PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries PDF (Lo-Res) - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

03.04.2013 Views

300 Brown, B., and E.M. Schlaikjer 1940. A New Element in the Ceratopsian Jaw with Additional Notes on the Mandible. American Museum Novitates, 1092:1-13. Carlson, S.J. 1990. Vertebrate Dental Structures. In Joseph G. Carter, editor, Skeletal Biomineralization: Pattern, Processes and Evolutionary Trends, 1:531-556. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. Charig, A. 1979. A New Look at the Dinosaurs. 160 pages. London: Heinemann in association with the British Museum (Natural History). Colbert, E.H., and D.A. Russell 1969. The Small Cretaceous Dinosaur Dromaeosaurus. American Museum Novitates, 2380:1^19. Currie, P.J. 1987. Bird-Like Characteristics of the Jaws and Teeth of Troodontid Theropods (Dinosauria, Saurischia). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 7(1): 72-81. 1995. New Information on the Anatomy and Relationships of Dromaeosaurus albertensis (Dinosauria: Theropoda). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 15(3):574-591. Currie, P.J., J.K. Rigby, Jr., and R.E. Sloan 1990. Theropod Teeth from the Judith River Formation of Southern Alberta, Canada. In K. Carpenter and P.J. Currie, editors, Dinosaur Systematics: Approaches and Perspectives. 8:107-125. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Currie, P.J., and X. Zhao 1993. A New Troodontid (Dinosauria, Theropoda) Braincase from the Dinosaur Park Formation (Campanian) of Alberta. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 30:2231-2247. Edmund, A.G. 1960. Tooth Replacement Phenomena in the Lower Vertebrates. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 52:1-190. 1962. Sequence and Rate of Tooth Replacement in the Crocodilia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 56:1—42. 1969. Dentition. In C. Gans, A.d'A. Bellairs, and T.S. Parsons, editors, Biology of the Reptilia, pages 117-200. London: Academic Press. Elzanowski, A., and P. Wellnhofer 1995. The Skull of Archaeopteryx and the Origin of Birds. Archaeopteryx, 13:41^16. 1996. Cranial Morphology of Archaeopteryx: Evidence from the Seventh Skeleton. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 16( 1 ):81-94. Evans, J. 1865. On Portions of a Cranium and of a Jaw, in a Slab Containing the Fossil Remains of the Archaeopteryx. Natural History Review, new series, 5:415-421. Gardiner, B. 1982. Tetrapod Classification. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 74:207-232. Literature Cited SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO PALEOBIOLOGY Howgate, M.E. 1984. The Teeth of Archaeopteryx and a Reinterpretation of the Eichstatt Specimen. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 82:152-175. Madsen, J.H., Jr. 1976. Allosaurus fragilis: A Revised Osteology. Utah Geological and Mineral Survey Bulletin, 109:1-163. Martin, L.D. 1991. Mesozoic Birds and the Origin of Birds. In H.P. Schultze and L. Trueb, editors, Origin of Higher Groups ofTetrapods, pages 480-540. Ithaca: Cornell Press. Martin, L.D., J.D. Stewart, and K. Whetstone 1980. The Origin of Birds: Structure of the Tarsus and Teeth. Auk, 97: 86-93. Miller, W.A. 1968. Periodontal Attachment Apparatus in the Young Caiman sclerops. Archives of Oral Biology, 13:735-748. Osborn, H.F. 1912. Crania of Tyrannosaurus and Allosaurus. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, new series, 1:1-30. Ostrom, J.H. 1969. Osteology of Deinonychus antirrhopus, an Unusual Theropod from the Lower Cretaceous of Montana. Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History, 30:1-165. 1978. The Osteology of Compsognathus longipes Wagner. Zitteliana, 4: 73-118. Perle, A., M.A. Norell, L.M. Chiappe, and J.M. Clark 1993. Flightless Bird from the Cretaceous of Mongolia. Nature, 362: 623-626. Peyer, B. 1968. Comparative Odontology, xvi+348 pages. Translated and edited by R. Zangerl. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Reisz, R.R. 1981. A Diapsid Reptile from the Pennsylvanian of Kansas. Special Publication, University of Kansas Museum of Natural History, 7:72-74. Schmidt, W.J. and A. Keil 1958. Die Gesunden und die erkrankten Zahngewebe des Menschen und der Wirbeltiere in Polarisationsmikroskop. 386 pages. Miinchen: Carl Hanser Verlag. Tomes, CS. 1923. A Manual of Dental Anatomy, Human and Comaprative. Eighth edition, 616 pages. New York: Macmillan Co. Walker, A.D. 1964. Triassic Reptiles from the Elgin Area: Omithosuchus and the Origin of Camosaurs. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society of London, series B, 2478:53-134. Wellnhofer, P. 1988. Ein neues Exemplar von Archaeopteryx. Archaeopteryx, 6:1-30. 1993. Das siebte Exemplar von Archaeopteryx aus den Solnhofener Schichten. Archaeopteryx, 11:1-48.

Humeral Rotation and Wrist Supination: Important Functional Complex for the Evolution of Powered Flight in Birds? John H. Ostrom, Samuel O. Poore, and G.E. Goslow, Jr. ABSTRACT To achieve a better understanding of the function of the M. supracoracoideus in extant birds, we measured the mechanical properties and actions of the supracoracoideus in the European Starling (Sturnus vulgaris Linnaeus) and a pigeon (Columba livia Gmelin). We performed three sets of acute in situ experiments by direct nerve stimulation. We measured length-active and length-passive tension, forces of humeral elevation and rotation (torque), and humeral excursion (elevation and rotation). The supracoracoideus is capable of generating a tetanic force 7-10 times the bird's body weight, imparts a torque about the longitudinal axis that is greater than its force of humeral elevation, and, when tetanically stimulated, elevates the humems a limited 50°-60° above the horizontal but rotates it through 80°. We conclude that the primary role of the supracoracoideus is high-velocity rotation of the humerus, a movement critical to achieving the upstroke portion of the wingbeat cycle. In addition, we propose that high-velocity humeral rotation may also serve to augment supination of the wrist during upstroke. A morphologically derived supracoracoideus to produce rapid humeral rotation and the skeletal features associated with it, an acrocoracoid, triosseal canal, and tuberculum dorsale, are not evident in Archaeopteryx or Sinornis. These features also appear undeveloped in Iberomesornis and Concornis, dirt unknown in Cathayornis, and apparently are not preserved in the most recent find, Confuciusomis. Introduction In order for a flapping wing stroke to be effective, the wing surface must be converted from an aerofoil to a "nonaerofoil" surface as the wing changes from the powered downstroke to the recovery upstroke, either powered or unpowered. The wing of birds is pronated and extended during the downstroke to provide maximum surface area for both lift and thrust, but it is supinated during the recovery upstroke so as to minimize the surface area and thereby reduce drag. The focus of this contribution centers around the M. supracoracoideus and its role in modem birds for augmenting supination at the wrist. These data provide a new perspective on the fossil record of birds. The statement written twenty years ago that "any consideration of the evolution of flight must start with Archaeopteryx" (Ostrom, 1976a:3) is more important today than when it was written. This is because more is now known about the anatomical details of Archaeopteryx, especially after publication of the last three finds (Wellnhofer, 1974, 1988, 1992, 1993), and because of advances in our understanding of bird flight mechanics (Gauthier and Padian, 1985; Ostrom, 1986, 1994, 1995; Jenkins et al., 1988; Rayner, 1988a; Dial et al., 1991; Vazquez, 1992; Pennycuick, 1993). This fact is brought home in a most compelling manner when the now seven nearly complete, articulated specimens of Archaeopteryx are compared with the often incomplete, solitary Mesozoic bird specimens {Iberomesornis, Sinornis, Cathayornis, Concornis, Otogornis, Confuciusomis, and others) that have been reported since the Eichstatt specimen was recognized. Recognition in the Eichstatt specimen of the maniraptoran-like semilunate carpal (Ostrom, 1976a, 1976b) resulted in a careful reevaluation of the hypothesis of the theropod origin of birds (Hecht et al., 1985; Schultze and Tmeb, 1991) and the origins of flight in birds (Padian, 1986; Gauthier and Padian, 1989; Bock and Buhler, 1995). These arguments aside, however, from a functional standpoint this same semilunate carpal was central to the maintenance of pronation during downstroke and to the execution of supination during upstroke. JohnH. Ostrom, Division of Vertebrate Paleontology, 170 Whitney Av­ After meticulous investigations of the morphology of the enue, P.O. Box 6666, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, United States. avian carpal-metacarpal complex and functional morphology Samuel O. Poore and G.E. Goslow, Jr., Brown University, Department of the pigeon carpometacarpus, Vazquez (1992, 1995) demon­ of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Box G-BMC 204, Providence, strated that the articular surface of the trochlea carpalis in mod­ Rhode Island 02912, United States. em birds acts to automatically supinate the hand upon wrist 301

Humeral Rotation and Wrist Supination:<br />

Important Functional Complex for the Evolution<br />

of Powered Flight in Birds?<br />

John H. Ostrom, Samuel O. Poore, and G.E. Goslow, Jr.<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

To achieve a better understanding of the function of the M.<br />

supracoracoideus in extant birds, we measured the mechanical<br />

properties and actions of the supracoracoideus in the European<br />

Starling (Sturnus vulgaris Linnaeus) and a pigeon (Columba livia<br />

Gmelin). We performed three sets of acute in situ experiments by<br />

direct nerve stimulation. We measured length-active and<br />

length-passive tension, forces of humeral elevation and rotation<br />

(torque), and humeral excursion (elevation and rotation). The<br />

supracoracoideus is capable of generating a tetanic force 7-10<br />

times the bird's body weight, imparts a torque about the longitudinal<br />

axis that is greater than its force of humeral elevation, and,<br />

when tetanically stimulated, elevates the humems a limited<br />

50°-60° above the horizontal but rotates it through 80°. We conclude<br />

that the primary role of the supracoracoideus is high-velocity<br />

rotation of the humerus, a movement critical to achieving the<br />

upstroke portion of the wingbeat cycle. In addition, we propose<br />

that high-velocity humeral rotation may also serve to augment<br />

supination of the wrist during upstroke.<br />

A morphologically derived supracoracoideus to produce rapid<br />

humeral rotation and the skeletal features associated with it, an<br />

acrocoracoid, triosseal canal, and tuberculum dorsale, are not evident<br />

in Archaeopteryx or Sinornis. These features also appear<br />

undeveloped in Iberomesornis and Concornis, dirt unknown in<br />

Cathayornis, and apparently are not preserved in the most recent<br />

find, Confuciusomis.<br />

Introduction<br />

In order for a flapping wing stroke to be effective, the wing<br />

surface must be converted from an aerofoil to a "nonaerofoil"<br />

surface as the wing changes from the powered downstroke to<br />

the recovery upstroke, either powered or unpowered. The wing<br />

of birds is pronated and extended during the downstroke to provide<br />

maximum surface area for both lift and thrust, but it is supinated<br />

during the recovery upstroke so as to minimize the surface<br />

area and thereby reduce drag. The focus of this<br />

contribution centers around the M. supracoracoideus and its role<br />

in modem birds for augmenting supination at the wrist. These<br />

data provide a new perspective on the fossil record of birds.<br />

The statement written twenty years ago that "any consideration<br />

of the evolution of flight must start with Archaeopteryx"<br />

(Ostrom, 1976a:3) is more important today than when it was<br />

written. This is because more is now known about the anatomical<br />

details of Archaeopteryx, especially after publication of the<br />

last three finds (Wellnhofer, 1974, 1988, 1992, 1993), and because<br />

of advances in our understanding of bird flight mechanics<br />

(Gauthier and Padian, 1985; Ostrom, 1986, 1994, 1995; Jenkins<br />

et al., 1988; Rayner, 1988a; Dial et al., 1991; Vazquez, 1992;<br />

Pennycuick, 1993). This fact is brought home in a most compelling<br />

manner when the now seven nearly complete, articulated<br />

specimens of Archaeopteryx are compared with the often incomplete,<br />

solitary Mesozoic bird specimens {Iberomesornis,<br />

Sinornis, Cathayornis, Concornis, Otogornis, Confuciusomis,<br />

and others) that have been reported since the Eichstatt specimen<br />

was recognized. Recognition in the Eichstatt specimen of the<br />

maniraptoran-like semilunate carpal (Ostrom, 1976a, 1976b)<br />

resulted in a careful reevaluation of the hypothesis of the theropod<br />

origin of birds (Hecht et al., 1985; Schultze and Tmeb,<br />

1991) and the origins of flight in birds (Padian, 1986; Gauthier<br />

and Padian, 1989; Bock and Buhler, 1995). These arguments<br />

aside, however, from a functional standpoint this same semilunate<br />

carpal was central to the maintenance of pronation during<br />

downstroke and to the execution of supination during upstroke.<br />

JohnH. Ostrom, Division of Vertebrate Paleontology, 170 Whitney Av­<br />

After meticulous investigations of the morphology of the<br />

enue, P.O. Box 6666, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, United States. avian carpal-metacarpal complex and functional morphology<br />

Samuel O. Poore and G.E. Goslow, Jr., Brown University, Department of the pigeon carpometacarpus, Vazquez (1992, 1995) demon­<br />

of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Box G-BMC 204, Providence, strated that the articular surface of the trochlea carpalis in mod­<br />

Rhode Island 02912, United States.<br />

em birds acts to automatically supinate the hand upon wrist<br />

301

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!