PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
312 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PALEOBIOLOGY 20 years ago by the Polish- and Soviet-Mongolian expeditions, but the first review of their osteology was published only recently (Barsbold et al., 1990), and most of the long-known Mongolian cranial specimens still need to be thoroughly studied. New finds of oviraptorids, including an embryonic skeleton, have been reported from Mongolia (Norell et al., 1994; Dashzeveg et al., 1995). The following description is based on the skull of Oviraptor sp. (ZPAL MgD-I/95) in the collection of the Institute of Paleobiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland. This specimen has been illustrated and interpreted in the context of broad, primarily functional, comparisons (Osmolska, 1976) but was never described in detail. Osmolska's (1976) reconstruction of the oviraptorid palate proved correct except for details of the median pterygoid contact. Barsbold (1983a, fig. 12) published an illustration of the similar palate of Oviraptor philoceratops, which is not accompanied by a description and contains a misinterpretation of the vomer as the rostral part of the pterygoid. Both the premaxilla and maxilla bear sharp tomial edges that suggest a cutting function of the jaws (Figure 1). The palatal shelves of the premaxillae and maxillae form an entirely closed "secondary" palate. The two shelves of each bone remain separated by a median suture. Dorsal to the shelves, the body of the premaxilla encloses a spacious sinus. The ventral (palatal) surface of the premaxillary shelves is overlapped by the maxillary shelves. Each maxillary shelf is made of two longitudinal bulges separated by a shallow groove. The shelf is separated from the tomial edge by a deep, probably neurovascular, groove that empties into an opening at the suture with the premaxilla. The tomial edge is continuous with the lateral wall of the bone, which overlaps the premaxilla rostrally. The medial wall is seen in part as a perpendicular stmt, visible in the antorbital fenestra (Figure 2 A), that rises in the midlength of the bone and leaves a large maxillary foramen in front. The medial and lateral walls are both fenestrated and enclose a spacious maxillary sinus (a part of the antorbital fossa) that extends all the way to the caudal (jugal) end of the bone (Figure 2A). The maxilla of Oviraptorphiloceratops has a similar structure (Barsbold et al., 1990, fig. 10.1 A). The maxilla is forked caudally (Figure 1). Each palatal shelf has a prominent knob- or tooth-like caudomedial process. The two caudomedial processes brace the vomer. Caudolaterally, the maxilla continues as a palato-jugal wing that articulates with the palatine, jugal, ectopterygoid, and lacrimal. The vomer is tightly held between the maxilla and the pterygoid. The rostral end of the vomer is strongly expanded and composed of a median knob and lateral wings. The knob is braced and the wings are overlapped by the caudomedial processes of the maxilla. The convoluted suture to the pterygoid suggests a deep interdigitation. The palatine is composed of the maxillary process, which is its only prominent rostral process, and the pterygoid (caudal) qj pm mp plm 1 v fp A^—p 1 c W-ec FIGURE 1.—Reconstruction of the oviraptorid bony palate based on the specimen ZPAL MgD-I/95. Arrow points to the palatine's ascending wing (invisible in this view, see Figure 2). Scale bar=10 mm. (ec=ectopterygoid, fp=postpalatine fenestra, in=intemal naris, ip=interpterygoid vacuity, j=jugal, l=lacrimal, m=maxilla, mp=tooth-like caudomedial process of maxilla, plc=choanal conch (pterygoid wing) of palatine, plm=maxillary process of palatine, pm=premaxilla, pt=pterygoid, ptb=basal wing of pterygoid, q=quadrate, qj=quadratojugal, t=tomial edges of premaxilla and maxilla, v= vomer.) wing, which encloses the choana caudally. The maxillary process has a triangular ascending wing that forms the lateral wall of the choana and articulates with the lacrimal dorsally and the maxilla rostrally (Figure 2B). The pterygoid wing, which is paper-thin and poorly preserved, is strongly convex-concave dor-
B FIGURE 2.—Oviraptorid specimen ZPAL MgD-I/95: A, upper jaw in lateral view; B, lateral wall of the choana in medial view, with a schematic reconstruction of the pterygoid wing of the palatine (pic). Arrow points to a narrow pocket that opens laterally by the postpalatine fenestra. Each scale bar=5 mm. (ec=ectopterygoid, fp=postpalatine fenestra, in=intemal naris, j=jugal, 1= lacrimal, m=maxilla, mf=maxillary foramen, ml=lateral wall of caudal maxillary sinus, mm=medial wall of caudal maxillary sinus, mp=tooth-like caudomedial process of maxilla, nf=nasal foramen, pl=palatine, pla=ascending wing of palatine, pIc=choanal conch (pterygoid wing) of palatine, plm=maxillary process of palatine, pm=premaxilla, pt=pterygoid, s= openings to caudal maxillary sinus, v=vomer.) soventrally: its dorsal vault fits in the ventral trough of the pterygoid and appears to be partly fused with that bone. The rostromedial comer of the wing probably formed a diminutive Pic 313 counterpart of the vomeral process of other theropods (Elzanowski and Wellnhofer, 1993, fig. 4), as in Oviraptorphiloceratops (Barsbold et al., 1990, fig. 10.ID). Laterally, the palatine
- Page 272 and 273: 262 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 274 and 275: 264 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 276 and 277: 266 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 278 and 279: 268 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 280 and 281: 270 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 282 and 283: 272 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 284 and 285: 274 America. Science, 214(4526): 12
- Page 286 and 287: 276 concerning the amphicoelous str
- Page 288 and 289: 278 ment of the radius that are con
- Page 290 and 291: 280 The left coracoid is represente
- Page 292 and 293: 282 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 294 and 295: 284 Kurochkin, E.N. 1982. [New Orde
- Page 296 and 297: 286 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 298 and 299: 288 Palaeontological Institute. [Sp
- Page 300 and 301: 290 1991). In this paper we use a "
- Page 302 and 303: 292 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 305 and 306: Implantation and Replacement of Bir
- Page 307 and 308: NUMBER 89 297 saurs (Figure 1E-G).
- Page 309 and 310: NUMBER 89 299 would seem unlikely a
- Page 311 and 312: Humeral Rotation and Wrist Supinati
- Page 313 and 314: NUMBER 89 303 apparent. It is now c
- Page 315 and 316: NUMBER 89 305 FIGURE 3.—Dorsal vi
- Page 317 and 318: NUMBER 89 307 FIGURE 4.—Wing of t
- Page 319: NUMBER 89 309 Jura-Museums, Eichsta
- Page 324 and 325: 314 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 326 and 327: 316 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 328 and 329: 318 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 330 and 331: 320 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 332 and 333: 322 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 335: Early Evolution of Birds: Roundtabl
- Page 338 and 339: 328 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 340 and 341: 330 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 342 and 343: 332 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 344 and 345: 334 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 346 and 347: 336 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 348 and 349: 338 evolved independently twice." M
- Page 350 and 351: 340 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 352 and 353: 342 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 354 and 355: 344 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PA
- Page 356: 1 i'~L ,i "^ 1 •vw* HBB!/'' . m
B<br />
FIGURE 2.—Oviraptorid specimen ZPAL MgD-I/95: A, upper jaw in lateral view; B, lateral wall of the choana in<br />
medial view, with a schematic reconstruction of the pterygoid wing of the palatine (pic). Arrow points to a narrow<br />
pocket that opens laterally by the postpalatine fenestra. Each scale bar=5 mm. (ec=ectopterygoid,<br />
fp=postpalatine fenestra, in=intemal naris, j=jugal, 1= lacrimal, m=maxilla, mf=maxillary foramen, ml=lateral<br />
wall of caudal maxillary sinus, mm=medial wall of caudal maxillary sinus, mp=tooth-like caudomedial process<br />
of maxilla, nf=nasal foramen, pl=palatine, pla=ascending wing of palatine, pIc=choanal conch (pterygoid wing)<br />
of palatine, plm=maxillary process of palatine, pm=premaxilla, pt=pterygoid, s= openings to caudal maxillary<br />
sinus, v=vomer.)<br />
soventrally: its dorsal vault fits in the ventral trough of the<br />
pterygoid and appears to be partly fused with that bone. The<br />
rostromedial comer of the wing probably formed a diminutive<br />
Pic<br />
313<br />
counterpart of the vomeral process of other theropods (Elzanowski<br />
and Wellnhofer, 1993, fig. 4), as in Oviraptorphiloceratops<br />
(Barsbold et al., 1990, fig. 10.ID). Laterally, the palatine