Hen, and of Aphanapteryx bonasia, the extinct,<br />
flightless Mauritius Red Rail. In these two species, the cora-